in this case, we were looking for something that was really antithetical to that position, which was that we would all these non-trust land with a lot of non-trust uses on them, and they were worried that we would be using pork harbor funds to subsidize the activity. so we have been careful in the legislation to make sure we have separate accounting and that we have an overall equation that provides a financial benefit to the trust. >> thank you. questions, comments? >> i had a question regarding the need to have these sites cleaned up and whatever remediation. does that need to be completed, just a plan to do the remediation? >> typically, you need to have an adopted remedial action plan. so that has gone through the entire public process that the regional board or department of toxic subsidies controls and administers. in this case, we are working with the regional board. we have gone through site investigations, identified the extent of the contamination, you have done a number of concepts about how you are going to approach remediation while managing on site or removing it, dispo

because your lack of voting will actually enhance and encourage people whose political philosophy is antithetical to the things that you believe and want. i do think that the president will get a large nber of voters, but there is one thing i need to remind you. the president has given targeted attention to the hispanic community, and he should, because they are a part of america and they deserve some attention because they have some unique problems and some unique concerns. what members of the congressional black caucus are saying is that so do we. i would hope, i really, really would hope that this nation has grown past this neanderthal position where, if he is going to give attention to african- americans, we're not going to vote for him anymore. i would love to believe, and i embraced the notion that america is not there anymore. if we are still there, i think we are in trouble. >> is there a way for you to put pressure on white members of congress, particularly senators, gubernatorial candidates, to be pay more attention -- to pay more attention to jobs in the african-american community? the

just that it answers terrorists completely antithetical to used al qaida has had total contempt for saddam hussein himself he's been a socialist he's been very harsh he's treated islamic leaders misleaders extremely harshly rock and we have very good intelligence on this was not part of the picture of terrorism before we invaded saddam hussein and bin laden were enemies bin laden considered and said that saddam hussein was the socialist infidel these were very different kinds of individuals competing for power in their own way and saddam hussein made very sure that al qaida couldn't function. in iraq that terrorists couldn't function except for the small northeastern quadrant of the country where there was an extremist group but he had no control over that it was near the iranian border ties with al qaeda it was just a scare tactic to exploit the trauma the very real trauma that the american people have felt ever since nine eleven and to associate that trauma with iraq has you know from the polls most americans believe that iraq had something to do with nine eleven and it was a very succes

one can see the way that that synthesis of gospel includes to form sought by many people to be antithetic go, eventually going to give rise to risen -- rhythm-and-blues and soul. >> the importance of ebony magazine. >> ebony -- ebony magazine is in many ways the first movement on the part of african-americans in journalism publishing to come up, in essence, with a successful life style formula for media. and several components to this. one is editorial. ebony was very interested in trying to find ways to encourage african american leaders to think about individuals coming out of their community as being able to convey stories, narrative's, trajectories, art, unquestioned success. and so you would have, whether it was of major movie actor, a musician, an important on to power. increasingly organizational and political leaders, civic celebrities, and a sense. there would be brought out, not always thought about are covered in terms of work, but also their family life. what are there tastes in relation to clothing or food or fine wine and spirits in such. for some people this was a disregard

. >> well, if you lift the bun or lift the paper on the outside of this deal, the contents are antitheticalo everything that all the great religions of the world teach which is taking care of the poor, the elderly, the children and i don't think that we can find that kind of content in this -- in this legislation. there are some things that are good politically. there are some things that are also good i think legislatively, but when you look at the whole of this -- this bill, it's -- it's not a good deal. >> you're going to vote against it, congressman, is that right? >> well, i'm walking over to vote as soon as i get through, making up my mind, and the reason that i'm saying this is that the consequences of voting no may be more dire than the consequences of voting yes. >> it's hard to believe something could be more dire than a satan sandwich, right? >> satan sandwich is not a tasty deal, and it's even worse when it's been sprinkled with potomac river water, and i think that we've got to, you know, figure out how we can continue to govern in an atmosphere here where everybody is naft toe

