SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
25
25
Nov 16, 2017
11/17
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 25
favorite 0
quote 0
we've conducted studies on the appellant ease property. this diagram shows existing proposed conditions at 9:00 a.m. at three different times of year. there's sets showing existing and proposes. this is 9:00 a.m. in the spring, existing proposed 9:00 a.m. in the summer, and 9:00 a.m. in the winter. there's a worst case scenario, this is the addition and this is the appellant's house, and there's no shadows created on his property. also, here's a photo taken at the roof of the proposed project, and as you can see, in this area, there's a lot of buildings at the height of the proposed addition, so there's already blockage horizontally at this level. the appellant claims that the midblock character will be adversely impacted by the proposed project. the proposed project is compatible with the existing midblock configuration. there's this site plan, you look at the rear yard, we are -- there is no horizontal addition. the existing setback is 33'9". the required set back is 25 feet, and we're well within what's required. also, if you look at th
we've conducted studies on the appellant ease property. this diagram shows existing proposed conditions at 9:00 a.m. at three different times of year. there's sets showing existing and proposes. this is 9:00 a.m. in the spring, existing proposed 9:00 a.m. in the summer, and 9:00 a.m. in the winter. there's a worst case scenario, this is the addition and this is the appellant's house, and there's no shadows created on his property. also, here's a photo taken at the roof of the proposed project,...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
40
40
Nov 25, 2017
11/17
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 40
favorite 0
quote 0
i know the appellant brought up structural concerns. i've seen a lot worse than this, so i'm not worried about it, but they would be warned to tread carefully when they are excavating for the slab, and obviously, the building inspector's going to be involved in that process for the inspections. apart from that, i didn't see anything else. we did have some active complaints a couple of years ago. they were subsequently closed. that was in 2015, in november . the complainant was the appellant as well, and it was about a structure built in the rear yard with the permits, and we found that the structure was just a greenhouse, and we closed the complaint. >> inspector duffy, looking at the brief on exhibit 2, where there's a picture of the properties from the rear, the street looks like it's slope down, so if that was the case, the foundation footings could not be matched up, so maybe the drawing is incorrect? >> maybe possibly. >> yeah, maybe maybe her drawing is more correct, because looking at the back, it looks like there is some sloping
i know the appellant brought up structural concerns. i've seen a lot worse than this, so i'm not worried about it, but they would be warned to tread carefully when they are excavating for the slab, and obviously, the building inspector's going to be involved in that process for the inspections. apart from that, i didn't see anything else. we did have some active complaints a couple of years ago. they were subsequently closed. that was in 2015, in november . the complainant was the appellant as...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
40
40
Nov 28, 2017
11/17
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 40
favorite 0
quote 0
the appellant is incorrect. again, the project would not remove travel lanes and know -- no reduction of pathways would occur. it is not leading to an unusual circumstance. the appellant brought up parking and these are social issues while they're concerning they're not seeking appeal. further the remove of two underutilized commercial loading zones would not be considered an unusual circumstance so a class 1 exemption was determined to be the properly level of review. other issues have been addressed and our responses the appellant claims the current project compliend combine combined with the other project -- thus we've addressed the other concerns in our responses. for the reason stated in our appeal responses and statements made at the hearing. the determination complies with the requirements of class 1 categorical exemption is the appropriate environmental review determination. the appellant has not provided substantial evidence to refute the conclusion of the department. therefore i urge you to uphold the
the appellant is incorrect. again, the project would not remove travel lanes and know -- no reduction of pathways would occur. it is not leading to an unusual circumstance. the appellant brought up parking and these are social issues while they're concerning they're not seeking appeal. further the remove of two underutilized commercial loading zones would not be considered an unusual circumstance so a class 1 exemption was determined to be the properly level of review. other issues have been...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
21
21
Nov 19, 2017
11/17
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 21
favorite 0
quote 0
the appellants raise two issues. one they felt it was not a cooperative process that included the presidio heights neighborhood association in the process and i want to take you back for a minute and say that this truly has been a cooperative process in terms of coming up with that well designed facility that we had. san francisco here exercises its proprietary rights with respect to this design, so three years ago, we began working on a design with the san francisco public utility commission fore them to approve this design in order tfor it t be leased to verizon wireless. it went through ceqa review, and the board, and the board threw out a design to keep this design. this design was thought to fit into the context of san francisco and to meet those -- to match those poles that they currently are attached to, and that is the cooperative process that began several years ago and then continues with article 25, wherein this situation, presidio heights neighbors received a notice, and they did protest in a timely matte
the appellants raise two issues. one they felt it was not a cooperative process that included the presidio heights neighborhood association in the process and i want to take you back for a minute and say that this truly has been a cooperative process in terms of coming up with that well designed facility that we had. san francisco here exercises its proprietary rights with respect to this design, so three years ago, we began working on a design with the san francisco public utility commission...
