reported, thee similar amount, you know@noc ose rec atnoc bvi óaooked 2nnoonc .rec cvi t reaction it was aóasusie: would@ no c itrec 2 atbvóacv still do,v longerazon is not jto lower@ businesses, but ultimeir experiv cvvertising, cetera. not kind of aall thes and@ retal nococ ntreinc ue2 tocvóacv om. i thinkc on2linecvóacv potentia e-@: i have to jump@nov t. >> susie: thancvóacv ken. thoug. >> susie: i've@no with ken s@noc rec research a@e saw a big dvc frreomc d2ecembedvr'óas cvr óacv nonsumers ue this year.@ noc rec 2dvóacvy convinces consv welusterevels.>> tom: stocks stt drop@ i c 2 dow lost@noc rec gain almose dvóatwcv.regnc s 2tonighdvtóacv. a third st@raightno mc onre all citi@noc rec 2dvnd poor's cr innoc rec 2dvóacv dvóacv erika miller from here.@ noc óacvnooic nsre ac n 2estimaevtev experthalf million.@noc unfortunately for se ounotlc oorek c fo2r th is becoming linongc sreeac so2, @report tracking 20 metrop@noc re reoc rec 2evóand that'sc coevmióangcv off two mon cv october. >> reporter: rec fallen by a third since the 2pricnoesc nreowc s2tand aevt, @problem is t@he vasnoc trec ev

divert other money to -- >> we don't have any to cost until we see what happens to phase two of the aoa. i think the answer's all of the above, to what you said. we are continuing investment, i think in everything that you mentioned. and i can't really speak to anything further on recon aircraft. do you have anything to add? no. but we'll be happy to get back with you if we have something. >> thank you. if the army believes it's better to shut down the abrams production plant, request $9 million for it in fy 13? >> oh. that's for abrams upgrades. not new production. >> okay. and then a quick follow-up on the humvee recap. i understand there is some money left over from previous years in that account. do you have that number handy, by chance? >> we received a very, very large, almost $1 billion for humvee recap very late in '11. you remember, a year ago talking about the challenges of many continuing resolutions. i don't know how much of that, almost a billion, we've ex-pended to date, but that's going to carry us for a while. we can get back to you on that. >> something in here about le

that is to do an aoa. so we will take the congressional to do someaoa and determine what the fallout will be. you have satellites that have been lasting longer across the fleet. this gives us enough time to take our time and do another development so will be a new start. >> what does the word "expand" mean? >> the fact that the satellite have -- satellites have lasted longer, you do some things to make sure there are not obsolescence issues. >> you mentioned $125 million in fiscal year 12. well that -- what will that money be used for? >> that was the congressional ad and the intent, the air force will follow through with is some additional development work and study work to try to flesh out follow-on plans for dwss. >> can you flesh out the future of this -- the three had money for in 12. that is nato ags and what is the plan -- are you going to waste tax dollars and mothball them? what will you do with them? >> we are not going to use that system. we're using the u2 instead. the cost is slightly less and