court of appeals. another thing that i think is relevant to the here is that in describing what the courts appeals could do, at static and set aside or modify an order on the record that have been developed. i think that's pertinent to the question here because that doesn't really give us the relief that we're looking for, which is an injunction against proceedings before the congressional -- >> i understand, but my question is, have we barely discern that it was congress's intention to allow for that kind of interlocked argument to be made, or was it saying, i mean i agree with you, there's nothing that suggest that argument can't be made at all, but can we barely look at this language here and say that congress intended for that kind of argument to be made while the proceedings were going on. and i think it matters, and maine, one of the things that your have at the side is that there was maybe a reason why congress wouldn't want to have been made later. and part, because it may avoid having to have j

in the last issue, we told you the story of the former head of the appeal court of the court of crimealery chornobuka in 2014, during the occupation of crimea, he supported russia, taught judges the legislation of the occupying country and called on his colleagues to go over to the side of the enemy, then he fled to the dnipro and hoped that everything was forgiven him, but no, chernobuk is accused in the case of high treason, but even now he does not lose hope of avoiding punishment, he mobilized to the armed forces of ukraine and assures us that he protects us from the enemy of russia, the same enemy in which he happily met in crimea, the most important question is how did this happen in the first place. what is the fact that a person is accused of treason at the moment, not you? she has access to the personal data of the ukrainian military because he works for the military. chernobuk, manipulating legal norms, stopped the trial of the case against himself during the war, and he is not the only one , public activists have counted at least eight more judges who also use the scheme , i

toove more quickly, if you have a district court review, and then court of appeals review, t you court of appeals review.he >> the second poi. tsecond thing i was going to say, there is at least, the rehat we have now is reviewable and certain agency options are not reviab. r they are not reviewable until they kind of crystallized in a final rin and yu focus on what is the agency action your challenging? and thenook to the statute that govern, can get review of that. and so in that court. you certainly, you could have close questions. that provides a fair amount of deterministic, i think the regime that your postulate-ing would create indeterminacy into different respects. first, the courts would have to devise rules f determining what is a sufficiently syste or structural constitutional challenge to qualify. argument was not just that the -- the members were improperly insulated from removal, there was also one appointments challenge which, didn't prevail. but was toffect that they had not been constitutnay appointed. under that theory, they were unlawfully exercising governmental pow

that's not a question e division of responsibility between the court of appeals in the district court of appeals. and what point does the agency order before the court of it >> is your argument about the district court nger retaining instruction under 13 up into that point, how do you run the statute or the apa or where is it coming >> it is coming from a combination of the exchange act review provision in the exchange act review provision, the only court they can review the final order of the court of appeals the apa saying the preliminary action is reviewed on the final agency and that doesn't necessarily mean it will be reviewed by the court to review the final agency act. >> in pages 40 7:50, we did not have the apa and the agency actions. >> it is certainly the case that authorities included cases that were decided before t api was enacted. the principle that courts will not intervene long predated the apa. the api simply confirms that by referring to final action in section 704. when we refer to unclassified principles onistrative law, we are met with the legitimate response by

we will be going back to the court of- will be going back to the court of appeal, — will be going backonths. and i'm hopeful that when they rehear the arguments, we can fall— when they rehear the arguments, we can fall in _ when they rehear the arguments, we can fall in line with the rest of the world _ can fall in line with the rest of the world. because people should not be going _ the world. because people should not be going to prison for submitting numerically accurate rates. and rules— numerically accurate rates. and rules should not be created ten years _ rules should not be created ten years after the event in retrospectively applied. and of the founders— retrospectively applied. and of the founders of the rates, who wrote the rules. _ founders of the rates, who wrote the rules, who _ founders of the rates, who wrote the rules, who say it wasn't against the rules, _ rules, who say it wasn't against the rules, it's _ rules, who say it wasn't against the rules, it's an— rules, who say it wasn't against the rules, it's an alice in wonderland case _ rules, it's an alice in wonderla

