on the boos no new evidence or manifest injustice. >> thank you on that motion if commissioner ann lazarus to deny the request commissioner fung commissioner honda. >> commissioner swig. >> that that motion carries and the request is denied move on to item 8 from item 5 appeal nancy versus the zoning administrator the property on vallejo appealing the denial on may of a minimum lot area with variances to subdivide a late lot into two substandard lots we will start with the appellant you have 7 minutes to present. >> my name is sandy present the appellant in the appeal of the denial of the variance for a lot subdivision for lot subsection with a street address an vallejo street there are 5 elements that need to be met under planning code to grant a variance and our appellants property meets all those requirements the first one is the first finding that requires on extraordinarily circumstance exists are the property that property this lot was created in the early 19 century between 19 hundred and 1910 and basis on the fact that one of the building was constructed in 1912 we don't have the a

president is presiding tonight, that is darryl honda and he's joined by frank fung, commissioner ann lazarus, commissioner bob wilson and rick swig, we will be joined by our deputy city attorney, bob owen, at the control iss the board's legal assistant, gary and i'm cynthia goldstein, the board's executive director w.' ear groined by representatives of the city departments that have cases before the board this evening, [inaudible] and next to him is scott sanchez, the zoning administrator who's also represent thing planning department and planning commission, and in the front row is [inaudible] shaw representing the public works bureau of streets use and mapping and chris buck also representing san francisco public works and he's with the bureau of urban forestry, the board requests that you silence all phone and is all electronic devices so they will not disturb the proceedings, please carry on conversation dms the hallway, the board's rule of presentation, appellant, permit holders and department responders are given 7 min touts to present their case and three minutes for rebuttal, they mu