comments from marilyn tavenner and we see the ranking member, carl levin there, let me bring in anna eshoo. distinguish good to see you. >> thank you. >> is what we're seeing a preview of kathleen sebelius when she comes before your committee tomorrow? >> yes, i'm looking forward to it. it will be high profile. and of course my republican friends will -- it will be some high theater, but at the end of the day, i think that the things that i would like to know is -- and have confidence in is when the bugs are out, what's that time frame, making sure that healthy young people are able to enroll. this is all about getting people enrolled so that they can have health care, and it's a vote that i'm exceedingly proud to have cast, because it's such a great need in the country. so -- but i also think most honestly that we have a real problem with federal procurement. it has been at the top of the list, one of the highest priorities of the government accounting office since 1992. and so i think that really congress, if we really want to do something across the government, that we examine that and

but i have a feeling behind-the-scenes people like john dingell and henry waxman and anna eshoo, even nancy pelosi and steny hoyer i think they are going to roast this guy or girl that is going to do the briefing. it's unlikely the president is going to give the republicans is another option. but again, we are the majority. we can hold hearings and invite whoever we want to with the support of the democrats to come to these public hearings. >> host: we want to make sure we get in calls. the republican number is 202-737-0002. democratic callers to 025-85-3880 and independent your number is 202-58-5382. he mentioned that you will hear health and human services secretary come and. what are your questions for her specifically? >> guest: when did she know this was going to fail and why didn't she do anything about it would be one question to be buying the chairman and the caucus and i have questions about the lack of privacy of the individual data. i'm told there is a disclaimer somewhere in the synnott process where it tells you any information that you give them any web site is not propr

that was a democrat in anna eshoo who was suggesting how in the world could you have not planned forhe was going after the contracts, obviously, but by extension the question for jay carney in the briefing in the next few moments of course will be where was the oversight from the white house? the contractors were paid to do a job. this is the president's signature domestic achievement, this is something they clearly wanted to roll out in a much more effective manner. that's why we've seen former top white house officials like robert gibbs say somebody should be fired. it has been quiet on cap -- capitol hill until yesterday when various house democrats jumped on and said it's time for someone to go. take a listen. >> the president just needs to man up and say this was not just a glitch, this was a very serious mistake, and he should replace the people responsible for it, put in a new team and give us a date certain. >> reporter: and beyond that there are at least six senate democrats now saying they want some sort of changes to this law. five of them, we should note, are up for elect