had today about the fact that trey gowdy's big question has already been answered. do you think it's laziness, bad preparation? how does trey gowdy not know that very yes has been answered by hillary clinton in testimony a year ago. >> i'm not sure whyhas been ans by hillary clinton in testimony a year ago. >> i'm not sure why he put that forth. there have been other questions he's put forth that have also been answered. but it underscores to a large extent just how comprehensive the investigation has already been. a lot information coming from the investigations. to cgowdy's credit, a lot touchs different aspects from that night and maybe it hasn't been put into a comprehensive investigation, but at this point in time people probably know what remains to be answered. there are some questions that remain to be answered. >> i guess if there is something new to mind here, there is one they think new to mind here,

they've given one answer, we see other answers by these emails. they were worried about the president's reelection and not being straight with the people about what happened. i think it's great that you played that whole string of trey gowdy because it gives people an idea of why he was picked to head this committee, regardless of whether you think it's a good idea or bad idea, they thought it was a good decision based on the fact he was a successful prosecutor. they think he can do the best job ferreting out the answers to these questions. they're important answers that we don't have and just what you were talking about now about the c.i.a., i think a lot of people don't know about that. >> there's a reason they don't. it's the c.i.a. >> what were they doing there? the first ambassador killed since 1979, and there's questions. >>> boehner thinks the white house has been holding out on congress. the white house exposed 41 documents it had with held from investigationors. at least one of these directly contradicts what congressional investigators w

the committee has sought these answers for more than a year. lerner's refusal to truthly answer these questions posed by the committee cannot be tolerated. i urge a yes vote. following that swift action by the justice department to ensure that lois lerner provides answers on exactly what she i.r.s. was up to. mr. chairman, i thank you and yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady yields back. the gentleman from california reserves. on the time remain, the gentleman from california has 11 -- has 12 minutes left. the gentleman from maryland has 6 1/4 minutes left. the gentleman from maryland is recognized. mr. cummings: i yield two minutes to mr. davis of illinois. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized. mr. davis: i agree that one of the responsibilities of our committees is to investigate, to try and make sure that the laws are carried out the way we intended and to try and make sure that the money is being spent the way we intended for it to be spent. that we spent $14 million up to this point investigating this one iss

refused to answer our uestions and invoked her fifth amendment right and wouldn't answer any questions about she made during her opening stay statement. is not how the ifth amendment is meant to be used. it's protection. shield." >> a witness with cannot come before the committee to make a and serving statement refuse to answer questions. you don't get to use the public hearing to tell the press and your side of the five,.and then invoke the additionally, mr. speaker, when evoking the fter fifth, when asked about previous documents,he made in she answered and authenticated went back to asserting her fifth amendment rights. things have inting come to this point. lois learner had almost a year reconsider a decision not to answer questions to congress. meantime she gave a no-strings -- will not to suspend. >> i would be happy any time the chair tells me my time is expired. expired. me is >> thank you. i yield myself an additional 30 seconds. >> thank you. >> in the meantime after she gave a no strings attached interview to the justice department. to the press entirely voluntarily before a

my answer is yes. i don't have a view on what the exact mandatory should be and the incentives that flow from that will be. what you are saying makes sense to me and prince paul. it is always -- makes sense to me in principle. >> one of the aspects addresses an issue for which i plead congressional guilt. the decision to increase the sentencing guidelines on crack cocaine over powder cocaine. at the time we did it, it was a full-scale congressional panic over the arrival of this new, cheap, addictive narcotic that destroyed lives and babies mothers were carrying. we said hit it and hit it hard. with a 100 to one disparity. whether it should be 100-1 or 1-1 which i happen to endorse, we have reached a congressional compromise that 18-1. the bill addresses the people serving prison sentences under the old guidelines for crack cocaine. it does not treat them as a class. it only allows each individual to petition for reconsideration of their sentencing. i had a man in my office yesterday, at the age of 17

>> they have to answer a lot of these questions. as sam said, i don't think the objection here is to having a free and open inquiry that is based on kind of a rational process. the issue here is sort of making the conclusions first and drawing them later. what i am so confused about, and i have tried to follow this story, i've followed it as a reporter, is to establish a fact pattern so we even know what questions are the sale yeient questions to ask. what is it that you want to know? >> that is the problem. there are so many questions being raised as if they haven't been answered when in fact several inquiries have been made. i get that you want to put it all into one comprehensive study, but when the person investigating comes out and says this is a trial, which is sexually whctio essentially what trey gowdy said, it raises suspicions. >> also when you start fundraising off of it in this shameless fashion. darrell issa has raised $2.5 million in cycle. he will make more this cycle at this pace than his first what is it four terms.

