is that the appellant the appellant has property line windows or that the appellant has. i heard somebody say something about the view onto the garden and the, you know, the obstruction of that view. is that something that we need to pay attention to or is that that's what you get when you got windows on one side of your property and somebody decides that they're going to expand their building. and that's just the way it goes in the big city of san francisco. so i'm i'm not aware of any property line windows on the appellants property or the subject property. there are windows nearby on the shared property line, but they're not on the property line. no no windows will be obstructed. okay. as part of this project. so so we don't, um, it's the same old story. views are not protected. light and air would be protected. but in this case, there's no issue to worry about. light and air. well the light well, that's proposed helps to lessen any sort of potential impacts to light and air. okay, thanks. and finally, plans finalized plans there. if there was a doctor, there had to be

so we won a case in the appellate division and this judge refuses to acknowledge appellate division meeting -- he refuses to talk about it or acknowledge. and the attorney general, she's a corrupt person. terrible person. driving people out of new york, number one. that's number one. number two, it just came out a few minutes ago where palm beach county, the people that do this, agree with us 100%, and they say the judge is wrong. the judge is wrong on his ruling. he valued mar-a-lago at $18 million and it's worth a billion dollars, maybe a billion 5. and you saw where various properties we have that are valued in the financial statements, which is totally subject to the close and open hearing about buyer beware, they call it. but this just came out, in new york civil fraud case against trump is flagged by industry insiders who say valuation of mar-a-lago cited by judge is based on a misunderstanding of basic real estate practice so. they are saying the judge has misunderstood basic real estate practice. i say they are wrong about that. he didn't misunderstand it. this is a rigged court. he

instead the appellate court said today would be the first day of the proceedings.uestion is whether the appellate court could still jump back into this case which donald trump in his remarks is clearly hoping for, suggesting he is believing this judge would be a biased one. as the judge laid out in his ruling last week, as somebody unlikely to rule in his favor in these months ahead. >> that's been his consistent defense. still months to go in this trial. vaughn hillyard, thank you. >>> supreme court justices are back on the bench today with a number of political lightning rods on the document. among those issues, should guns be banned for anyone who is the subject of a domestic violence restraining order? should states prevent social media companies from censuring their users? how much power should the federal government have over things like financial institutions and environmental protection? in addition the justices could hear arguments in a case to limit the availability of mifepristone. >>> scorching heat waves and flooding destroying aging infrastructure acr

had the appellant had a communication with the with yourself, ms. rosenberg they would have discovered that the same way the permit holder did. so so there's so for clarity, the exhibits don't count towards the page exhibits don't don't, don't count as edits all on on the second notion of motion or the second request, i got my self handed to myself a few weeks ago by accepting a document as you are requesting a post filing and was fairly clearly reprimanded about doing that and it was a mistake. so i'm not going to do that again. and so because your document was not filed appropriately at the at the right time, i can't accept it on behalf of the commission on lest i get in trouble yet again. so i hope you're sympathetic to that. and with regard to just a sidebar, with regard to settlements, we this this board, i think we had in our conversation and i'm not going to i'll try to paraphrase this, this board created an extension for you all to talk to each other. and we created a time timeline, which i believe both of you were asked, is that enough time

they'll say, we want the appellate court to now pause it while we continue to pursue an appeal. i'm not a betting man, i don't want to lay a bet on this one, i don't think the appellate court will be all that amenable to pausing it, given donald trump's repeated apparent violation of the terms that were in the gag order once it was lifted. so it's an open question, but i wouldn't expect the appellate court necessarily to intervene with its own pause. >> and molly, trump's lawyers have claimed that a gag order like this one would prevent trump from talking about, quote, key campaign issues. those arguments, i would argue, don't hold water, given the fact that there were specifically addressed in the documents that were presented as to why he still has the right to speak about this case. he just doesn't have the right to threaten the officers of the court or the witnesses. >> yeah. i think there's a real important difference between the trump targeting people who are involved in this case, clinics, you know, different lawyers, the judges, versus him talking on the stock. and these

