anso it warage, was the rst thini felt. indicatethat youave intenti of terveninremarks,e preventhe nextn't preventhe next re orhe onot say it whatas to bu, pre minist, fore youan smelthe smok but it eed up becong a message th resonat with oer peopland... that washe begning a big cnge for , in takg the ri i rely was sred to sak out tabout clate chan,bere. 'cause ielt like i'd inrna" that y'll get acked talking out this 'causet's too litical. that yand ddenly,when iwasn, talking out this 'causet was fucng hot, that yand ddenly,when iwasn, and it h smoke blowing and burnt dn 'causmyeighbour houses, thatat's a fking,when iwasn, and anthrang bushfe,ic dd you trto not let it hpen agaiway, [♪♪][cunso] climatc, ks aot of manity. we c't just y "well.so] climatc, made mistaken that o, taking oselveso accounn. it's y who do wwant tbe a speci, movingorward? made mistaken that o, how doe see takiourselvedifferenynn. it's y withinhis web ofelations made mistaken that o, th we d wh does itakeucted or h? takio atone f the losnn. it's y w do wever makright what we' done as species when wtalk abo mass ei

it'sore impoant get thamargin rise in econoc growth regardss of wh it mean r peop in cntries le mine ansoow can tre be juice? [muck sqshing] our isnds wille unrwat. t througour faul not r creati. the infoation anthe sciee damaginmy home.at wt is g they'vgot so mh powerto do e ri. .yet w do theyesitate? [♪♪ for many ars d decade i've sn it d my fatr has se it and my aestors ve seen peopleome inere and justake the sources, and my aestors bud their ms, taketake, ta. [♪♪] wh the cstructiostarted, i was vastated by whai saw. the ount otrees at were t... thmachinerthat yoused wajust lika blende it jusblended erything rig. th didn't re abt the ople, theyidn'care theyidnout e animalt land, ey didn'carottle]any par you can'help to el angry whent's someing th's happeng caed by me otherlace the world anit's imptings. witht a doub inuileave a rbonootprint whe, our footint on t earth righacis very ttle,nt. comparedo some o thvery bigndustriaareas it's imsed ontos wiout our lcome. esn't ma no diffence how mu you ice youroncern, at youresent, how yode- esn't ma no diffence it's sll goi to happ. [♪♪] thp

the seedot mixedp, anso you got lighcolor eds d dark-cor seedsixed u and sorying tosepara them thbestn't ink, tobe honest th youi don'think the ys gonnacontinueo peas pject .it wld be ni, but nah. - might. - you gh t? - marcuson'tind itthat'sfor sure.- now, that'll bgrea at's a sprise to hr you sathat . okay . mean you'lplant and ck it,shelit, dry ? u do a of thos - -hm. okay, we'lse e. (leas rustli) banks: so you want him back before 12:0 0? he can help me, you know .yeah what kd of chine doou run - ything.- you n't run achine i kn. - huh? - you dot know tride noower .- yeahuh. - whatower ? ower, thweed eat he l me dohe big olplow, anall that. ere yourother at in brunsck, in a o. but mama, mma used to get itroubl t she dot get in troub no more. and e got hea job at the, .. . - e done cnged, ah? uh-huh she, sheork atshe workt strikeon e. shgot threjobs e got attrike zo she workt mcdona's en s work the, umwhat y call , the, u.. - e work at the donald'sn brunswk? - uhuh .- shwork thec... mcdonald where - on alt a. - go tre all t tim e.- you n't nevesee her?- no . - yeah, she rk in...- w

impt commun ies that's bght sevel mole home rks ross t stateexacsame model; buit, jack up e re nt ansong to be able to go ba to t legislare in ja ary. ev some of our rublicafriendsare loing at ts ansaying "boy, at doesn look fair."- mm-h. - uh, an so eoreticay, i, i thinit's poible we' see somchan ge t of coue, um,it'sot over ll it's er. ye, you kn pele are gonna . nobodyan stayon theidelinesnymo re is is rely aboutpeopleetting ithe fi t. cand and we' gonna w. - ah.wahls: you knowmobile he parks uld be aart of aeffectiv affoable houng solution long ashey're n being sold und false ptens es asong as wdon't ha out--state cpa nies cking uphe r en and king tm noonger afrdab leand, a so longs weave the siprotections at are nessary f folks who,whlive in theseprop ties to, call th h ome.man: yeah, i an, i'veever b n ally polically aive. rren: yeah. ma but i tl you what en they' coming ter mei guestheyin d offorcede into i waen: ye . th has bee goinon for yea . - , gosh, ah. - d these dge fu s at come ... - yup.m- hmm. ...they y up ausiness. - ye ah - anthey don c are. th made thr mo ne d whate

anso just ese littleinute chges thatappened sed on the han activy in ts ceremo of lighti that motain tually h scientically valiconnectis to calng the fi up the ver. (soft muc) - r religi we actice ipic-ya-wh, tranated as orld renal". so the karuk people were fix-the-world people. toda we're gonnao down a we're gna fish in ishpishi fas. it's vy... it's vy romantic i so people'eyes, very fstratingnd other. i'm bothf those. i love i that's way of fe, but thhealth othe rive ns parall with t heth of thpeople. we need to p to acti, the phical actns on t landsca. we've t to sta eaning t sacred ails. d cleani the fore once agn. evythingd e salmonenefits om. (st chestralusic) - son our tral ceremy is to fithe world. it's notust to fid this cek or fix o famy or fixur river we want fix thehole wor, beuse if tngs are ong here theye wrong the other si of the rld too. that's jt the wathe world rks onhe balan. so iour trib we knewhat in f the wor ceremon piya-wis even a all grou of pple withreat eney, great cus and pure thoht caactuallyrigger the wod, the eth, and put back onts balan. (fire crkling

