the appellate will refer to open space. you see this is a private year yard and you see the impact of this. will neighbors on 39 have a wall they cannot seat property or the rear yard. 51 bernard a view from the upper deck. the two neighbors may have a slight of skew from the windows. looking around the tree or the fire skaechl >> now back to lindsey. we ask the d r motion language removed all together. we did discuss a number of circumstance this is came up post hearing we were made aware of. what we want to reiterate we made substantial effort, 15 plus times two preplanning hearings to meet with the folks and they have refused. and never speak with us they decide they want to meet with planning commissioners before the hearing have them to their house. we are not understanding when about that behavior is acceptable. ful but if than i want to do that that's fine we ask that when we showed up we thought we had the same 7 minutes and that was not the case. so, that's all i want to say about that nothing exceptionalor extraor

nedeau action requested by appellant: appellant appeals the january 12, 2023, order of abatement and assessment of costs. appellant seeks “that the order of abatement requiring painting of the building be stayed until construction can be completed.” and the does want will present their case first, they may come forward. >> may i make a disclosure i would like to disclose that someone from my firm has been contacted by a representative of the owner of this property to observe the property that person is a husband of someone that works - not engaged xhubl and will not have an affect on my ability to new york state that disclosure. >> thank you commissioner sommer. >> okay. >> good morning. i'm the senior housing inspector and presenting the case this morning 102 baker st. lot one 2 one 9 this is a contract. >> e1. case no. 6911: 102 baker st. - complaint # 202290668 two family r-3 residential dwelling and the notice of violation was issued this case was present item three, 4 and 6 on the violation were it's been a long time coming. >> phil do you have the power point? >> sfgov are you

si tu ne vois que le pire ♪ ♪ oh appelle ton amour ♪ ♪ appelle ton amour ♪♪ [cheers and applause] >>ent french. we are practicing for april fools and also to get ready for the olympics to kick off on nbc and peacock, we are going to be in the television, the files are in the computer. a little zoo lender reference you're welcome. july 26th, it's going to be magnificat. how do you say that? we are going to learn it, i'm going to be great. our first guest -- thank you. not that much duolingo, the owl is disappointed in my french. we are going to get to our first guest, she's a grammy-winning artist was inducted into the rock & roll hall of fame last year, incredible artist. new album out now called evolution, you can buy it wherever you get your music, please welcome sheryl crow! [cheers and applause] you look so cute!

he turned on the appellate decision appellate decision division -- they made a decision that gave me -- and he turned it down he said -- is a corrupt judge and this judge is terrible, gave a person i have no idea who she is $91 million. this is a corrupt system where in and i think people are understanding and. look at the polls got the people of our country are understanding it's. thank you very much. >> [indistinct question] >> neil: you never know if you has more cannot record unhappy with today's proceedings of the fact that he was fined $9000 for violating a gag order the prosecution says that if he keeps doing so since that -- maybe next up we'll be to

>> like the appellant any rebuttal?> um, getting back to what i said earlier the wall has been removed so not an imminent hazard on 34 part removed so not a hazard as see i think we are done and removed that hazard the complaint was about so i feel that we're not even though the work has not done with the drawings but working, working with another engineer to address the retaining walls and had cracks in that for over 20 or thirty years and i want to mention the property line the neighbor was talking about a second ago is that that been around for a long time and leaning on his property has been removed and so that's where we stand right now. >> thank you. >> thank you. okay.. thank you. >> um, then the board have discussion or questions? >> i have a couple of questions. >> so i'm sorry, go ahead. >> there is been a assertion made that it is life safety hazard this is not a life safety has is there an engineering report do you have a engineering report stating not a life safety hazard. >> at that point in written report

as has been stated by the appellant, and residents as well. so, you know, i definitely do have questions for the entertainment commissioner as well which i'll get to in a few minutes but. >> what i'll ask you right now, i understand your vision for the shared spaces expansion. my question is what the need is for the full shut down with the fact that there is nothing else going on other than your lion dances. giving the fact that the merchants are here protesting here a little bit. what is the need for the closed down before there are con scaoet plans and funding in place for a larger activation? >> i guess for the street closure, since it was handed out to me. i didn't know much about it, i thought it's a duty, i must keep this closed at this times, flexible and time can be an option, right but i feel like, not given information on how things are working and told everything that i found out is through public notice. and each time there was public notice, i wented and talked to the merchants or whoever directly, and hey, is this issue, they nev

he turned down the appellate decision developed divisions decision. they gave a decision that gave me mostly a win just about the whole thing was when and he turned it down is a corrupt judge. this judge is terrible and kaplan is terrible. gave a person, i have no idea who she is, 91 in dollars this is a corrupt system. we're in and i think the people are understanding it. >> if you look at the polls the people of our country understanding. >> thank you very much you could figure that one out are you going to eat? >> mostly now?