answer this question. if you've got someone in this country illegally who commits a violent crime should have person, after serving time here not be deported back to their country? >> yes or no? >> of course they are. they're being deported all the time. this report is misleading. >> the ice report is misleading? immigration and customs enforcement? numbers are a lie? >> judge, judge, interpretation is wrong the people that are being released, we cannot hold them forever. half of them for minor traffic offenses. >> no. no. no, no, ryed i don't want to fight with you. i want to hear from the sheriff. you're saying if they serve their time, if they're illegal, that they should be allowed to walk out on the streets and irrespective of their convictions? >> judge, judge, we need to see each case individually. >> i give you a guy murderer. >> what if they're married to a u.s. citizen? they have u.s. citizen children? what happens with those cases? >> those are sad cases. a agree. >> these are the type that meet

tweet me your answers. and i will read some of those a little later on in this show. >>> well, tonight, we invite you to join fox news for a special program that takes a closer look at these latest developments. benghazi, white house cover up revealed. special reports will take a look at the administration about who knew what and when they knew it and how the white house story is beginning to unravel. that's coming up tonight, 10:00 p.m. earn and will air again tomorrow at 9:00 p.m. >>> now, to a big developing story that has many in the medical community concerneded about that mysterious middle east virus now making its way to the united states. the centers for disease control say the first confirmed case of mers or middle east respiratory syndrome, has now be found in indiana. nearly a quarter of people who have been diagnosed with this virus have died. at the moment, there is no vaccine or cure. welcome, doctor. great to have you here today. >> thank you. >> let's talk for a moment about how serious this

lois lerner has things to answer. she ownsly answers the part she wants to. >> we're sending message to future administrations this type of nix i don't knowian behavior is acceptable. -- nixonian. let's not send that message. >> sad little scraps of political nonsense they keep trying to peddle as leadership. mr. speaker, this rule and resolution are colossal wastes of time. >> i could not vote to violate an individual's fifth amendment rights just because i want to hear what she has to say. a much greater principle is at stake here today. bill: that was from last night. this morning florida congressman rich nugent is with us. sir, good morning to you. >> good morning, bill. bill: willow wisconsin lerner go to jail no. >> that's a possibility. but you the whole idea behind this content resolution was to get her to tell the american people, what's happened within the irs? this is not the position we wanted to end up in. she would have cut this off right away by testifying. she went and spoke to the prosecutorial aspect

who do you want answering the phone? >> i'm hillary clinton and i approved this message. >> so hillary, why were you on the phone with the president of tunisia that night? no americans were dying in tunisia. and even before that, why did you continue to downgrade the security for our ambassador while he and his staff were asking repeatedly for more security? all the while the cia telling you that al qaeda affiliated training camps, at least ten of them, surrounded benghazi. and hill. why did not you go on those sunday morning talk shows? too busy racking up those frequent flyer mails? and why tell dead man's parents that would you get the guy who did the video. that you were so quick to blame. and even more revealing, 36 hours before ben rhodes' e-mail linking the white house to the fake video narrative and directing that obama's policy not be blamed, hillary, said almost the exact same thing. and will someone please tell me why the cia was even in benghazi and our ambassador after everyone had left? were they there to f

answers.ean less waiting for things like security backups and file downloads you'd take that test, right? well, what are you waiting for? you could literally be done with the test by now. now you could have done it twice. this is awkward. check your speed. see how fast your internet can be. switch now and add voice and tv for $34.90. comcast business built for business. even in this with your upgrades and your own personal money but congress and our fore fathers envisioned members of congress being every day people and not an elitist type class. i would take the opposite view. >> yes, sir, you do. does it happen very often, are there lots of congressman who fly first class back to their districts? >> there are a few. every weekend we travel. there's a lot of upgrades when there's an open seat in first class, people would get upgraded automatically, and this bill doesn't prohibit that, but what it does say if you are going to buy a first class ticket, you are going to pay it with your own money

