international court of justice, the ambassador with a special charge of the ministry of foreign affairs, anton korenevichech, he said that russia justifies the war against ukraine, referring to the terrible lie he quoted, that the goal of the invasion was to stop the kornev genocide, or called on the international court of justice to decide that it has jurisdiction to hear the case and to rule that russia must pay reparations for the invasion under false pretenses, russia is waging war against my country in the name of this terrible lie that ukraine is committing genocide against its own people, this lie is for russia an excuse for aggression and conquest, russia has not provided any it cannot provide reliable evidence, and that's why russia acted and continues to act on the basis of ukraine's false accusations of genocide. i am twisting the content of the laws that ukraine is contesting . ukraine had a say during the court session yesterday. hennadiy kuzmin's speech lasted three hours, he said that the international court of justice apparently has no jurisdiction in the case regarding accusations of gen

hypnotize the court, well, i also managed to talk with the representative of ukraine in the court, anton koreneviche told us that he was optimistic, because ukraine in this court was building your arguments based on facts, and russia used the allotted time for sounding. propaganda, and in general, this case, according to him, should help ukraine receive reparations in the future. we need it for various purposes, so that we have a statement that it is not, no, no, not only the state is a victim of this aggression, as the main judicial body of the united nations believes so. well, we need it, including for reparations, because , for example, the issue of reparations can be brought before an international court, when there is a decision on the case essentially, that is, the next stage is the stage of reparation and compensation. at the end of these hearings, the court must decide whether it has jurisdiction over the case, which is the issue the parties have been discussing these two weeks. and the court will now take a break for a few months to decide on the matter of jurisdiction, the ukrainian deleg

anton kurynevich said in court. our side insists that russia itself has been preparing the grounds for genocide in ukraine for years, and the current hearing used for distribution. korenevichlso reminded that moscow did not comply with the request of the un international court to cease hostilities and should be responsible for this, and regarding the jurisdiction of the court, ukraine points to the ninth article of the convention on genocide, which enshrines the right of countries to resolve disputes regarding this document precisely in to the un international court of justice. we presented all possible legal arguments based on international law and relevant facts to enable the court to consider its jurisdiction. we believe that for these almost two weeks of hearings revealed all the necessary information for the court to proceed to hearing the case on its merits. we will wait for the court's decision and hope that the case will proceed to consideration of the merits. it may take months for the court to decide on its jurisdiction. however, the ukrainian team hopes that the case will progress as quickly as it did from the very beginning, when the court issued the first deci