i agree, that is, he should change everything, give up everything to come to moscow, antonin, let metalgia, because it seems to me that we live in such an atmosphere, for me it is something special, to be in russia for the first time in my life, to paris not only fashion models, but also film directors are sent. this is a very ancient method of telling parables and writing fables, so the content of my paintings obviously has not changed. i was amazed that in the last phrase on this man’s death certificate, blood type is zero. a very sharp turn. on the bridge, where the teytuka river is, it was as big as a cannon shot. matador on friday, on the first. neurophysiology is a young science, and many discoveries were made within the walls of this institute under the leadership of natalie petrovna bekhtereva. one and the same problem: the brain can solve with a variety of different systems, it seems to try in all the most difficult situations. all my life i saw how my mother sat at the table and wrote, wrote, wrote, it was all connected with treatment, her task was to determine the disease,

do what they have to do in the mold of justice's antonin scalia, samuel alito are great gentleman and another great gentlemen, clarence thomas trump, more than delivered on his 2016 campaign, promises to name conservatives to the courts. his single term appointments rival those of presidents who held office for twice as long as he did. but legal scholars note it's not just the number of trump appointees. its who he appointed that has had such a dramatic impact on the judiciary that will resonate for decades. >> we like people in their 30s so they're there for 50 years or 40 years. trump's three supreme court nominees, all younger for than 55-years-old when he named them to the bench, meaning his judges could have decades to shape rulings and policy across the country. in the key common denominator amongst all of his picks, rock rib conservative credentials. will you commit to voters tonight that religious liberty will be an absolute litmus test for anyone you appoint, not just for the supreme court, but to all courts? >> yes, i would that 2016 promise of conservative judicial appointm

antonin scalia samuel alito, a great gentleman and another great gentlemen, clarence thomas trump, more than delivered on his 2016 campaign, promises so just to name conservatives to the course, his single term appointments rival those of presidents who held office for twice as long as he did. but legal scholars note it's not just the number of trump appointees. it's who he appointed that has had such a dramatic impact on the judiciary that will resonate for decades. >> we like people in their 30s, so they're there for 50 years or 40 years. trump's three supreme court nominees, all younger than 55-years-old when he named them to the bench, meaning his judges could have decades. the shape rulings and policy across the country in the. key common denominator amongst all of his picks, rock, rib, conservative credentials. will you commit to voters tonight? that religious liberty will be an absolute litmus test for anyone you appoint think not just for the supreme court but to all courts? >> yes, i would that 2016 promise of conservative judicial appointments is especially following the death

two-volume set of his works in a fiction publishing house, and thanks to the efforts of the writer’s widow antoninral... based on anniversaries, then every 10 years, naturally, during the period of decades , quite a lot happened, so if... we had good circulations, and even in 2006 a four-ton collection of works was published , but now i’m talking about mass publications, several three-volume collected works have already been published, well , that’s a lot, several mass editions, i can’t give an exact figure right now, well, about three or four collected works have been published, in this decade we managed release the kunar. first of all i would say that now the difference in the degree of study and nevertheless , nevertheless, there are many blind spots, well, look , i waited, waited for this answer and i have my own catch, of course, well, like you, i also understand what is happening in the academic environment, a lot of effort is being made, i know that a fundamental four-five-volume work is being done now, and the meeting that you are leading, right? that when the first posthumous collection w

after the sudden death of antonin scalia. she declined interest in both and while ag and 2014, her close knit family expanded. she married loss. angeles attorney douglas emhoff. she has made a lot of noise as california's junior senator on the high-profile judiciary and intelligence committees. she has stood out in hearings using her skills as a prosecutor. attorney general barr, has the president or anyone at the white house ever asked or suggested that you open an investigation of anyone? >> i wouldn't. i wouldn't yes or strict. could you repeat that question? i will repeat it in a chamber dominated by republicans. she has helped lead the fight for national police reform and the federal anti-lynching bill. >> they're not marching in the streets for water down proposals been vocal on the need for more relief and critical of the white house handling of covid 90. >> i think there's been other vacuum of leadership at this white house and supported impeachment of president trump. i am in favor of beginning impeachment proceeding

antonin scalia law school at george mason i'm there of dedicated my career to that because they don't fit a lot of the trends that i'm gonna talk about here. and i also want to talk about the reception up. it's you of crisis that has been in particular or the support that the chancellor of the university has shown for the for the benson center and its enthusiasm for it. when i when i met with them so some and i'm not going to but i'm gonna talk about everybody else else that how's that sound so i want to start off with a premise that underlies this whole thing. i don't know what a conservative strategist is, what what the conservative strategy is for fixing higher education. but whatever it is, it's not working. is there anybody here who thinks that whatever we're doing at higher education is working right? it's just getting worse, right? it just sometimes gets worse slowly at it. sometimes it gets worse quickly, but it always gets worse. and it never goes backwards. and the history of the world is that, frankly, whenever the left captures an institution, it never goes back. and we ar

