process by which permit applicants and holders may appeal a decision to deny, suspend or revoke a permit. four, authorizing the director to deny a massage establishment permit to an apn applicant who has been convicted of any offend relating to prostitution. five, massage standards relating to vermin, employee, locked doors and advertising. six, prohibiting a massage business from operating a massage school on the same premises and massage establishment. seven, inspection fee of -- per hour. eight, updating administrative and permit penalties. nine, authorizing the im the imposition of a lien of property that has resited article 29 of the health code to collect unpaid penalties, costs, fines and attorney's fees. fees -- presenter is jennifer from the department of public health. >> good evening commissioners thank you for having me. my name is jennifer, and i am the manager responsible for the massage program at the department of public health, environmental health branch. i am here to present the amendments to the existing san francisco health code, which was introduced by supervisor tang this year. i will ry try to summarize. we are cleaning up the language includ

ap applicant did meet with me in d.b.i. they met with senior inspector walls. some were hard regarding the drawings and getting an accurate description of work. at the last hearing, i wasn't here. inspector hernandez was here. i believe some questions were raised on the structural elements. the subsequent decision, i did see the e-mail that the a tell ant had gone to d.b.i. with a photograph. met with a senior inspector who escorted him to met mr. u with a photograph. he wasn't a furred i case. given a machine on a general question. which wasn't really -- i would prefer if appellant and this is a board of appeals issue that they let staff know that. it might help us, the people dealing with the hearings would know that. at some points they were brought up that were valid. mr. yu, i was made aware of the e-mail when i returned from my work and realized mr. yu wasn't made aware it was an appeals case. we did set up a meeting with mre engineer. mr. yu and him did meet. i was part of that meeting with the permit holder. there was some -- the header issues on the window were addressed. they had been addressed on the p