commissioner antonini >> yeah. thank you for a very good report it's regretable that w it takes us another year realistically we may not start this until 2018 is that it. >> your optimistic schedule will have us open in 20022 or 23 this is a great opportunity the feasibility study and the environmental review in i figure out the details you can make that period more streamline so it's going to be a good opportunity. >> i hope to see it. anyway a couple of comments i think the longer than subway and break-in make sense a separate right-of-way there was a feeling as discussed in some of the sessions including the st. francis cycle you have the m and k lines that are underground somehow so makes the project more expensive and can i reflect that's something having the year of the t s r we're considering building that into the m and k underground and sort of scoped to defining the project when we learned if he wanted to get the m under 19 avenue what we have to start at the eucalyptus and what the cost analysis so we'll

commissioner antonini. >> yeah. move to continue ones 1, 2a, 2 b and three and four for indefinite to june 19th. >> second. >> on that item. >> commissioner antonini commissioner hillis. commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong. commissioner president wu that places you under your calendar and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission. there will be no separate discussion of these items a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests in which event the matter shall be removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. we have one item under consent item 5 at 840 irving street i have no speaker cards but i believe commissioner sugaya has an announcement >> i have a member of a medical group i impounded with a city attorney and he said there were no conflicting positions but i'll be voting on the item. >> commissioner fung. >> i'm a member of that group as well. >> commissioner antonini. >> seeing. >> we need to take publ

on the recusal of commissioner antonini commissioner antonini? >> aye. >> commissioner borden? >> aye. >> commissioner hillis? >> aye. >> commissioner moore? >> excuse me, commissioner sugaya? >> aye. >> and commission president wu? >> aye. >> so moved commissioners. commissioner antonini, you are now recused. and jessica, you may present the case. >> thank you. good evening president wu and members of the commission, jessica luck, planning department staff. before you is a mandatory directionry review request for medical cannabis dispensary at 1423 ocean street. with proposed hours of operations from 10:00 a.m. too 10:00 p.m. monday through sunday. the windows are proposed to be clear and unobstruct ed proposed mcd will sell cannabis and cannabis foot stuffs and would allow on-site smoking and vaporization. the mcd would also be required to comply with the mayor's office of disability requirements. the project site is located within the ocean avenue nct district and there are two other existing mcds in the area, that operate on ocean avenue. the first mcd is located at 1545 oc

commissioner antonini. >> thank you. i have a few items. the first is that i need to get an opinion from staff. i don't need the answer today, but there was an editorial in one of the papers yesterday. i think it was the examiner and the writer stated the opinion, "if a project was voter-approved that the project then did not need environmental clearance and did not have to contribute to a lot of exactions and fees that most projects would." and i'm not sure if it was accurate about that, but that is a very important point that the public should be aware of, because there is a possibility that some projects in the future might require voter-approval pending some electoral platters and if this is the case, that is an important thing to know about. so i will take my answer in the future, if staff could just look into that and let me know if he was right before that. the second item also from the newspaper, former mayor willie brown i think he was right on target in his column on sunday. he talked a little about the possibility of the city try

i appreciate you thought about the upp the upper no such >> commissioner antonini. i'll be supportive of the project sponsor working with the staff and seeing if there's a possibility but i'm not to make a motion to take dr and approve the project as currently designed with the change we drop the roof height of the what is considered the fourth floor on the area designated as the dining room down to a 11 feet external height. i'm sorry you're right 10 feet external height and that's on the third floor >> a question whether they're talking about the third or fourth the floor where the dining room is. >> and top. >> and to raise the height of the windows that are francis scott key to the north to a minimum of floor to the ceiling. >> i'm going to vote against the motion by the way, the design response we're talking about has less to do with the light and air and in terms of small property owner and the relationship to the rest of the neighborhood and so - and i also building that in terms of the design there are many ways to approach a design whether a regular residen