i would like to dress a comment the appellate made. he mentioned that he need architect approval to get the plans. you can view the plans at db oishgs if you want copies you need the architect's approval. i'm available for questions you may have >> commissioner eppler. jowl said that the window complaint fileod august 24 in >> the complaint fileod august 16th. site inspection was august 24. >> thank you. and did this complaint include the lot line windows. why yes. like me to put complaint up. why great. >> thank you. complaint on the southern side plan to install windows take away privacy from the complex next door we'll like the windows cancelled. as that is the way it has been since the building was built and getting push back and concerns in regards to installation of windows on the side. this complaint was received on the website the dbi website. assigned to an inspector and he david the inspector did do a site visit on august 24. and everybody knows that says the date this condition was last observed was on the day prior to the f

and the appellate division already decided that. so, it was great.y that he acknowledged it. it was a good step in the right direction. >> todd: alina, the underlying decision from this very judge that many legal experts don't even know how it carries out in practice. basically, it appears like this judge is taking away all of donald trump's ability to do business. so you're a member of this legal team. if this actually ends up being reality. what happens? do you know? >> sure. it's called the corporate death penalty. that's what we call it anyway. effectively, it's what the attorney general wants. they want to say that president trump and not only president trump, his children, and the 850 plus people that work for him will be affected and not able to do president trump and the trump family will not be able to conduct business in new york. will have to be dissolved in the state of new york for doing, what? i don't know. they put together a compilation of their values which then sophisticated banks came in, looked at, and did their own valuations of

so, the appellate court is not going to rubber-stamp this. i think it's likely trump loses. but it's not a foregone conclusion. >> all right. so, ty, in the fulton county case, we have some developments there as well today. because we have learned that the d.a.'s office has now approached several codefendants about accepting plea deals. there were 19 total, so they've approached several of them, including a former campaign official. we know that to be on the list. and the context here is, one, noncentral to be fair, but one defendant has already pleaded. now, chris christie, who is obviously challenging trump for the gop nomination, he is a well-known former prosecutor as well, told me friday he thinks about half of trump's 18 codefendants will take plea deals. do you think he's right? >> so, he may be right, but i think it's sort of a fool's errand to pick a number out of 18 that may plead guilty. i don't think any of the consequential defendants are likely to plead guilty with the possible exception of chesebro who is adamant that he won't take a deal. but i think the uniq

we knew it was going to the appellate decision. after lunch they talked about the idea of the stay.he scope of that stay. is it a stay on the consequences of the summary judgment, so the dissolution of the llcs, naming receivers for that process, letting an independent monitor who's a former judge about the movement of assets and liabilities or a stay of the entire trial. the attorney general's office, much to that chagrin did not like they weren't getting the scope of this. their 24 hours notice was not sufficient because they don't know about the scope but they did continue on with the trial with trump's attorneys saying they're going to be filing stay with the appellate division. >> can i get your legal analysis on that point in particular, the idea that he's filing a stay while awaiting the appeal, why didn't his lawyers do that before the trial started. >> the day after the judge issued his decision basically finding trump liable and the organization liable under executive law, now they're going to appeal it and move to stay the trial. and that they didn't, is shocking. today t

last week, appellate court ordered today could happen, and the first day of trial could move forward. donald trump frustrated by the mere existence of this lawsuit, going on attack not only against the attorney general but also the judge overseeing this case. of course, a play book that we have seen donald trump go forward with in the past, and the situation of the judge, it's not like the judge is going to leave the courtroom. for donald trump, unless he chooses to testify himself before the judge, going and walking outside of the courtroom is his best microphone, outside of going on the campaign trail, and convincing millions of americans that he is being -- facing an unfair civil lawsuit from the new york attorney general. >> let's talk about the fact that he showed up today at all. ken dilanian, we don't usually see him in court. he said he's going to show up in the past but he hasn't done so, at least in new york. what did it mean today to have him in that courtroom? >> that's right, katy, and he's not required to be here. it's a civil trial, but he chose to be here. for one thin

appellate courts only consider the record in front of them.rts they did not put in front of the district judge. by building a record, she's creating an evidentiary filing that court of appeals will be able to take a look at if in fact she issues a gag order that needs to be affirmed. >> joyce, i had glenn kirschner on my show this weekend and we were joking a litt bit about how when we were in law school, you focus on the footnotes. the reason i bring this up is there is the footnote in jack smith's filing on page 14 for those at home who follow along and that talks about this firearm purchase. purported purchase, did it really happen? we said it, we bought it, we didn't really buy it. words can be harmful. they can result in actual physical harm. the purchase of a firearm in violation of bond conditions as well as in violation of federal statutes is something a little more serious. do you think it's worthwhile for judge chutkan to actually have an evidentiary hearing on this allegation raised by jack smith's counsel here or jack smith about t