0
0.0
Nov 27, 2017
11/17
by
CSPAN2
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 2
greg is an exceptionally taloned and brilliant appellate lawyer. his commitment to public service and academic qualifications are impeccable. in addition we can attest to greg's thoughtfulness, temperament and character. the group of distinguished attorneys who have in their own words worked with greg or litigated against him in the supreme court or federal courts of appeals or otherwise familiar with his work, penned a letter of support for mr. katsas' nomination. we hold a broad range of policy reviews, but we are united in our view based on our experience noodged of greg's work that he is highly qualified to serve on the d.c. circuit. once he completed his time at the department of justice and returned to the private practice, he has continued to impress his colleagues with his legal skill and judgment. his firm's managing partner wrote a letter signed by partners around the globe recommending his nomination. here's what they wrote. greg is a truly great legal thinker with a well-earned reputation for integrity, fair-mindedness, and respect for
greg is an exceptionally taloned and brilliant appellate lawyer. his commitment to public service and academic qualifications are impeccable. in addition we can attest to greg's thoughtfulness, temperament and character. the group of distinguished attorneys who have in their own words worked with greg or litigated against him in the supreme court or federal courts of appeals or otherwise familiar with his work, penned a letter of support for mr. katsas' nomination. we hold a broad range of...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
25
25
Nov 20, 2017
11/17
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 25
favorite 0
quote 0
or the appellant representative. colleagues, without objection we will proceed in this way, and open up this hearing and at this time we will ask for the appellant or the appellant representative to please come forward. >> here or here? >> president breed: either, whichever you prefer. you have ten minutes. >> we have one question for some of our speakers. did they have to speak at a speaker card, the public members, members of the public on our side? they are speaking after the ten minutes, do they have to fill out a card? >> president breed: no. >> ok, thank you. president breed, members of the board, thank you for permitting us to speak in support of this appeal today. my name is mark bruno, i run a program for the homeless in north beach where i live. before we discuss the appeal itself, and that will be presented mostly by an architect, brent mcdonald, and mataas, before we discuss this, i would like to request that the city attorney permit our elected representative, aaron peskin, to debate today, to vote and o
or the appellant representative. colleagues, without objection we will proceed in this way, and open up this hearing and at this time we will ask for the appellant or the appellant representative to please come forward. >> here or here? >> president breed: either, whichever you prefer. you have ten minutes. >> we have one question for some of our speakers. did they have to speak at a speaker card, the public members, members of the public on our side? they are speaking after...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
21
21
Nov 18, 2017
11/17
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 21
favorite 0
quote 0
originally opposed later wrote letters of support [ inaudible ] the appellant claims 140 neighbors are against that project, yet 35 of them don't even live in pacific heights, 40 of them are duplicates. four of them are at the u.p.s. p.o. box center representing themselves as neighbors. many having seen the 34r57bs nor t -- plans nor the studies but are friend of the deniros and agreed to support them. we have been going through this process for almost three years now, and we'd really like to have a functional home. we're available for questions. >> thank you. >> mr. teague? >> good evening again president honda, commissioners, cory teague from planning department staff. i'd like to begin with some procedural department background. the subject property at 2523 steiner street is located within the rh 1 zoning district and a 40 x height and bulk district. the proposal is to expand the existing third and fourth story of the existing single-family home into the required rear yard. based on the design feedback from the planning department's residential design planning team, the planning dep
originally opposed later wrote letters of support [ inaudible ] the appellant claims 140 neighbors are against that project, yet 35 of them don't even live in pacific heights, 40 of them are duplicates. four of them are at the u.p.s. p.o. box center representing themselves as neighbors. many having seen the 34r57bs nor t -- plans nor the studies but are friend of the deniros and agreed to support them. we have been going through this process for almost three years now, and we'd really like to...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