. >> what i'm saying is that if you lift the ground you can see antithetical to what great religions teach, take care of the poor and the aged. >> i have lifted the bun and congressman is misleading you. america can take care of the eldlerly and poor. change the tax code that. can happen. but he doesn't want that. he wants to redistribute income. and so does paul hoovman. >> from perspective of a rational person, in other words a progressive, we shouldn't be uncomfortable about spending cuts now. there is 9% unemployment. the cuts goring to worsen unemployment. it's going to hurt the long run fiscal picture and could be a situation where more people are becoming permanent unemployed you may remember professor krugman supported a massive stimulus spending package saying it would bring down unemployment. he said it over and over again. didn't happen. but instead of learning his lesson he demands more spending -- stimulus spending. this guy teaches economics at princeton university. how much is tuition there? how about our pal barney frank who oversaw the collapse of fannie mae and fred

. >> what i'm saying is that if you lift the ground you can see antithetical to what great religions teach, take care of the poor and the aged. >> i have lifted the bun and congressman is misleading you. america can take care of the eldlerly and poor. change the tax code that. can happen. but he doesn't want that. he wants to redistribute income. and so does paul hoovman. >> from perspective of a rational person, in other words a progressive, we shouldn't be uncomfortable about spending cuts now. there is 9% unemployment. the cuts goring to worsen unemployment. it's going to hurt the long run fiscal picture and could be a situation where more people are becoming permanent unemployed you may remember professor krugman supported a massive stimulus spending package saying it would bring down unemployment. he said it over and over again. didn't happen. but instead of learning his lesson he demands more spending -- stimulus spending. this guy teaches economics at princeton university. how much is tuition there? how about our pal barney frank who oversaw the collapse of fannie mae and fred

if you lift the bun, what you see is antithetical what the world teaches, take care of the poor, takehe aged. >> the narrative got defined for the president, he bought into it, and then you could see the trajectory of these whole negotiations. we were going to end up with a deal that was not going to have any revenue generation in it, we were going to end up with a deal based on spending cuts to discretionary programs, and that deal was going to be hard to swallow. >> so you voted against this bill today. what was the deciding factor for you? >> all of the cuts come from people who have already sacrificed so much, middle class people, our senior citizens, poor people, all the people that we should be protecting and not a hair from the head of a millionaire or billionaire. >> there are a lot of disappointed progressives out there, a lot of liberals, disappointed in the way the president handled this. do you think anyone is going to emerge and challenge him for the democratic nomination? >> i have no idea, but i do believe the president should be held accountable. when you say something

i am saying that if you lift the bond what you will see is antithetical to everything that the great religions of the world teach, take care of the poor and the age and when you look at the phone calls that i have gotten, there are 7 to 1 in favor of a balanced deal, and also preserving medicare and medicaid and social security. i'm concerned about this, because we don't know the details, and until we see the details, we are going to be extremely noncommitted, but on the surface, it looks like a satan sandwich. >> tell me on the surface, what it is about this package what you are hearing about this deal that makes it incredibly inpalatable for you. >> well, when you talk about $1 trillion in spending cuts without identifying what the spending cuts are, that should cause concerns to the american public, an also, we are going to the create a super congress to then put together a program and a plan and we need to understand completely what the triggers are if this super congress can't put a plan together. i -- i'm not really excited edd about this, but our leadership, i think understand

i am saying that if you lift the bond what you will see is antithetical to everything that the great religions of the world teach, take care of the poor and the age and when you look at the phone calls that i have gotten, there are 7 to 1 in favor of a balanced deal, and also preserving medicare and medicaid and social security. i'm concerned about this, because we don't know the details, and until we see the details, we are going to be extremely noncommitted, but on the surface, it looks like a satan sandwich. >> tell me on the surface, what it is about this package what you are hearing about this deal that makes it incredibly inpalatable for you. >> well, when you talk about $1 trillion in spending cuts without identifying what the spending cuts are, that should cause concerns to the american public, an also, we are going to the create a super congress to then put together a program and a plan and we need to understand completely what the triggers are if this super congress can't put a plan together. i -- i'm not really excited about this, but our leadership, i think understands th

