and to back to the appeal court and to be heard there.t who has together 1a experts brought together 1a experts from around the world who have looking at all 1a been looking at all 1a cases, the seven seven the seven murders'ahd seven murders. they the seven murders'and seven murders. they say from what 7 7 from whatthey from what they have that, from what they have found, no criminality took place. was no crime, was no murder. have poor skills in the blamed poor skills in the hospital, poor in the hospital, poor plumbing in the hospital, poor plumbing in the hospital, poor decision—making when it came to the treatment whenl't came to the treatment of the children. they of some of the children. they that what the parents admitted that what the parents of those children will be hearing today would be upsetting. they said they want to add to didn't want to add to their distress pointed out distress but pointed out that there simply wasn't the case that they had been any there simply wasn't the case that they 1 involved. ny there simply wasn

in a court of appeals that you say are erroneously stated. i do not know why if we determine the court of appeals applied the wrong standard and vacate its ruling the district court injunction does not just come back into effect. you are not asking us to issue pis that right? >> that's right. cooks we are in a situation where we don't have to be reaching that merits of success. what we are doing is evaluating the court of appeals was correct when it said this was supposed to be evaluated under the rational basis standard as opposed to strict scrutiny, right question asked all i meant to suggest more guidance rather than less in the opinion as to why extensively the district court did not use the discretion because it may not be if they disagree with you. this is my other question you'd youdiffer from the government insofar as the government says just decide the wrong level scrutiny was apply here send it back to the fifth circuit to apply it too. you cite no, we should be applying the standard for strict scrutiny. that's what's opening the doo

a federal appeals court upheld that standard back in 2020, ruling that prisoners held at guantanamo are not entitled to due process. noem says under the trump administration plans, detainees will not be held at guantanamo bay indefinitely. the plan is to have a process that we follow that's laid out in law and make sure that we're dealing with these individuals appropriately according to what the state and the what the national lawsuit or law directs. it's still not clear whether women or children slated for deportation could be held at guantanamo. noem did not directly respond to several questions from moderator kristen welker about women and children at the facility. well, higher prices at the pump are expected following the president's decision to apply tariffs on canadian and mexican oil, analysts and fuel traders are predicting a likely hike in fuel prices. the u.s. imports some 4 billion barrels per day of canadian oil, 70% of which is processed by refiners in the midwest. it also imports more than 450,000 barrels per day of mexican oil. those are mainly for refiners concentrated

the court of appeal down her requests to challenge those convictions. medical evidence".l was not murder or attempted murder. reassessed all of the evidence thejury had during letby�*s two trials. we did not find any murders. in all cases, death or injury were due to natural causes orjust bad medical care. attempted murders. the jury in the trial heard evidence letby murdered babies them with air. an alternative explanation. for these babies' deaths and that there was a combination, if you take the totality of the 17 cases, there was a combination of babies being in the wrong in other words, they say the nhs failed and letby�*s the court of appeal. it said... where letby worked. she is serving 15 whole life prison sentences. researchers are hoping they will learn whether artificial that could improve the rate of diagnosis sian taylor—phillips — isjoint—lead of this it isa it is a large publicly funded trial, funded by the research trial. funded by the institute for health and it is really research. ana it is—rsat—ty ——————~r—— on researche ana it is—rsatty . . on improvin

but whether appeals courts and ultimately the supreme court, which will weigh in will do so remains to be seen. >> if they go into effect, what's the expected outcome of the freezes? >> well, i think it's been extraordinary. have we seen the last two weeks? it's been a, you know, the sort of shock and awe campaign of this administration to try to rein in the federal bureaucracy? again, i don't think anyone would argue that the federal bureaucracy doesn't need reform. but, you know, the spending freezes the over the weekend, hearing that again unilaterally that usaid would be would be eliminated. that was an agency created by an act of congress. the president doesn't have an authority to actually eliminate a federal agency created by congress. it requires an act of congress to eliminate it. but we heard elon musk tweeting over the weekend that he and president trump agreed that that agency would be shuttered. we're hearing today that, in fact, nobody is in the office today and that, in fact, things are coming off the walls. this is fairly remarkable. and again, this is an administration