49
49
Nov 18, 2017
11/17
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 49
favorite 0
quote 0
appellant. the appellant is commenting on this one pole and he indicated that as with other developers of buildings and technology that the neighborhood is open and willing to accommodate a -- the reasonable development of new technologies. that would be an organized way to put a grid of these devices throughout presidio heights. i think what we're -- what i would like to -- and that requires proper noticing of the entire neighborhood, really the macro neighborhood and a plan so it doesn't become health scelter. and defeat the purpose of what -- what -- helter-skelter and making sure haul their light stanchions are exactly the same. that;mb is why i think we should reject this and sustain the personality -- protect the personality of the neighborhood and push verizon to put together a plan with the neighborhood association and the neighbors in a macro sense. >> so what about the richmond district or sunset district or excelsior district? should they mail out and reach out to the district each ti
appellant. the appellant is commenting on this one pole and he indicated that as with other developers of buildings and technology that the neighborhood is open and willing to accommodate a -- the reasonable development of new technologies. that would be an organized way to put a grid of these devices throughout presidio heights. i think what we're -- what i would like to -- and that requires proper noticing of the entire neighborhood, really the macro neighborhood and a plan so it doesn't...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
29
29
Nov 15, 2017
11/17
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 29
favorite 0
quote 0
>> supervisor tang: for the appellant? >> president breed: no, you can ask him now. >> supervisor tang: ok, i have a for the appellant. >> supervisor tang: just one question. how long have you lived in your current house? >> i've lived in nobles alley since 1985 with travels to los angeles and other places, but 1985. >> supervisor tang: how many different owners have there been? >> mr. yee has owned the property for 50 years with his family. i knew them because they were there when i was living there. he sold the property in 1997. and that -- >> supervisor tang: i'm sorry, one speaker at a time. >> just so -- so that everybody knows, people feel strongly -- >> supervisor tang: just answer the question, how many people have owned -- >> i believe there have been four or five owners. >> we believe this garage was established in 1997, this current owner, we saw e-mail saying she came into ownership of august 2016. i'm wondering why at this moment, why all of a sudden, after you've lived there since 1985, you brought forth the
>> supervisor tang: for the appellant? >> president breed: no, you can ask him now. >> supervisor tang: ok, i have a for the appellant. >> supervisor tang: just one question. how long have you lived in your current house? >> i've lived in nobles alley since 1985 with travels to los angeles and other places, but 1985. >> supervisor tang: how many different owners have there been? >> mr. yee has owned the property for 50 years with his family. i knew them...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
38
38
Nov 16, 2017
11/17
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 38
favorite 0
quote 0
i think the primary differences between the appellant's renderings and the permit holder's renderings was the height and the perception of how close people may be to their property relative to the new addition. i should point out and i think it was pointed out here, too, that the permit holder's renderings show that on the fourth floor the terrace went a little bit beyond the addition, like, a little bit closer to the property line than the tula addition itself, and i think it was pointed out that was a slight inaccuracy. it will be flush with the fourth floor addition as conditioned in the variance. >> thank you. >> may i see a show of hands of how many people plan to speak under public comment? okay. so if you haven't already filled out a speaker card, if you could do so before or after you come up to speak, that would be helpful. i would also ask that you lineup on the far side of the room over there, and the first person in line can be right where that stack of papers is, and -- >> first person come on up. >> president honda. >> two minutes because of the time length. >> and we ar
i think the primary differences between the appellant's renderings and the permit holder's renderings was the height and the perception of how close people may be to their property relative to the new addition. i should point out and i think it was pointed out here, too, that the permit holder's renderings show that on the fourth floor the terrace went a little bit beyond the addition, like, a little bit closer to the property line than the tula addition itself, and i think it was pointed out...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