>> i think the appellate court decision halting of the trial court judge and then ordered to get ridf the certificates and dissolve the trump busin businesses, the appellate court has serious concerns with the judges actions violate due process rights of other nonparty persons and entities involved directly with the trump organization. they were given no notice, no right to be heard or defend themselves without authority. and the order to deprive them of the constitutional rights they are entitled to. he did under the new york consumer protection law. that is not protecting cons consumers. it is punishing consumers with the entire fraud trial brought under that statute. it is intended for cases where the general public has been injured. the public was not injured the bank made 100 million profits. insurance companies made out like bandits. the judge is misusing the statute allowing attorney general james to go after trump with fraud without proving the basic elements of fraud demanded by law. >> there is no injury. we would see the judge mugging for the camera if it continued. the ci

the no longer in or the right of the appellate strong shows up support to do for the palestinians in the tedium. deputy santiago, they seemed quite new 75 years of occupation. this was the most suffering of abreast people who cannot stand it anymore. you know? i am very, very sorry, so the victims on both sides to the team. i do not support any desk from any side. they are in the streets of the danish, deputy, copenhagen and outside the white house in washington, dc. in london, tens of thousands of protest is going for a free palestine menu demanding an immediate cease fire. it's according to what happened just such a day. next week i will read a shot. i'm seeing. no, it just will come from is room tompkins is people out in the streets in the majority of the nations of funding that these are boxed on the on the constitution country of human activities in germany's financial deputies transferred and approved for the senior value. the non compliance with the order, nick discusses between the protective and the police and actions that and destruction just defies bad. the excess, anyone

so that's in a little bit of a separate bucket that an appellate court can apply to that piece of it. as far as the trial goes, there's no difference at all, which begs the question why team trump didn't try harder to get a jury trial here which could have only benefited them. it's unclear whether they would have been entitled to it, but apparently they didn't even seek it which is kind of a bit of a puzzle. >> i also want your read, jennifer, that in the trump's organization's dealings, there were no victims -- i believe the phrasing that was used, there were no untoward profits or something to that effect. what do you make of that? >> well, there certainly were untoward profits. when you think about a fine amount or damages, one way to assess that is loss to the victims. another way is ill-gotten gains to the defendant. if they fraudulently said our properties are with this amount and the banks gave them a better interest rate than they would have gotten had they not defrauded the bank, those ill-gotten gains is something that should be disgorged. what's the harm here? nobody lost m

the judge started by explaining an appellate court decision from back in june regarding the statute of limitations, essentially what he explained that is the attorney general's office will continue questioning a man by the name of donald bender, donald trump's old accountant, they have been discussing a lot of transactions and financial statements from back in 2011, the judge will allow that to continue if and only if the state connects it to crimes, alleged crimes that happened more recently after 2014 or in some cases after 2016. donald trump spoke for the second time today as he entered the courtroom, he was again very critical of new york attorney general letitia james. listen here. >> this case should be dismissed. this is not a case. she should probably be dismissed also because she is terrible and grossly incompetent. and they out to get on to violent crime in solving the problems of new york city and new york state. >> attorney general james accuses trump of falsely inflating his net worth and deceiving banks by fraudulently overvaluing his properties. sheep out of video last n

so we won the case in the appelate division.r acknowledge it. and the attorney general is a total corrupt, she�*s a corrupt person. a terrible person. driving people out of new york, number one. that is number one. number two, wejust came out a few minutes ago, people that do this agree with us 100% that they say thejudge is wrong. thejudge is wrong in his ruling. judge engoron opened the proceedings after allowing cameras in to court to document the scene. as you can see, donald trump sat there — arms folded, flanked by his legal team, throngs of reporters and spectators in the gallery. the opening exchanges did not bode well for the trump organisation. "one thing i know a lot about," said thejudge, "is the legal definition of fraud". the president is right about one thing he said this afternoon, cary, that every time he appears in court and is charged, and there are 91 indictments on the list, his poll numbers go up. indictments on the list, his poll numbers go un— indictments on the list, his poll numbers go up. yes, it is a