the attorney general tennessee filed for an emergency stay at the six circuit court of appeals. sort of a can to what we see in the shadow docket at the supreme court where you're just getting these rushed opinions and perhaps 24 hours or less putting this decision from the district court on pause while the case is proceeding. this allows the law to go into effect. the court is not close to the record. there were hundreds and hundreds of pages of expert declarations filed in this case. the appeals court admits they may have got it wrong because it was rushed, which means they should not have done it in the first instance. this was not a comprehensive appeal, this was an abbreviated process where the court interjected itself. in many cases, had no citations it admitted, have got it wrong. the consequences is hundreds of trans adolescents are now without the medical care they need post of amy: talk about the medical organizations opposed to this. >> every major medical association in the u.s. as opposed this type of legislation including the american academy of pediatrics, america

structural constitutional claims were different and ty release you can get on the court appeals. thetute of the court of appeals to set aside or modify the l order. special constitutional claim that does not give you the relief you're okg for. it wouldn't give us the relief we're looking for in an a injunction against this constitutional action. and my frie m stewart answer on thi question, i think was telling what he said in that situation was, when we get a desi and on remand, y e the case that comes of a ninth circuit would have to follotht. which is to say that the agency might not have to follow that with respect to cases in the other circuit we are talking again about the very existence in the very authority of the decision-maker to act at all which different. in fact -- thift that the statute is limited in terms of e release of the crof appeals can grant actually think does speak to why these claims were not divested by congress. >> you y broader argument as justice kagan points out would suggest i think starting over, and how the court as this whole area. and maybe it's ju

the court of appeal to the supreme court for an appeal today. the supreme court for an appeal today .'m sure you're not confused and you followed very closely. not to worry. the point is that ultimately democracy must and judicial must prevail and judicial activism must fail. the rwanda policy is an important step in creating a deterrent against the channel crossings crisis that we have seen over the past couple of years. and it's the right of this democratically elected government to pursue its own policy agenda without political interference from the court of appeal or from the echr . joining appeal or from the echr. joining me on this is my panel of contributing editor to novara media, michael walker, and the historian and senior fellow at the new culture forum. rafe heydel—mankoo . thank you both heydel—mankoo. thank you both very much for joining heydel—mankoo. thank you both very much forjoining me. michael, i mean, it is quite a complicated set up that you appeal to the court of appeal to appeal to the court of appeal to appeal against its own judgement. government judgement. b

that is what the court of appeal is _ case? that is what the court of appeal is currently _ case? t the court of appeal is currently hearing at l case? that is what the court of i appeal is currently hearing at the moment. andrew malcolm since said he spent 17 years in prison for a crime that he said he never committed. in a 200a, mr makinson was jailed for life after being found guilty of raping a mother of two in salford in greater manchester, back in its 2003. that was done on a majority verdict, at the time. andrew parkinson has always denied committing this crime. he said it was a case of mistaken identity and that he was an innocent man. despite his minimum sentence being seven years, he actually spent 17 years in jail because he refused to admit to doing a crime that he said that he never committed. his convictions were referred here to the court of appeal, on new dna evidence, which has actually linked another man on the national dna database, potentially to that crime, and greater manchester police has said that they have arrested somebody else, pending further inquiries.

you are going to be looking at some video from t that appeals court. hearing this case on -- it's on the docket today, at some point today and it's the last casee that the court is scheduled to hear. again, this is not the end of it today. arguments may finish today, but we'll be waiting on the decision, whatever the decision comes to, it is now the decision of the city attorney whether or not they will end up appealing it if they don't like it which could actually bring it up to the supreme court and much more on to the national stage. so we'll be keeping a close eye on this. you'll be getting those updates on air and online at nbc bay area.com. in san francisco, ginger conejero saab, nbc bay area news. >> a lot to follow, ginger, thank you. >>> new overnight police investigating the shooting of a pregnant woman in oakland. it happened last night on international boulevard and 77th avenue. police say the woman is nine months pregnant and her unborn baby are in stable condition, both of them. >> officers found the woman in the car shot in the chest. sh

has decided today. i is what the court of appeal has decided today.— is what the court of appealere are some of the — decided today. i mentioned there are some of the questions _ decided today. i mentioned there are some of the questions he _ decided today. i mentioned there are some of the questions he is - decided today. i mentioned there are some of the questions he is already i some of the questions he is already raising. he is extraordinary angry but angry at the police, the criminal cases review commission who he had pleaded with several times to revisit his case?— revisit his case? yes, that is riuht. revisit his case? yes, that is right- it _ revisit his case? yes, that is right. it seems _ revisit his case? yes, that is right. it seems there - revisit his case? yes, that is right. it seems there were l revisit his case? yes, that is - right. it seems there were multiple opportunities that were missed in this case and that is what he said. he is incredibly angry because he cannot get almost 20 years of his life back and we are yet to see what he then decides to do next is

