at in fact, as a rule, the human factor is to blame anna efimova valery savelyev anastasia popova typicalraine about what ukraine wants and what ukraine can achieve by blackmailing the world with man-made disasters on its territory. we will talk with our permanent expert to historians, political scientist rostislav, ishchenko rostislav good afternoon. good afternoon roslav. what is he striving for? ukraine, striking its nuclear infrastructure at the zaporizhzhya nuclear plant, well, ukraine wants to achieve victory in the war, which means that, including strikes on itself, zaporozhye nuclear power plant. and how can you win by blowing up? actually there at the power plant. first of all, they are not going to blow it up just because they will not explode. yes, in the worst case, there will just be a release of a small e- radiation, well, such a self in the very worst cases, after all. uh, chernobyl exploded. although it did not explode, too, there was a choice of radiation. yes, everyone is still alive, kiev is standing there, mogilev is also europe, in my opinion, still cannot. everything

anna efimova valery savelyev anastasia popova typical ukraine about why in ukraine they constantly talkedut the difficult colonial past and cultivated the image of the victim. we will talk with our permanent expert historian alexander vasiliev. sasha good afternoon. hello in general in nationalist mythology, as a rule, but cultivates the image of the hero the image of success. and why in ukraine they suddenly started talking about the victim as the main content, well, ukrainian history, it seems to me that there is a whole range of factors, but one of them is that this image of the victim, it gives such a universal, well, or something , is there a moral induction for any action? well, here is an example of events. uh, in the thirtieth year in western ukraine, the region at that time was part of poland, so uh, the second commonwealth ruled there, and punks. yes it was di very tough authoritarian regime, uh obvious fascist even elements. that is, of course, ukrainians did not live well there . and so, it means, uh , ukrainian nationalists fought against him. yes, and olun. uh, just now, whi

anna efimova valery savelyev anastasia popova typical ukraine ukrainianness as a political and ideologicalject in the twentieth and 21st century, we will talk with our permanent expert, historian and political scientist rostyslav. ishchenko rostislav good afternoon. good afternoon, rostislav, in short, what is political ukrainianism. well, i would characterize it as anti-russian in the first place, because uh hmm i already talked about this once, but i think it's not a sin to repeat it. so it's no coincidence. uh, the political ukrainians are ukrainian nationalists. so this was put forward by their main slogan, kill the russian in yourself, that is, they proceeded from the fact that a ukrainian can appear only by killing himself a russian. non-polish, and there are no jews, no armenians, which means not greeks. although these nationalities are also represented in ukraine, something in a large number of precisely russian means in this way. they are russian as part of the russian world. yes , in this way they actually confirmed that they once were, right? or even now they are russian. if the

now, is, where to perform, especially when his country is this theater of war anna efimova valery savelyev anastasia popova ukraine about why this year has become a turning point for ukraine and magnolia everything will work out. otherwise, we will talk with our permanent expert, historians and political scientist rostislav ishchenko astislav. good afternoon rostislav and how predetermined was the path that ukraine has traveled over the past decade maidan civil war tragedy in the donbass, the departure of crimea is the territory. and here's what's happening now. well, basically, uh, as they say, there is no subjunctive mood in history. yes, but nevertheless our future is always undetermined. now we can say that yes, it was inevitable. this does not mean that there was no other option. but this means that under those external and internal conditions that ukraine turned out to be at that time, there was another option . well, at least unlikely doubtful, it means precisely because again, the people who made the decision, after all, they themselves supported these very nazi parties, thinking that they would ra