commissioner antonini >> move to approve. second >> on that motion to approve commissioner antonini. commissioner hillis. commissioner borden. commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong. commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to endear and place you on commission matters the consideration of the draft manipulates for may first >> any public comment on that item? seeing none, public comment is closed. >> commissioner fong. >> move to approve draft minutes. >> on that motion to defeat definite the minutes. commissioner antonini. commissioner hillis. commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero >> comments on a couple of things an unfortunate situation that occurred last week some you have saw it on the news a small restaurant in the mission dprakt was a van willed and painted with graffiti and said get out. sooeven son looked at this it is locals corner one of michael's boring it's

commissioner antonini >> yeah. i could go either way on the suggestion i think that's down well seeping e keeping the 1634 facade every one will be fine with me at the pleasure of the commission i like they've incorporated a little bit of the stronger corner to mirror the level of those retained facades to make it a lot a little bit more uniform on pine street there and the setbacks are very well appreciated so wherever they can blended the two together they've done more precastn. almost everything else as one speaker said is many older victorian building but the towers have a lot of precast and less glazing so to be more authentic to having the precast in there is going to make it blend in a little bit better otherwise i'm fine with the project i think it's going to add to the housing stock and quite a demand for that people that are looking for housing at all income levels this addresses the market rate housing and that's a great project. >> o'connor we still he will have the motion. >> there is another motion on

commissioner antonini >> yeah. maybe i could ask someone to speak on behalf of the vesty and the chapel regarding what the speaker said because i think we saw a picture of the bottles and cans and the recycling being a contained area which didn't look like this was outside in the area is it true they're out there or in a contained area like in the picture. >> their contained in the morning and in order to fill them we have to take them out of the containment. so basically, i, tell you of course, basically, the empty cans are on the street our moaning person comes in in the clock in the morning and once the facility is closed we store the bottles inside he'll bring that auto and sort it and then this goes back into the containment and around 6:00 p.m. really, really them out and around midnight or one a.m. the cleaning crew comes out so there's no dumping the bottles are not dumped into the back of the parking lot >> this operation is all occurring sometime around 6:00 p.m. it doesn't sound like anything happens in

>> i would support commission er wu's interpretation. >> >> commissioner antonini? >> i will make a motion to continue to may 22. >> before we vote on it, stilled feel there is greement from the commission and i don't want both partis to come back on the 22nd and we end up at the same endpoint. >> we see two plans, one kind of outlining some of the things that commission moore and commissioner sugaya have suggested and one with what has been stated by other commissioners and then we can see what look better. i don't have any other solution there. >> commissioner moore. >> i don't have any particular plan or solution. i'm not here to design the building, but i would like to suggest that the building with interpretation from the zoning administrator help to address some of the common open space obligations that these projects need to fulfill? how that is done, is something that the residential design team could greatly help with. if your interpretation before was very kind of delineated based on the interpretation from a few years ago, i think you gave it some room to

antonini commissioner borden. >> commissioner hillis. commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes that unanimously and places you on item 15 item 14 has been continued and the next case at the 777 van ness street is a public informational hearing to review the inclines of continues >> good afternoon this is an informational discussion of the business operations at the 77 van ness street perkins approval for the conditional hearing for the business operations this continues a live microscopic venue and an outdoor activity area that opened in 2013 and the outdoor activities opened that on a few times basis thereafter and there's two conditions the first one is excessive noise complaints from neighborhoods from patron noise think the street and open doors and i woulding vehicle noise ass and the recircling the garbage the other xooedz the hours including the trash picks up are occurring outside and the community staff has worked the neighbors to solve the concerns and cont

. >> commissioner antonini. no >> commissioner borden. >> no. that commissioner hillis. commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong >> no. president fong. no >> that motion fails 2 to 5 is there an alternative motion there is no alternative motion it will be approved in its current form. >> thank you, commissioners shall we move on to the next item it is item 15 for the next case at the 1423 ocean avenue a mandatory discretionary review on may 1st time f first, the commission continued the matter to this date by a vote of 5 to zero and commissioner antonini upper recused and commissioner antonini i recommend you request that recall again and president fong in order for you to participate in today's hearing you have to acknowledge you've reviewed the materials. >> yes. i was planning to participate pending a communication with the city attorney but there is still a little bit cloudy i'm no longer the owner of any dental practice, however, 0 over $100 to the practice an outside contractor so this is a gray area in my mind and until we get complete clarification i'm going to hav

