i knew it was an antisemetic tweet. just raced to did he actually consciously upload this graphic, or was this done for him and he doesn't really know what's going on. then once that story broke that it came from this antisemetic website, it just unfortunately confirmed all my fears about trump and his organization, which is not that trump wakes up every day thinking antisemetic thoughts. i don't think, i have to know reason to believe he himself is antisemetic but he panders to a crowd that traffics in antisemitism and he's been resistant to say emphatically this is unacceptable. that alone is horrifying. if this were a democrat doing this, republican leaders across the board would be up in arms putting a spotlight on this. it's a shame that, a, it's happening to our nominee and b, more and more republican leaders aren't speaking out against it. >> what does it say to you that trump not only did this thing but has defended on on two consecutive days, where he said he regrets taking it down. it seems repetitive, but doe

>> assuming he had not sent out an antisemetic tweet? >> fair enough. divided country. anybody who is the nominee of either party these days immediately gets a lot of support. it's much harder to see a goldwater johnson nixon mcgovern type landslide but let's not underplay. this is the first time since 1908 that a popular president has gone all out for someone from their own party. >> usually -- there is truth to that. usually there are old wounds that haven't healed or they are unpopular. there's always a reason for it. >> hillary clinton is the richard nixon in this election. when you look at her, you say the same thing with nixon. why is this woman laughing? >> she would take one thing. he went two terms. she would take that. we'll leave it there. we'll be right back. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ take on any road with intuitive all wheel drive the nissan rogue, murano and pathfinder. ♪ >>> that does it for us tonight. we'll be back tomorrow. "with all due respect" starts right now. >>> in the mannamerican politic system there are two separate yet equally important grou

tweets that it was a sheriff's star. twitter responds then why did you delete it if it wasn't an issue. clinton's campaign calls it antisemeticp's campaign says clinton is trying to divert attention from her issues. >> this is a simple star. >> this hand wringing that's going on over a shape in a tweet is out of hand. >> it's a star of david over $100 bills. this is imagery which is significant to a lot of people. >> on to the next story. >> that is hurlt hurtful to a lot of people. i want to play veepstakes with you. >> given the momentous clinton news dropped by director comey today, is this trump tweet controversy over or will it linger somehow? >> i think it's over because of the comey news and because veepstakes, the conventions are coming. i do think once again trump has got to prove himself and his operation prove himself to republicans. he can't let a story like this fester. whether you think it's unfair or the press is out to get you, whatever, you can't let a story like this fester. i think he's off the hook probably for this one in terms of dominating the news but he does have to prove himself that he won't let the

. >> look, antisemetic images, they have no place in a presidential campaign. candidates should know that. the tweet has been deleted. i don't know what flunky put this up there. they obviously have to fix that. as you know, i was -- one of the few times i spoke out against him during the primary very forcefully was in this area. when he failed to disavow white supremacists. i understand this is done by staff, not by he himself but more importantly, they have to clean this thing up. >> these are tweets that are going out on the real donald trump twitter account, going out from his account. i can't imagine how republicans react if hillary clinton retweeted a white supremacist, he's done it over and over again. it's not the first time. what do you suppose is at work here? you don't accidentally wind up on the praise where neo-nazis are tweeting images of stars of david and hillary clinton. you don't accidentally do that. what do you think is going on that he keeps treading into this territory? >> a complete and utter lack of judgment which you can't have in a presidential campaign. i was mayor of a sm

the wall with mexico, about muslims and about the re-tweeting or tweeting, we should say, of a star that some people viewed as antisemetice as the law and order candidate and be one that people can embrace? >> he's been the anti-black lives matter candidate. in december he said any person who kills police officers should get the death penalty. so i think this is where he's going in a kind of blue collar voters he's trying to appeal to. >> he needs to broaden that, obviously. that movement is massive right now. >> that's what strange about this vp list. key question here is, gingrich was speaker of the house. there you get a lot of governing experience. mike pence was leader in the house, within the leadership of the house and christie was a governor. it will be a key choice to determine if he wants a washington insider or someone more outside like christie and somebody like trump. >> speaking of vp selections, hillary clinton still has her choice to make as well. likely she will piggyback on the republican convention and do as soon as they end, she will come out with her own to steal become the spotlight. >> maybe even b