appel: sure.rist by training but a lot of my work is medical history. many years ago, and 11th grade, we had to solve a historical question and mine was the question of whether or not warren harding father an illegitimate child. i've been obsessed with the question of presidential health ever since. host: what does the history of president and ex-president -- presidents and presidential candidates and their doctors, what does that tell us about the presidents' fitness for office, and obviously this question now surrounding president biden? dr. appel: what i can emphasize is we will weather know whether a particular president is healthy enough for office at the time. we learned this many. years past defect. people who have seemed very healthy -- past the fact. people who have seemed very healthy at the time -- franklin roosevelt, widely viewed as are most successful, and with a long history of deception by the white house, which is not necessarily bad. because any information we learn about the pre

we will hear from the appellate. thank you.sk a lot of the questions and the same issues i would have brought up in rebuttal. i appreciate the time and -- our hoaccnr state that approval of the other owner is required before improvements or modification to the owner's unit that adversely affects the other unit. we did not hear from them. the work was done prior to obtaining the permit. the permit holder fengz mentioned this would beying settled began work without we will reaching out to us. approval from the other ordinance required before an owner making modification to the unit that may affect the open space requires approval by the planning department. that is specific in there. not in the building upon department but planning department. if planning has to be involved to give input on the fences they should as well come to us and hoa first. we ask you revoke the permits. come in discuss this with you. we are in the we have discussed mediation and we are you know -- we are hoping that is going to move forward. we think that

the appellates. i ask the board denight appeal to the permit being poorly properly issued to thetrary without merit. this delay brought stress to my family especially my wife. our son started school in august in glen park. zeal to coordinate drop offs and added stress we have to commute from sunset versus our project if our project completed the commute would be 5 to 10 minute drive this brought a wedge between a good relationship with my neighbors. i understands their occurrence the liability for lack of drain sxaj not communicating and delaying the project is sadning t. is brings to question whether they are responsible for the over time damage to run off and lack of drainage they admit in the their brief. aye open to skrfrgzs but will not entree selfishness. i work hard to do things correctly in the laws. i fear the delays will add more time to the project and fees and costs associated result nothing a large are financial burden. we are blue calf collar workers who don't have resource at our dispo

in addition to just the supreme court hework you're in charge o the whole appellate docket.n the supreme court every month to go argue the most important case. is very hard because there are nine people and they are all confident they have a lot to say. they are all trying to speak to each other at the same time they are asking you questions sometimes you're just getting in the way up there. [laughter] they are having a very nice conversation and what are you doing trying to get a word in edge wise.super interesting cases and you can't say to the president i'm sorry could you just hold off and wait a few more years. i would've loved to have done it a little bit longer. my first case of the court was the argument of citizen united. citizens united had been this campaign-finance case it started off pretty small campaign-finance and had not gone well to the government this was in the spring just as i came onto the court and one of my associates have done the argument in the last day of the year the court issued every argument noticed. and the court in particular wanted to bit a

by the way, the appellate court has found in an earlier instance in this very case that judge cannon was wrong as a matter of law. your viewers may remember that she had appointed a special master after the execution of a search warrant at that time mar-a-lago estate. and the appellate court reversed her on that and said the procedures she employed were wholly improper, and it reversed her rather quickly and let the fbi and the department of justice have access to the documents that were lawfully seized from the home. so could that happen again? sure. will that happen quickly? i doubt it. >> chuck, stay with us. the whole question of what is de facto brings on a whole new meaning. i want to bring in msnbc legal correspondent lisa rubin. lisa, your thoughts. >> i woke this morning, jose, to this. it was a late night for me. i'm kind of astonished. the reason i'm astonished has as much to do with judge cannon as the issue that caused her to dismiss. this motion was argued to her extensively over the course of two days last month. do you recall those oral arguments she expressed what ma