something is done and i think the world is increasingly beginning the no longer in or the right of the appellate strong shows of support due for the palestinians in the tedium deputies santiago, they seemed quite new, 75 years of occupation. this was the most suffering of abreast people who cannot stand it anymore. you know? i am very, very sorry. so the victims on both sides to the team. i do not support any desk from any side. they are in the streets of the danish, deputy, copenhagen and outside the right house in washington, dc. in london, tens of thousands of protest is going for a free palestine, many demanding an immediate cease fire. it's according to what happened less that today makes me feel free to show i'm seeing. no, there's just will come from each room. tompkins is people out in the streets in the majority of the nations of funding that these are boxed on the, on the constitution country of human to put these in germany's financial deputies, transferred and approved for the senior value, the non compliance with the order. let's discuss the between the protested and the police and

congress historically has made changes to the court's appellate jurisdiction. and indeed there's a provision in the constitution that says something like, the supreme court shall have appellate jurisdiction under regulations that congress provides. or -- i'm mission the exact words, but -- missing the exact words, but it actually talks about congress having a role in our jurisdiction. talks about congress regulating the jurisdiction of the supreme court. and i think more generally, this is not surprising. our whole system is one of checks and balances. and usually when the court talks about that, we're talking about other actors and the way they check and balance each oregon or the way we -- each other or the way we check and balance them. but it can't be that the court is the only institution that somehow is not subject to any checks and balances from anybody else. i mean, we're not imperial. and we too are a part of a checking and balancing system in various ways. so can congress do various things to regulate the supreme court? i think the answer is yes. now,

congress historically has made changes to the courts appellate jurisdiction. there is a provision in the constitution that says something like the supreme court shall have appellate jurisdiction under regulations that congress provides. i am missing the exact words. definitely talks about congress having a role in our jurisdiction. talks about congress regulating the jurisdiction of the supreme court. and generally, this is not surprising. our whole cyst them is one of check and balance is. usually, when the court talks about that, we are talking about other actors, the way they check and balance each other or the way we check and balance them. if you just can't see that the court is the only institution somehow not subject to checks and balances from anybody else he looked at us we are not imperial. we, too, are part of a checking and balancing system in various ways. can congress do various things to regulate the supreme court? i think the answer is yes. does not say what things. on the other hand, can congress do anything it wants? i'm going to say no. it c

. >> lifelock team encourage lucas tomlinson standby in tel aviv and greg appel cut is in northern israel knew the lebanese border word hezbollah could open a second front in the war steve harrigan and beirut, lebanon speaking with mike tobin live near the border in the south. >> eric, after nearly two weeks in hamas captivity judith and natalie raanan are free from evans in illinois they are free from the gaza strip. rapidfire negotiations yesterday that sprung them free the two were visiting relatives near the gaza strip when hamas should the massacre in their taken hostage last night with all the development their family finally learned the mother and daughter duo had been moved to a base in central israel. >> that's the worst situation. i did not sleep at night. my head always was in israel. lots of phone calls to israel. lots of tvs have been glued to the tv for two weeks. hoping for any good news. finally it came. >> now met them at the crossing from gaza into israel retired israeli general who was pulled back into service to handle this herchisherculean task of tryingo secure the f

i would think it would probably be resolved at the appellate court level, in front of the d.c.it. >> one of the other options the judge has, this is what everyone's wondering, none of the fines are working, trump is not, he's continuing to attack people, we all expect him to continue to, if she's not gonna put him in jail what can they do? >> maybe increase the level of fines. i think the judge in new york started at $85, 000, they went from $25, 000, start imposing fines that even for a person who claims to be a billionaire will have some kind of impact, hundreds of thousands of dollars in terms of the fines that might be levied. >> we also learned today in alabama man, i mentioned this as well, who is indicted for threatening fani willis -- you've watched hate speech, you watch the impact of trump's rhetoric. what is the connection, do you see a connection there between the allowance of these types of threats, what trump is doing out there publicly, and threats against people like fani willis? >> his comments by the former president need to be viewed as a tax in two ways. one