as soon as there is movement there, we will turn to the court of appeal. jury at a court in london has found the hollywood actor kevin spacey not guilty on all counts of committing sexual offences against four men between 2001 and 2013. the allegations which covered over a decade over four men. the allegations which covered over a decade overfour men. kevin the allegations which covered over a decade over four men. kevin spacey speaking outside thanked the jury saying that he was humbled and described the allegations as malice. iimagine i imagine that many of you can understand that there is a lot for me to process after what has just happened today. but i would like to say that i am enormously grateful to the jury. say that i am enormously grateful to thejury. the having taken say that i am enormously grateful to the jury. the having taken the time to examine all of the evidence and all of the facts carefully before they reach their decision. and i am humbled by the outcome today. i also want to thank the staff inside this courthouse the security and all

of the case considering that the case is already in appeal at the moment, if the appeal confirms the verdict of the courtce, then panchenko will be already forced to go to serve her term. and this is the well-known judge of the kyiv appeal administrative court, ihor petryk. he runs very fast.

and think where the confusion is common in the courts of appeals, the courts appeals been very explicit about trying ure out the distinction n free enterprise and elgin is that the next para free enterprise -- waonding to the government's argument thatoh, you could just get reviews afterwards and the court said not i particular circumstance because the court, becae plaintiff was challenging theinvestigation and said there might not be a final sanction. the question is really if you st taking within the presidents, is that second paragraph for free enterprise, is that justresponding to the government's argument, or is that justsetting forth a condition that isnecessary before you can avoid theagency review process. i think that's what the court ofappeals has zeroed in on, and i would be interested in your response. i think the court and free enterprise in the paragraph you referred to, the idea that in order to triggera scc adjudicthat you would have to commit a violation deliberandsubject yourself to penalties. think that that is really the heart of theopinion and in that respect itwas

inapa confirms the inference th court of appeals is the only court exercise revi in neral, the court of appeals jurisdiction is limited tothe final cease and desist but we cited cases at page our brief that say, when the all writs act refers suing writs in eight of you diction, that can meet not only a pending appeal, but a potential al. so the court that could review the and desist order as a of ancillary jusdtion to super e the administrative process to the extent of being able to step in if there's rea egs deviationappropriate practice. >> going back to r basin, i told mr. clement that i thought his woctor was i think the other two factors are pretty darn bad for you. on expertise, court and free enterprise fund, whatever distinctions that might be as between free entse fund and this, case the court in free enterprise just says you lose an expertise. then on collateral, i think just the ordinary understanding of what we mean when we use that term is is it unrelat to bject matter of the dispute. a clai goes to the legitimacy of they's structure as a whole is completely unrelated to

if the appeals court agrees that could put the acquisition off the appeals court does not come i do notw exactly how long this takes, but i know the plan was for this deal to be close over the weekend or early next week. we will continue to look for details on this. microsoft shares currently up 1%. it is the activision piece that sees the volatility whenever we get these kind of headlines. we will continue to monitor this. i want to get to delta, it is sought second quarter profits soar as a rebound in international travel keeps planes up. sheila kahyaoglu has a buy rating on it. thank you so much for coming in. let's talk about delta first. their planes are packed. everybody is trying to get tickets which is why prices are high and these airlines want to buy more vehicles, more airplanes. how are they doing in relation to their competitors? sheila: delta is well-placed given their premium offering. it was up year-over-year. that number was not positive for the sector. their international revenues are exploding. atlantic was really good for them. i believe up 20%, higher yields so bett

however, the third judge in the court of appeal the third judge in the court of appeal, the lord chiefustice himself, agreed with the home office that it was a lawful policy. so given that it's not clear cut at all, and that's why it'll go to the supreme court. as i say, the highest court in the land to make that final decision. yeah mark, thank you very, very much for the update. >> that's mark white there, gb news home and security editor. it is worth reminding ourselves when were talking about when people were talking about whether a safe whether or not rwanda is a safe country, lot of people country, a lot of people think that's singularly that's based singularly around the play there. the human rights on play there. so it for okay you to be a so is it for okay you to be a woman there? is it okay for you to in political opposition to be in political opposition over there? is it okay for you to be gay over there? but that ruling previously it's not ruling previously said it's not really that. it's whether ruling previously said it's not retnot that. it's whether ruling previously sa

