ann gorsuch wrote in her memoir that son neal who was 15, was distressed over the deal. now justice gorsuch is in position with his fellow conservative justices to continue the legacy and further curtail regulation of american business. kaitsz, john. >> thank you so much for that. >>> developing in london we're watching to learn more information about kate middleton, the princess of wales, is in the hospital we've learned after undergoing ab nominal surgery. back to max foster. when it comes to anything having to do with surgery and personal health, there's a lot of secrecy around it, but what more are you learning from the palace? >> as you say, you know, these prior medical matters they keep them quiet but she has gone into hospital, some might have seep her, but there is a public just in knowing that future queen has gone into hospital. we know it's gone as planned and she will be in hospital up to two weeks but she could be in recup per rags up to three months at home. quite significant in terms of the treatment she's going to receive as a result of this surgery. a so

. >> the 1984 case actually arose from policy that and gore such was implementing, -- and ann gorsuch, who wrote a book said are you tough enough, she talked about how her son was upset about what he what had happened to her, 15 at the time, here we are with a major test decision that became a landmark through epa policy and let's tell you about the 1984 case, chevron with the national resources defense council, what it says is, if there is a ambiguous statute being enforced by regulator, judges who would hear any kind of lawsuit should defer to with the agency says it means, as long as the agency's interpretation is reasonable. it comes about because congress will often write sweeping statutes, and leave the details of policy to the agency, this 1984 ruling has been one of the most if not the most cited cases in the federal courts, and the supreme court, today it is being treated and tested because big businesses supporting the fisheries, challenging a marine fishery policy have come before the justices got urging the court to overturn chevron and this court is really prime for it, b

well, the chevron case itself arose when ann gorsuch, neil gorsuch's mother, was head of the environmental protection agency. she was part of the reagan revolution anti-deregulatory revolution. she was in office, tangled with congress. in fact, was even held in contempt of congress. and when she was forced out, she wrote in her own memoir, neil, son neil who was only 15 at the time, said, you shouldn't have quit. you taught me not to be a quitter, you shouldn't be a quitter. but neil gorsuch, perhaps inspired by his mother's own emphasis, has really opposed agency latitude here and urging his colleagues to take up a case like it's taking up today has said, rather than say what the law is, we tell those who come before us to go ask a bureaucrat, we place a finger on the scales of justice in favor of the most powerful of litigants, the federal government, and against everyone else. i expect him to be a major player today, poppy and phil, but i also want to tell you that he's got several colleagues on the bench with him who also oppose chevron deference, despite poppy's enthusiasm. >> yeah, i

and anne gorsuch, trying to destroy the epa from the inside, out., republicans like chevron deference because they thought they would control the executive branch forever. now let's fast forward 40 years, republicans understand, it's easier for them to control the courts than to control the executive branch, so they want the courts to take the power. again, away from the people. >> so, when it fits the purpose for conservatives, they will deploy the judiciary when it fits the purpose of conservatives, they will deploy the executive office when somebody like donald trump, and at the end of the day, they sit back and they chuckle along the way. elie being missed all, this is the reason why i needed you here, so americans could understand why this is such an important case. thanks for being here again, and getting us started, i appreciated. >> thanks for having me. >> coming up after a quick break, the funding fight inside the temporary legislative deal on capitol hill to keep the governments lights on, at least until march 1st. plus, decision 2024. we