are we answering him. an question -- answering emperical question? what is the reasonable expectation of privacy with a person in 2014 with a cell phone? or are we legislating what we think is a good privacy rule? >> i think the court is determining whether or not in a14, an individual has reasonable expectation of privacy against government intrusion into a device that carries around an increasingly large percentage of somebody's personal -- >> part of that is, people must actually have that expectation, that must be the expectation of people at large in 2014. everything that is on their cell is private. or some of the information is private to read or they think nothing is private. where do you think we should look to answer that question about what people in 2014 think about that question? >> i think from the fact that people carry them with them in a pocket or purse. that exhibits an expectation of privacy. you don't expect people to rummage through your pockets. or through the -- >> why? i'm not going to suggest they are like things that existed

my answer is yes.i don't have a view on what the exact mandatory should be and the incentives that flow from that will be. what you are saying makes sense to me and prince paul. it is always -- makes sense to principle. >> one of the aspects addresses an issue for which i plead congressional guilt. increase theto sentencing guidelines on crack cocaine over powder cocaine. it was ame we did it, full-scale congressional panic over the arrival of this new, cheap, addictive narcotic that destroyed lives and babies mothers were carrying. we said hit it and hit it hard. with a 100 to one disparity. orther it should be 100-1 1-1 which i happen to endorse, we have reached a congressional compromise that 18-1. the bill addresses the people serving prison sentences under the old guidelines for crack cocaine. it does not treat them as a class. it only allows each individual to petition for reconsideration of their sentencing. i had a man in my office age of 17 in the rockford, illinois, he was convicted of drug c

we are demanding answers. moving on from the defensive tone of this administration, you hear those words from nancy pelosi and wonder why everybody isn't demanding those. why does she wan wants to divere conversation? >> i think they are arrogant. they are annoyed by the constant question. like benghazi is over with, time to get over it. but the point something out. >> we're watching president obama joint news conference with the german chancellor angela merkel. let's wash. -- let's watch. president obama: it is always a pleasure to welcome angela merkel to the white house. germany is one of our strongest allies. angela is one of my closest partners. with her indulgence i want to start with making to go brief comments. first as president my top priority is doing everything we can to create more jobs and opportunities for hard-working families. the economic strength as a strength in the world. we learned our business is created 273,000 new jobs last month. all told the businesses have created 9.2 million new jo

exit question, quick answer.show that if you're a racist, you will be ostracized in america, progress or not? >> yes. >> i think it is progress. we've all agreed -- >> everybody agrees. progress? >> huge progress. we are a good society. >> all right. have a great weekend. >>> coming up, brand-new developments. the impact that our special "hannity" investigation has had into these disturbing reports about how the v.a. in phoenix has been betraying our veterans. we have updates, some that are pretty impressive. we'll tell you about it, coming up next. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ [ male announcer ] great rates for great rides. geico motorcycle, see how much you could save. but with less ergy, moodiness, gri had to do something.des. i saw mdoctor. a blood test showed it was low testosterone, not age. we talked about axiron the onlynderarm low t treaent that can restore t vels to normal in about two weeks in most men. axiron is not for use in women or anyone younger than 18 or men with prostate or breast cancer. women, especlly those who

there is a number of different answers as to why. we are not the only ones answering it or even posing the question. the big issue is as we look at each one of these and looking and determining if it is a human issue or an environmental factor and if it is a factor the partners at mta are taking the steps to correct those. >> the second question off of the cuff and you may not have sweater answer. >> something that you said we can't find out if they are on the cell phone, if there is an injury and you intend to detain the driver why can't we check the cell phone to see if they were on it at the time, because we can do it with other types of detention, to see if, their text messages about a narcotics transaction and that kind of stuff, if it is a serious case and someone has been hurt and can we check to see if there is cell phone usage at the time of the accident. >> legal issues is beyond my ability. but i will offer this. and i will know that the issue of cell phones such as before us, the supreme court and so we are awaiting some

up global air traffic control. >> i will give you the answer, the answer is, yes, it is time to tighten up. richard, we will have you back and more on this story with tom geist. other important news we're following including new controversies over the benghazi attacks, reignites after white house e-mails are released 18 months after the assault. republicans are claiming foul and demanding answers. >>> banned for life from the nba, donald sterling may be required to sell his team and people want to buy it. if you have moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis, like me, and you're talking to your rheumatologist about a biologic... this is humira. this is humira helping to relieve my pain. this is humira helping me lay the groundwork. this is humira helping to protect my joints from further damage. doctors have been prescribing humira for ten years. humira works by targeting and helping to block a specific source of inflammation that contributes to ra symptoms. humira is proven to help relieve pain and stop further joint damage in many adults. humira can lower your ability to fight infection

