commissioner antonin made statements that were not contradicting statements before. to paraphrase, he said that one cannot judge the adequacy of a cell phone signal on their own cell phone. it is increased usage and activity. it is not part of the commission's findings to say whether there is a significant gap or not. >> i think it is part of the analysis. we need to figure out whether or not there is a necessity here. when the commissioner makes a statement that this is necessary from an evidentiary standpoint, why is the basis of that statement? i do not see in the record what that is. can you point that out to me? >> they made that finding based upon the evidence of the record in the coverage map. including the relatively thin your information presented by the appellants. >> they did not have the report from the expert hired from the appellants around some of the technical issues that they raise? >> that is correct. >> did the commission have some of the information that at&t has on its website regarding coverage? was this something presented the last time this ca

the stealth nominee did not shy away from an escalated war of words with his conservative colleague antonin scalia. a first attempted establishment clause cases suitor began to take the lead on the separation aside, such as in board of education versus the school district, majority opinion, rosenberger versus university of virginia dissenting opinion. thomas remained steadfast in his jurisprudence. votes and opinions have dedicated originalist conservative posture, including firm commitments to a limited government role such as gonzalez versus carhart, majority vote, statutory construction, determined opposition to racial preference policies inherit in the affirmative action, university of michigan case, dissenting opinion. and resolute of federal principles the united states term limits versus thornton, dissenting opinion. in 2007 he boasted to federalist society. one thing i have demonstrated in 16 years on the supreme court is you can do the job without asking a single question. end quote. >> with that, i'll say a few words of conclusion to draw this to a close. justice sutter's record w

the question is the timing. " a number of justices including antonin scalia ask why the process shouldng -- >> in california, the seiu represents 95,000 employees. 45% of them are nonmembers meaning that it could have an impact on how seiu collects and uses dues money for political purposes. at the supreme court, shannon bream, fox news. >> bret: no grapevine tonight so we can bring you more primary coverage from here in new hampshire. but first, another trip to see the action on primary day. >> it's busy here outside of ward one. a lot of people coming and going. gale fisher, you just voted. >> i did. >> it's important to you? >> it is. >> can i ask who you voted for? >> i voted for romney. a tough decision. i made my decision at the last minute but i voted for romney. >> it's big deal here. >> it really is. >> yeah. >> this is our fort -- our port in the winter every four years. >> thank you for talking to us. >> nice to meet you. >> you too. we'll be right back after this. i want to fix up old houses. ♪ [ woman ] when i grow up, i want to take him on his first flight. i want to run

. >> host: antonin scalia, former university of chicago law professor, isn't he? >> guest: yes, he is. >> host: is he a friend of yours or acquaintance? >> guest: acquaintance. >> host: he would not agree with your premise, is that correct? >> guest: i think that's right in the sense that he says he's an originalist. now, in practice as a supreme court justice he understands that originalism doesn't work all the time, and he's even said, well, i'm an originalist, but i'm not a nut, and there are times when i'll depart from originalism when it's really necessary to do so. >> host: but hasn't he used the phrase "dead constitution"? >> guest: he has, in order to talk those of us who -- to taunt those of us who believe in a living constitution. and as i say, the concern is, well f the constitution's changing, just tell me something about who's changing it and why and when, and i'm not sure i want to get onboard with the people who are changing it. as i said, i think there's a concern there that needs to be addressed. >> host: how do you glean the founding fathers' int

that great left-wing aclu card-carrying member antonin scalia said this is ridiculous. even under basic concepts of the government trespassing on the car, that great civil libertarian or sam alito, the alternative view presented was just reasonable expectation of privacy that were violated, not the search of the car. we have to debate about exactly to what extent have the government was violating our civil liberties. obviously to the constitution. we've got to look at this legislation is to be working for members of congress may constitutional points of order and talk about this to your constituents because people understand that and ultimately the first amendment is there to check these abuses of government power. like i said, i'm optimistic. i think we can turn this around. we'll see what the core rule is obamacare, on a whole host of big issues before the court this year. hello, constitution is in play. the law matters. it's not just a matter of which he respected dan and mike, dollars and cents. if we get rid of this staff, a lot of the bad dollars and cents goes aw