i never had an appellate court.i practiced pretty young and had been an academic and government lawyer and policymaker. so it was my first appellate argument ever that was a little bit petrifying. now on the other hand, i can't really tell you that i thought the fate of campaign-finance rested on my shoulders because it was so clear what they were going to do. >> i almost talked myself into thinking -- >> i don't think in this case where the issue. you should argue about whether the cases should be overruled. we are going to hear this case againga in the next year and particularly address the breathing whether the cases should be overruled. i thought the answer was going to be yes they should be overruled. >> i thought that the pressure was off a little bit. not to say that it wasn't still a little bit scary, but one of the great things about the office is you work with magnificent people to pass the collection of lawyers. i remember i had a few sentences prepared to say first thing before the questions started. i f

appellate processes can take a very long time.f there is a sentence it will go through the typical appellate process. >> julie: chuck schumer ripping the supreme court's decision saying this. this disgraceful decision by the maga supreme court he called it comprised of three justices appointed by mr. trump himself enables the former president to weaken our democracy by breaking the law. you are nodding your head. >> i think it's a very myopic position because of hatred toward donald trump. this deals with the american presidency. when you start going down hypothetical ideas what might happen. >> julie: the wall street editorial board so-called maga supreme court doesn't exist. unanimous decisions in the following cases, colorado trump ballot case, ruling against pro-life doctors suing the fda over the abortion pill and decision allowing the nra to sue a new york regulator for coerceing insurers to stop doing business with gun rights group. out of the 49 decisions by the court in this term, only 11 were decided along straight ideol

appellate avenues aggressively. and we do expect he will be vindicated. thank you. >> so we obviously had audio problems there. not sure what happened. but you heard at the end adam feen making the statement that really supports what we've been talking about and the expectation that there will be appeal. he sees grave appellate problems in this case. we couldn't -- none of us reads lips. don't know what senator menendez said. i thought he seemed to say that he had every faith the law and the facts would not sustain this verdict at the beginning. but don't hold me to that. we'll try to see if we can somehow get a clean copy. but it seems like there was a bad feed there. but the whole idea, charles, of grave appellate problems is a pretty strong statement. >> it is. and i think that on the heels of a trial and a jury verdict that does not go along with what you may have wanted that's the type of rhetoric you would expect to hear. you don't want to appear to the public downtrodden, particularly because you're talking a

with a traditional process, we're trying our best to do it with fight thing your call is in the appellate division in the silver and gold. well, i mean, they would argue that it hasn't happened soon enough. let me, let me just repeat exactly what has happened in the last week or so. because of course, the you mentioned that started with these a student protests against the job. quite a system with 30 percent of jobs were originally was a full veterans of the war of independence. i'm that close relatives. and like now all these protests, the supreme court has slash that 25 percent with 2 percent financing minorities and those with disability. so in siri, 93 percent of jobs now should be given to people on marriage. is that how you see it? 93 percent of jobs and bangladesh should go to people who st. peter's over here. do you then accept the 93 percent with go to the might? so you all in agreement that they quotes a system unfairly benefited those close to the rolling a while me lead polity, which of course was founded by those who for the independence for that is the arguments that the pro

so at the same time, the government challenged the judgment of the high court in the appellate division of the supreme court and our position on the court and the students demand were on the same page. there was no difference. so we get, we repeated that fair to the students, that if there's a judgement coming out of the high court, that cannot be changed in the street by demonstrating. so we went through the division and telling challenging that judgment so that we can restore back this article that was issued by the government back in 2018, something which was the demand of the students to. so we told them, why don't you come and join us attached your attach to a lawyer in the court. let us do it together in the court. so we kept on telling them to be patient. let us do it to the judge of process. so our position at their provision was totally on the same page. but steve, they went ahead with this book that us, and they wanted us to make a declaration that we're gonna have to uh, farm a commission so that we can refund the court. and then we said, when it is a sub do, does matter, the