i'm happy to answer any questions. >> so just to get the timing right here you guys are going to sort through all this figure out where the cuts could happen where the revenue could be generated and come back to the commission before -- >> no this is just a transition plan the mayor is going to propose his budget on may 1st and we will come back to you explaining how that's going to fit into our budget at that time. >> okay so that will be may 13th. >> correct. >> is when we'll have to make some hard decisions. >> yes. >> we put those capital projects into the absolutely required buck ets and important to have but potentially deferrable and that third bucket an expansion of service nice to have but whether or not it's required so the materials you have before you show 3 options that can get us into a positive zone one can actually satisfy your 15 percent reserve policy but they are going to have to come with a combination of capital cuts as well as additional revenues in order to solve a half a billion dollars shortfall as we discussed in january. >> i would just like to comment that

the committee has sought these answers for more than a year. lerner's refusal to truthly answer these questions posed by the committee cannot be tolerated. i urge a yes vote. following that swift action by the justice department to ensure that lois lerner provides answers on exactly what she i.r.s. was up to. mr. chairman, i thank you and yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady yields back. the gentleman from california reserves. on the time remain, the gentleman from california has 11 -- has 12 minutes left. the gentleman from maryland has 6 1/4 minutes left. the gentleman from maryland is recognized. mr. cummings: i yield two minutes to mr. davis of illinois. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized. mr. davis: i agree that one of the responsibilities of our committees is to investigate, to try and make sure that the laws are carried out the way we intended and to try and make sure that the money is being spent the way we intended for it to be spent. that we spent $14 million up to this point investigating this one iss

our questions but most of the answers fell short of what we needed to know. essentially it's set up you're not going to be able to go unless you get off work and it was like 7 days notice. i was lucky. i think this was all of boxes walk i'm running out of time so thank you very much >> thank you. any other comment on 210 randall. >> good evening and thank you very much for holding the hearing i'm bruce i'm that will with the glen park association. i'd like to talk about a few things a followup on the information we did we forced at the box walk on this particular site in dealing with about 12 questions some of which were technical and some had to do with policy. as nicholas indicated they didn't get back to us until a week from the hearing many weeks later and the responses they give us were often referring us to their pr website. we did a spreadsheet and gave to you as part of the information we provided for the earlier hearing that was continues because we were on our earlier agenda and i decided to move it on. i wanted to make the point it was completely n

. >> wolf, we're finally getting somewhere in our search for answers on benghazi. >> yeah, and the answer is it's all partisan republican nonsense. the debate starts right now. >> tonight on "crossfire," have the republicans gone too far in their hunt for hillary? >> if she wants to compete for the highest job in the land, my goodness. >> republicans double down on benghazi. democrats push back. >> this is a stunt. this is a political stunt. >> on the left, van jones. on the right, s.e. cupp. in the "crossfire" representative elliot engel, a democrat from new york, and representative morgan griffin, a republican. are the benghazi hearings a trap for hillary clinton or her republican opponents? tonight on "crossfire." >>> welcome to "crossfire." i'm s.e. cupp on the right. >> i'm van jones on the left. today republicans are once again using the murder of four americans in benghazi to raise money, distract us from their nonexistent agenda and, of course, tear down hillary clinton. now, if you don't believe me, listen to senator rand paul speaking to cnn just a few hours ago. >> i think that

and if you the policeman can answer the phone. it doesn't mean that the person on the other end has to respond. it's -- >> i was thinking in terms of reasonable expectation of privacy. most people don't pick up other people's phones to answer them unless the phone is lost. and then you pray the person who found it answers it. >> and perhaps this would be analogous to that. so the -- >> so do you think -- it's got nothing to do with plain hearing. i'm not saying they can't obviously they can hear the ring. i'm just it's a big, different step to answer it. >> if the police have seized the phone and they can secure it, pending application for a warrant to engage in a search of its contents, then answering the phone could be viewed as part of securing. >> does the owner of a cell phone have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the call log? >> yes. i believe for the associational data and reasons that i have just articulated, that there is an expectation of privacy in the call log. >> but the cell phone company has all that informat

