ukad blocked the proposal, but the world anti—doping agency is looking into the matter.lates to early 2016. a few months before the games. at that point, we'll of obtained e—mail correspondence between british cycling former chief doctor and members of the governing bodies hierarchy and in this correspondence, he details how he suggests asking writers for monthly at the biological passport test results for statistical analysis similar to that performed by anti—doping agencies. he says this is an opportunity to give warning of targeted testing. freeman said it would allow early detection and fluctuations of the writers aptly biological passport, but that is an electronic record, a profile if you like of competitors readings to look for abnormalities which may be a signal of potential doping. so it's become a passport for those who are fighting for clean sport and this would give time, he put it for writers to consider reasons as to why there may be fluctuations and prepare a defence. the following month of february 2016, british cyclists anti—doping commission met and min

anti-doping agency, usada, charged with administering anti-doping agencies for the olympics, paraolympics. they handle in competition and out of competition testing, results management processes, drug reference resources and the athlete education for all u.s. olympic and paraolympic committee recognized sport national governing bodies for athletes and events. usada is the administrator for the ultimate fighting championship anti-doping program. re-authorizing this important agency will further the advancement of clean sports, fair game and positive sportsmanship. i ask my colleagues to support the bill. we'll be hearing from one of my colleagues in a moment, colleague on the committee, bill johnson, and also want to thank the chairman for working together to get this done today. and i reserve the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman from washington reserves. the gentleman from new jersey is recognized. mr. pallone: thank you, mr. speaker. i yield three minutes now to the gentleman from california, mr. thompson, who's the lead sponsor of the legislation. the speaker

anti doping agency's allegedly allowed our families to clean their reputation by taking doping tests in applying the lab multi-nation see what the details brought off the break. the world is driven by a dream shaped by the curse of those great. new dares thinks. we dare to ask. a mass keyser what for my guide to financial survival this is on a device used by professional scallywags to earn money. that's right these has flaws are simply not accountable and we're just getting more and more to them. totally destabilize the global economy you need to protect yourself and get in for a while because they're for. welcome back to the program an italian man has made a 2nd trip to russia in 2 months to get his 2nd dose of the sport and. why he'd come to moscow. the 8 years of vaccine rollout has been a debacle hard to miss for months now it's been a regular in the headlines and with more production and delivery to laze on the cards it still looks like a fun piece word had now waltz most e.u. citizens are waiting and hoping that the brussels somehow gets its act together always have taken thing

anti-doping agency lets a leetle impugns investigate themselves off to testing positive for steroids and subsequently cleared their plates of any wrongdoing. in the shooter are here to discuss the story. well right now we have front and center to a british 2012 a limp ians that would be hurdler rhys williams and the runner gareth warburton now back in 2014 they both tested positive for steroids but they blamed supplements that they had taken saying that they had been contaminated so of course at the time tests were carried out and it was found that those supplements had been contaminated and the 2 were let off with a 4 and 6 month suspension respectively and you can decision at the time said that the athletes were victims but they had brought the matter on themselves thus the suspension so case closed right well it was until right now the mail on sunday has come out with a report that has turned all of that upside down 1st of all they say that the pair themselves arrange the testing of the supplements and allowed that had been recommended to them but had no you can hope for over visi

the clerk: h.r. 172, a bill to re-authorize the united states anti-doping agency and for other purposes. the speaker pro tempore: the question is, will the house suspend the rules and pass the bill? members will record their votes by electronic device. this is a 30-minute vote. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman rise? >> as the member designated by ms. sewell, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. sewell will vote yes on h.r. 172. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from hawaii seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. moulton, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. moulton will vote yes on house resolution 172. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady fro

reporter: some of those topics, re-authorizing the u anti-doping agency for test og limpians, rejecting saudi dissidents, do you fear having a portion of your caucus consistently voting for things the rest of the house sees as noncontroversial make yours party look more radical? mr. mccarthy: i think you're misinterpreting what the argument is about. your first place is you're saying, suspension votes have become controversial because members of congress have asked for the vote. many of them will ask for the vote, actually vote for the bill. they want to be able to have a vote instead of a voice vote. i don't think that's controversial that a member elected to congress, expected to be here to actually vote. that's not controversial. that's where you're misconstruing. in any given suspension votes there's some who vote for it and some vote against it. suspension votes normally come out of committees that could actually pass, it takes a 2/3. you can't amend it and others. but you need to speak to each person individually. sometimes it comes about funding. is it too much money? sometimes a