they won the first federal court, and then the appeals court overturned it. the supreme court upheld the appeals court. so, the legal part of it is over. jim thorpe, pennsylvania is taking some of its fame from him being there. they are not going to give it back. would take an act of real integrity and moral courage for it to be returned to where he belongs in oklahoma. i do not see it happening. kevin: not soon, but one thing we know about native americans is stashed david: they are patient. let's hope so. kevin: absolutely. jim thorpe continues to make news. david: i had nothing to do with it, but it was good timing. his medals were taken away from him, and in july this year all of his records were restored after a long campaign from many, many people. anita france on the international olympic committee. robert hill and his wife, who were his earliest chroniclers. a lot of native american activists were fighting for this forever. and it finally happened. 110 years too late. the other way the story is in the news is, the indian boarding schools. here you had

a federal appeals court limiting the biden's communication with social media platforms. ng that found the white house violated the right to free speech by having social mmedia platforms limit the spred of what they consider misinformation including covid policies. your thoughts on this? what we discovered, let's be clear, this is the twitter files, was that basically the administration was using every -- they were e-mailing meta and twitter, twice a week, i mean, it was bullying tactics if you look at the messages that were going from the biden administration to social media companies, saying pull this, leave this out. i mean, it was selective. it was egregious. >> yeah. and the appeals court is going to have a hearing on an expedited basis to determine whether this injunction stands but the real fundamental issue here is the first amendment right to free speech and the government can't infringe on that right, nor can they subcontract the infringement out to these social media companies. so i think this case is actually pretty stored. i'm surprised that -- straightforward

after the decision of the court of appeal, the british government intends to get permission to appeal to the supreme court of england. england had previously announced that the purpose of implementing this plan is to prevent illegal immigration . human rights activists and the deportation of immigrants to rwanda due to some people consider the conditions of this country, including insecurity, to be a violation of the rights of immigrants. chalos was blocked due to flood damage and was reopened after 19 days . alborz general director of highways and road transport said that with the round-the-clock efforts of the karaj chalos road traffic forces, they first cleaned and then it has been secured and is ready to be used by our compatriots . it was around 15-21. announced that the process of sending a new ambassador of iran to sweden was stopped in response to the permission of the government of this country in connection with the holy quran. the government of this country has issued a permit to dare to enter the holy area of ​​the holy quran safavi's mission to iran has been stopped for t

prior to that, he held the position of a judge of the court of appeal of the zakarpattia region. mind you that the previous head of the criminal court of cassation , stanislav kravchenko, headed the supreme court of ukraine after the law enforcement officers jumped in. vsevolod knyazeva for bribes of almost 3 million dollars in the last issue we told you the story of the former chairman of the court of appeal crimea valery chornobuka in 2014, during the occupation of crimea, he supported russia, taught judges the laws of the occupier country and called on his colleagues to go over to the side of the enemy, then he fled to the dnipro and hoped that everything was forgiven him, but no chornobuka is accused in the case of high treason, but now nadia has escaped he does not lose his punishment, he mobilized to the armed forces of ukraine and assures us that he is protecting us from the enemy of russia, the same enemy that he happily met in crimea , the most important question is how what happened is that a person is accused of high treason at the moment, no. she has access to the pers

- court of appeal to hear it? that's a basic question, _ court of appeal to hear it? eal to hear it? that's a basic question, i quite agree. i i basic question, i quite agree. i just want to reflect for a moment and stepped back. one has to remember that the court of appeals itself had a different name at the time at the beginning of the century, it set up because of the risk of unreliable convictions on the back of unreliable identification evidence. that was the whole for the court itself. and this case is a shocking example of why in the first place at the trial this man should never, never have been convicted. because it was recognised after the setting up of the court itself in the beginning of the court itself in the beginning of the last century that identification was one of the most unreliable areas and what i think you did mention in that resume was the key to this conviction was the identification by two witnesses, with the victim set at the moment, two witnesses. of course what the jury had to be assessing was it wanting for the victim to say something, she