chevron was championed by the conservative svengali antonin scalia it is one of the better decisions ever come out of the supreme court. the reason why it was a conservative decision in the 1980's and trumpeted by conservatives in the 1980's is because conservatives believed they were more likely than not to hold control over the executive branch. this is during the reagan era. when reagan looked unbeatable. when george h.w. bush would succeed him. they thought they would control the executive rage and thus be able to deregulate the environment, worker safety, health safety, civil rights -- thought they could deregulate through the executive branch and so they loved chevron because it capped what they thought were liberal activist judges out of their way. fast forward 40 years, it is relatively hard for republicans and conservatives to ensure long-term control over the executive branch. it is relatively easy now that they have the super majority on the supreme court to control regulation through the courts for the next 20 or 30 years. that is why the rest of the conservatives have fl

welcome to the show, antonin.ere there's not much bonhomie in the air. and is it any surprise that the tickets aren't selling out? almost ,3,000 to watch some of the events, ,700 to watch the swimming? is there wonder swimming? is there any wonder there's not much good spirit in there's not much good spirit in the air? tell us more . the air? tell us more. >> yes, but you know it's always the same before olympic games. >> you saw that in london also when , the olympic games were when, the olympic games were there. and just before there is a lot of politics. but here in france we have not the same picture than you have in england, there is a lot of people and we feel that tourist is are arriving now by now these days just at just these days for the openings of the olympics game and there is a there is a problem, there is an issue. >> yes, it's true with the, with the, with lausanne . where, where the, with lausanne. where, where there there will be, some, some athletes. but you know, we thought , we athletes. but y

after the sudden death of antonin scalia. declined interest in both and while ag and 2014, her close knit family expanded. she married loss. angeles attorney douglas emhoff. she has made a lot of noise as california's junior senator on the high-profile judiciary and intelligence committees. she has stood out in hearings using her skills as a prosecutor. attorney general barr has the president or anyone at the white house ever asked or suggested that you open an investigation of anyone? >> i wouldn't. i wouldn't yes or strict. could you repeat that question? i will repeat it in a chamber dominated by republicans. she has helped lead the fight for national police reform and the federal anti-lynching bill. >> they're not marching in the streets for water down proposals been vocal on the need for more relief and critical of the white house handling of covid 90. >> i think there's been other vacuum of leadership out of this white house and supported impeachment of president trump. i am in favor of beginning impeachment proceedings

this is someone who in his career as chair of the senate judiciary committee in 1985 confirmed antonin scalia. he believers in the institution. i may not agree with scalia's politics but it is reagan's choice to install him as associate justice. he has come a long way since then. the supreme court has also come a long way since then. and i think we talk about the twilight of this presidency. he speaks to a lot of different topics in this speech. he talks about ukraine. gaza. climate. but the supreme court is a very specific thing that he spends a little bit of time on. >> the fact he calls it out in this speech is an indicater it is a real priority for this administration and it will be interesting to see. we talk about november, november, december, and january are critical moments for the survival of our democracy and the supreme court could very well play a key role in that. so if there is going to be any reform, time is of the essence. >> when he left, dropped out of his first presidential campaign in 1988, one of the things he said, gave us the long term perspective we need on this

after the sudden death of antonin scalia.r close knit family expanded. she married loss. angeles attorney douglas emhoff. she has made a lot of noise as california's junior senator on the high-profile judiciary and intelligence committees. she has stood out in hearings using her skills as a prosecutor. attorney general barr has the president or anyone at the white house ever asked or suggested that you open an investigation of anyone? >> i wouldn't. i wouldn't yes. strict. could you repeat that question? i will repeat it in a chamber dominated by republicans. she has helped lead the fight for national police reform and the federal anti-lynching bill. >> they're not marching in the streets for water down proposals been vocal on the need for more relief and critical of the white house handling of covid 90. >> i think there's been other vacuum of leadership at this white house and supported impeachment of president trump. i am in favor of beginning impeachment proceedings and the reason is you know, i've read the mueller report