made that he wanted them to consider, the whole basis for the disagreement between us and the court of appealsnd the disagreement that actuall divides the circuit courts on this question. justice sotomayor: can i reduce three sentences from this opinion? this is the majority. we maynly ask whether officer felix was in danger at the moment of the threat tt used him to use deadly force against barns. it said its inquiryas "confined to whether the officersr other persons were inanr at the moment of the that that resulted in the officer's use of deadly force. it stated, any of the officer's actions leading up to the shooting are not relevant for the purposes of an excessive force inquiry in th ccuit." so judge higginbotham did n make up the moment of the threat doctrine. it haseeused and cited repeatedly by other circuits. i's well known by that name. this is not a made-up theory. let me finish. you can see page 34. that if the officer was the aggressor, there are circumstances. you do not think this is one them. but, there are circumstances in which officer's actions are relevant, correct? mr. mc

it wasn't just district court judges or even appeals court judges or executive nominations, but it would eventually lead the supreme court. and he had a choice, though. he could have said, well, i'm not going to take that path. instead, he didn't. he took it as an opening and he remade the supreme court sort of in a right leaning conservative image. let's go forward three years to 2016 after this. and the death of supreme court justice antonin scalia. mitch mcconnell had become majority leader by then and declared this about the vacancy. mr. president, the next justice could fundamentally alter the direction of the supreme court and have a profound impact on our country. so, of course, of course, the american people should have a say in the court's direction. it is a president's constitutional right to nominate a supreme court justice, and it is the senate's constitutional right to act as a check on a president and withhold its consent as chairman. grassley and i declared weeks ago and reiterated personally under president obama, the senate will continue to observe the biden rule. so tha

the court of appeal has previously turned what they describe — as "significant new lucy letby, arrestedf chester hospital was not murder or attempted murder. letby�*s two trials. orjust bad medical care. attempted murders. in our opinion, the medical opinion, the medical evidence the jury in the trial heard evidence letby murdered babies in a number of different ways, including injecting and inappropriate or absent treatment. conviction should be reconsidered by that can only happen if the criminal cases review commission agrees. it said... about the care of children at the hospital tom symonds, bbc news. around the world and across the uk, this is bbc news. america's top diplomat — secretary of state marco rubio citizenship. the deal, which designated el salvador a safe country marques from bbc mundo. and as you say, president trump singled him out and singled him for his admiration, the way he has treated the security so in his second term, he has promised growth and he might get that by more or less dancing to the us tune. so do we have any details of what kind of agreement has well,

meantime, google asking a federal appeals court to overturn a ruling that would force it to make changesp store. lawyers for google want the san francisco based ninth circuit court of appeals to overturn a ruling from 2023, in a case between google and epic games, the maker of fortnite. a jury ruled that google was running an illegal app store monopoly by not allowing apps to sell things through their own stores. google claims the judge in that case should not have issued an order telling the company to change its app store. a new report finds climate change could cause a nearly $1.5 trillion drop in home values across the country over the next 30 years. the report from first street, which measures financial risks, finds the decline in values will be mostly linked to rising insurance rates that is caused by the increasingly costly disasters such as the southern california wildfires and recent hurricanes in the gulf coast. researchers say those increased insurance rates, or lack of coverage at all, will make it harder for homeowners to sell their homes, and that will take down prices. i'm

believe it will pass legal muster whether or not you get allows a judge on the district court level, but certainly on appeal it will. knowing that the supreme court a little bit, i would imagine itth will probably sustain scrutiny at the court ae s well. do you have lawyers in place already? some people aren't confirmed tol handle what will clearly be a crase ah of litigation here.e >> yes. the department of justice has put together an incredible team of attorneys to deal with all this litigation. but i want to be clear about an important point. every agency of the federal government always has ans d wilt continue to enlist congress change the law, exercise independent discretion about gr. hethere is a way this works, foreign countries which is crazy but foreign countries apply for money for domestic organizations. we they send in applications. here is why we want your money and here is what we want to do with. theydi have always exercised whether to approve or deny applications and will continue to accept this time, theses agencies will do so in a court with the policy priorities of f donald trump, the ame