i ask you to answer my question -- >> when you get a show, i'll answer your question. >> you won't answeruestion until you know the truth, sean. >> i can answer the question. it's simple. on the evening of september 11th, hillary clinton put out a statement, which in part blamed the video, when you fast forward to what the cia said, the cia did say that there were spontaneous protests that evolved. >> thank you. >> but did not make the story about a video and if you go back to the testimony and written testimony when he was asked questions about it, he specifically said that the video story did not come from the cia. so those are the facts. >> what you just said actually was misleading. what the cia wrote is it came from protests in cairo, everybody knows that protests in cairo were triggered by the video. >> next question, next question -- >> hang on, hang on a second. >> crew -- >> next logical question. >> yes or know, guys. >> lanny, stop with your aggressivee himry crap because it's not going to work here. >> is that your answer -- >> the next question -- >> sean -- >> lanny, the nex

exit question, quick answer.se show that if you're a racist, you will be ostracized in america, progress or not? >> yes. >> i think it is progress. we've all agreed -- >> everybody agrees. progress? >> huge progress. we are a good society. >> all right. have a great weekend. >>> coming up, brand-new developments. the impact that our special "hannity" investigation has had into these disturbing reports about how the va in phoenix has been betraying our veterans. we have updates, some that are pretty impressive. we'll tell you about it, coming we'll tell you about it, coming up next. huh, 15 minutes could save you 15% or more on car insurance. everybody knows that. well, did you know that game show hosts should only host game shows? samantha, do you take kevin as your lawfully wedded husband... or would you rather have a new caaaaaar!!!! say hello to the season's hottest convertible... ohhh....and say goodbye to samantha. [ male announcer ] geico. 15 minutes could save you 15% or more. if you have a buness idea, we

we as taxpayers pay a guy to not answer questions that we need answered. i know that press isn't elected, but they serve a purpose to try to get answers and we put this guy out there and jay is doing what he is paid to do. he's just giving nonanswers, evasions, he just quotes all the nonanswers he gave on the shinseki thing. ridiculous nonanswers. >> in some respects, the nonanswers and evasion of the shinseki story became a story in its own right. when the president said he was sticking by shinseki last week and jay came to the briefing room and was pressed on whether the president stood by his words and jay could not answer that question. that became a story in a weird way. it showed that the administration had moved a little on shinseki. in fact, it came the next day. >> my brief stint in washington as a reporter, i did not play well with press secretaries. when i see a story like this, i am sympathetic. i wrote something she didn't like, they argued with me for 20 minutes. i wouldn't give in. they said give me your editor's number. i'll give you my par

so are you not answering my questions because you're influenced by marco rubio's not answering questionsnot going to answer that question, stephen. if i tell you -- >> stephen: all right, all right, that's enough, david. just answer this much-- do you, a young person who will be able to vote in 2016, think marco rubio could be elected president? >> what are you high? ( laughter ) let me tell you why i'm not going to answer that question. >> stephen: we'll be right back. ( cheers and applause ). let us help you find the cigna dental plan that's right for you. ♪ oh, oh, oh, oh, oh ♪ i'm ten feet tall ( cheers and applause ) >> stephen: welcome back, everybody. my guest tonight is secretary of the navy, ray mabus. ( cheers and applause ) secretary maybus, thanks so much for coming on. sir, nice to have you on. >> glad to be here. >> stephen: happy fleet week. >> thank you. it's a great, great fleet week. >> stephen: it absolutely is. but, please, be careful out there. i don't want to see you in a little sailor suit running around town singing, "new york, new york." all right? >> deal, neith

answer the question. it's pretty simple. the chronology is not difficult to understand. on the evening of september 11th, hillary clinton put out a statement which in part blamed the video. the cia did say there were spontaneous protests that evolved, but did not make the story about the video. if you go back to the testimony, morrel specifically said the video story did not come from the cia. those are the facts. >> what you just said actually was misleading. what the cia wrote was that it came from protests in cairo. everybody knows that protests were triggered by protests in cairo. >> stop with your aggressive i love hillary crap because it's not going to work here. the next logical question then is this. you have people on the ground, people that were eyewitnesses. congress has not had access to them. there's videotapes of apparently what happened that night. why would you talk to the people in langeley and not talk to people that were present? >> there were mistakes and judgments that were wrong that