anso thehange for drive time of ksas beneficiaries is 95% of 15 minutes of the pharmacy, and that leaves about 3000 constituts that have to travel a little beyond 15 minutes. 99is the overall number once we go outside 15 minute within 30 minutes. >> i would push back or make the case that a pharmacy is nojust a commodity, it is a relationship. our servicemen and women have had that relationship with their pharmacy for a long time. and to be told that it is no longer an option ithe pharmacist indicating they had no option to continue is still problematic to me. the transition was driven by a 2019 independent analysis that the department seems to be unwilling to provide to me. is there a reason you cannot share that analysis so that i and others can analyze the methodology by which rched these conclusions? >> i actually don't have that answer, but i willet back to you. >> my time has ru but ield her nomination. i put a holon younominaon because of lack of cooperation. i lifted that hol well, presumably, i lifted that hold a votedor your confirmation. that commitmenwas that i would have the

we're just wanted to say thanka you for being a girl.heers anso proud you go , girl.te that phrase with every fiber of my being.s history mont yeah, it's women's history. month, cat.hank y >> thank youou for being a womah you're welcome .at well o, now that we got that out of the way, as corporations and groups celebrateve women, you know, those mysterious creatur creatures science can't identifyes , the toronto raptorsng sor are saying sorryry to them foreo this now deleted video goes around the world becauseun there's only one the w great dar everybody. all women are great because they're all queen. >> so those first two players said women are the onl ty onesws that can pro who can procreate and birth everybody outta. those dudes think they areyone. what do those dude biologist's. where did they grow up, man?w up the truth. they spoke. a lot of people, includingpiss women that stand up to . men th pee.u don't want to them off or on . the team quickly took the video down and apologized, saying prides itself on doingth the right thing when it comes to inclusion and re

anso they have not been deprived of any procedure associated with that decision-making. justice brown jackson:o at they would need, wld suppose, that if we notify the authority of the secretary to do i of the secretary to do what it did in the heroes act, that they would necessarily be the alone forgivens ogram under the aga. ms. prelogar: yes, and they c't make anything like that showing here. itotal speculation on their part to suggest that if the secretary is blocked from taking this action, maybe he will look for a different source of authority and issue an entirely different program under that source of authority. and i think that shows that their theo iutterly speculative here. i thk is important to recognize as well as why they are pressing this claim and the sh of this theory. the reason they are asking t court to go down this road is so that they can effectively raise a substantive challenge t heroes act. that was actually the only cim on which they prevailed below. the district courtn is case rejected their assertions of procedural harm, and instead, went on to

anso, congress made a choice, and that may have been theig choice or it may have been the wrong choice. but that is congress'choice. and you are saying that the secretary implemented his powers under congress's oice, which gave him authority over loaning . definitely did not give him authority over loans for long care. ms. prelogar: that is correct. the secretary would have no authority to act outside the student loan pgr. the heroes act is specifically designed only to empower the secretarwi respect to that portfolio. juickagan: maybe as sotomayor said, congress gave a different kind of authority to a different secretary with respect to a different set of struck.ies, when an emergency is that correct? ms. prelogar: yes. >>ustice gorsuch? juste rsuch: i just wanted to make sure i undstd your position with respect to some of e arly language in this statute, which is waiver mody. affected individuals to ensure they're not placed in the worse position financially bau of the covid crisis. you would agree atoesn't authorize the secretary to place persons in a better position than they were,

anso of them are on the record, some may not be. but the secretary, if you are ght, then the secretary presumably could do more and therefore, i think it's a fair question to saywh is your client's view about the fairness question that some people have posed? and that was reiterad r you by the chief justice. ms. prelogar: thvi of the department is that this is warranted. justice alito: why is it fair? if you didn't have to do it, why isn't e answer to say that it was wanted? maybe it was wanted, but why? gus you don't want to answer . prelogar: it was fair because in the absence oth relief, it's undisputed that there are going to be millions of student loan rrers who are not going to be able to pay their student loans. they wildeult in delinquency, and the heroes act was specifically desigd r the situation. th icongress telling the secretary, you don't have tle that happen. anwhen we have this kind of a pandemic, that requires is kind of relief, i think that the heroes act is operating right within his domain. juste ito: all right,

anso i gave a lot of credit to dave rose, some of the attorneys i worked on the work, catherine mansell who was a crazy person but wonderful attorney and i say that with all my kay baldwin. i worked on a wonderful case with her with the natiol bank case, which i'll talk about steve rosenbaum. i was the first person he was allowed to supervise. and we had good times traveling. and working together at my office mate clifford johnson, we both were rookies and we would give each other our documents to prove before we turned into supervisors and. of course, bill fenton with the hawkeye always found an eor. jerry. well, i was fortunate enough to start in the education section where landsberg was the chief of the section, and he's here today and. the two deputy is were tom keeling and joe rich and. the senior lawyers were paul hancock mark and dan frenzelnd one of the things that i was fortunate enough to have. is a sense of recognizing who were the really brilliant people that i should try to get to know. and brian and tom and joe and dan and paul were those people. and i consider them to be