everything matters, but the main message with which, in your opinion, or with your information, antony blinkin came to kyiv, well, it seems to some that antony blinkon came to show off the amount of aid provided by the united states, finally after six months of singing, but we are talking about something else, it's about what blinken needs to find out all the points of foreign policy, which are swarming in the heads of the ukrainian leadership, about what we are talking about, are pushed. several serious international events: the first is the g7 summit , immediately after it the peace summit in switzerland and after it the nato anniversary summit, i.e. three important events that er, well, obviously concern the prospects of ukraine, and the position of the kyiv leadership, the ukrainian leadership current it is very important, because there are very strange behavioral motives of representatives of the ukrainian authorities, only sydzenpin visited belgrade, the minister of foreign affairs is flying there for some reason, but it is not clear whether it is his visit or the visit of the first lady

structure of their troops, well... and you can, they are shelling us, the secretary of state antony blinkinays that it would be good to change a little the american concept of permissions, anyway for now everything is in place, and the aviation is where it is, so so to speak, it is currently located, that is, not at our military airfields, covered by additional patriot systems, here is this construction, it is also very disturbing, when this discussion appeared for the first time, for the third time already, i very carefully ... got acquainted with the transcript, looked at everything i said, and i want to give some clarifications here, why there is no wrong position here, let me ask everyone's question like this, and so the correctness of ukraine is that it seeks to be given the necessary weapons in order to she transferred war on enemy territory, strategically absolutely. but the correct position, but at the same time, mr. antin, dear listeners, pay attention to the second position, right here position: give air defense systems, give pro systems, and nato should shoot down enemy air objec

extremely important, we understand that there were meetings in beijing with the secretary of state antony blinkin, the president what did macron, german chancellor olaf scholz and putin do after that? putin went to beijing and took his officials with him. china's position is one of the key international factors in russia's war calculations. china supported russia by providing it many technologies and details are necessary for waging war. the united states is not happy about it. us secretary of state. tony blinken visited beijing and called on the chinese to stop supporting russia. the united states has imposed sanctions on some chinese companies that evade their compliance. these efforts are likely to continue and even intensify if china continues on its current course. interestingly, president putin visited beijing, and as far as i understand, the results of that visit were minor. the chinese are ready to help the russians, but not yes. a lot, as they would like it. it seems that in this sino-russian partnership, without limitations, there are certain limitations. and yet china's position is tha

with xi jinping, well, but there are certain, a certain part of powerful public signals, and antony blinkino warned xi jinping that it is impossible to pretend that china does not help russia, because he de- in fact provides it with everything necessary for waging war against ukraine. well. in addition to weapons and personnel, this is how they help the russians, and blinkin warned the chinese, asked them not to do this. yes, in response, xi jinping began to talk about how he believes that the united states and china, they are all great states must be responsible and respect the territorial integrity, sovereignty of other states, and so on and so forth. what did xijin ping really mean and how far would the united states be willing to go to... to discourage the people's republic of china from supporting russia, but china did not give everything to russia at once, however, in its peace plan, especially in the first point with regard to ukraine, the main emphasis on maintaining territorial integrity reflects china's own interests in taiwan, so the invasion russia in ukraine has put china in a

the us secretary of state antony blinkin's speech here at the polytechnic institute in kyiv has literally just ended. mr. blinkin spoke in particular about the three main points of the usa's commitment to ukraine, and as he said, these are real steps of long-term assistance. first of all, of course, this is military aid. blinkin noted that the us will not work only with partners in order to provide ukraine. weapons and the necessary equipment, as well as on the fact that ukraine could independently provide itself in the long term by producing the necessary necessary weapons and equipment, and he said that yes, that quite active actions are already being taken in this direction and that ukraine can expect specific results. the second is economic assistance. mr. blinkin noted that the tasks of the united states and the obligations of the united states. not just to ensure the survival of the ukrainian economy, but also the prosperity of the ukrainian economy, and again, he listed a number of directions, and the third point, according to mr. blinky, is that the united states undertakes to hel

he said that washington's position was described in kyiv by secretary of state antony blinkin: we do encourage or support strikes on the territory. but ukraine ultimately makes its own decisions about its military strikes and operations. today, my colleague kateryna lisonova asked american senators whether they agree with the current policy of the administration, or whether washington should still clearly allow the use of weapons against military targets on the territory of russia. then the opinions of representatives of both parties. i support the use by ukraine of american weapons, respectively. to our mutual interests. some of russia's goals may be justified, while others may not. i would consider them selectively. but in general, it should be the most aggressive use of the weapon we provide. the fact that the biden administration has not provided longer-range artillery has given the russians an advantage and the ability to attack ukraine without the ukrainians being able to stop them because they do not have the same. to the judge's advice, some were compensated by the use of dro