presented to the jury. of experts, it's another to overturn the murder conviction, and that's the court of appealplication innocence or guilt in a case, that's a matter for the courts, its role is to refer the case to judges if it thinks dominic casciani, bbc news. for talks with president trump, the first foreign leader to visit the white house since mr trump returned to power. ef cedr trump “drrsnt , ~ ef cedr trump in rent , ~ ef cedrtrumpin the , ~ ef cedr trump in the oval office yesterday said there are no guarantees that is guarantees that that ceasefire is going to hold, that is very much going to hold, so that is very much the most important topic for them he enjoyed �*asa i as a peacemaker �*as a peacemaker in the himself as a peacemaker in the middle already takes credit if the if"? t that 7 7 th; 111315; a.” . for the hostages that have been released from gaza so far, even that 7 thatdealwas --, that deal was negotiated though that deal was negotiated before he returned to power. and now though that deal was negotiated befc he 1e returned to power. and now though that deal was negotia

believe it will pass legal muster whether or not you get a lousy judge in the district court level but certainly on appeal it will and knowing the supreme court a little bit, i would imagine it will sustain a scrutiny at the court as well. do you have lawyers in place already, some people unconfirmed to handle what will clearly be a pressure litigation? >> yes. the department of justice has put together an incredible team of attorneys to deal with this litigation. we want to be clear about this. every agency of the federal government always has and will continue to unless congress changes the law, exercised independent discretion about the grants. the way this process works, foreign countries which is crazy, foreign countries apply for money as a domestic organization. they send in applications, they state here's why we want your money. agencies have always exercise discretion about whether to approve or deny those applications and will continue to. except this time these agencies will do so in accordance with the policy priorities for donald trump and the american people voted for. >> laura: is usaid goi

with support from chinese community groups, wong appealed to the supreme court. himself, he couldn't have done it. the fact that there were other people that stood up alongside with him made a difference. stephanie: in 1898, the court decided 6-2 in his favor in a landmark judgement. prof. frost: the text of the 14th amendment speaks in universal terms and does not make any distinction based on race. it says all persons born are citizens. it's why the supreme court upheld that provision for wong kim ark, even if they didn't believe in the sentiment, they couldn't deny the scope of the text. stephanie: today, wong kim ark is seen as an asian-american pioneer. the court's decision paved the way for generations of children to become citizens. norman wong: i'm a product of these laws. so, if those laws were never here, i probably would never get born. it's amazing they got this -- that's mom, kimiko takeuchi. stephanie: for the wongs, president trump's executive order also brings back much more recent family history, on their mother's side. >> the beginning of americ

. >> miriam has filed numerous appeals with the courts.die with it. i'm sorry. it's just not in my nature to do that. >> how often do you think about him? >> i think about him all the time. he was funny. he would say things that i remember. his biggest thing was, "it's only business. treat it that way." just, he was -- he was fun to be around. >> after the trial, did you see your mom again? >> no. i have not seen her since the trial. >> after so long, what did miriam finally have to say to her son? a single touch can say a thousand words. it says... i see you. i feel you. i got you. and i'm never letting go. (♪) ever. (♪) say it all with irresistibly touchable skin. get in touch. gold bond. ♪ ♪ premium comfort that keeps up with anything without costing everything. life's a workout. flx with it. exclusively at kohl's. ♪ are you having any fun? ♪ ♪ what you getting out of living? ♪ ♪ who cares for what you've got ♪ ♪ if you're not having any fun? ♪ ♪ have a little fun ♪ ♪ like a relentless weed, moderate to severe ulcerative colitis symptom

