peter: contemporary justices, ruth bader ginsburg, well-known, antonin scalia a, well known. fair?> absolutely. they gave rise to the great scalia-ginsberg opera and much more. and justice ginsburg did have that great movie made after her, so maybe we are continuing in that great tradition. peter: let's hear from jack from davenport, iowa. go ahead with your question. >> what would holmes think about the internet, where people are looking for rooms full of people so they can get them all stirred up, and then they yell fire to stir up a lot of anger? beck's great question, so important, the question gets to the heart of homes incitement test. in the abrams decision he not only said that speech had to be strongly protected, but he endorsed a version and it was articulad that speech could only b restricted ift's intended to and likely to cause imminent violence. so it's not enough t say something that someone may be, possibly in the future might react badly to, it has to be intended to create imminent violence in the violence has to be imminent and serious. the supreme court embraced