>> yes, sir, short answer. jon: so the top intelligence official covering africa, jonah, said there was really, essentially no discussion of the attack that night having been prompted by a youtube video. why did the secretary of state, why did national security advisor susan rice, why did the president continue to hammer that video every the next weeks and months? >> right. you could have a modest defense of this white house saying they thought at some point in this process that this youtube video was a big part of the thing and it was part of the story and they clung to it because they wanted to believe it was true and group think all of that i think you can say those things. these people are human beings. on september 11th you could say that maybe. keep in mind the ben rhodes memo talking about in the press conference walling written on september 14th, 12, 24, 72 hours after everybody knew this was not about a youtube video and the white house was still putting it out there. you can give them benefit of the d

exit question, quick answer.e show that if you're a racist, you will be ostracized in america, progress or not? >> yes. >> i think it is progress. we've all agreed -- >> everybody agrees. progress? >> huge progress. we are a good society. >> all right. have a great weekend. >>> coming up, brand-new developments. the impact that our special "hannity" investigation has had into these disturbing reports about how the va in phoenix has been betraying our veterans. we have updates, some that are pretty impressive. we'll tell you about it, coming up next. ♪ (woman) this place has got really good chocolate shakes. (growls) (man) that's a good look for you. (woman) that was fun. (man) yeah. (man) let me help you out with the.. (woman)...oh no, i got it. (man) you sure? (woman) just pop the trunk. (man vo) i may not know where the road will lead, but... i'm sure my subaru will get me there. (announcer) love. it's what makes a subaru, a subaru. >> test >> test >> test >> test >> test >> test >> test >> test >> test >> test

so are you not answering my questions because you're influenced by marco rubio's not answering questionsu why i'm not going to answer that question, stephen. if i tell you -- >> stephen: all right, all right, that's enough, david. just answer this much-- do you, a young person who will be able to vote in 2016, think marco rubio could be elected president? >> what are you high? ( laughter ) let me tell you why i'm not going to answer that question. >> stephen: we'll be right back. ( cheers and applause ). let's see it, buddy! wooo! the samsung galaxy s5 has an all-new, ultra hd camera that snaps photos with twice the resolution of the iphone, has the ability to enhance your photos before you get the shot, hahaha, you got it? perfect. yeah! and change the focus, after you take the picture. it's our most powerful camera ever. whoa! t-mobile will pay your termination fees when you switch and trade in your device. get the samsung galaxy s5 now for $0 down at t-mobile. ♪ show 'em the curve. it's beautiful. it's more than that... ...it's perfect. introducing curved ultra high definition televis

i think the answer is no. we got a terms, if bigger discount, that would cause a programmer to go to a smaller cable company to try to make up the discount by getting a higher rate from the programmer. that would assume any initial negotiation, it left money on the table. charge them less than what they could otherwise get. now that they got less from us, they have to go back and get more from the other programmer. i think economics and antitrust law is pretty well settled on that fact. >> before we go to the professor, i have other questions. next i'm going to go to mr. sh -- schaeffer. do the requirements in the mec order adequately address your concerns? comcast has allegedly it is abiding by the net neutrality rules and not , itriminate against content has refused to upgrade its connectivity to all major backbones globally. they'lletina testimony, in the written testimony, the alleged that the vast majority of traffic goes through connections. -- over 30% of the traffic is going to its customers. there is

i'm not getting any answers. violating their own policy by not deporting these vicious criminals. >> and ryan, you don't seem to have a problem with this. how would you respond? >> well, i think you fall for this stunt of these people, with the book, "impeachable offenses" that came out a couple of weeks ago. >> whoa. i'm not here to promote anybody's book. >> you fell for it. this is a publicity stunt. this group, we know what they are. a nonprofit organization -- >> okay, i'm going to have to pull rank. should someone with a criminal record not be deported back to their country? >> of course, and they're being deported all the time. i'm saying this report is misleading. >> the report is a lie? >> the interpretation is wrong. we can't hold them forever. some of them are minor traffic offenses. >> i don't want to fight with you. i want to hear from the sheriff. you're saying if they serve their time, even if they're illegal, they should be allowed to walk out on the streets, irrespective of their condition? >> ju

how would you answer that question? i will answer it today the way they answered it in that time. one of my russian compatriots -- 9.celebrated v-day on may what happened after that? is part of the answer to your question. that ispened after stalin remained in power in the andem of which ignited participated in aggression 1993 -- against poland, that system in russia in the soviet union remains. that was the course of the cold war instead of the united in proper terms of not in technical terms of the word. then what happens today, the main problem is that russia has this.t bothered with stalin is referred to the approved or endorsed textbooks for our children. able -- as an manager. can you believe it happened in germany with hitler? an ableonsidered manager. that is basically what happened. that is basically the root of the problem today with the theine that is part of russian establishment. do you know what happened? 1994, russian elite, the ruling class, those who benefited the most and privatized the results of the --ocratic revolution of 1991 i haven't seen any of those in th