the defendant from criticizing the government of public figure, it's less likely to survive in the appellantheavily disfavored under first amendment law. >> right and the purpose of the gag order would be obstructing cerumen stensively to prevent the jury pool from becoming tainted or in some extreme instances prevent threats, harassment, of court personnel and this one i think clearly goes beyond it when you get to special council and get to we'll see whether or not the judge can be criticized, both of those grounds are concerning under that and you're right. it's also, you know, a bit odd to say that there's a concern about tainting the jury pool in this case. we've heard it before and everybody know this is is a political case. there's a concern and improperly intimidating challenging jack smith or the judge for being biased publicly doesn't carry water to me. i think there's a good chance he'll win on appeal again with a caveat that we need to see the specific language in the final order. >> i mean, former virginia governor bob mcdonnell. he said jack smith overcharged him and really wen

à aimararan je pense que c'est exactement la même chose qui va se passer et maintenant si j'ai un appel la population à être un peu plus vigilante pour que il ait moins de pollution et qu'il ait plus de retombées. now what needs to be done to tap into this potential without relying on exploitative western powers? i understood that niger is providing 25% 25 25% of the of the uranium that. uh the eu needs, okay, so we know that the first country is france, so france is kind of distributing the the uranium to the rest of of of the eu, and this is where france gets its money, okay, so it's everyone benefiting, so this is why they are all quiet about it, because they are all benefiting from it, okay, so that's a big problem, and i think that yes, so to make things change, because i think the people of niger, they waited too long, and once you have all these different armies, foreign armies in your country is very difficult to make to make things change, so i think unfortunately it's going to take them some time. well, unfortunately our time is up for today, our expert there says france and o

like tom said, the appellate courts will look at the record and make a new determination as to whetherhis file was trade and had an accurate outcome. >> neil: when i heard that, i thought wow, this is going to drag on awhile. thank you both very much. again, if the former president comes out or letitia james or the principle players come out, we'll take you there. that is expected in 20 minutes or so if it happens at all. we're on top of that. we're on top of the government fighting on to keep the lights on for at least another 44, 45 days. that is not so certain for the fate of the speaker of the house, however. aishah hasnie on that. aishah? >> hey, neil. we are still waiting for matt gaetz to filed the motion to vacation. i'll tell you who really has the gavel in their hands and what happens to it next. with the freestyle libre 2 system, know your glucose level and where it's headed. no fingersticks needed. manage your diabetes with more confidence. freestyle libre 2. try it for free at freestylelibre.us now subway's slicing their ham fresh. like on the new grand slam ham. piled hig

today the appellate division of the new york supreme court rejected his request for a stay in new york attorney general letitia james's civil fraud trial. the court, however, did agree to temporarily pause the cancellation of his business certificates. the decision effectively halts what trump's attorneys described is a, quote, corporate death sentence, while the trial continues. in court today jeffrey mcconney, the controller for the trump organization, testified about how he was instructed by eric trump to include the value of seven nonexistent mansions when calculating the value of trump 's seven springs property in westchester, new york. in a dramatic moment at the end of these proceedings, mcconney also testified that this man, a long trump organization cfo, allan weisselberg, asked him to help carry out tax fraud. mcconney told the court he agreed to help out weisselberg because he was afraid he would lose his job if he didn't. when the court resumes on tuesday, allen weisselberg will take the stand, and special counsel jack smith's 2020 elections case against donald trump. judge

that way the appellate court can say, you know what, the this judge already said some of the defensee a fantasy world, so do they have to bring a completely new defense, danny? >> what's the over/under on how many times the defense are tries to introduce an issue and justice engoran says i already ruled on that in summary judgment. in fairness to the defense, the ruling on summary judgment, there maybe some gray area on what exactly is already decided and what is defense, you've got to try everything you possibly can. catherine's exactly right, there isn't a whole lot of things left to dispute. the things left to dissput are largely things contained in documents and those documents will speak for themselves. i wonder to what degree the defense will try to re-raise their prior arguments that, for example these statements of financial condition, nobody takes them seriously in the business, and they really did do some evidence that that may be the case, but justice engoran wasn't having it, so the question is if the defense still thinks it's true that, for example, statements of financi