command staff of their troops, well, as much as possible, they are shelling us, state secretary antony blinkinays that it would be good to change the american concept of permits , all the same for now everything is in place, and aviation is where it is, so to speak, at the moment. that is , not at our military airfields covered by additional patriot systems. here is this construction, she is also very anxious. when this discussion appeared for the first time, or for the third time already, i studied the transcripts very carefully, looked at everything i said, and i want to give some clarifications here. why is there no wrong position here? let me put everyone's question like this. and yes, the correctness of ukraine is that it seeks to be given the necessary weapons in order for it to transfer the war to the enemy's territory. strategically, it is an absolutely correct position, but at the same time, mr. antin, dear listeners, pay attention to the second position, right here position, give the systems air defense, give pro systems, and nato should shoot down enemy air objects over the territor

the strengthening of one or another, i don't know. understanding of the work of the government, antony blinkinsecretary of state of the united states, was arriving in kyiv now, yes, and he constantly tirelessly said general things, i emphasize, extremely emphasized. on this one about corruption, yes, but he did not elaborate, well , accordingly, speaking of shmygal's career, that is, shmygal stayed, or is it possible that he is being prepared for his exit? well, this question is very unfortunate, you know, there are different rumors, and it cannot be said that someone is absolutely, absolutely, let's say, protected from the possible. resignations, maybe there are several people who are very close to the president's office, but the issue is that really, i absolutely agree with you, there is no clear strategic line of thought, because even those mergers or, on the contrary , the separation of ministries, they are happening rather, you know, as a reflection on some events, and not some... real plan, because it seems to me that it would be logical at a certain stage if a decision was made: yes, he

and vitaly portnikov, today we will talk about important events, what did us secretary of state antony blinkinth, what is happening in georgia, as of now?

the first time that united states secretary of state antony blinkin arrived in kyiv, vitaly shabunin at this meeting, as well as, let's say, i saw a deputy of the previous convocation, a very active politician and public figure hanna hobko there. the conversation took place, if anything is known about this conversation, how at all, which is possible, or was the opportunity to voice certain messages about the situation regarding corruption, the fight against corruption. in the country for the secretary of state from, so to speak, the public sector, and not only from officials, from people who touch this corruption every day and try to talk about it, please, of course, there was an opportunity to convey information about what is happening with governance in ukraine, in particular with the situation with the fight against corruption, with the situation with the rule of law, these issues were among the main ones in the delegation, and antony blinken. arrived today, this is already a continuation delegation that started yesterday, yesterday michael carpenter was, this is sullivan's deputy

however, what words did antony blinkin say about it in kyiv? let's listen now.f all, let me make one thing very clear that really shouldn't need to be explained, and that is that the united states is committed to ... ukraine winning this war, and we have demonstrated that through the extraordinary support that we have provided and continue to provide, we did not encourage or provide strikes outside of ukraine, but ultimately ukraine has to make its own decisions about how to fight this war, a war of protection of its freedom, its sovereignty and territorial integrity, and we will continue to support ukraine with the equipment it needs for success and for... victory. rest assured, president zelenskyy the day before openly asked for two patriot installations for kharkiv. is washington ready to meet this request? yulia, this is a topic that anthony blinken actively discussed with volodymyr zelenskyi and dmytro koleba. blinken says that this issue is urgent and urgent. let's listen to his words. of. as for the patriot batteries, as i mentioned, we are reinforced foc

xijin ping discussed, but there are certain, certain parts of the powerful public. signals, and antony blinkine facto warned xi jinping that it is impossible to pretend that china is not helping russia, because it is de facto providing it with everything it needs for... a war against ukraine, well in addition to weapons and personnel, this is how they help the russians, and blinkin warned the chinese, asked them not to do this. so, in response xijinping started talking about how he thinks that the united states and china, they, all major powers should be responsible and respect the territorial integrity, sovereignty of other countries and so on and so forth, what xijinpin really meant and how far they will be. are ready to go to the united states in order to discourage the people's republic of china from supporting russia. but china did not give up russia all at once, right? in his peace plan, especially in the first point, regarding ukraine, the main emphasis on preserving territorial integrity reflects china's own interests regarding taiwan. so russia's invasion of ukraine put china in a dif

