anton drobovich to speak. my friend, and at the same time a person whom i sincerely admire, because anton is a warrior. anton is a military serviceman who defends our country with a weapon in his hands. anton, it's a great honor to host you today, to invite you today, that you're with us today, in one of your interviews, you said an interesting phrase that stuck out to me, that in fact, the russians chose history as the reason for this war, or is our historical memory is a weapon against the anti-human cynical. total war, which has been waged against us for 100 years, and russia is actually waging more against us. your word. undoubtedly, our memory and the strength of our memory and a healthy brain become a weapon in this war, and everyone who sees that we resist russian propaganda, russian informational aggression, and this applies to aggression in absolutely different planes, from television, dissemination of information, judges. international and ending with the battlefield, this is a place where memory and good taste are decisive for victory, by the way, these are exactly the things t

lesya hasidjak, please anton drobovich with us. head of ukrainskyi institute of national remembrance, please, lesya, please, and eh, the ambassador on special assignment of the ministry of foreign affairs has also joined us. affairs of ukraine, agent of ukraine, ambassador anton korenevych. please, anton, please, we will continue, please sit down, we will continue, in fact, this main topic, the cross-cutting topic of our meeting today, is the parallel between the genocide of ukrainians, the genocide of ukraine in 32-33 years and the genocidal war. that russia is waging against ukraine today, this is such a large complex background of our memory and our reality. i would like to to begin our conversation with a question to ms. lesi. on the one hand, it is honorable, but it is certainly very difficult to be the head of such a special institution for national memory as the national museum. of the genocide, ms. lesya, in your opinion, in order to explain it to ukraine, to ukrainian society, although i think that many things are obvious and clear, why today , during the war, the ukrainian s

from the time of communist repressions of the last century, and as the head of the institute anton drobovich explains, if they start, for example, to dig graves already for dead ukrainian soldiers, they may come across burials , and then the process of exhumation, reburial, research, he will drag out this process for years, that is, construction will stop again, another reason he cites is the size of the site, he says that after observing all the buffer zones, there will be less than 50 hecs left in the cemetery, which is not ... the concept of a memorial cemetery, these are the reasons, and the reserve itself, the bekovnyan graves, also opposed it, so this is the information we have at the moment, thank you very much, iryna sysak, researched the topic of the construction of a military cemetery, extremely important, a sensitive topic, and i think we will return to it many times, irina, thank you, and in brussels. in the meantime, we are ready for the next step in our relations with candidate countries for membership of the european union. the european commission, having assessed the progress