anthea, you brought up rush earlier.he interesting thing about calling the pope a marxist, besides the fact it probably isn't a good idea to go after the lord, is there actually is a history to marxism in the latin-american church that kind of relates a little bit to pope francis. can you explain? >> we talk about liberation theology. i want to go back to a father who talked about the preferential option for poor. and later in the early '70s, what you have is this whole lifting out of that to create liberation theology, gu ta voe gutierrez. but what rush limbaugh doesn't understand is this option for the poor has always been there in the catholic church. it's not marxism. he knew the history of card know who became pope francis, you would know he didn't guy bye sb into the marxist piece of liberation theology. first of all, rush is just wrong. second of all, chief amongst the sinners he should not cast stones against the holy man who would probably still embrace him if he came to the vatican. third, what's so wrong about