evacuations are in place for north, south and east of lake county highway, west appellate stage road, north of lally toll road and south of highway 29 and east of lake county highway. there are also evacuation warnings for the following areas, south and east of livermore road, west of oak hill road, north and east of lake county highway. we say good afternoon to you. i am ryan as we continue to follow this breaking news and let's bring in jessica birch live in the virtual view studio and jessica, dry conditions out there. extremely hot conditions and now you add the winter. just a bad combination. >> that's exactly the reason why the weather service issued a red flag warning like a day like today. we were anticipating conditions like this all week long and low relative humidity mixed with high winds of these are fiber the conditions and for forcing the bay area and that is exactly what we are dealing with and this red flag warning remains in effect for our highlighted communities on this map in calistoga is what of them at whole road as we zoom in and look at current conditions with t

when judge are inexperienced, they tend to follow supreme courts, appellate courts, precedent. that is the gold standard. instead she's going rogue and doing her own thing. she had the invitation from justice alcohol mass where this issue hadn't been raised or argued. i can't stress to you how unyoushl it is for a supreme court justice to be opining on something with no relevance whatsoever to the issue before him knowing this is a live issue in a completely unrelated case. it was an invitation for her and she took it. others may look at this and try to use it to their advantage, but it's so bad that i don't see it working. >> let me take what you just said and build on that along with what andrew just said, if i can, lisa. there's been reporting that smith's office has been putting together essentially a list, dossier, whatever you want to call it, of what they see as bad decisions by judge cannon. let's assume they decide to appeal to the 11th circuit. are they ready to go? can they do it quickly? as andrew touched on, is it possible they could also petition for a new judge w

attorney in chief of the appellant's -- appellate circuit.r take on another rider sentenced to jail while another big fish gets immunity from the supreme court. >> andrew will tell you something federal prosecutors don't like to do is to see what we will call the little fish pay the price for a crime one big fish walk away. sometimes that is the reality. it can be difficult for instance in organized crime cases to go all the way to the top and that is why you hear prosecutors working their way as far up as possible and i would not be so quick to be sure that justice won't ultimately come for donald trump. if justice comes at the hands of the voters when the election takes place, then federal prosecutors get a little bit more time on the clock to make sure they get the job done. >> andrew, has the supreme court given trump a get out of jail free card or does jack smith still have a shot at trying the january 6 case, or in short, doesn't require what joyce just said, the election of the -- the re-election of the democrat in the white house to g

whether you know, he was famous about this book about appellation and in appellation, ohio, they aredo any of the things he promised to make their lives better and he has done more for the silicon valley than he has people there or whether it is about his never trump background or now how he is trying to reshape his stance on abortion. he isn't honest and he will remake himself into what is convenient or politically expedient to service ambition. >> you have a big job ahead of you and a big senate race and thank you for your time this evening. we do appreciate it. >> it is super interesting. hearing this home state perspective on him. in ohio, we have all been in this business long enough we saw ohio go from a purple state to a red state and sherry brown has been an exception and there is a good chance hopefully of holding onto a seat in the democrats i think believe he has a chance to hold onto it. but to see jd vance ride to the senate on the strength of that autobiography and the strength of that book he wrote and then essentially beat the senator of peter thiel and say the senate

. >> are talking doctor jacob appel about the history of their presidents and health issues gives a cally party democrats two 202-748-8000. republicansnd 202-748-8001. an independence to 202-748-8000 two. start calling in now. do you think the white house physician doctor kevin o'connor needs, to be more forthcoming about the president's health? >> i'll be can i have no idea how forthcoming he is. >> do you think you should go in front of cameras and answer questions from reporters? >> not necessarily. we primary job for doctor or, is to beat the white house in the present get the president healthy, keep them in good shape and candidly that is with the losses. the accountability act guarantees confidentiality between the president and his physician. the mistake is to believe the job that physician hasof a secod duty to serve the public and some broader way payto the publc and create other mechanisms and that is not that the response of the white house. the white house physician had john kennedy's white house initiative was a household name. others very much behind-the-scenes. tiny very m