28
28
Nov 25, 2017
11/17
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 28
favorite 0
quote 0
can they speak as the appellant? >> you can call them up here. >> i'm going to call the current property owner. if they have a representative with them or counsel or someone who is assisting them. are you the current property owner? [off mic] >> do we need to administer the oath? >> this is the oath of office to you. you can come to the podium. do you swear that the testimony you're about to give is the truth to the best of your knowledge? >> yes. >> hi. >> hi. i'm the new owner. >> do you want to state your name? >> my name is jennifer -- we lived there for three weeks. october 19th. i'm very new about everything. i take over the property. >> can you speak into the mic a little bit? thanks so much, ma'am. >> the property had a violation, and i tried to follow up and correct everything as soon as possible. i already got the permit to fix the furnace, heater, and plumbing. yes. but i have a little bit issue with the tenant. so the tenant won't let me in the property and won't let the housing inspector come in. they pu
can they speak as the appellant? >> you can call them up here. >> i'm going to call the current property owner. if they have a representative with them or counsel or someone who is assisting them. are you the current property owner? [off mic] >> do we need to administer the oath? >> this is the oath of office to you. you can come to the podium. do you swear that the testimony you're about to give is the truth to the best of your knowledge? >> yes. >> hi....
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
37
37
Nov 20, 2017
11/17
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 37
favorite 0
quote 0
we will have up to three minutes for rebuttal from the appellant.or appellant representative. >> thank you very much, president breed. i want to -- there are so many things they accused me of, i can't comment on them in three minutes, not even 30 minutes. i want to point out that the two garages were built at the same time. and interestingly, you have in your own record, it's black and white, in fact it's a record presented to the board of appeals by the current property owners. it shows you who owned the property when. mr. lombardo, a very large architectural firm owned the property in 1997, buying it from mr. yee here, can you stand up? ok. and they bought it for one price and doubled what they sold it for, less than seven months later, the same year, 1997, because they put in two illegal garages. illegally. all they did was exploit the property. not these people. not anybody in this room. not me. but it's a matter of record. that's who did this and to claim there are hidden records and they meant to put in permits or as he claims, that there are
we will have up to three minutes for rebuttal from the appellant.or appellant representative. >> thank you very much, president breed. i want to -- there are so many things they accused me of, i can't comment on them in three minutes, not even 30 minutes. i want to point out that the two garages were built at the same time. and interestingly, you have in your own record, it's black and white, in fact it's a record presented to the board of appeals by the current property owners. it shows...
83
83
Nov 29, 2017
11/17
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 83
favorite 0
quote 0
but the appellate courtroom is no stranger to you or to mr. duncan. mr. chairman, i got a few letters that the judiciary committee has received with regard to kyle duncan. i'd like to introduce a few of those. we received one letter from 31 louisiana lawyers. they all say the following together -- as practicing attorneys we hold a wide range of political views on both sides of the aisle. regardless, we all agree that kyle duncan is exceptional well qualified to serve as judge on the fifth circuit. he'll make everyone in louisiana proud. also got a letter from an l.s.u. professor by the name of paul buyer. he was mr. duncan's opposing counsel in some litigation involving a challenge to louisiana's statute dealing with same-sex marriage. notwithstanding the fact he was opposing counsel in this very high profile and contentious case mr. beyer said, kyle duncan is a magnificent nominee. fifth make surpassing circuit judge. please support your confirmation with all your might. finally, i'd like to submit in the record with 19 former and present state solicitor
but the appellate courtroom is no stranger to you or to mr. duncan. mr. chairman, i got a few letters that the judiciary committee has received with regard to kyle duncan. i'd like to introduce a few of those. we received one letter from 31 louisiana lawyers. they all say the following together -- as practicing attorneys we hold a wide range of political views on both sides of the aisle. regardless, we all agree that kyle duncan is exceptional well qualified to serve as judge on the fifth...