i have a couple of questions to follow up on commissioner antonini. you're going to negotiate with caltrain obviously but as far as access to the remainder of the embankment i wouldn't think caltrain would be favorable to that idea we're in district 4 already, we've meet with them and the concern of the other speakers i want to be clear we have to provide a new fence you don't want people wondering into the 280 where the boundary of that fence is where we want to negotiate with caltrain >> i have a question for staff. so looking at two things here per one the numbers are the same $565,100 was the amount approved by the cac >> no recommend. >> that's the original amount before the request for the increase so the 5651 hundred a within the 50 to 99 percent that the cac looks at in terms of how much fee waiver can be approved? that's correct. at that time, there were projected impact fee amount about $1.1 million they were q 50 to 99 percent of that and at that time, cac recommended 5 hundred and 65 thousand >> it was about how much. >> it was about half

antonini commissioner borden. >> commissioner hillis.

so... >> move to approve. >> second. >> i think that is not... >> commissioner antonini? >> i will take and make it easier, for commissioner moore, i will move to approve. >> made the motion. >> and second. >> commissioner sugaya, you have a coffee or a tea preference. >> i don't drink coffee and only tea i think that there are too many coffee shops in the city already. >> nothing further commissioners, i could use a new bar. >> there is a motion and a second, commissioners on nraort to approve with conditions, on that motion, commissioner antonini. >> aye. >> borden >> aye. >> hillis. >> aye. >> moore. >> aye. >> sugaya. >> aye. >> and fong. >> aye. >> that passes, 6-0, and places you under public comment, for which i have no speaker cards. >> is there any general public comment this evening? >> okay, public comment is closed and the meeting is adjourned.

commissioner antonini >> yeah. i have questions for the representative from at&t. many of the speakers brought up some alternatives and i don't believe they're among the ones you've analyzed like 17 hundred green and i don't know if any of those buildings would useable or close enough to fill the gap >> sure i took down 31670 green street and union street the landlords were not willing to work with us. under any price. so they are under the guidelines they're not a leased intrusive alternative and the clock tower the building across the street is exactly the same height so it would be blocked so virtually useless >> i'm looking pictures produced by at&t you may have those available their photo simulations i guess if you can bring them up fine but they're new stacks look like 38 they blend in how much of the of stacks i can certainly give those to the gentleman if i want to put those up on the screen and i'm not saying those photographs were taken from the various streets. when you view those you can see the before

commissioner antonini >> i have a question i'm supportive but i have a questdet doesn't specify whatever liquor licenses a 37 or 42 lastly it's in accumulation with the bona fide eating places. >> yes. >> i'll move to recommend with staff conditions. >> second. >> could i please talk through a little bit more what other entertainment my entail whether or not increase unat the end consequences. >> of entertainment use to include the recreation uses like bowling alleys and maybe skating rink we're specific xooutd the live dancing and poetry reading one has to get a entertainment permit. >> so the code specifics specific used uses within other entertainment. >> that's right. >> okay. thank you. >> commissioner moore. >> mr. sanchez please verify that is only for indoor uses explain that to me it would be interesting to hear that as an expansion of an indoor use correct. >> yes. however, certainly commercial entities that could be open air. >> would they come to us separately because we know of instances where large gathering in outdoor spaces have ramifications i have you could explain that

and commissioner antonini? >> maybe i could ask teddy, from at&t project sponsor to answer some questions and a lot of speakers have been talking about the pool across the street. and to my knowledge, you have to go down that john, young drive quite a ways before you get to that, am i thinking of a different location? because the police station and the pool are down at the end and so that in itself is a few 100 yards i would say to get to that but what about the pool? is it high enough, even if you were able to talk park and rec into it for a site for to give you the coverage? >> so, thank you commissioner for your question. our rf team sent, went out there several different times to try to find locations in that area. and they determined that they could serve one of the sector and it would be the four panel sector that would lead six antennas left on the roofs of the building. and they could serve one sector out of balboa park just because it is pretty far away. and in terms of rf distance not necessarily in w

