i want to thank ann marie rogers and supervisor wiener's office and the university of san francisco for their reports and i also want to thank the san francisco law library. i agreed with the adoption, your adoption of an amendment to prohibit conversions of existing housing to certain housing. the six months probation will not accomplish the goal you had set out when you had told permanent prohibition. -- total permanent prohibition. ssro's. as i understand, some remarks made by sro's, there would be a replacement fund that involves moving a family. i would like to ask you to please not do anything with sro's. just let them be. another thing about supervisor wiener's amendments is they are too broad and not limited. for example, the word similar. everyone understands the validity of changing convents and monasteries into student housing. that seems fine. however, the phrase that would also change things that are similar religious order facilities, there is already a very good description of religious order facilities in the planning code. the word similar makes it too broad. so please

we have every rodgers from the planning department, kevin gheiuy, -- anne marie rogers frm the planning department. the presentation will be as extinct -- assisting dess possible so we can get to members of the public. >> we're back again today to present the recommended height changes to the general plan and the zoning map. this is where the commission began their consideration and proposal with these two ordinances and with the fundamental credit -- question of what is the proper height at this location. the commission went on to consider the other entitlements you have approved through the conditional use authorization and the planned unit development. because of the nature of the appeal process, this board was forced to consider the ceqa appeal and the cu appeal prior to looking at the more fundamental question of height. is that policy discussion for today. the project planner will review the general plan policies that led the commission to believe a height to change was appropriate. both ordinances make the same change. the first changes the height map in the general plan. while i