34
34
Nov 20, 2017
11/17
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 34
favorite 0
quote 0
vacatedeme court has both of the appellate court rulings against the president's travel policy. vacated the injunctions. we have also successfully staying a rare order abusive discovery disorder to stop the winds down of the daca program. overreach. i don't know how many time you've seen it be granted but this one was and we appreciate the appellate court for doing so. some district courts have initially ruled against us, i am confident our positions will be vindicated and if necessary in the supreme court. has the statutory authority to suspend immigration in the law of any individual group of individuals he thinks -- he deems contrary to the national interest. proclamation from certain countries dysfunctional and provide risk is justified within his powers as the chief executive who has the responsibility to protect the public interest. we are proud to vigorously defended. -- defend it. let me say this. there are those in this room, maybe more than a few who get frustrated about when they turn on the tv at night's and you and to take rolaids everybody has an opinion of what th
vacatedeme court has both of the appellate court rulings against the president's travel policy. vacated the injunctions. we have also successfully staying a rare order abusive discovery disorder to stop the winds down of the daca program. overreach. i don't know how many time you've seen it be granted but this one was and we appreciate the appellate court for doing so. some district courts have initially ruled against us, i am confident our positions will be vindicated and if necessary in the...
37
37
Nov 20, 2017
11/17
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 37
favorite 0
quote 0
and we appreciate the appellate court pursuing this. and although some district courts have initially ruled against us, i'm confident our positions will be vindicated president trump has the statutory authority to suspend immigration in the law of any individual or group of individuals he thinks -- deems contrary to the national interest. his rational, narrow proclamation of countries that are dysfunctional and provide risk is justified within his power as the chief executive who has the responsibility to protect the public interest. we are proud to vigorously defend. before i conclude, let me say this. there are those in this room and maybe more than a few in this room who get frustrated about when they turn on the tv at night and had to take rolaids -- [laughter] everybody has an opinion of what the attorney general should do, i get frustrated also. there were -- are things i would like to say and explain that the rule of law is not always about getting the outcome. it is using the same, fair process, pursuing the truth wherever it le
and we appreciate the appellate court pursuing this. and although some district courts have initially ruled against us, i'm confident our positions will be vindicated president trump has the statutory authority to suspend immigration in the law of any individual or group of individuals he thinks -- deems contrary to the national interest. his rational, narrow proclamation of countries that are dysfunctional and provide risk is justified within his power as the chief executive who has the...
157
157
Nov 1, 2017
11/17
by
KRON
tv
eye 157
favorite 0
quote 0
appel claims she didn't use it because she thought it should only be used if they were close to death.. but it's not the only inconsistency in their story. meteorologists say the women describe a storm which never actually happened.. c(steve) coming up on kron4 news at five... a terror attack in new york city kills 8 people. and tonight we are learning more about the man who drove into bicyclists this afternoon. who are these people? the energy conscious people among us say small actions can add up to something... humongous. a little thing here. a little thing there. starts to feel like a badge maybe millions can wear. who are all these caretakers, advocates too? turns out, it's californians it's me and it's you. don't stop now, it's easy to add to the routine. join energy upgrade california and do your thing. (catherine) kron 4 viewers are sending in photos of their halloween costumes tonight take a look. these are just some of the pictures that have been sent into our newsroom.(steve) we want to see your costumes so we can share them on air and online. all you have to do is send us
appel claims she didn't use it because she thought it should only be used if they were close to death.. but it's not the only inconsistency in their story. meteorologists say the women describe a storm which never actually happened.. c(steve) coming up on kron4 news at five... a terror attack in new york city kills 8 people. and tonight we are learning more about the man who drove into bicyclists this afternoon. who are these people? the energy conscious people among us say small actions can...