with her affair with someone else working in the office that have held that case up in the georgia appellate i have no idea what's going to happen with the georgia case. all of this will be resolved after the election. sumi: richard paynter, thank you as always for joining us on bbc news. let's go now down the line to republican congressman might carry from ohio, joining us on the phone. i hope you can hear me, it is quite loud in the convention center in milwaukee. j.d. vance, the pick for vice presidential nominee for donald trump, center from your state. what's your reaction? >> i'm excited. we are kind of the cradle of president's in ohio and it's great to have a vice president. j.d. is a dear friend of mine, somebody who has been very effective since he has been elected to the senate. he is somebody i think will do a great job for the president and looking forward to having him on the ballot. sumi: what do you think he brings to the ticket? what priorities will he bring to the platform? rep. carey: he is strong on the workforce, strong in a region of our state and most of a region that

the appellates.eal to the permit being poorly properly issued to thetrary without merit. this delay brought stress to my family especially my wife. our son started school in august in glen park. zeal to coordinate drop offs and added stress we have to commute from sunset versus our project if our project completed the commute would be 5 to 10 minute drive this brought a wedge between a good relationship with my neighbors. i understands their occurrence the liability for lack of drain sxaj not communicating and delaying the project is sadning t. is brings to question whether they are responsible for the over time damage to run off and lack of drainage they admit in the their brief. aye open to skrfrgzs but will not entree selfishness. i work hard to do things correctly in the laws. i fear the delays will add more time to the project and fees and costs associated result nothing a large are financial burden. we are blue calf collar workers who don't have resource at our disposal. life does wonders but t

igor, look, today, or rather the day before, when the appellate court there was deciding whether to keeper house arrest, his lawyers said that mykola should be released, because if he stays at home, he will not be able to attend meetings of the verkhovna rada , and if he will not be able to attend the meeting of the council, then the activity of the verkhovna rada will be. paralysed, i don’t know, maybe someone believed it, but you tell me, what does the absence of a specific, even such an active deputy, affect, you know, well, it doesn’t affect, er, it doesn’t affect units do not affect the actions of the verkhovna rada, let's put it this way, we have several people's deputies today in one way or another deprived of the opportunity to be present at the meetings of the verkhovna rada, some of them are suspected of treason and they are .

that will go back through the appellate court and same as it stands for his public speeches. that is something that the court is going to have to reassess. all of that leaves room for a genuine question whether a president is acting inside or outside that official capacity and whether he can be prosecuted. that is not political. it shows the court wasn't willing to just slap down this prosecution in full total slapdown. they leave room for prosecutions in some cases in the outlying conditions. it shows that it is really not . >> sandra: this is private from official conduct will be difficult but not always. take the president's alleged attempt to organize alternative slates of electors. in my view that conduct is private and therefore not entitled to protection. weigh in further as this is going to be -- there will be a lot of reaction and debate in the wake of this ruling. >> justice barrett's opinion is not the majority controlling opinion with respect to that point. our view of this is that on remand back to the d.c. district, as andrew was actually just covering, a vast m

attorney and former chief of the appellate division in the 11th circuit.y of alabama school of law, and a cohost of the # sisters-in-law podcast. they are both msnbc legal analyst. joyce, before we get to judge cannon, what is your view on today's january 6th news? another small fish sentenced to jail while the big fish who inside of the mob on january 6th gets immunity from the supreme court? >> you know, andrew will tell you that something the federal prosecutors don't like to do is to see what we will call the little fish pay the price for a crime when big fish walk away. i mean, sometimes that's the reality. it can be difficult, for instance, in organized crime cases to go all the way to the top. but that is why you hear prosecutors working their way as far up as possible, and emma jonathan, look. i would not be so quick to be sure that justice will ultimately come for donald trump. if justice comes at the hands of the voters when the election takes place, then federal prosecutors get a little more time on the clock to make sure they get the job done.