he taught us, as he said in his nobel prize acceptance speech -- civilization and violence are antithetical concepts, and non- violence is a powerful moral force for social transformation. in my home town, one of our most beloved high school teachers was ann schwerner. our school grade as a community, black and white together, when her son mickey and his friends, james chaney and andrew goodwin, were murdered by the klan. so on this beautiful august night so many decades later, it might be easy for those of us who were not dr. king's brothers and sisters in the march to forget just how radical his ideas were 40 years ago. after all, at the end of the 20th century, dr. king was one of the most admired people in america. according to gallup, he ranked just behind mother teresa and ahead of john f. kennedy, albert einstein, and helen keller. but that was not the case years earlier when he delivered the speech at riverside church entitled, "beyond vietnam: >> in that riverside church speech, and dr. king told a crowd of more than 3000 people that many persons had asked him, why are you speaking

it's antithetical to the centrists. and then he got some pushback from the organize to his community in the united states and from the netanyahu government and he let them win. you want to weigh. he said it's not going to be a cakewalk, so a train do something else. and the net and yahoo! government has shown they don't have to make any concessions. the republican congress will be on their side. 90% of the organized american jewish community will be on a site, even though the majority of americans are not. a similar problem to many we have with our own democracy and the power of money and it's outdated mindset. and so, i think would have been if i can transfer here to the hamas et al. saying is that this is just not happening. the only way for this to happen is that the united dates is willing to exhibit real pressure on the israeli government and force difficult concessions to step up to the plate. they are not going to do that. you know, netanyahu denounced this agreement and said hamas must choose between peace with

he taught us the civilizations of violence -- civilizations and violence are antithetical concepts, and non-violence is a force for social transformation. in my town, one of my teachers was and turner. our school grieved as a community when her son and his friends were murdered by the ku klux klan. and this beautiful august 9th, so many decades later, it might be easy -- beautiful august night, so many decades later, it might be easy for those of us who were not dr. king's brothers and sisters in the march to forget just how radical he was. after all, by the end of the 20th-century, dr. king was one of the most admired people in america. he ranked just behind mother teresa and ahead of john f. kennedy, albert einstein and helen keller. but that was not the case years earlier when he delivered the speech at riverside church entitled, "beyond vietnam, a time to break silence, a declaration of independence from the war in vietnam." i do not have to tell all of you in the audience how controversial it was both within the movement and without. in the riverside church speech, dr. king told an

so what is antithetical to its interests.hen he got some pushback from the organized jewish community in the united states and from the netanyahu government any luck and went. he walked away. i'll try and do something else. the netanyahu government has shown that they don't have to make any conceptions. the republican congress will be on their side. 90% of the organized american jewish community will be on its side, even though a majority of americans were not. it is a similar problem to many problems we have with their democracy and the power of money and it's outdated mindset. i think what happened -- i can transition here to the home i fatah thing is that the palestinian authority decided this is just not happening. the only way for this to happen is the united states is willing to exhibit real pressure and enforce difficult concessions and step out to the plate. they are not going to do that. netanyahu said he denounced this agreement and said that hamas has to choose between peace with israel in peace with hamas. and the

he taught us as he said in his nobel prize except in speech, civilization and violence are an antitheticalor social transformation. one of our most beloved high school teachers was -- -- and their children were murdered by the klan. it might be easy for those of us to forget just how radical his ideas were 48 years ago. after all, at the end of the 20th-century, dr. king was one of the most admired people in america. according to gallup, he ranked just behind mother teresa and ahead of john f. kennedy, albert einstein, and helen keller. that was not the case years earlier when he delivered the speech at riverside church in titled "beyond vietnam, the time to break silence." i don't have to tell you how controversial it was both within the movement and without. in that church speech, dr. king told an overflow crowd of more than 3000 people that many people have asked why are you speaking about the war, dr. king? why are you joining the voices of dissent, peace, civil-rights telmex. dr. king said that those questions greatly saddened him because they meant that the -- had not really known hi