aneesh, do you want to start on the? aneesh: sure, and maybe i will put some context.ast thursday, a report by mckinsey was issued that suggested if we applied those same technologies that might be modernizing our manufacturing operations or addressing how we shop on the internet but put them more to connect us to the jobs and opportunities, we could boost the gdp by $2.7 trillion globally. but on human capital, we are still stuck in a decades-old approach, which is what was your job title at your last place of employment and where might you have a similar job title for the next place of employment? if we have the same sophisticated analytic capability, we could identify that, while i was performing a function like this in the economy, the skills i have that allowed me to do that would also be applied in this job i never thought i could do. kay: this is the new economy and we will all love it if we learn to participate in it. i am optimistic and i think there is improvement with our health care system, more information, more predictive analytics. predictive analytics a

aneesh, do you want to start on the? aneesh: sure, and maybe i will put some context.ast thursday, a report by mckinsey was issued that suggested if we applied those same technologies that might be modernizing our manufacturing operations or addressing how we shop on the internet but put them more to connect us to the jobs and opportunities, we could boost the gdp by $2.7 trillion globally. but on human capital, we are still stuck in a decades-old approach at the job title at -- approach, which is what was your job title at your last place of employment and where might you have a similar job title for the next place? if we have the same sophisticated analytic capability, we could identify that, while i was performing a function like this in the economy, the skills i have that allowed me to do that would also be applied in this job i never thought i could do. kay: this is the new economy and we will all love it if we learn to participate in it. i am optimistic and i think there is improvement with our health care system, more information, more predictive analytics. we a

aneesh, do you want to start on the? aneesh: sure, and maybe i will put some context.ast thursday, a report by mckinsey was issued that suggested if we applied those same technologies that might be modernizing our manufacturing operations or addressing how we shop on the internet but put them more to connect us to the jobs and opportunities, we could boost the gdp by $2.7 trillion globally. but on human capital, we are still stuck in a decades-old approach at the job title at -- approach, which is what was your job title at your last place of employment and where might you have a similar job title for the next place? if we have the same sophisticated analytic capability, we could identify that, while i was performing a function like this in the economy, the skills i have that allowed me to do that would also be applied in this job i never thought i could do. kay: this is the new economy and we will all love it if we learn to participate in it. i am optimistic and i think there is improvement with our health care system, more information, more predictive analytics. we a

and aneesh chopra served as our first nation's technology officer appointed by president barak obamaand served as the virginia leader of technology and now in a technology firm. and erik has already been introduced and still a professor at m.i.t. [ laughter ] >> the way we will do this, i will pose an opening question to each of our panelists and we will move to a moderated free flowing discussion and leave the final 10 minutes for audience q & a. we will be collecting your questions on note cards which then will be brought up to the panel. david, i'm going to open it up with a question for you. you have written extensively about the nuanced relationship between technology and computers and workers, particularly noting that there are certain things that computers can do that substitute for tasks historically or traditionally performed by humans and other things computers do that complement tasks performed by humans. so, in light of your research and the framework that erik and andy have laid out for us, how do you see this all shaking out for workers? >> that's a great question. i'm

so aneesh, i'm going to turn to you.ith the chief technology officer you were tasked with using technology and innovation to further our nation's goals of job creation, reduced health care costs, protecting the homeland, tall order. but you've spoken very optimistically about the power of technology and innovation to improve our lives often a wide -- on a wide scale. so i'm curious to hear how your view of what technology has done skpars to that -- skpars to that as erik and andy have laid out and ho have you seen technology effect sectors, including technology and education and others. >> thank you. i have three opinions, all very bullish on the next decade. the first started with my first trip to google. i was the virginia secretary of technology and we were trying to open up government data to search enk ipgs to make it more accessible to more people. people were getting information through search engines now coming to the url of xyz.gov. and i saw a globe when i walked in that had a light emitted for every search con

aneesh chopra, our first chief technology officer appointed by barack obama and previously served asirginia's fourth secretary of technology. he is currently the co-founder and executive director of hunch analyti analytics, a technology firm. and erik brynjolfsonn has been introduced from the technology school. and i'm going to pose an opening question to each of our panelists an move into a moderated free flowing decision and leave the final ten minutes for audience q&a. we will be collecting your questions on note cards which then will be brought up to the panel. okay, so david i'm going to open it up for a question with you. so you have written extensively by the nuanced relationship between technology and computers and workers and particularly noting that there are certain things that computers can do that substitute for tasks historically or traditional by performed by humans and other things that computers do that complement tasks performed by humans. so in light of your research and the framework that erik and andy have laid out for us, how do you see this shaking out for work