in a very rural that had a hard time hiring teachers, even for the primary subjects, much less ap physics. that school partnered with a thatrofit organization provided a teacher that -- a yale physicist, that taught those physics students asynchronously. each of those students were also matched with a mentor, a physics student in college somewhere else in the country, and they would connect virtually and work on whatever problems they were working on. it was a very practical solution and a choice that required additional or a different deployment of resources. i used that as an example of what rural communities could and should think about, in terms of providing more choices to the students they are serving. not to suggest that by introducing school choice, another building should go up next door to the existing building, but to think more broadly and creatively about what introducing choices can be or could be. >> you are for letting 1000 flowers bloom in education? >> essentially, yes. haveell over 150 years, we been approaching how we do education in very much the same way. for too lon