tonight the controversy about hillary clinton's e-mails and we talk to ann garon, mark halperin and john hileman. >> not the first thing anyone has done, it has bad judge. , the exact line people want to go after her on, it shows she was supported by people who again helped her engage in something she shouldn't have done. an she has been in setting it up, she has just been too cavalier about it because she never from her experience in little rock, her experience in the white house, she never wants to admit weakness, error or a failure to exer good judgement because she knows quite rightly she will be attacked more and more. the more she reveals and shows weakness, she will be attacked more and more. this is going to be a problem for her for the fore seeable future. >> rose: we continue with julian barnes, his new novel is called the noise of time, a

joining me ann garon, political correspondent for "the washington post." in mark mark halperin and john helle man of bloomberg politics, the hosts of with all due respect and of them along with ann on this program. let me begin with you. exangtly, is this-- what is the report say and how damaging is it for hillary clinton? >> well, the report says that she violated state department e-mail practices in a couple of regards. it says she failed to get approval for this system, private e-mail system ahead of time. and that that approval would not have been granted had the state department officials in charge known all of its ramifications because of security concerns. it also says that state department sort of sloppy handling of e-mail dated back to previous secretaries of state and that is something that the clinton campaign is relying on in its defense, but it makes clear throughout an 83 page report, and i think scathing is not too harsh a term to apply here. scathing 83 page report that hillary clinton was by far the worst offender on those sloppy practices