109
109
Nov 15, 2017
11/17
by
CNNW
tv
eye 109
favorite 0
quote 0
for federal and appellate judges are being heard just this week. now, you compare that with president obama at this point in his presidency, only two appellate judges were confirmed. now democrats are questioning the speed of these nominations and they're pointing to the controversies swirling around several of the picks. damion shiff is a right wing blogger who referred to justice anthony kennedy as a judicial prostitute in 2007 and wrote that medicare and social security were unconstitutional. president trump has nominated him to the u.s. court of federal claims. john bush has pend hundreds of political blogs under a pseudonym deriding president obama and dispatch arnling gay rights. he has already been confirmed for the circuit court of appeals. recently took down a prolific social media platform where he killed on hillary rotten clinton to be locked up. he has also not tried a case. now democrats are expressing frustration and kpach rags about the picks and the process. >> there's a point at which this whole process becomes just a joke of rammi
for federal and appellate judges are being heard just this week. now, you compare that with president obama at this point in his presidency, only two appellate judges were confirmed. now democrats are questioning the speed of these nominations and they're pointing to the controversies swirling around several of the picks. damion shiff is a right wing blogger who referred to justice anthony kennedy as a judicial prostitute in 2007 and wrote that medicare and social security were...
44
44
Nov 17, 2017
11/17
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 44
favorite 0
quote 0
and we appreciate the appellate court pursuing this. and although some district courts have initially ruled against us, i'm confident our positions will be vindicated president trump has the statutory authority to suspend immigration in the law of any individual or group of individuals he thinks -- deems contrary to the national interest. his rational, narrow proclamation of countries that are dysfunctional and provide risk is justified within his power as the chief executive who has the responsibility to protect the public interest. we are proud to vigorously defend. before i conclude, let me say this. there are those in this room and maybe more than a few in this room who get frustrated about when they turn on the tv at night and had to take rolaids -- [laughter] everybody has an opinion of what the attorney general should do, i get frustrated also. there were -- are things i would like to say and explain that the rule of law is not always about getting the outcome. it is using the same, fair process, pursuing the truth wherever it le
and we appreciate the appellate court pursuing this. and although some district courts have initially ruled against us, i'm confident our positions will be vindicated president trump has the statutory authority to suspend immigration in the law of any individual or group of individuals he thinks -- deems contrary to the national interest. his rational, narrow proclamation of countries that are dysfunctional and provide risk is justified within his power as the chief executive who has the...
44
44
Nov 18, 2017
11/17
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 44
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court has vacated both of the appellate court rulings against the president's travel policy. they are taking on marriage but they had vacated injunction. we have also successfully obtained before the second circuit a rare mandamus order saying a premature and abusive discovery order in a case to stop the wind down of the daca program. this is an overreach. i do not know how many times you have seen a mandamus be agreed to, but we appreciate the appellate court for doing that. [applause] so, although some district court seven initially ruled against this, i am confident it will be vindicated in the court of appeals and if necessary, in the supreme court. the president -- president trump has a authority to suspend immigration in the law of any individual, he thinks or deems are contrary to the natural -- to the national interest. his proclamation of countries that are dysfunctional and provide risk is justified within his powers as the chief executive who has the responsibility to protect the public interest. we are proud to vigorously defend it. before i and -- i conclude, le
the supreme court has vacated both of the appellate court rulings against the president's travel policy. they are taking on marriage but they had vacated injunction. we have also successfully obtained before the second circuit a rare mandamus order saying a premature and abusive discovery order in a case to stop the wind down of the daca program. this is an overreach. i do not know how many times you have seen a mandamus be agreed to, but we appreciate the appellate court for doing that....