and at this point in time, we're currently drafting all the appellate paperwork to proceed forth. got these convictions. they've effectively laid a blueprint for how to disrupt the american government. but the next time somebody wants to do this, somebody with a better plan, smarter, more dedicated, they can just follow the blueprint that's been set out now. i think that with all the january 6th cases, you know, unless... ..former president trump is called to account for this event, all of them become almost farcical. you know, everyone knows who caused that event. everyone there was there for him. the rest of these people are pawns, even the...even the important ones. this is a prepaid call from an inmate at the washington, dc central detention facility. to accept this call, press zero. beep i mean, you know, we all listened to the trial. this is a prepaid call from an inmate at the washington, dc central detention facility. to accept this call, press zero. beep i mean, you know, we all listened to the trial. a lot of it does have to do with, you know, the encouragement of gettin

in gaza, the public opinion from different channels, well, anyway, it gets these appellations. of course, if it is really the way the media here claim , if they publish the news at least 10 to 90, i agree. many experts believe that the amount of support for the palestinians has increased several times over the same period. at the same time, after the gaza bombings , public support for the palestinians has increased widely . one day after this, thousands of people protested in front of the zionist embassy in london. holding the largest demonstration by raising the flag hoisting palestine and the palestinian flag on electric poles around the zionist embassy. and asking their government to support itself as quickly as possible and not act against the wishes of the people and end its support for the zionist regime . well, on saturday, the largest anti-zionist demonstration in the west was held in england, that is, in the very birthplace of the zionist regime, with the presence of ten thousands of people and this demonstration was held in front of the bbc building in protest against

>> well, i think this appellate court decision halting the trial court judge in gordon's to, you know, get rid of the certificates, dissolveheu the trump businesses. the appellate court has serioums concerns that the judge's actions violate the due processs rights of other nonparty persons and entities who were involved directly with the trump organization. they were given no notice, no right to be hearorganizad, no tn chance to defend themselves without authority. >> and gordon's order deprive them of the constitu tionaltutin rights they're entitled to. and you know, he did it under thisalare enti new york consumer protection law. >> well, that's not protecting he. umer it's actually punishing consumers in the entire fraud the l was brought under that statute. that statute is intendedentire a cases where the general public has been injured here. >> the public wasn't injured. the banks made more than ade 100 100 million in profits. the insurance companies made out like bandits.li so i think the judge has been misusing this statute and allowing letitia james to go after trump for fraud

their decisions decisions, decisions of the supreme court, they are binding on other judges, lower appellate judges of the first instance. and these are the requirements of procedural codes, that is, the supreme court has both legal and informal, huge, huge impacts on how the judicial system basically works, the absolutely wild decisions of the supreme court in many cases, these are all indicators of the huge problems that are in the supreme court, moreover, after, as far as we understood, how difficult and wild the situation is there , we called the judges... of the criminal court to ask why they decided to nullify one of the terms awarded to oleksandr shepelev, it is undeniable that the prosecution noted: and all the participants in the process did not deny that this person was held on the territory of the russian federation specifically to fulfill the request of ukraine in this criminal proceeding, and the prosecutor personally confirmed this, therefore, in order to ensure that the rights of the individual, which are then established by the european court, are not violated and that the st

. >> your honor, joseph manning, plaintiff and appellant. smith is his attorney, representing another blind man in a similar website accessibility case. in 2019, riverside d.a. what after joseph manning. and three other attorneys, citing a number of a.d.a. suit filed in southern california , saying attorney to manipulate these laws do so for the purpose of illegitimate financial gain. these abuses not only hurt the specific small business owners, they also jeopardize the long-term legal protections of the disabled persons these laws were designed to help. but that case was quickly dismissed. when we asked manning about the via corona case, he told us he does not, on pending litigation, but it was this is actually proud of efforts to bring the blind and visually impaired population into the 21st century. adding a surefire way to avoid such a lawsuit is to make your website accessible. carlos had limited money for attorney, and has since settled the case. he cannot discuss the amount. >> it is unreasonable. i have complied with the law. i don'