well, you know, which introduce yourself, she is appellation america. which introduced herself to the first time she said i'm from kentucky or woman is in fully dressed without her gun. that was her attitude. and, and you know she was tough and she was disciplined and she is the reason why i've had so many good opportunity i've had in my life. people don't realize waspe an incredibly sweet and kind and caring person. i'll never forget i was probably ten or 11 years old when she picked me up from school and there was just very, i've never seen this person should public for 215 come young girl in the back of card could freak out. i get emotional telling the story i don't think i've ever told the story before but mamaw said who is this person? mamaw said don't worry about it. i said okay. i shut up. eventually we dropped her off and then went back home. i asked mamaw who wasn't what she said that was a little girl that i guess there was some pretty bad abuse in her house. and when the little girl ran away from home and tried to find a safe space, she's a w

those three constitutional points, you would think a former federal appellate judge, attorney generalited states would appeal this and they will lose. they lost immunity, people saying donald trump's is ridiculous. it is not ridiculous, trump won. obstruction was not correct, they misapplied what did supreme court say? misapplied. in case of georgia, on appeal for unethical conduct by the day in manhattan. the president has pathway to supreme court. lawfare is almost dead, on its back because donald trump defeated it and he has saved our justice system. that is what he's done by defe defeating, he has "saved: a war reporter's mission to make it home"ed the justice system. we are behind him 100% period. >> bryan: mark, you have not been on in nine days, in 10 minuteings, you covered nine days. can't wait to watch your show saturday and sunday. more "fox and friends" in a moment, don't move. if you have chronic kidney disease you can reduce the risk of kidney failure with farxiga. because there are places you'd like to be. farxiga can cause serious side effects, including ketoacidosis t

voulons l'abrogation de la réforme et retraite, il renvoie nos racines en fin de matinée la cgt a appeléfacebook. really impressive how still today uh give to people the sent the idea of freedom imam hussein. means a message of defiance against oppression and dictatorship is relevant for all times and applicable for broader audience for generations to come, the headlines on press tv, yemen launches a drone strike onto aviv leaving one person dead and several others injured. at least 50 palestines are killed in the latest israeli strikes across gaza with total death troll approaches 38,850 and the international court of justice says israel's practices and policies in the occupied palestinian territory are in violation of... international law.

determination, i think there's a very good chance this case will work it is way back through the appellates and maybe even back to the supreme court to determine if they made an appropriate and correct finding. ashley: so we could go through the whole psychoand will being changed depending on how the courts rule and could end up at even more final level and it would be even more dig right down into the nitty-gritty and could end up back at the supreme court. >> yeah and the court points out they're a court of verne view not first view and can't make factual determinations and the idea of whether somebody is immune from prosecution is something that is appealable pretrial so if a lower court determines that president trump is for instance not immune because they find the acts to be unofficial, that is an appealable issue through the appellate courts before trial. so this is a long way from going to trial more than likely if it ever get there is and certainly a huge win for former president trump. ashley: now, the people upset with this on the other side and prosecutors arguing we're just gi

court will certainly give it a fresh look.— the appellant court will certainly give it a fresh look.alk _ give it a fresh look. sarah, always good to talk to — give it a fresh look. sarah, always good to talk to you, _ give it a fresh look. sarah, always good to talk to you, thank- give it a fresh look. sarah, always good to talk to you, thank you - give it a fresh look. sarah, always good to talk to you, thank you forj good to talk to you, thank you for coming on the programme. we will talk aplenty what aboutjoe biden after the break. you are watching bbc news. we are continuing to watch pictures from the convention, we have just seen the two trump sons are waiting for their father to appear alongside jd vance and we will bring you that live of course. course. trailing in the polls. the attack ads on hold, and the alarm growing among democrats that not only will they lose the white house but the house and the senate too. tonight the president will sit down with nbc�*s lester holt, part of the rehabilitation the biden campaign planned after that disastrous debate with donald trump ea