on top of that, they answer you.t is nice work if you can get it. >> one of the things i learned as an academic, trying to find data, if you show the slightest interest in anyone, they will give you whatever data you want. it is amazing. he can't understand how they think it is in your best interest. you are the first person to engage them. they will do whatever they can. he >> he is very smart. i'm ok to. [indiscernible] he doesn't have to prove it. what i find is that truly smart people, in my view, the smartest people, are the ones who can explain what is going on in their thought process. we are surrounded by people who are really smart and they have ideas. you asked them to tease and out. if you ask the smart people, they can walk you through and explain the theory, show data, tell the stories. >> i can think of two people who are good at that. warren buffett. the other is nathan ai mearball. .> clinton is good >> he has the genius of being able to say there is a sense of respect for whoever differs with him. he

the answer is always kids.nstead of accepting as a fact, they said, the magician, somewhat in the business of fooling people, and asked what he thinks. his answer, adults. it is the way you guys think. it is unconventional thinking. let's test what hypothesis we have. >> you are right. go seek data. have fun doing it. >> that is a good life. >> we are lucky. >> then make it into a documentary. what does it mean? to think like a freak. >> the only good answer is that it took us so long to say it we had to write a book about it. it is not complicated. there are a number of steps. the biggest things, get rid of preconceptions. let me go back to the magic thing. and learned so much about the way kids thing versus how adults think. we had alex stone, this magician come in. to see how this work and hersen. the magician will say i want you to look at this handkerchief. what you do, what adults do, we pay attention. it means focus everything on the one thing that we are encouraged to. we are vulnerable to mr.. that is

every day, seimens answers are helping build a future of america. seimens, answers. >>> just wanted to check and make sure we were on schedule. the first technology of its kind. >> mom and dad, i have great news. >> is now providing answers. seimens. answers. >>> issue one, cooking the books. >> will you explain to me after knowing all this information why you should not resign? >> i tell you, senator, that i came here to make things better for veterans. that was my appointment. >> embattled veterans affairs secretary, eric consecki about whether he should resign in the face of a growing management scandal in his agency. the v.a. hospital system has a management goal of making an appointment for sick veterans to see a doctor within 14 to 30 days of a call. last month's retired doctor told cnn that the phoenix veteran's hospital met that goal by cooking the books. one list submitted showed appointments scheduled within the goals. the second list, the real list, showed between 1,400 and 1,600 veterans were forced to wait months. 40 veterans are allege

and maybe you can answer it for me.re was the president and what did he do the night of the attack? >> i believe the president was at the white house and he was in communication with some of the folks with his administration in and aren't time of the attacks. >> do you -- do you know, congressman gowdy, where the president was and what he was doing during the seven hours of the attack? >> no, sir, i do not. nor do i know what communication if any he had with secretary of state clinton nor can i tell you why we were still in benghazi despite the fact that there was an kaes lags escalation in viol leading up and i don't know if he called any allies and said can you get any assets to benghazi, we're under attack. i have more questions than answers despite the fact that committees of congress have looked at this attack for 19 months now. >> congressman becerra, can you answer the specific questions that you just heard from congressman gowdy? >> also, i want to say happy mother's day to all the mothers out there. trey, you s

the american people deserve answers. and if you want answers, it's going to require the house of representatives to investigate. >> which means i should donate $500? >> it means if you want answers from this administration, you want to maintain the house majority and grow it. because but for the house majority, the republican house majority, this administration would be answering to no one. >> so this is a base appeal? >> this is an appeal to people who want a check and balance on this administration. and right now the only check and balance is the house republican majority. >> do you agree with congressman gowdy and speaker bain they're the nrc should not be asking for money on this issue? >> i think i haven't read the fundraising appeal, okay. what i'm suggesting to you is for me to go home to my consistents and say the only reason we're going to get any answers on benghazi is because we have a republican majority in the house. and if you think that is important on all of these issues, not just benghazi, irs, and other

