that's anotheruestion. i don't know.but i will say it'- whatever is behind it, if somethi is, it's probably somethinthat's beyond han conception. just as inking about electrons in aefinitely simplistic way-- one thinquantum physics has told us is tt the way we're thinking about ectrons is wrong, a. and b, the human minis prably not capable of thinking about them rlly accurately. okay? and ye thinking about them in this crude way and drawing little things that you say a electrons, you know, thas a useful-- it'a given the constraints on theind it's all we can do. and it's useful. well, you might say that in e moral realm given the constrais on human cognition believg in a personal god is a pretty defensible way to g about orienting urself to the moral axis of the universe which wodn't mean that a person god exists. but-- >> moyers:n imagined personal god is accountle for our cocience then? >> i think evolutionary pshologists know on the one hand, w the conscience actually evolved roughly speaking. in other words, we canxpl