a court of higher appeals. >> to which he. >> could appeal, which was the republican party.rty. so i think netanyahu's leverage right now is lower than it. >> was over the last. >> four years. >> what is donald trump most interested in? is he most interested in israel and the survival of israel and the best interests of israel, or is he more interested in maintaining a good and fruitful relationship with saudi arabia? because those two things can, you know, they can work together, but they also can be in conflict, right? >> i mean, i think donald trump wants to win, right? we've heard this so many times. he wants to succeed. he wants to demonstrate that no other american president or secretary of state or administration could achieve the kind of results in the middle east that he wants to achieve, how. >> serious he. >> is about. >> this, how much leverage he's actually prepared to bring against israel in this regard is unclear, but you're dealing with a highly transactional individual whose conception of the national interest. i think if trump 1.0 is any indication, is subo

and over the years, hincapie couldn't get a court to hear his case again. when all my appealsy got down on my knees, lester, and i told god, i don't want to be here anymore. i don't want to live. lester holt (voiceover): and then one day, 16 years into his prison sentence, a reporter heard about hincapie's claim of innocence. i covered crime. i got a lot of letters from prison inmates saying they were innocent. i never believed any of them. lester holt (voiceover): it was bill hughes. i met with johnny, listened to him for a couple of hours, and i didn't believe him. i saw his confession, and i thought he was guilty. but i read the transcripts. i started to look into it. lester holt (voiceover): one of the first things he did was reach out to the other men convicted of this crime, who were all still in prison. i interviewed gary morales, who actually stabbed brian watkins. i interviewed emiliano fernandez, who slashed mr. watkins. and both admitted they were involved. and both said johnny was not. lester holt (voiceover): hughes also watched the original interrogation videos.

the pardon power was given to a president at a time there was not all these layers of court cases that you can appealthis was a break glass in case of emergency type power that obviously presidents have extended and extended and extended. now we are having conversations that the founders never had in their brains as a potential. if we want to change it and we are worried about it, there are routes to ameliorate those concerns with a constitutional amendment. host: this is willy in arkansas, democrat. you are next. caller: my question is all the stuff he says we have learned through the books and social studies and stuff, now we learned all of that back in the day. now they have -- they have somebody doing something different lately to what we learned. the same stuff we learned back in the day it does not associate with us today. host: a question about education again. guest: it is that same point that civics is different than history and civics is different than government. one is an active participation requirement or knowledge and one is knowing the theory behind it. theory and practice are very di

court level. we shouldn't allow this. um we appealed it up to the appellate level. initial decision to allow this past november election to proceed as it has for the last previous four elections. we're going to be in front of that court soon. stay tuned. we'll see what happens. it was good to hear that the city was able to reach a settlement with the center for medicare and medicaid services are meant laguna honda could still operate. how did you manage to reach that agreement? it was not an easy conversation . just a little bit of background. so laguna honda has been an incredibly important institution in san francisco for 150 years, taking care of our most vulnerable patients are frail, very elderly patients, many of whom are at end of life. and a few years ago, there were some issues in that hospital. some violations of rules that we very much want to make sure don't get violated. there were folks that weren't using proper ppe, who are bringing cigarette lighters into the facility, who might have brought some contraband into the facilities. we have zero tolerance

we hope that case ends on appeal to the u.s. supreme court.ansas naacp versus the board of apportionment. we are going to have to communicate better on all playing fields in order for us to win back power. jen: thank you. governor o'malley, let me go to you on this question of how to communicate more effectively. i want to know specifically, give me two formats or outlets that you think you would do as the chairman of the dnc that a dnc chair would not typically do. gov. o'malley: one of the things we agree upon is we need to establish an information war room within the dnc, the purpose of which would not only be to combat this information, misinformation, and rapid response, it would also be communications over time with the very people who felt like we were not talking to them, and in many cases we were not. one senior democrat told me she was all for ground game. we were knocking on a lung doors four weeks before the election with stone tablets, but the other guys who had already been inside the doors over a period of time, speaking to peop

a line crossing around samsung winning an appeal case relating to a merger dating back to 2015. the high court has upheld an acquittal of samsung's executive chairman so they are currently down 2.7%. that may be more of an effect in reaction to the tariff risk. emerging market currencies have slumped with the peso iran the biggest losers. let's check in with mark cranfield. i know you have been monitoring the impact across the treasury curve. it's difficult to know which asset classes to zoom in on. what stands out to you in terms of how the markets are adjusting to this news? >> it's the macro traders in control so far today and that's not too surprising because we have the cash markets that have not opened so we have to take into account what we have seen. the dollar is strong across the board. suspension of stealth intervention already to try and keep them stable and that certainly the genesis of an article suggesting they are preparing talks with the u.s. but what's interesting is that the short end is looking at the inflation impact from tariffs and higher yields, especially the two year.

