special court, such an assumption was expressed by the deputy head of the president's office andriy smirnovadded that in this matter it is necessary to move from political to legal issues, three solutions are currently being considered by the un general assembly, the hybrid model and the international treaty ukraine believes the most acceptable is the last option as part of the main group of states that support the creation of a tribunal for the crime of aggression, 38 states, including all the members of the big seven , it is not necessary to evaluate the position of our international partners, and key international partners. i mean the united states of america, france, great britain, germany, who advocate their side the possibility of creating a hybrid tribunal as part of the ukrainian judicial system, it should be exclusively an international tribunal, only any hybrid combined it is true that we already see problems on a practical level that will be difficult to carry out further operational briefing from the general staff during the day there were about 30 combat clashes from the supers

all-encompassing condemnation of the war unleashed by russia , andrii, the deputy head of the office of the president of ukraine, stated this smirnov, the legal aspect. he is not the main thing in this. the main thing is that the risk of the fact that the crime of unprovoked aggression will actually be narrowed down to the level of the legal assessment of the interstate conflict of two countries . the huge crime of aggression by russia against ukraine is not a question of ukraine. it is a question of the civilized world. this is a question of the existence of a civilized world working in accordance with international law. actually, we do not need a decision of the tribunal on behalf of ukraine, we need a decision of the tribunal on behalf of the civilized world therefore, any attempt to create a proposal to install something in the judicial system of ukraine is unacceptable for ukraine, and now to our air, oleg . first of all, we congratulate you on independence day, and we wish it to be a good and beautiful day. we would like to ask you, can you explain to us in simple words what this hybrid tribunal is, and actually why it is not

smirnov valentina rudkevich andriy rudenko and oleg bondarenko, especially for the program to conductolish ruling party law and justice, in order to earn points on protecting polish farmers from cheap ukrainian grain, the office of president duda, played in offended ukraine the truth pressed ukraine really received a lot of support from the polish authorities. i think it's worth starting to appreciate. what role has it played for ukraine in recent months and years? poland, even such a short fuse for ukraine, turned out to be enough; its foreign ministry detonated, calling the polish ambassador for an explanation, to which the polish foreign ministry responded by mirroring the ukrainian ambassador to itself , what ukraine does not appreciate help from poland this is obviously a game for its own opportunistic interests, which have nothing to do with reality. manipulation there's nothing worse than having your savior demand payment for your salvation. even when you bleed, and it was a mistake, the poles first reminded kiev that the ambassador he called on the anniversary of the warsaw up