we are joined by prosecutor anna sigga and peter johnson and ann bremner.y was the accused. what we saw, was for the first time the prosecution basically coming out and saying, george anthony's suicide note was real. this guy is not someone who has committed any of the acts that he's been accused of. do you think the jury is going to buy that? >> in the end they probably will. although there was no evidence for anything they said many what they heard in this trial was, a pattern of deception and a pattern allegedly of not telling the truth. we heard testimony that well, i don't have a mistress. then we heard that perhaps in fact, he did have a mistress. we also saw a suicide note, which i believe was a litigation suicide note, not worthy of belief. so we have on one side a pattern of lies, proven absolute, pathological, by the defendant casey anthony. but we also see, deception after deception, in my view, by critical family witnesses in this case. so the prosecution says, if you believe that casey anthony is in fact a liar, then you must execute her. in th

criminal defense attorneys, and fox news legal analyst bob massi and the new york city prosecutor, anna-siggai was kind of surprised that for the first time we heard the narrative and the jury heard bets and pieces and had to tie it together. what we heard from jeff ashton, a powerful, beginning to end, how she died, how, what the mechanism of death was, did the prosecution prove its case this morning, diana? >> well, i mean, obviously, it was a beautiful presentation by jeff ashton. he's a fabulous speaker. it was very organized, it was dramatic where it should be dramatic. but it was also subtle. you know, i've seen jeff in court go overboard sometimes, get overenthusiastic, there was some real subtlety. and he didn't go out and call her a slut as she got called later. said i'm not saying that pele at 22 out and partying is bad, but she's a mother. and he got an information in an hour. >> he proved quickly. >> mark, do you think that he got the-- he established his mission? >> i believe that he did. certainly, with me individual will you, but i'm not on the jury and none of us your and we w

criminal defense attorneys, and fox news legal analyst bob massi and the new york city prosecutor, anna-siggai was kind of surprised that for the first time we heard the narrative and the jury heard bets and pieces and had to tie it together. what we heard from jeff ashton, a powerful, beginning to end, how she died, how, what the mechanism of death was, did the prosecution prove its case this morning, diana? >> well, i mean, obviously, it was a beautiful presentation by jeff ashton. he's a fabulous speaker. it was very organized, it was dramatic where it should be dramatic. but it was also subtle. you know, i've seen jeff in court go overboard sometimes, get overenthusiastic, there was some real subtlety. and he didn't go out and call her a slut as she got called later. said i'm not saying that people at 22 out and partying is bad, but she's a mother. and he gotn information in an hour. >> he proved quickly. >> mark, do you think that he got the-- he established his mission? >> i believe that he did. certainly, with me individual will you, but i'm not on the jury and none of us your and we w

but come on, doesn't this just scream anna sigga, guilty? >> of course.t how jose baez opened. he talked about this outrageous story that people were waiting. i'm sure the jurors were waiting day-by-day. then the defense rests. where is the story? where is the accident? where is the incest, molestation all the unbelievable claims they made? the only way they could get that out was by casey. >> do you think the jury was also expecting to hear from casey anthony? >> i do. with that type of story who else could talk about what happened not only with her daughter but fanning her with the father and the reason why she reacted the way she did. -- >> arthur if the defense was confident in their own story about the accidental drowning and the mother panicked, why wouldn't they put her on the stand? >> they couldn't. from day one monica they has been telling lie after, different story. first she lied about her daughter being missing. then she acknowledged she was missing it was the babysitter and the boyfriend. then in opening statements we found out she knew how

anna sigga, perjury? they've got her dead to right on this. do they go after her?r case. >> i don't think they will. i understand while we want to send a clear message, certainly in a case of this magnitude, i think it will come down to having compassion for her. a mother who had already given devastating testimony against her daughter that 911 call where she says her granddaughter has been missing for 31 days and the car smells like there's been a dead body in it. that is some of the most important moving testimony we've heard. ultimately, the prosecution though they have her, no question, i believe they are going to show compassion and know she has suffered enough and let her hopefully go on after this trial. >> ann, do you think that cindy helps the prosecution ultimately or the defense? >> great question. she helped the defense up until she was proven to be a liar. now all of a sudden she is almost underscored the lies. what we heard in the closing and rebuttal, lies and lies, so many lies in this case. now this lie saying i know my daughter did it, so i better

and prosecutor anna sigga nick low is with us.er you and i spoke earlier in this. we looked at casey's conduct. we looked at her lies. i said this should be a slam-dunk. we both believed that. i watched this trial. and i watched these closing arguments. i was shocked myself that the defense attorneys did not -- the prosecution did not meet that high standard of reasonable doubt in my mind. >> and didn't in mine either. i pointed out, i think it is a great day for the american jury system. people saying how can you say that? i believe she is guilty. but a jury verdict is the last word in our society. and if we don't do everything in our power to ensure that the jury verdict and not vigilante hosts, and vulture justice reigns in this country then we have a problem. if we are going to honor the constitution honor it in a courtroom in orlando, through due process so to the notion of reasonable doubt. whether we agree or disagree with this verdict, the jury of 12 decided that the prosecution failed in its burden. >> sean: this is what

. >> judge jeanine: anna sigga, awe grey? >> absolutely. -- it makes no sense.ummation than i expected. both prosecutors did a phenomenal job to remind the jury let's look at the evidence. none of jose baez's assertions make any sense and you can pick them apart, one by one. anyone in this family had anything to do with casey's disappearance it is none sense i don't see anywhere way the injure -- [ unintelligible ] i believe it is only going to come back to one person, casey anthony. >> judge jeanine: do you think this jury cares if george anthony had an affair with river cruz? >> defense did something smart bringing up this issue of molestation and sexual abuse. even if the jury doesn't believe it, it makes you look at george differentlism it makes you question him. i think throughout this trial, we've seen there have been many different faces of george. i think getting up there, lying about the affair when it is so clear that it happened. krystal holloway's good witness for the defense. i think that hurt his credibility. but i think all of this, the reason for

with us now, criminal defense attorney jennifer berringer and anna seeg tha sigga-nicolazz gw we are seeing some things that have to do with the casey anthony case and some don't. jurors want different types of evidence. is the days of all of the crime shows on television. we have what lawyers call the csi effect. cases on television proven by laser beam trajectories and the specific typeface on a computer. laser beam recognition that can prove beyond all doubt without any possibility this is the person. that is not real but that is what the juries or the average person watches from all walks of life and so they expect it when you come into the courtroom. >> bill: juries have been in fectded by television and movies and internet. information that isn't really conceivable in most cases and they come in if they don't see that information they are liable to acquit. >> and that is it. there have been great leaps in forensics and other areas. we have dna. we have. >> but we had those leaps in this case. we had two fbi people come in say you know what, there was chloroform in the quar. you