42
42
Nov 18, 2017
11/17
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 42
favorite 0
quote 0
i do not know how many times you agreeden a mandamus be to, but we appreciate the appellate court for doing that. [applause] so, although some district court seven initially ruled against this, i am confident it will be vindicated in the court of appeals and if necessary, in the supreme court. the president -- president trump has a authority to suspend immigration in the law of any deemsdual, he thinks or are contrary to the natural -- to the national interest. his proclamation of countries that are dysfunctional and within risk is justified his powers as the chief executive who has the responsibility to protect the public interest. we are proud to vigorously defend it. and -- i conclude, let me say this. there are those in this room and maybe more than a few in this room who get frustrated about when they turn on the tv at night and you have to take rolaids -- [laughter] and everybody has an opinion on what the attorney general should too. get frustrated, there are a lot of things i would like to say and explain. the rule of law is that it is not always about getting the sameme, it i
i do not know how many times you agreeden a mandamus be to, but we appreciate the appellate court for doing that. [applause] so, although some district court seven initially ruled against this, i am confident it will be vindicated in the court of appeals and if necessary, in the supreme court. the president -- president trump has a authority to suspend immigration in the law of any deemsdual, he thinks or are contrary to the natural -- to the national interest. his proclamation of countries...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
26
26
Nov 18, 2017
11/17
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 26
favorite 0
quote 0
the appellant made the same argument at the board of apaoelts but the board determined that the project had been properly approved and voted unanimously to deny the appeal of the building permit. finally, the board considered an appeal of the rear yard variance issued by the zoning administrator for the project 2523 steiner street. the proposal was for rear additions on the third and fourth floors. the planning commission heard a discretionary review on june 15, 2017 which was filed by an adjacent neighbor. and the zoning administrator heard the variance at the same hearing. the commission voted 4-1 to take d.r. and disapprove the entire project, which also included a horizontal addition of the front of the fourth floor that did not require a variance. the zoning administrator took the variance under advisement and granted the variance with several conditions of approval that set back the proposed rear additions terraces further from the adjacent property. the appellant made basically the same argues to the board of appeals after a lengthy hearing and deliberation. the board voted 3-2 t
the appellant made the same argument at the board of apaoelts but the board determined that the project had been properly approved and voted unanimously to deny the appeal of the building permit. finally, the board considered an appeal of the rear yard variance issued by the zoning administrator for the project 2523 steiner street. the proposal was for rear additions on the third and fourth floors. the planning commission heard a discretionary review on june 15, 2017 which was filed by an...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
32
32
Nov 25, 2017
11/17
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 32
favorite 0
quote 0
of these buildings are conforming or cocompliac co-compliant, and the people arguing against the appellant's buildings also are non-compliant, so the -- it raises the question which one is more wrong, you know, and i was thinking about that in light of another case we had on russian hill, where the organizers of and owners of certain buildings went against a permit, and the rationale they used was, you know, in terms light, air, and everything else but it was their building that went to the rear property line. so as i started to think about those kind of things, then i realized just what i said earli earlier is this is not a project permit. it's a project variance, and whether we agree that the five findings as produced by the za were correct in our minds, and i have to say that i don't see that the five findings have been met. nobody in the audience talked to the findings. i'm speaking that i think only two have been met, but the majority have not been met. >> i remember that project that commissioner fung is referring to, as well as recently, we just had 68 richardson, which was very, very
of these buildings are conforming or cocompliac co-compliant, and the people arguing against the appellant's buildings also are non-compliant, so the -- it raises the question which one is more wrong, you know, and i was thinking about that in light of another case we had on russian hill, where the organizers of and owners of certain buildings went against a permit, and the rationale they used was, you know, in terms light, air, and everything else but it was their building that went to the...