antonin scalia law school at george

this is someone who on the chair of the senate judiciary committee on 1985 confirmed antonin scalia. he believes in the institution. i am paraphrasing. i may not agree with his politics, but it is reagan's choice to install him as associate justice. he has come along way since then. the supreme court has also come along way and i think we talk about the twilight of this presidency. he speaks to a lot of different topics in this speech. he talks about ukraine, talks about gaza, talks about climate. the supreme court is a specific thing he spends a little bit of time on. i want to call for supreme court reform because this is critical to our democracy. the fact that he calls it out in this 13 minute speech, one of the last two big ones who will make, is an indicator that it is a priority for this administration and it will be interesting to see. we talk about november, november, december, and january are critical for the survival of our democracy we and the supreme court could very well play a role in that. if there is going to be reform, time is of the essence. >> when he dropped out

they really mean one of his best friends on the court was, antonin scalia. scalia would come and talk to him, you know, but they waited until he died. i mean case they kind of just hinted at what would be necessary to stop desegregation laws. they waited. he died. but the nineties in a series of cases that culminate in missouri versus jenkins basically. the court said to the extent that school segregation patterns just reflect segregated neighborhoods, that's the district school district's fault. and so we will no longer force them to have integration pants to overcome residential segregation. and that's the main reason we have rapidly resegregated and justice marshall was devastated. but the day after the opinion came down, he came back in the office. his jolly self, you know, and. his attitude was, you know, each generation has to just pick up the fight. so you young people in the room, you got to pick up the fight. and i said, i'm. sure sure. i enjoyed that. he took.

peter: contemporary justices, ruth bader ginsburg, well-known, antonin scalia a, well known. fair?> absolutely. they gave rise to the great scalia-ginsberg opera and much more. and justice ginsburg did have that great movie made after her, so maybe we are continuing in that great tradition. peter: let's hear from jack from davenport, iowa. go ahead with your question. >> what would holmes think about the internet, where people are looking for rooms full of people so they can get them all stirred up, and then they yell fire to stir up a lot of anger? beck's great question, so important, the question gets to the heart of homes incitement test. in the abrams decision he not only said that speech had to be strongly protected, but he endorsed a version and it was arculated that speech could ly be restricted if it's intended to and likely to cause imminent violence. so it's not enough to say something that someone may be, possibly in the future might react badly to, it has to be intended to create imminent violence in the violence has to be imminent and serious. the supreme court embrace

, antonin, i’m holding on, thank you.it there, sea, mountains, young people, perspective, why do you say that? well, you don't want to let me go, do you? i shouldn't ruin your life. but i love you, you. no need, sophia. you will meet a young, handsome man. he has a lot of children. yes, that's not what i want. and i don't want you to become a young widow. i i thought you loved me. you're just... i’m a coward, yes, i’m a coward, and i’m afraid of ruining your life, but you’re ruining it now, and you’re ruining it for yourself too, i’ll go and don’t see me off. the bus is delayed, where is your carriage, somewhere at the end, come on faster, come on faster, why are we standing there, we’re running out of time, don’t worry so much, we’ll get your daughter there safe. i was driving, but i saw zakharkin’s twisted face, nothing, let it cool down, what else, give it to the young woman, he needs it for the old goat, give it back. did you hear that there was a fire in the forest again? yes, it’s the middle of summer and there’s no

after the sudden death of antonin scalia. she declined interest in both and while ag and 2014, her close knit family expanded. she married last angeles attorney douglas emhoff. she has made a lot of noise as california's junior senator on the high-profile judiciary and intelligence committees. she has stood out in hearings using her skills as a prosecutor. attorney general barr, has the president or anyone at the white house ever asked or suggested that you open an investigation of anyone? >>i wouldn't. i wouldn't yes or district. could you repeat that question? i will repeat it in a chamber dominated by republicans. she has helped lead the fight for national police reform and the federal anti-lynching bill. they're not marching in the streets for water down proposals been vocal on the need for more relief and critical of the white house handling of covid 90. i think there's been other vacuum of leadership this white house and supported impeachment of president trump. i am in favor of beginning impeachment proceedings and the

politically one of therg most qualified ever toe none to the supreme court but be death of justice antonin scalia in february of 2016. president obama nominated merrick garland to fill the vacancy on march 162016. senator mitch mcconnell and his wisdom said there would be no hearings or votes because nine months before the new presidential term was to close and the people should decide with only nine months to go. of course the people have decided on president obama who was selected in one of those in genuine bona fide constitutional four-year terms as president of the estates mcconnell successfully blocked any hearing into his nomination of merrick garland in any consideration of the nomination. this he remained vacant when president obama left office and then went trump got in he immediately brought in neil gorsuch a right-wing conservative and this demonstrates how and may care the right-wing has gotten about running roughshod over all principals and mores that might interfere with absolute determination to control the norms and principals they have made up themselves in the past and co