jinping's visit to france, hungary and serbia is currently being prepared, we understand that antony blinkinisited xi jinping and also very clearly talked about a certain framework, i don't know what might be behind the brackets when we talk about closed negotiations, but in any case, they are trying to stabilize china, but the question is how much china will be ready to stabilize. yes, this is the most important question, now, in my opinion, there is such a rather crude, point of view, naive, that china has completely taken the side of russia in this conflict, behind russia it is the source of the conflict with the west, and putin is only a proxy for china, but i don't look at it that way, i think that china is very a big, really independent player, as before, despite the fact that china got a relatively large market now in russia, as a result of self-isolation. but at the same time relations with the eu are extremely important for china, vitally important on the one hand. europe remains the most reliable, expensive and calm market for china, and not only the market, and the same situation

i am more concerned about antony blinkin's statements regarding the corruption component in ukraine,his is the biggest problem in our country, because they would be ready and happy to help in certain moments, but if we ourselves do not... want to change internally, then this summons her to the old man, and if blinkin is a man, who, as a political figure, is quite tolerant and the americans are very careful in such statements, if they are already in... openly talking about corruption, it means that they have a huge number of examples to make such claims, and the number one question facing ukrainian society now is: we we have to free ourselves inside if we want to stand and win, and we have to live according to the golden rule of vyspoito: don't lie, don't steal and don't be silent if others are fishing, and we are silent when others are stealing ukrainian money, i only just to add context, blinkin spoke to the students of kpi in kyiv, and he said: you must eradicate corruption once and for all, victory on the battlefield will allow ukraine not to become part of russia, and victory in

the freedom of the morning, you didn't think so, it is really united states secretary of state antony blinkins in a kyiv bar talking about support for ukraine. blinkin sang nikayang's rocking in the free world on stage. this is a rock anthem released in 1989 before the fall. berlin wall. during his visit to kyiv, blinken announced the conclusion of a 10-year security agreement with ukraine. according to him, if russia or someone else attacks ukraine, the united states will immediately cooperate with ukraine at the highest level to coordinate actions on how the country can repel the threat. they also want to strengthen the military-industrial complex so that ukraine can produce artillery shells, air defense equipment and other weapons. well, to our broadcast. ivan stupak joins. mr. ivan, i congratulate you. congratulations, thank you very much invitation. thank you for joining. we want to discuss many events. first of all, i would like to start with what is happening in crimea today. astra, with reference to local residents, writes that there were about 20 rockets in the belbek airfield area.

that i read the reaction of the rest of the progressive community to blinkin's visit to kyiv, what in their opinion anton, well antony, should have done, come on julian's f-16, go to the front and personally lead the attack on vovchansk on bradley, bring a patriot and, as an assistant, shoot down several iskander daggers, at least shoot with a javelin, take a picture, i’m sorry, this is the language of the original by the rogue kubrakov, and then to release ermak and scold the government for corruption, defend service in the church, handcuff himself at the baptism, eat kyiv pastries, bring a suitcase of cash and donate it to the armed forces fund, well, that is, he takes it to the point of absurdity, in fact then he says that if no joke, then the ukrainian , ukrainians often do not understand and will never understand the united states, because in fact the state secretary came to support ukraine in an emergency situation against the background of the escalation, and blinkin was also covered up for that... so to speak, and he says that ukrainians and ukrainian the authorities are ungrateful, and this thesis resonates

us secretary of state antony blinken admitted that washington cannot present russia as a sponsor of terrorism. the states simply have nothing to show. blinkinp would completely destroy international relations and make reconciliation with moscow in the future almost impossible. participants in the special military operation were given benefits when enrolling in military universities, raised the age threshold from 27 to 30 years, this will attract the most trained and motivated cadets to educational institutions, and military veterans will be provided with expanded quotas, this is 10% of the total number of applicants, and fighters. the black sea off the coast of the krasnodar territory has reached a temperature at which it is already possible to open the swimming season, as forecasters report. summer warmth reigns in the central region, how long will it last and what dangerous phenomena can sometimes be accompanied by such ideal weather? vladim will tell you about this zavodchenkov. +20 and above, in the west of the russian plain it is so warm that dust devils are spinning everywhere. why is it better not to get in the way of these whirlwind

state antony blinken arrived in the ukrainian capital, who, by the way, was also in china three weeks ago. kyiv is not ready for negotiations with moscow, at least not publicly. in particular, blinkin confirmed that when to sit down at the transition table depends on ukraine and only on it, and president zelenskyi emphasized that ukraine ties its diplomatic hopes to the global peace summit in switzerland. concerning. then again, these decisions should be made by ukraine, not the united states or any other country. therefore, if you imagine that if putin showed at least some interest in serious participation in the negotiations, i am sure that the ukrainians would respond to this, but putin demonstrates the exact opposite every day. despite everything, we are preparing the summit peace, we are preparing the ground so that the world majority can force russia to make peace. i am grateful to everyone for their aspirations. to restore the full effectiveness of international law, we will act no less actively in the future, all continents, all views of countries must be presented at the peace summit. however, will the peace summit in switzerland really bring results. the main idea of ​​th