>> because they know it's an issue, they don't want the appellant issue, and if judge -- if that sentencein the new york and state court, it's often adjourned because issues like this, not involving a former president, but issues come up and it's adjourned. >> we just got the letter from trump's team to juan merchan, and tell me about the trump team and their strategy with using this immunity decision? >> the argument they are making, donald trump's attorneys, are not necessarily that donald trump was immune from the charges he was found guilty of, but some of the underlying evidence, particularly the tweets and public statements used and brought into as evidence by the district attorney's office to help the judge find he was guilty. for these reasons, most of the president's public communications are likely to fall comfortably within the outer parameter, and if the d.a.'s office was not able to bring some of the testimony in, it's not assured the jury would have found him guilty. this is now where july 11th was supposed to be the sentencing, and we expect that to be pushed off based off

appellate avenues. aggressively and we expect to be vindicated. thank you. >> thank you. [inaudible conversations] the house will be in order. [inaudible conversations] >> there we go. hello everyone. welcome. we are few minutes later we understand there's a massive line of security downstairs to get an so i apologize a little bit for that but we expect folks to be joining in after get started. thank you guys all for coming on behalf of the u.s. pca. welcome to milwaukee. we are thrilled that you were here to talk about the 2nd amendment standing up for our constitutional rights in this election and the importance of personal safety and security i'm the managing director of government affairs and executive director of the u.s. epa action fund. i did want to take a moment i think it's important for all of us to pause briefly and hold a moment of silence for our lives that were off or after the convention last saturday. i want to member corey is a man who was senselessly murdered as well is if you others

arrête il renvoit nos racines en fin de matinée la cgt a appelé à faire in the beginning god creat. didht. based on the old toraw squirrels, jewish rabbies believed that light was god's first creation. 20th century physicists doubted the nature of light, was light small particles moving in space, or was it like seawaves? according to jewish rabbies, water was second element created by god. water with its wave motion, was the first jewish embodiment of matter. in jewish mythology, creation was god's will to transform energy into matter. at the beginning of the 20th century, a jewish scientist from europe established the equation as his theoretical foundation in physics, a theory in which matter and energy were interchangeable with one another. albert einstein, like many other jewish scientists, immigrated to america with the spread of nacism and his threat against jews. at the same time, research into a backlash had begun, this time, instead of the movement of energy to matter, the movement of matter to energy was invested. this reverse move had the opposite result, if the movement of en

appellation feud -- he grew up in a troubled and broken family.is parents got divorced when he was very young. his mother struggled with drug addiction. he was raised primarily by his grandparents. he spent his summers growing up returning to kentucky, to coal country where meemaw's family roots were. he said he felt like kentucky was his spiritual home even though middletown, ohio was his actual home. his mother struggle with drug addiction has become essential part of his political story. the way republicans have been using the opioid epidemic and tying it to immigration is a good symbol for the various assaults on national sovereignty -- this is how they would put it. the united states has surrendered control of its border and its people to outside influences, to foreign invasion, to use a popular conservative term. we have abandoned protecting our borders and that means immigrants, drug dealers are assaulting our american citizens. obviously it is a political risk that resonates with the republican base and an interesting symbol for the way re

i good thirds of flights are cancelled, further flights disrupted for appellant the problem here is thatholidays have just started this week. even at the best of times we find here at this airport in particular every school holiday there are stories of the queues at the airports, so this would have been a difficult week for travel anyway. you add this global it outage, and it is pretty distressing for people. inside the terminal, we had to move out, we could not get reception, everyone is trying to rearrange their plans, but inside it is very crowded. lots of anxious —looking faces. it is not chaotic. there is a calm scene. there are people with high viz vests walking around the airport dry to calm people down and give them information, but a lot of concern, people wondering what to do now, they cannot get to their holiday on time. and very much like in britain, some hospitals have been affected. northern germany, quite a lot of hospitals have cancelled pre—planned operations. emergency services still carrying on. certain regions being massively affected when it comes to public services,