you might have seen over the weekend that there was a weekend ruling from a federal appeals court in tennessee, tennessee republicans have been going after trans people everywhere they can. if federal appeals court this weekend on saturday, in a divided 2 to 1 decision, let that state go forward with banning is specific kinds of health care for trans people. and this is not a some kind of distant threat or something that is locked up in the courts now. thanks to that appeals court ruling, on saturday this weekend, for people under the age of 18 that ruling this weekend means whatever ongoing health care they have been getting in tennessee, it is now officially illegal. that ruling went into effect immediately and any such health care, ongoing health care that you have previously been receiving, it has just opened mediately. but that is also happening in the context of this other thing that republicans are doing in the state of tennessee. i do think it puts them at the front of the line right now. the republican state attorney general in tennessee is using his office to obtain the pri

words for the judge from that appeal court. so clearly here is the judge is now trying to show that she is as level as even as possible. and that's another significance in the fact that this trial date is set half way between what the prosecution wanted and what the defense wanted. not giving an inch either way and my visa or so as we know not they are in the charges, the trump faces. can you remind us all of the various different charges that the former president faces and how this sits, submit store of that as well. let's look at this particular case that is that a charges have been brought against the full i'm a president. and also he's a will to now to these charges basically arise from the fact that he took documents when he left the white house. but also very importantly, that the argument is that he attempted to conceal the fact and then attempted to obstruct justice when a thought which is wanted to reclaim the documents. so these are a series of charges as suddenly linked to the espionage tact. not that he's accused of

find the now south african run a cost as a mini i has won an appeal at the european court of human rights. the 3 time willed and doubled of intake champion or the 800 mesa is was born with so cold differences of sexual development. she is not allowed to compete in advance without taking testosterone reducing drugs. now the quote is rolled, she was discriminated against, but it did not struck down the existing as okay, here's the, remind to now about top story that way. following for you, ukraine will be allowed to join. nice. so when close allies agree and conditions and next that's according to the blocks. the secretary general dentists don't bug you. cranes, president savanski earlier said it's a suit and that is because there's no definite time to get and you can always get d, w and use on the go. just download all out from apple file from a google store that will get you access to all the latest use from around the world as well as push notifications, breaking news. if you'll part of a new story, you can use the app to send us photos and videos of what's happening with steve and beesl

for 2 murders in 1969 in may, leslie when houghton was cleared for parole after a california or appeals court over ruled governor governor newsome's efforts to deny her prolong to there's been renewed mass protests in israel after the parliament gave initial approval to a controversial bill to limit the power of the countries courts. it's the lanes the pen by prime minister benjamin netanyahu, his right wing coalition to push through a judicial or form that has been met by months of demonstrations and angry crowd creeds arrival at israel. it's been going on at ports, protest of luck to the streets in response to law. that was the scrap the supreme court's rights to strike down government decisions they need to know if it's to stymie the court, is an attack on their basic rights. we're fighting for misery, democracy for our independent traditional system. and in israel we only have one check over, you know, when the checks and balances when they had one check over our dish or the government, which is a judicial system in our supreme court. and what they're doing right now is trying to take it

treason filed such statements, arguing that they were mobilized, however, in may 2023, the court again appealede military unit and commander petryk reported that his official duties allowed him to participate in court sessions in person, so vaks renewed we hope that every ukrainian hero will return home with an award, and that every overly resourceful judge who, under the guise of war, saves himself from responsibility for a crime will eventually answer for it. for today, you have all watched judicial control. to the judicial system, write to the e-mail you see on the screen or to me on facebook, we will meet in exactly a week , everything is fine, it is difficult to get up and climb the stairs old injuries and sprains constantly are reminded of themselves with sharp pain. you need help. the knee brace moves easily. a reliable assistant for the joints. order now with a discount of only uah 199. it fixes tightly , reduces stress and tension, and significantly improves blood flow . reliable support of the muscular skeleton. see how easy it is to use . put the knee brace on your leg and fasten the