the attorney for google argued in front of the ninth circuit court of appeals yesterday that the judgefferently from apple. if google should lose that appeal, it would have to make its play store available to competitors. a ruling could take several months. >> a 311 year old stradivarius violin could become the most expensive instrument ever sold. [music] i'd be afraid to. >> play it. isn't that beautiful? >> i'm not even touch it. right. yeah. sotheby's is auctioning off the violin this friday. music experts predict it will go for between 12 and $18 million. the current record is held by another stradivarius, which sold for 15.9 million back in 2011. the violin that's up for auction was donated to the new england conservatory, which is selling the instrument to fund student scholarships. 650 now, thousands of people marched in protest in a national demonstration called a day without immigrants. [music] many of those who participated also didn't go to school or work, and didn't spend any money to show the economic impact of immigrants in the united states. some businesses also closed.

court level. we shouldn't allow this. um we appealed it up to the appellate level. sion to allow this past november election to proceed as it has for the last previous four elections. we're going to be in front of that court soon. stay tuned. we'll see what happens. it was good to hear that the city was able to reach a settlement with the center for medicare and medicaid services are meant laguna honda could still operate. how did you manage to reach that agreement? it was not an easy conversation . just a little bit of background. so laguna honda has been an incredibly important institution in san francisco for 150 years, taking care of our most vulnerable patients are frail, very elderly patients, many of whom are at end of life. and a few years ago, there were some issues in that hospital. some violations of rules that we very much want to make sure don't get violated. there were folks that weren't using proper ppe, who are bringing cigarette lighters into the facility, who might have brought some contraband into the facilities. we have zero tolerance for that and

appeal. the first case on the court's calendar this morning is 36873, richard bennett tabish and sandra renees finally heard by the nevada state supreme court, dershowitz argued rick and sandy simply did not get a fair trial. --that this defendant was convicted in this case on the basis of insufficient evidence. keith morrison (voiceover): remember that testimony from ted's lawyer? take sandy out of the will, if she doesn't kill me tonight. keith morrison (voiceover): hearsay, said dershowitz. no way to prove ted actually said that. yet the jury heard it stated as fact. and there was something else off about the trial. rick, but not sandy, was also charged and convicted of extortion with a deadly weapon, a completely separate case involving a former business partner. and it should have been a separate trial, too, said dershowitz. it had nothing whatever to do with sandy. yet how could a jury think otherwise? she was sitting right there in the courtroom. and the justices of the supreme court of nevada agreed. rick and sandy would get a new trial. and once again, sandy's benefactor, bill fuller

and a jury would be asked to decide whether what fair that could also be appealed to a higher court theury'secision and so the litigation coulast anywhere between 2 and 5 years as an example of a recent eminent domain proceeding that the city has engaged in relatively recent. the city obtained city obtained the property for the north beach branch libra by eminent domain. that proposal began around 2003. the the litigation that the court process spanned from 2004 2009 so about five years and then the library opened in 2014 . so that was an over year ten year process to obtain that project completion. i think he's a new attorney. >> so just to make sure i'm understanding it correctly, this isn't exactly an eminent process. the result of the process would leave the property vacant for anywhere between 5 to 10 years depending on how it's handled. >> but that that one possible outcome. yes. okay. the thank you for the clarification. i want to return back to this parcelo we heard context of the site today and some questions we've heard some concerns in the community about ensuring short, medium te

