annamarie: "morales." clarence: yeah. m-o-r-l-a-s? l-a-e-s? annamarie: morales.ryant: how are you going to work fosomebody you can't even spell the name of the damn funeral home? clarence: [laughs] because i researched them. i researched them. james bryant: it's not m-o-r-a-l-s. that's "morals." clarence pierre: m-o-r-l-a-e-s. l-e-s. james bryant: and what else was about them that was so impressive? clarence pierre: very professional. they have a lot of families. they have high volume. so they're doing good, though. and i would like to go over there and just become a part, if i can, to something that's alrdy going. james bryant: see? there's nothing wrong with going with the funeral home. i grew with this funeral home. this funeral home wasn't doing all this when i started here. but if you want to start off at the top, you know, annamarie say it is fine. so it's ok. i'll come see you in morals. annamarie lopez: in morals [laughs] clarence pierre: no. what is it? annamarie lopez: morales. clence pierre: morales. james bryant: morales. clarence pierre: yeah. james

annamarie: the tweets have stopped.president trump would really take to twitter a lot in bashing china in trade policy, etc., and now that has stopped, but what has not stopped, and you are right, anna, is the policy towards china. most notably, the tariffs, which u.s. officials told us that was not brought up in the call yesterday, but this administration has been waiting for months whether or not to lift some of those trump-eric trade tariffs, but they still to this day remain in place. even if they were to be lifted, it would only be on a few consumer goods with things like sweaters or bicycles. what you see is a continuation of this strategy with the biden administration saying that a key difference is that they want to work multilaterally in combating china, where the former administration really took more of a unilateral approach. anna: thanks very much, annmarie hordern, joining us with an update on what to expect from the pelosi trip. we will be back with more on the markets and look ahead to what is coming up.

bloomberg news is joining our panel now, there was a headline in the new york times this weekend, by annamariesulate where democrats are. it says democrats can win, if they embrace the politics of fear. the politics of fear here, going beyond abortion, into some of this other stuff. the effect on the treatment of women for all kinds of reproductive related issues, also, ivf. does that work? >> i mean, it is a good question in the midterm year, there is traditionally much lower turnout in midterms, it is very hard to predict who will turn out but i will say that, this is not just about fear mongering, there is actually concern for the advocacy community, that roe is a first step, not the last step, and that there could be subsequent moves on all kinds of privacy issues, on marriage, on lgbt issues and a push at the federal level. on the antiabortion movement. where would that matter? it wouldn't matter in most red states. it could matter in some purple states, there seem to be fewer and fewer every two years, and in congressional swing districts, i am not hearing any predictions about the house