. >>> coming up, a federal appeals court allows ban on gender affirming care for minors to take effectnnessee. that's straiaight ahead. so researchers can help life ununderwater flourish. ♪ how can anyone love a cat more than a dog. because cats are adorable. debatable. - it's pronounced gif. - it's gif. what is the pot of decaf coffee? ev hybrid plugn hybrid to each their own...electric. ( ♪ ) your record label is taking off. but so is your sound engineer. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. indeed instant match instantly delivers quality candidates matching your job description. visit indeed.com/hire julian's about to learn that free food is a personal eating trigger. no, it isn't. (sigh) yes, it is. and that's just a bit of psychology julian learned from noom weight. sign up now at noom.com. the first time you connected your godaddy website and your store was also the first time you realized... well, we can do anything. cheesecake cookies? the chookie! manage all your sales from one place with a partner that always puts you first. (we did it) start today at godaddy.com [

it depends how the appeal court rules. this is a major test of the first amendment. sources i spoke with declined to speak on camera or be named as this process plays out in the courts. it is something those who wear the badge are watching closely. we'll follow it. >> bill: we shall. early days even, too. thank you so much david spunt, d.o.j. >> dana: kitchen sink congressional hearing sounds right. some thread users are calling the new social media platform a twitter rip-off. elon musk and twitter executives agree and threatening legal action against zuckerberg and his parent company meta in a social media showdown. kelly o'grady is live in los angeles with the latest on this. >> hi. you already had twitter threatening legal action. hours after launching the twitter legal team sent a cease and desist letter to zuckerberg accuse him of stealing trade secrets and they enforce their property rights. they said meta has hired dozens of former twitter employees, meta deliberately assigned these employees to develop in a matter of months meta 's copycat thread app that they

unfortunately, the court rejected both the judge's appeal and the prosecutor's appeal, well, in the future. as you can see, the court session will be closed, we in in our turn, we will try to prove roman's innocence in court, even in a closed court session, all of them violate the rights of roman chervinskyi, all decisions on roman chervinskyi are made with a gross violation of the right to defense and other violations of the law, unfortunately, e.e. for now , we have no other way protect yourself, how to appeal to the community in zhytomyr oblast, the icon of the mother of god berdychivska gathered believers near her and celebrated the anniversary of her coronation due to the martial law on foot pilgrimage this year not many people, usually thousands of people from all over ukraine came to berdychev this year small groups came to the catholic shrine during the week to pray for peace in ukraine and our defenders in the forest near berdychev is preparing to meet pilgrims walking from afar there is a need to eat well sometimes on the way people cover up to 100 km on foot ms. alla from polonn

and in terms of migration , the court of appeals migration, the court of appeals just overturned the uling on rwanda while the house of lords is busy gutting the illegal migration bill so it really isn't. the prime minister's fault. sometimes politicians cannot deliver even when they make their best efforts . however, my panel is efforts. however, my panel is back and i'm sure they may well disagree with me. former brexit party mep ben habib and the author and broadcaster michael craig. ben well, rishi. rishi is doing his absolute best and he is beset by by obstructionism from various blob like quarters as well. >> i for the first time i find myself at odds with you. jacob, if i may say so, rishi is squarely responsible for having broken the economy . i find it broken the economy. i find it quite amusing that during the leadership campaign he kept saying, you know, i'm the responsible one. i understand numbers . i'm responsible one. i understand numbers. i'm going to fix everything. actually, he was the one who was chancellor of the exchequer at a time when the uk borrowed money than

for tonight is a state appeals court cleared. leslie found allison for parole. overruling governor, governor newsome had written will found in the couch all of the light senior rates of franklin has been ruled, legitimate by us to re this thing and left no form of wheel locks, or she died in 2018 in that spot. a long legal battle between her 4 sons as well. they've been more mess protests in east rile off to the palm and guy financial approval to a controversial bill to limit the power of the countries quotes. it's the light is detained by prime minister, been made, and benjamin netanyahu is file rice, i'm sorry, right wing coalition to push through and traditional reform that's been meant by months of demonstrations. as an angry crowd greets arrival at israel, it's been going on at ports protest as luck to the streets in response to law. that was the scrap the supreme court's rights to strike down government decisions. say natania house efforts to stymie the court is an attack on their basic rights for fighting for our independe

injailfora rape that he did not commit has today had his conviction formally overturned by the court of appealnson has been fighting since 2003 to clear his name. papers disclosed in court today show that the original jury was misled about the honesty of a key witness, and the dna of another man has been found on the victim's clothing. our legal correspondent dominic casciani reports. a day ofjustice, a day of truth and freedom. after two decades, andy malkinson and his lawyers walked into the court of appeal with a message for the criminal justice system, a message about how his life has been destroyed over a crime he always said he never committed. i have been let down. i have been terribly let down. i know i am not the only one either. i don't trust the only one either. i don't trust the state because the state is largely unaccountable, and it will not... it doesn't like to admit failure. ., ., , , ., not... it doesn't like to admit failure. ., ., ,, ., g , failure. the various began in july 2003. a woman _ failure. the various began in july 2003. a woman was _ failure. the various began in

