i would like to first call up anne marie rogers to talk about the legitimization processed. thank you. >> thank you, supervisor. as the supervisor has described the commission is grateful to revise the ordinance consistent with their unanimous recommendation. my presentation, i will give a little bit of the background, applicable fees, and the process for applicants. this area plan balances uses to provide space for housing and the production, distribution, repair. the final plan was a compromise. as adopted by the board and commission, it did allow for an additional 10,000 dwelling units, but these units and the increased land for housing did come at a cost. this rezoning would cause a loss of 10,000 pdr jobs. we have seen these jobs continue to thrive and expand at a rate faster than other job growth in the city. according -- san francisco saw an increase of about 10% in these pdr jobs. the overall job rate only increased by about 2%. the plan was seeking to provide this balance. part of the balance was providing a means for this existing property owners of nonconforming u

. >> ann marie rogers, planning department. >> there are now many of us, but i am one of them. this is the map that the committee considered last time, showing the c three district in red. the colors are not really good, but they are with their color currently applies. there are other areas in the southern parts of the southeast and southwest of the city that have been proposed for inclusion. what you are considering today is all of the map except for those two areas. let me show you what that is like. this revised amount has removed the rh and rc districts in the tenderloin of that area, as well as was mentioned by supervisor chiu in the east and southwest parts of the city. it remains within the south market zoning districts on north 13th streets and scattered throughout the eastern neighborhoods. supervisor chiu: obviously, supervisor kim's office has been made abreast of these chaes

. >> ann and mary rogers from the plan reporting staff. first, i would like to tell you about a report that we gave on but the interagency plan implementation committee -- their annual report -- as well as an annual report on development impact fees. staff has reported to this body on the same subject in january this year. i

. >> ann and mary rogers from the plan reporting staff. first, i would like to tell you about a report that we gave on but the interagency plan implementation committee -- their annual report -- as well as an annual report on development impact fees. staff has reported to this body on the same subject in january this year. it is an update on our progress toward implementing the plant and the proposed capital for those project areas. as far as the annual the ultimate impact feed report and deactivated -- updated development impact fees for this year, a member of the public stated that the impact fees cover only 30% of the projected impact. therefore, he urged this board and commission to continue searching for funding for the infrastructure. the other item is what you have talked about a little bit. it is the ordinance that will extend the neighborhoods legitimization deadline. it was introduced by commissioner cohen and would extend time for those who are operating without proper permits to submit to this condition. he requested that they