considered antony blinken's hint that such a decision exists, well, simple. as the ukrainian leadership decides, so it will be, i think no, i think that is not the case, i think that what blinkinys on the air is probably more about sending a signal in the same russian federations and show that they are, shall we say, determined, but still, for that we can strike or not, you need to know from the conversations, unfortunately, i do not know how the conversation with the president ended, what was said about it, i i think whether to strike or not, not to strike, this will not be a specific question, it has been voiced now, if they wanted to, they directly said, ukraine can strike, but now, let’s put it this way, at the decision of ukraine, but it can always be said that ukraine did not accept of this decision, so i think everything depends on the agreements that have been reached between the president there and blinken on the sidelines, there are agreements, maybe not yet, but later they will allow it, and maybe they have already allowed the question. this would really free our hands and we could be protected from such actions of the russian federation, because russia now has trum

antony blinken's hint that there is such a decision, well, how will it be decided? the ukrainian leadership, that's how it will be, i think, no, i i don't think so, i think that what blinkintill says on the air is probably more about sending signals to the same russian federation and showing that they are, shall we say, determined, but still for that , we can strike or we can't, you need to know from their conversations from the sidelines, unfortunately, i don't know how the conversation with the president ended, they probably talked about it. i think to strike or not to strike, this will be a question not specifically voiced now, if they wanted to, they would directly say, ukraine can strike, but now, let's say so, on the decision of ukraine, but you can always say that ukraine did not make this decision, so i think everything depends on the agreements that were reached between the president there and mrs. blinken on the sidelines, which are agreements, maybe not yet, but then they will allow, and perhaps the question has already been allowed, it really is for us... it would free our hands and we could be protected from such actions of the russian federation, because rus

state antony blinken arrived in kiev on an unannounced two-day visit, where he will hold talks with zelensky. i started my travels in poland, from where i went by train to the capital of ukraine. blinkintate of affairs of the ukrainian armed forces on the battlefield, current american assistance and washington's long-term commitment to support the kiev regime. however, in unofficial discourse, western officials openly admit that new military supplies will not be enough for zelensky to change the balance of power in his favor. the authoritative french newspaper lemont writes about this in particular today. the west should be prepared to collapse. experts again call for kiev to be given weapons, bigger, more powerful, more deadly. the main problem of ukraine is personnel. the country is bleeding, it has no people for formation of reserves. the russians' goal near kharkov is to stretch out ukrainian troops in order to facilitate an offensive in other directions. ukraine must find reserves, its soldiers have been in the trenches for 2 years already, they are tired and have lost their fighting spirit. russia has concentrated about 50 thousand people on the border, this is a new army, the r

ukraine condemned secretary of state antony blinken for partying in a basement bar in kiev at a time when in the war-torn country's northeast, violence is going on. blinkinsuch an obvious break between diplomatic meetings. vacationers blinken was cheered on at the bar, but social media didn't take kindly to the high-ranking american diplomat taking liberties during an official visit to a war zone. astonishing deafness, wrote jimmy rushton, a kiev-based foreign policy analyst. this shouldn't be a damn vacation. ukrainian soldiers fight and die in large numbers, and blinken sits in a kiev bar pretending to be a rock star. by and large, this will be perceived extremely negative, especially considering the current situation in kharkov, he argues. rashtan’s criticism was also supported by some other supporters of ukraine on the x website. they don’t need speeches, there are already... enough of them, wrote one user. who cares? he brought with him the f-16, petriot nasa, a rehash of neil young, you can’t defeat russia. and technically it's a canadian song, another user chimed in. some social media users joked that blinkin's string playing could help the milita

secretary of state antony blinken on tuesday for partying in a basement bar in kiev at a time when war is taking place in the northeast of the country. fierce battles. sixty-two-year-old blinkinness, wrote jimmy rushton, a kiev-based foreign policy analyst. this shouldn't be a damn vacation. ukrainian soldiers are fighting and dying in large numbers. and blinkin is sitting in a kiev bar and pretends to be a rock star. by and large, this will be perceived extremely negatively, especially given the current situation in kharkov, he claims. rashtan’s criticism was also supported by some other supporters of ukraine on the x website. they don’t need speeches, there are already enough of them, wrote one of the users. who cares? he brought the f16 with him, petriot, with a rehash of neil young, you can’t beat russia, and technically it’s a canadian song, he picked it up. some social media users joked that blinkin's string playing could to help the military, since we cannot produce enough artillery shells, blinkin will finish them off with his kringe. we are winning the battle of the orchestras, other ukrainian supporters joke. the national council of the slovak republic, the parliame