taking into account that the case is already on appeal , if the appeal is confirmed in the court of first forced to go to serve her term. and this is the well-known judge of the kyiv appeals administrative court, ihor petryk. he runs very fast, young people, we will see what we want. ihor petryk is known for his ingenuity at the end of 2016 the law enforcement officers detained the judge for holding a $5,000 bribe for the adoption of the necessary decision by the panel of which he was a member. the judge hid the money under the judge's mat, but it was not for nothing that he had a special inner pocket sewn under it. after petryk's arrest, he was suspended from administering justice. at the end of last year, the court stopped the hearing on petryk's petition because he was mobilized to the ranks of the ukrainian army as an assistant to the brigade commander from legal work to procedural the code provides for the possibility of the court to stop the proceedings if the accused is called to mobilization, and as we can see, some of the judges who are accused of bribery and even treason filed s

of the manager can be carried out exclusively by the supervisory board, at the same time in the appeals courthe appointed vision does not come to the meeting and sends a letter of insistence to raise the issue before the court on the responsibility of the relevant prosecutor and the head of the meeting, the meeting is postponed to the end of july at the time when the meeting was supposed to take place, but the office did not representatives appeared at the premises of our company who introduced themselves as the authorized managers of our company and demanded access to the documents. thus, we see a whole range of directed and purposeful actions regarding, on the one hand, delaying the process , on the other hand, taking possession of the company as soon as possible. on its activity, starting from the morale of all employees , the impossibility of doing business with partners because partners are afraid of anything new the management will not give an opportunity to fulfill existing contracts or existing obligations, a blatant situation when the company is actually trying to simply stop, we are

an appeals court, a federal court? caller: trump had one. i don't know why they haven't announced it in the states. host: trump rails against january 6. they write the former president railed against the justice department and to his efforts to remain in power after losing the election he said his first on camera comments speaking with sean hannity during the town hall and iowa. here is some of that conversation from last night. [video clip] >> it bothers me the letter on sunday night. i don't think they've ever sent a letter on sunday night. they are in a rush because they want to interfere with an election. it's never been done like this and it is a disgrace. whatever is happening with this country whether it's borders has become a weapon for the democrats and it seems that every time i poll we are leaving by a lot. and where leading by a lot in places like iowa. not only with republicans but were leaning against biden by a tremendous amount. they feel like they wanted to mean and diminish and frighten people but they don't frighten us bec

so they appealed it, and last night, the 11th circuit court of appeals ruled that the justice department use the mar-a-lago documents in its criminal probe! oooh, boom! boom! awww, shucky ducky! something means something. it's happening! actions have consequences! i'm so excited to find out the unimaginable permanent damage it's done to our national security. [weakly] usa! the appeals court obliterated the former president's most frequent defense, writing, "the plaintiff suggests that he may have declassified these documents when he was president. but the record contains no evidence that any of these records were declassified." yes. thank you. you can't say there's an alibi and then produce no evidence of your alibi. "officer, i couldn't have robbed that bank. i was at dinner with my girlfriend. what's her name and where did we have dinner? that is on a need-to-know basis, and you don't need to know that i just made that [bleep] up." importantly... sorry about the language. sorry about the language. [cheers and applause] family show. now, importantly, the appeals court also noted that "d

found ways to, for example, help donald trump in a manner that would not draw the ire of the court of appeals. her inexperience i think led her to make some very poor decisions there, decisions that ultimately were harshly criticized by the court of appeals. if she does the same here, she's going to get herself and a lot of trouble, given how high the stakes are here. and given the many ways in which you can misstep regarding classified documents. it remains to be seen what she is going to do but i definitely think that if she rules in a way that -- she can escape any challenged by smith, but smith is aggressive as possible and is going to be looking for opportunity to appeal if she, for example, makes a misstep and engages in the sort of aggressive, advocacy from the bench in trump's favor that she did last time. >> all right, carol, new topic. in today's addition of a democracy is a fragile thing, the new york times is reporting some very alarming plans that are in the works. trump and his allies are reportedly, they want to toss out this idea that we have three separate but equal branches

