anthony nelson. good talk to you again. this is non binding, so what's the point? what can realistically achieve? well, it's important for us to do what it can. but this resolution underscore the limitations of the un in terms of its ability to really strongly intervene. and it's certainly fall short of the expectations of some of the protesters in m r, who have been calling from day one about the responsibility to protect this resolution. while it does condemn the hunter, while it does call on the countries of the world to start preventing a form of arms into the country, it's not a step toward the formal arms embargo. and it's very clear that a strong security council action would be vetoed by china, and probably also by roger. but any foreign businesses or for an interest to have stayed the course inside me and mar, working with what is now in effect, a military government personally, they'll just write the storm of this as well. yeah, i think it any foreign business that is stuck its way through the terrible events of the past few months through us sanction thr

it's now killed more than 800 people. 36 countries though abstained from the vote, is anthony nelson from the alright stonebridge, a group of business strategy firm in washington. it's a, several governments are trying not to antagonize me and miles military leaders. this resolution underscores the limitations of the un in terms of its ability to really strongly intervene and it's certainly fall short of the expectations of some of the protesters in m r, who have been calling from day one about the responsibility to protect this resolution. while it does condemn the hunter, while it does call on the countries of the world to start preventing a form of armed into the country, it's not a step towards the formal arms embargo. and it's very clear that a strong security council action would be vetoed by china, and probably also by roger many who want to preserve their relationships in the region with off the on. they simply don't see the point of getting behind resolutions that are ultimately going to be symbolic when, when likely, when the rubber hits the road in the current situation, c

anthony nelson with the bridget stonebridge group. he says, many countries are who abstain, i'm sorry, i'm trying to preserve their relations with vision tests. this resolution underscores the limitations of the un in terms of its ability to really strongly intervene and certainly fall short of the expectations of some of the protesters in them. or who have been calling from day one about the responsibility to protect this resolution. while it does condemn the hunter, while it does call on the country to the world, to start preventing the flow of arms into the country, it's not a step toward the formal arms embargo. and it's very clear that a strong security council action would be vetoed by china, and probably also by russia many who want to preserve their relationships in the region with off the on. they simply don't see the point of getting behind resolutions that are ultimately going to be symbolic when, when likely, when the rubber hits the road in the current situation trying to go to block strong action. the window will still h