you can maybe remove them from appellate jurisdiction which is where the heat is right now. the thing is, i don't have to convince you. i don't have to convince a bunch of legal academics. i have to convince the three justices who are on the court who have already served longer than 18 years. do you know who they are? john roberts, clarence thomas, samuel alito. what you think they will say when i roll in and say, by the way, time for you all to get. they are going to laugh at me, and they will reject term limits. we will be right back where i started. where we started. that's your problem with term limits. it's not that they could not be constitutional. it's the people who get to decide whether or not they are constitutional was say they are unconstitutional. this reform, even if you put forth the massive political effort it will take to get this past the house and senate, probably break the filibuster to pass the senate, signed by the president. when it gets to the supreme court, they will say no, son. the second problem is if you think about how term limits will work? let

many expect the appellate court to reduce the damages at least, the appellate court already decided thatefendants could post only $170 million less than the full judgment to protect his assets during appeal, that is foreshadowing, there is still no certainty it is possible that trump will have to pay some or all of this massive judgment someday in the interest will rack up the longer the appeal is fault, these arguments and briefs from trump's lawyers are reminded us of the law for him that trump is not over the civil cases continue even though we have the supreme court important immunity decision recently and skewered the criminal cases against him but new york attorney general letitia james and the judges hold a tremendous amount of power over trump and his financial fate. stuart: outrageous but that is my opinion, thank you very much indeed, the market has been open for 24 minutes we have the dow up 90 but the nasdaq powering ahead of 268, the ten year treasury, down at four-point to 2%, bitcoin, gold, that was close to a record high is stepped away but 24.42 announce, bitcoin rallyin

where as it moves its way up through the federal appellate courts, we could come out with differing and contradictory results. and that's typically exactly the kind of case that the supreme court can and should take and evan perez, i believe is set and ready now, my apologies, evan, if i came out to you too quickly, there is your reaction to all of this. i mean if you could also speak to something elie was just saying a few moments ago, we've had special counsels before. we've had special counsel investigations before, and those judges in those cases didn't toss them out. what's, what's going on here yeah. >> look, jim, this was part of the conversation that happened at the hearing that we were just a few weeks ago. one of the things that judge cannon was asking was you know, the trump team is arguing that there's not been any any special counsel's that wasn't appointed it by the senate, that wasn't confirmed by the senate on the republican administration. and they cited bill barr and it was during that hearing that you saw the justice department team during a break came back and said,

s so in addition to just the supreme court work, you are really in charge of the whole appellate docket for the united states. c and in terms of the supreme court, every month you argue the most important case and it's really fun arguing before the supreme court, very hard because there are 9 people, they all have a lot to say and are all trying to speak to each other at the same time they are asking you questions and sometimes you are just getting in the way up there, having a very nice conversation, what are you trying to do getting a word in edge wise? but superinteresting cases. youi' can't say to the preside, could you hold off and wait a few more years but i would' ve loved to have done it for longer. my first case at the court was about citizens united. citizens united had been this campaign-finance case which started off as a pretty small campaign-finance case and it had not gone well for the government. in the spring just as i came onto the court, one of my associates had done the argument and in the last day of the year the court issues a re-argument notice and it said in part

type of incarceratory sentence, i'd expect him to stay that decision, to put it on hold until the appellate about the supreme court decisions as of late? rightfully and understandably there's been a lot of focus on that immunity decision, but if you look at the number of the decisions coming out of this last term of the supreme court, they have essentially broadened and consolidated the powers of the executive branch to the presidency. what are some of the potential implications here especially if someone like donald trump or someone else with his tendencies and proclivities were to win the white house again? >> simone, i went back and knowing i was going to talk to you this morning and knowing you had a conversation with the head of the heritage foundation who is the point on this project 2025 scenario. i went back to see what the head of the heritage foundation said. and he said here, and i quote, that we're in the process of a second american revolution. that's what he said in response to this ruling. and here's why he said that because this ruling really does three things. it virtually

