the proposals made by anne ravel and the two professors are not gauged specifically at san francisco. they are looking nationally and at other jurisdictions. so, some of those proposals don't really indicate things that we need to change. one of those is the definition of electioneer for communications. at the federal level, they are exempted. but under san francisco law, that is not the case. in fact, we get filings if our office of internet communications. so, this isn't an area where we need to be looking at to expand. this is already encompassing this mode of communication. likewise, the electioneering communications window is much broader in san francisco than it is at the federal level. at the federal level, it's 30 days before a primary election and0 days before a general election. but in san francisco, it is 90 days before any election, which is much broader. and lastly on page four, state law has an impracticalability disclaimer and talking about political ads that have to be carried for by a disclaimer. if the communication so small it is impracticalable to provide a disclai