31
31
Oct 11, 2014
10/14
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 31
favorite 0
quote 0
chairman walden have a very aggressive agenda, and we have some bipartisanship with congresswoman anna eshoo of california and in new jersey, whichever one of them gains the minority ranking member position. anna is the ranking minority member on the subcommittee right now. so if you have republicans in the house and senate in the majority, i would say yes. say if you don't, i would it is possible. again, telecommunications is, has traditionally been a fairly bipartisan issue. and there are certainly things that could be done. fcc reform. you are to talked about net neutrality. that is a little tougher. privacy is an issue that could be handled in the next congress. so there are opportunities. >> speaking of anna eshoo, you and she sent a letter regarding spectrum auctions and low-power television stations. >> well, in 2012 we pass a law that makes it possible for the major broadcasters to give back some of their spectrum that they have and be compensated for it. authorityhe fcc the to repackage spectrum and reallocated. under current law, low-power television industry does not have automati
chairman walden have a very aggressive agenda, and we have some bipartisanship with congresswoman anna eshoo of california and in new jersey, whichever one of them gains the minority ranking member position. anna is the ranking minority member on the subcommittee right now. so if you have republicans in the house and senate in the majority, i would say yes. say if you don't, i would it is possible. again, telecommunications is, has traditionally been a fairly bipartisan issue. and there are...
83
83
Oct 13, 2014
10/14
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 83
favorite 0
quote 0
chairman walden have a very aggressive agenda, and we have some bipartisanship with congresswoman anna eshoo of california and/or frank pallone of new jersey, whichever one of them gain cans the minority ranking member position. anna is the ranking minority member on the subcommittee with greg walden right now. so if you have republicans in the house and the senate that are in the majority, i'd say, yes. even if you don't, i would say it's possible because, again, telecommunications has been traditionally a fairly bipartisan issue, and there are certainly things that could be done, fcc reform. you've already talked about net neutrality. that's a little bit tougher. i think privacy's an issue that could be handled in the next congress. so there's some opportunities there. >> host: well, speaking of anna eshoo, you and she recently sent a letter regarding spectrum auctions and low power television stations. >> guest: well, back in 2012 we passed a law that makes it possible for the major broadcasters to give back some of their spectrum that they've had and be compensated for it. it gives the f
chairman walden have a very aggressive agenda, and we have some bipartisanship with congresswoman anna eshoo of california and/or frank pallone of new jersey, whichever one of them gain cans the minority ranking member position. anna is the ranking minority member on the subcommittee with greg walden right now. so if you have republicans in the house and the senate that are in the majority, i'd say, yes. even if you don't, i would say it's possible because, again, telecommunications has been...
51
51
Oct 7, 2014
10/14
by
KQEH
tv
eye 51
favorite 0
quote 0
talked about the budgets, the tax increases, the middle and lower class are an fact and it is why anna eshoo, president obama and zoe lofgren didn't support the budget. he's entitled to his ideology, but it is not an ideology that would help lower taxes of the middle and lower class and on privacy, the congressman did show leadership on the patriot acting. i respected and admired that. but that was almost 13 years ago. the reason they said you're irrelevant on the policy issues of our time is because these issues aren't just about values, it is anying data and complex issues with the internet. >> mr. khanna, you said you would stand up to tech companies. you're supported by many of the leaders of the biggest tech company here from ebay to yahoo! to sales force. would you really stand up to that? there is concern that perhaps you would side in their favor for any sort of legislation. >> well, you know, i wish people knew my story more. i went to public school, paying off my student loans. and i'm proud of having the support of the top innovators in the world. one of the differences in this ca
talked about the budgets, the tax increases, the middle and lower class are an fact and it is why anna eshoo, president obama and zoe lofgren didn't support the budget. he's entitled to his ideology, but it is not an ideology that would help lower taxes of the middle and lower class and on privacy, the congressman did show leadership on the patriot acting. i respected and admired that. but that was almost 13 years ago. the reason they said you're irrelevant on the policy issues of our time is...
139
139
Oct 7, 2014
10/14
by
KNTV
tv
eye 139
favorite 0
quote 0
talked about the budgets, the tax increases, the middle and lower class are an fact and it is why anna eshoo, president obama and zoe lofgren didn't support the budget. he's entitled to his ideology, but it is not an ideology that would help lower taxes of the middle and lower class and on privacy, the congressman did show leadership on the patriot acting. i respected and admired that. but that was almost 13 years ago. the reason they said you're irrelevant on the policy issues of our time is because these issues aren't just about values, it is anying data and complex issues with the internet. >> mr. khanna, you said you would stand up to tech companies. you're supported by many of the leaders of the biggest tech company here from ebay to yahoo! to sales force. would you really stand up to that? there is concern that perhaps you would side in their favor for any sort of legislation. >> well, you know, i wish people knew my story more. i went to public school, paying off my student loans. and i'm proud of having the support of the top innovators in the world. one of the differences in this ca
talked about the budgets, the tax increases, the middle and lower class are an fact and it is why anna eshoo, president obama and zoe lofgren didn't support the budget. he's entitled to his ideology, but it is not an ideology that would help lower taxes of the middle and lower class and on privacy, the congressman did show leadership on the patriot acting. i respected and admired that. but that was almost 13 years ago. the reason they said you're irrelevant on the policy issues of our time is...