but take a wealthy town like antwerp in belgium, one of the wealthiest countries in the world, there at one point three years ago 38% of the local voters turned out for the phlegmish nationalist party. that's basically a one-issue party. it's get the foreigners out, anti-immigrant. if in a wealthy like place like antwerp or a stable welfare paradise as it's presented like denmark and france which is a very stable, wealthy, prosperous society, if you can get 15% to 20% of the electorate, of an educated modern electorate to say that they would in principle and sometimes do vote for someone who is a nationalist anti-european anti-immigrant anti-muslim political figure, that seems a worrying picture of the possible european future. it worries me. the american role in the marshall plan, for example, is crucial but sometimes misunderstood. it wasn't the money. the money matters but the money was spread out from '48 to '51 and it varied from country to country. what matters it was psychological boost. europeans in the spring and sum over '47 after an awful winter, terrible food shortages, c