you can't answer this question maybe. but the people who were so strong on the war on terror, i talked specifically on dick cheney. has cheney said one single thing about this? >> let's be honest. if he said anything, would you ridicule him? >> hold that thought, bob. we're going to talk about someone who could have designated them a foreign terrorist organization. then the patriot act would have come into play. i feel really bad for harry reid. how can he link boko haram to the koch brothers. >> or mitt romney. >> here a's another one. >> we also destabilized libya as well will. maybe our idea should be not taking out the strong leaders that -- then we wouldn't -- >> it was a guy named cue dauf 50 we've been trying to get rid of for a long time. >> do the oscar music. coming up, when hillary clinton was at the state department she fought to keep boko haram off the terror list. now she's changing her tune on the group. eric will fill us in, next. >>> welcome back, everybody. hillary clinton sounded pretty tough yesterday,

lerner's fifth amendment assertion and order her to answer the question. and as long as that deficiency is there, there is no reason to move forward with this effort today. but let's move on to the bigger picture. every single 501-c-4 that was in the queue before the i.r.s. could have self-certified. they didn't even need to be in that queue. so whether or not there was a list of progressive organizations and conservative organizations that they were through omehow get the thousands of applications they had, they could have moved aside and self-certified. there have been 39 witnesses before this committee, there have been 530 pages of documents. there is no smoking gun. but the other side is locked and loaded, they're just shooting blanks. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady yields back the balance of her time. does the gentleman from maryland reserve? the gentleman from california is recognized. mr. issa: if they hasn't made their applications perhaps they wouldn't have been asked the abusive questions like what books do you read, who ar

i need to you answer this question. asking questions about benghazi or should the media just give it a rest? go to gretawire.com and vote in our poll. just a reminder if you are just getting home now and tuning in before bill o'reilly. set a series recording of "on the record." see you tomorrow night 7 p.m. >>> tonight on "red eye." >> coming up on "red eye," the world's first man-lion hybrid. how is he fitting in with his all lion foster family? we spoke to one of his adorable half brothers to find out. plus, does the president think the country would be better off if we kicked a few states out of the union? and if so which one? >> maryland, connecticut, minnesota and hawaii, get fired up because it is the right thing to do. >> and finally. has the president rethought his position on kicking four states out of the union? >> makes no sense. >> none of these stories on "red eye" tonight. >> and now ltt's welcome our guest. beauty is in the

on the one hand i felt i now knew some answers. to my many questions on the of their hand i knew i had no words for them. so a big help that was. >> host: how long do you stay in limbo? >> i don't know which trails on into other phases of my life for so long. but i was pretty shattered. i think i was acting crazy. very self-destructive if my parents paid any attention would have thought i needed professional help. but philip k. dick the the lead detective writer, a science-fiction writer, and he had an encounter he called it a self disclosure. and it is less like a bracing the buddha them the victim of the hit-and-run accident. and i completely understand that. as a result of his behavior. >> like the late christopher hichens he said when he was dying of esophageal cancer that into talking about god it is the kilo talking. so you are still in the atheist camp. >> gore hall more severely could the eighth esp tested? [laughter] writes? i know lot of people but that must have been god? but i did not have that in my vocabulary is nothi

. >> and i want to make sure and i'm glad that you answered my question. >> thank you. commissioner rosales. >> i had a question along those lines and thank you for that explanation. the staff memo indicates that one of the possible uses will be office and retail uses and i'm just interested in understanding if the retail uses are kind of what compatible to what we see near the parnassus campus or talking about a different retail use? >> i will have laurie answer that, but these are all incidental to the primary educational core mission. >> i understand that. i was curious, what are we talking about when we talk retail? >> so since we need to devote most of our space and facilities to our core mission, it would not be appropriate for us to rent out our space to a destination retail tenant such as -- i don't know -- home depot or whatever. but as you know, at parnassus and at mission bay we do have smaller food operators and tenants, as well as we have a walgreens pharmacy, for example, on our parnassus campus. so when we talk about "incidental retail," it would be prima

we don't know the answers. you're right, today's a very important day for getting to some of the answers that are unfolding. you've got the hearing going on. there's a little break right now. when it comes back, we'll monitor that for the big, hot moments. a pivotal moment in finding out what's happening and an important one in american history. >> you know, sandra, we saw the people advising the president, people that we were counting on to get the answers have proved themselves to be masters of on few scaition. they have -- obfuscation. they have misled, tried to cover up, redacted documents, and here it is, so much time has passed, are we still going to be able to get the answers we deserve? >> well, you know, we're finally seeing some heated conversations and journalists actually pressing for answers. we saw in the white house press briefing yesterday it got very heated. we have yet to see if it's a similar environment today with jay carney. but yesterday carney said referencing those talking points susan r