the state appeals court will release its ruling by the end of october. well our time is 405. and like a tidal wave. swift mania is hitting the bay area right now. tonight, music superstar taylor swift will perform at levi's stadium in the first of two concerts in santa clara. a lot of excitement. lamonica peters has more on the excitement building up ahead of these concerts. it's taylor swift's message driven music brought thousands of her fans to levi's stadium to buy merchandise the day before her irish tour shows her melodies are very good. her lyrics are very, very, very powerful. this father and son say they traveled across the world to see taylor. originally, we came from tunisia. that's 10,000 miles strip. then we came to l.a. then from l.a to here. fans are calling the taylor swift concert a once in a lifetime experience, buying posters, cds of our music, water bottles and sweatshirts as souvenirs. does she, like, inspire you or, you know, a role model for you? maybe. oh yes. she starts with i was a fan when i was younger and just to see my daughter as a fan now, it's

and later last night, an appeals court ruled that the investigation into the classified documents hearded can go on. that meant it was damage control time, and so trump summoned his trusty hype man, sean hannity, for a good old fashioned han job. [ laughter ] trump claims he declassified those documents the fbi found at mar-a-lago using special powers no one imagined any human ever had. [ laughter ] >> what was your process to declassify? >> there doesn't have to be a process as i understand it. different people say different things. as i understand, there doesn't have to be. if you're the president of the united states, you can declassify by saying it's declassified, even by thinking about it. [ laughter ] >> jimmy: even by thinking about it. [ applause ] using the power of his mind! he can declassify documents. what he does is he puts a candle in an egg mcmuffin -- [ laughter ] makes a wish, blows it out, and the documents become declassified, hocus pocus. [ cheers and applause ] i have to say, sean hannity really outdid himself here. he had no follow-up to that. his approach was b

appeals court panel has temporarily stayed a lower court order on the biden administration's contactsearlier this week, on monday, the biden administration, they filed an emergency stay with the fifth u.s. district court of appeals to temporarily suspend that federal judge's ruling that limited government officials' contact with social media companies. this is over the issue of misinformation. and the biden administration had been in contact with these companies, whether that was to target accounts, to target users, this kind of goes back into the pandemic days and covid misinformation. but again, this is a loss, again, better biden administration -- for the biden administration that put in this appeal on monday, and they have just been ruled against. this is late breaking news as we move into the close of business today. >>> well, we already told you about results from wells fargo, citi and the blockbuster numbers we got from jpmorgan, but wait, there's going to be more. what about the regional banks in the sector's been under pressure since the collapse of silicon valley bank, signa

year, granting trump's request for a special master that was later overruled by a three-judge appeals court. a big question is whether the judge who was appointed by former president trump will rule for the prosecution or the defense about when the trial should begin. >> the prosecution has said we want to go to trial in december. we want to do this quickly. and the defense has said, let's postpone this indefinitely. >> reporter: the former president is the current front runner for the republican presidential nomination. he wants the trial delayed until after the election. today we could learn that start date. all eyes on this pretrial conference set to begin in just a matter of hours. >>> we will see what happens. >>> still ahead. it has been a rough year for tech layoffs . but companies are hiring. how a former meadow employee bounce back by applying outside the box. >>> san jose's only michelin star restaurant is closing its doors and what is replacing it shshould we sesell the carr and geget somethining bigger? yeah, , we can do o both on cacm but whatat if it's twtwins? what i if it's

newsom has read first parole grant three times since taking office for he is disappointed in the court of appeals decision to release her by the governor's office said newsom is not fighting the court's decision because he does not believe he will be successful this time around. and may the court ruled that how tenant now 73 years old should be released. cited remorse and what she says her extraordinary rehabilitative efforts for vaccination host nancy grace weighed in. >> she should absolutely not be released. there are some crimes for which there is no coming back. this is one of those crimes. when you look at her now she looks like a librarian that is not how she looked back in 1969 she took part in the murders of the family. >> the daughter of murder evicted expressed her great sorrow of the court's decision to the associated press on friday. she said her family is still heartbroken over the loss of their loved ones. arthel: christina: thank you. first of its kind federal court ruling means transgender youth in tennessee will not be able to get gender affirming care for now. lower courts have