argument that's only place you can begin new evidence and arguments and you cannot do that at the appellate delay in the district attorney's office and the judge were right to consent to the delay because this is where they should be litigated but ultimately the question is similarly litigated unsuccessfully by the trauma team when they try to remove the case to federal court back in 2023, i think the judge in the d.a. did the right thing by consenting to delay the sentencing, i don't ultimately think the motion is going to be successful. trey: let's listen to what are essentially public therapy some on the left are engaged in and we'll talk about on the other side. >> if leaders can be immune for criminal acts while in office designed to overturn a free and fair election, then that might very well be the end of our republic, this partisan supreme court just doesn't care. >> i guess theoretically president biden acting within the scope of his official duties could dispatch the military to take out the conservative justices on the court. >> the president because in a king in the first circum

hear the argument, though the only placen to bring in new arguments you can't donnot that at the appellebecause this delay in the district attorney's officeic and the judge right to consentth to that delay because this is the place where the issue should be litigated. ultimately, the question is similarly litigated unsuccessfully by the trump team when they tried to move this tow federal court backhe in 2023.20 i think the judge and d.a.'sd. office to the right thing by consenting to delayed the sentencing.ly i don't think the motion will bl successful.en >> trey: all right, katie, let's listen to essentially public therapy sessions, some on the left are engaged in and we will tal k about it on the other side. >> if leaders can be immune from criminal acts while in office designed to overturn free and fair election, it might be thett end of our republic. par this partisan supreme court just doesn't care. >> i guess theoretically,ithi president biden acting within the scopthe of his official duts could dispatch the military to take out the conservative justices on the court. >> the presid

nous voulons laboration de la réforme des retraites, il renvoit le racine en fin de matinée la cgt a appelé sell my things, to buy a piece of cloth and some strings, make it w with a long tail so that a child. somewhere in gaza, looking heaven in the eye, awaiting his dad who left in a blaze, and bid no one faill well, not even to his flesh, not even to himself, sees the kite, my kite you made, flying. up above and thinks for moment, an angel is there, bringing back love, if must die, let it bring hope, let it be a test. this week on expose, western media is a blaze with two tentalizing stories: trump's second presidential run is tering under a pile of criminal charges, while biden's re-election bid could be song. by party leaders nudging him to retire to avoid humiliating defeat. now online, the commentary on the biden trump clash is relentless. biden in particular is getting roasted for his clumsy performance, tripping over details and delivering lines like a malfunctioning robot. adding fuel to the fire, new poll from the new york times and sienna college shows trump extending his lead i

l'iran doit cesser son soutien aux acteurs déstabilisateur, exercer et appeler à la retenue dans toute en irak, en syrie, au yémen. et au liban, la france est profondément attachée à la stabilité régionale et à la sécurité de ses partenaires dans la région et nous appelons à ce que tout soit fait pour éviter une nouvelle escalade militaire, nous sommes en contact avec toutes les parties pour travailler à la désescalade et pour éviter une guerre qui aurait des conséquences terribles pour la région. le président de la république emmanuel macron l'a dit au premier ministre israélien et au président iranien. um as soon as we get some someone speaking english once in all because we do not have a real-time translator for for france on standby, we're going to uh swing over to mr. bruce kats in montreal. bruce, un security council uh members so far are back to uh step base step one urging for immediate seizfire, the uh release of captives on both sides uh humanitarian aid entry into gaza respect for security council resolutions and uh all of them said this is not the time. for ramping up tensi

those two other cases in substantial ways, assuming, for example, the georgia case survives this appellateceeding with respect to fani willis' ability to remain in control. >> for people, chuck, who say -- again, non-lawyers, normal people, i thought the supreme court's job was to clarify, was to make understandable what the laws of this country are and what they mean. do you understand if they throw their hands up and say, what? >> i do. i'm not sure that the courtesying its job always as to clarify. i think they often see their job as to pronounce. here they've pronounced, but that throws a great deal of uncertainty back to the district courts, not just in mrmg, not just before judge chutkan, not just in georgia, but for all -- think about the other decisions we saw from the supreme court in the last couple weeks. upsetting the chevron press denlt, which has a wlot to do with how strif agencies determine regulations and how much deference they're owed. that's gone. it's a pronouncement. now what happens? it's often left -- not always, but often left for the lower courts to sort out these