commissioner antonini. commissioner borden >> commissioner hillis. commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong and commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places you on item 17 for the next case at the 1118 polk street request for authorization >> good afternoon commissioner burns with the planning department staff this is for the conditional use authorization doorknobs as the shop and the applicant wants to establish the new formula rail use in a vacant commercial store front within the local mayor's office investment in the area. the subject of the chain specialize in supplements and the proposed operation or 8 to 4:00 p.m. and higher part time folks. there are no newt traffic shops in san francisco and they've got the rights within the 71 that is specializing in nutrition has two out of 4 hundred and 11 maximum spaces. there's one vitamin shop within a quarter of a mile within the use their formula retail establishment and two walling greats that sell supplements and the nutrition stores are within the proximity with

years we didn't have an iphone and before feedback we have had a different mayor and commissioner antonini was the only person on the board during that then i support the project and hopes it moves forward and it's a good project and hopefully in the next two or three weeks when it comes time for the approval you supervisors trust the community that put the time in to get to this point they showed you the meetings over two years you spread this over 10 years the developers and contingent put the time in and hopefully we'll moved soon. i want to add salvage lock it should be sin anonymous with san francisco salvage lock started in san francisco it was in visitacion valley before bought out by multi company it's a worldwide name and hopefully in two or three weeks you've approve that this is a good project. thank you >> thank you tim on behalf of the san francisco housing coalitions we were involved in this back in 2007 or 2008 i went to a couple of community workshops i remember vividly what was the racket thing the accord between the community members and the outcome was it was xeerm outre

. >> commissioner antonini. >> commissioner borden commissioner hillis. commissioner moore commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places you on item 12 a and braxton building inspection commission on bush street a request for kufks and we're consider requires for variances. >> good afternoon commissioner president wu and members of the board. i'm with the staff. the project is located at 1430 bush street and a conditional use authorization to construct a hundred and 15 at all mixed use construction and with the rent a car at the current location. you may recall it was heard by planning commission on september 9th of 2013 and just to bring to our memory the project that was shown at that time, in september. one hundred and 15 foot tall building with 32 unit facing a alley and at that time, there was a few members of public that spoke in opposition and if the commission continued to further work on the design. and there were concerns about a central courtyard in

and commissioner antonini >> yeah. i'm looking at one of the daylight studies this shows the courtyard i need help you, see where the apartment is of laura murdock and that makes sense it shows an before and after i'm trying to figure out where the new structures are supposed to be if we can pass that down it looks like it's exactly the same before and after as far as what's there. maybe the project sponsor can answer that >> commissioner, i, answer that the reason why it looks that it is essentially the same before and after what we've determined from your analysis this is a minor shadow cast right here in the morning hours and that shadow would stop to the approximately 10:00 a.m. in the summertime and winter one p.m. i want to pout those two units are facing north already so there's absolutely in change but the other two units ms. murdock referred to they're not impacted by our project at all. that's what's happening with the light. >> so i guess when we look at the picture our project happens to be in front of the

commissioner antonini. >> i think this is also a well-planned and well-designed project. i would just ask that project sponsor continue to work with staff, with the architectural to make things come out in a tasteful manner. there is an effort to make the three separate parts of it look distinct and i certainly appreciate that. these sorts of things have to be carefully done to make them look correct, because they are not industrial; they are residential and so blending the two together is often a hard thing to do, particularly the rounded unit might be one that needs a little more work. i think all things considered it's a well-done project. >> commissioner sugaya. >> i think the question of artists in san francisco is getting more publicity lately. there was just an article, i think it was in the chronicle that some techy firms have adopted or created a plan, something within the spaces, there either owner/leasing to accommodate a certain number of artists. i don't remember who the firms were and i don't know if there are conversations going on elsewhere in the city. i