asked to decide whether what fair market value is for that property that could also be appealed to a higher court the jury's decision and so the litigation could last anywhere between 2 and 5 years as an example of a recent eminent domain proceeding that the city has engaged in relatively recent. the city obtained city obtained the property for the north beach branch library by eminent domain. that proposal began around 2003. >> the the litigation that the court process spanned from 2004 to 2009 so about five years and then the library opened in 2014 . so that was an over year ten year process to obtain that project completion. i think he's a new attorney. >> so just to make sure i'm understanding it correctly, this isn't exactly an eminent process. the result of the process would leave the property vacant for anywhere between 5 to 10 years depending on how it's handled. >> but that that is one possible outcome. yes. okay. the thank you for the clarification. i want to return back to this parcel so we heard context of the site today and some questions we've heard some concerns in the community ab

court. and indeed, we have not heard officially if the justice department plans to appeal this.> jose gabe gutierrez in washington, thank you so much. that wraps up the hour for me. i'm jose diaz-balart. you can always reach me on social media at jd ballard, and you can watch clips from our show at youtube at msnbc.com/jdb. thank you for the privilege of your time. andrea mitchell picks up with andrea mitchell picks up with more [excited kids] honey? wait, what?! [dog whines] with covid-19 and my heart disease, i'm not gonna wait. if it's covid, paxlovid. paxlovid is an oral treatment for adults with mild-to-moderate covid-19 and a high-risk factor for it becoming severe. it does not prevent covid-19. my symptoms are mild now, but i'm not risking it. paxlovid must be taken within the first 5 days of symptoms and helps stop the virus from multiplying in your body. taking paxlovid with certain medicines can lead to serious or life-threatening side effects, or affect how it or other medicines work, including hormonal birth control. tell your doctor about all medicines, vitamins, an

the pardon power was given to a president at a time there was not all these layers of court cases that you can appeal a break glass in case of emergency type power that obviously presidents have extended and extended and extended. now we are having conversations that the founders never had in their brains as a potential. if we want to change it and we are worried about it, there are routes to ameliorate those concerns with a constitutional amendment. host: this is willy in arkansas, democrat. you are next. caller: my question is all the stuff he says we have learned through the books and social studies and stuff, now we learned all of that back in the day. now they have -- they have somebody doing something different lately to what we learned. the same stuff we learned back in the day it does not associate with us today. host: a question about education again. guest: it is that same point that civics is different than history and civics is different than government. one is an active participation requirement or knowledge and one is knowing the theory behind it. theory and practice are very different

a presidential candidate, donald trump outwardly courted michigan's key arab american voting bloc with promises of peace in the middle east. his appealseemed to have worked. trump won the arab american stronghold of dearborn, michigan, and the entire state with the help of arab supporters who had thoughts like this at the ballot, at the ballot box. >> i feel like. >> he's given us hope. i feel like, you know, all his talking points throughout his campaign about peace and prosperity for everyone and the ability to resolve conflicts. >> the israeli prime minister, benjamin netanyahu, credited trump yesterday for pushing forward the long awaited ceasefire deal. trump, however, now proposing a plan for gaza that went unmentioned during his michigan rallies. >> the u.s. will take over the gaza strip and we will do a job with it, too. we'll own it and be responsible for dismantling all of the dangerous unexploded bombs and other weapons on the site. level the site and get rid of the destroyed buildings. level it out. create an economic development that will supply unlimited numbers of jobs and housing for the people of the area. this was n

in other words, they say the nhs failed and letby�*s conviction should be reconsidered by the court of appeal only happen if the criminal cases review commission agrees. it said... an appeal could take years. tom symonds, bbc news. our home and legal correspondent dominic casciani joins us now from central london. dominic, what happens next? it isa it is a really good question because it is a really 90od tiuestion because glut?» it is a really 90od tiuestilm because gbét’” have it is a really good question because gbatfif have got here is clearly which the defence m something which the defence say, the say amounts to key defence team say amounts to key evidence but the key word that evidence but the key word in that from tom was "in my 27 this 7 - this is the opinion this effie opinions} opinion". this is the opinion of these other medical the these other medical experts. the question whether their these other medical experts. the question whethertheiropinion these other medical experts. the question whether their opinion is question is whether their opinion is sufficient to evidence in % h_s e