commissioner antonini. >> i had the occasion to visit dr requester about a month ago, i guess. and it's a little hard to really tell. i was able to see where that kitchen window is. it was a rainy day. there was some breaks and it wasn't totally overcast, but i do agree that there is a grade change and there is say fence there. so you can look up and see beyond the project sponsor's house a little bit. i have to rely on staff analysis to see if they feel that there is an impact. also i would have to agree with -- check with staff in regards to the zoning situation, which i think the zoning administrator has already said some things, but he can also add this whole question of whether the rear yard can be considered with regards to this? which former zoning administrator passmore felt differently i'm happy to address that now. >> that would be great. why don't we talk about that. >> section 134 require a rear yard for the subject property. that is clear. that is explicit in the code. the construction that is being done is not within the required rear yard. so while this would res

there is a motion and second to approve this project with conditions on that motion, commissioner antonini. >> aye. >> commissioner borden? >> aye. >> commissioner hillis? >> aye. >> commissioner moore. >> aye. >> commissioner sau eau? >> aye. >> commissioner fong? >> aye. >> and commission president wu? >> aye. >> so moved commissioners. that motion passes unanimously 7-0. zoning administrator, what say you? >> on the variance, close the public hearing and be inclined to grant the variances and noting the previous decision from 2010. >> thank you, commissioners. that will place you on item -- excuse me, item 13s a and b for case numbers 201.1574k and x, request for adoption of findings and large project authorization at 650 indiana street >> good afternoon, commissioners, diego sanchez with planning department staff. before you i present a project located at 650 englanda street proposing two five-story mixed-use build and proposing 111 residential units. in approximate life 122,000 gross square feet and within that development is also proposed approximately 1900 gross square feet of groun

. >> and i don't know that you can put that in the motion, commissioner antonini, and the attorney could... >> she is not here. >> well if it is not... >> i don't think that... >> maybe the staff can comment on that, we can do it either way. >> it is a unique condition, and i am not aware of any prohibition as such. ei think that i am going to have to make a motion to approve with the finding that we have heard from at&t that they will explore the possibility of whether if this ever becomes possible they might and you know lessen the number of antennas on the roof but that is not the motion, the motion is just to approve. >> second. >> commissioner hillis? >> i mean, it sounds like balboa park pool could be a viable option and it seems like there is the incentive in the wrong place if we are saying later take it down if you can find a spot on the pool, i don't think that there is, and there is not a big incentive to kind of find a solution, it seems like a large installation on this building it is a large building and it also has kind of you know, clean lines and dimension that get distu

. >> commissioner antonini. >> agree that petrino transformed the dog patch neighborhood. it's a wonderful restaurant and i always enjoy going there and this project is one that will further transform dog patch in a positive direction. it's already moving that way and helps to create the critical population mass that is needed in the neighborhood and therefore, we can start seeing more neighborhood-serving retail, going in, because you need enough population before it makes sense to have the neighborhood-serving services there. so that is something that we are moving towards with this and i'm very much in favor of this project. it's well-designed and well-planned and gives back a lot. >> commissioner sugaya. >> i have a question. is there rentals or condos or do we know yet? >> diego sanchez, it's a rental project. >> that is more encouraging because i think they are probably a better fit. so we're getting 16 affordable units, is that right? okay. i will move to approve with conditions. >> second. >> commissioner fong? >> well, you beat me to it. >> go ahead, you make it.

commissioner antonini >> yeah. i'd like to ask the project sponsor another question about the appearance of the stacks that's hard to tell will you but the existing stack on the building already i assume that's two existing ones. and i assume that the stacks are the new stacks will be of the same shape as that and obviously, the same color and what do we know about relate heights of the existing ones are they shorter or the same height or maybe another one >> so i'm going to let omar talk about that. >> from what i key is how tast blend into the building. >> do i hear a motion. >> commissioner borden. >> i'll make a motion to approve ask the staff continue to work with at&t on the least amount. >> on that motion to approve approve with conditions with direction to include that the staff continue working with design commissioner antonini. commissioner borden. commissioner hillis. commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong and commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unan

commissioner antonini >> i have a question i'm supportive but i have a questdet doesn't specify whatever liquor licenses a 37 or 42 lastly it's in accumulation with the bona fide eating places. >> yes. >> i'll move to