llp and we will hear from the appellant first. welcome. >> good evening, president lopez and commissioners, i'm andrew i'm an attorney at sachs and freedman which neighbors at 2032 union street. paul mouse is a outdoor and live entertainment events as well as prerecorded music productions. since its founding almost ten years ago, palm house has bin undating neighborhood with excessive noise due to events with or without perm uts. sfpd the entertainment commission approved for a limited live performance permit because commission dis recorded substantial opposition, we ask that they rescind or further mote fie the permit--modify the permit. clean record with respect to noise enforcement. however complaints with 3111 cannot and should not be determative on this issue. the good-neighbor policy, requires venue to see have onsite contact to be reachable by neighbors implying that neighbors should collaboration solutions before involving enforcement. reaching to solve noise issues rather than to report noise to 311 or police. proofs time

it's the $175 million bond, and an appellant court reduced that from the 454 plus down to 175, but it be posted before this thursday, and check that box as trump was able to do so. while donald trump is going to pursue an appeal of that verdict against him by justice author engoron, what happens is attorney general, james, she cannot seize his assets and all of the work done behind the scenes which we didn't know about for her to go and collect on this judgment is put on pause. there's another condition that got overlooked a little bit, and in the appellant court decision that reduced the bond to 175, and you will have to effect the appeal by september? >> you have to file the briefs and make sure this is done. in some way instead of being able to drag out the appeals process, the appellant court recognized there's an existing ruling with trump and the other defendants, and now you have to pick up the pace here. the appellant is not going to let him and others sit back and ask for more time and he has to get it done and done quickly. >> what did trump have to prove to appeal the civil

i do want to ask you if there's enough other appellate case that you can kind of compare this to the closest is bill cosby everybody was shocked when that case got overturned, but it's the same principle, basically prior bad acts, evidence, meaning uncharged crimes, things that don't have to do with the case in principle, can only come in if it's to show a propensity to and modus operandi relating to that conduct. >> it can't come into impugn the defendants character. and so it's a fine line as to whether or not that evidence can actually come in. witnesses can testify, and in some of these cases, bill cosby and now harvey weinstein appellate courts have found the judges went too far. they let too much in an ultimately that impacted the rights of the defendant. keep in mind sara it's not just bill cosby, harvey weinstein. it sets a standard for any other criminal defendant and that's why the appellate courts are very strict about when this type of evidence can come into the courtroom and prosecutors but what you have to think through this, but judges will also be paying a lot of atte

but let me say this -- i am very familiar with the appellate division, the appellate court. and the court of appeals. the judges there, they are all fair and impartial, but they are not dupes. so in new york, there are court rules that say that if you file a motion with the primary purpose to cause delay, that is considered a frivolous motion, and that can subject you to sanctions. so i am -- i have no doubt that the appellate court -- and if he tries -- if he tries to appeal to the court of appeals, they can decide the issue without staying the trial, and there is absolutely no reason to stay this trial from beginning on april 15th on monday. the only reason is what happens in other trials. someone legitimately gets sick. there's a real earthquake. so barring some unforeseen circumstance, this trial will start on monday. it is clear that these are all just frivolous delayed tactics. >> let me stay with you. what will start on monday, i think you obviously have a lot of experience with this, having tracked a bunch of cases in this venue and in this office. what starts is jur

the appellate court's oral arguments in september and local appellate lawyers say addition : four tothe presidential election. david, back to you directly who, thank you very much. let's welcome to the show, former ftc commissioner, hans von spakovsky, a soundbite of president trump in michigan today talking about his fighting, comparing it to crime in general. >> i'm the only one who has to put up a bond. i put on a bond, i didn't do anything wrong. i had to put up a bond for $175 million, i did nothing wrong. they could show, kill somebody, walk out of jail an hour later. do think that is a fair policy? it's called radical left. >> he's making serious points but popularized way. it is selective justice though particularly the weight is fine came about, the judge picked the number out of the air. >> he did and it was entirely reasonable and justifiable to radically reduce it and i think they should have reduced it even more because the purpose of an appeals bond is to prevent a defendant with a judgment against him from absconding from the state with all his cash. when all of your a

>> the next step is the appellate division which is the appeals court that supervises the trial courtnd that is where former president trump will go to fight the battles and -- and tries to get this judgement overturned. the appellate court will consist of three brand-new judges to the case who will look at what happened in the trial court can look at the penalties that the trial judge imposed, a look at the nature of the sanction count the amount of the punishment and the like whether or not it was lawfully imposed over there needs to be set aside. of the battle with -- will continue but no interest to the court of appeals. >> sandra: what does that hammock -- timeline look for all of this? obviously were are in an election year. >> 's comp -- going to move very slowly. typically unless there is some reason to decide things quickly and i'm not sure i see a reason here, it can take months and it can sometimes take up to a year for an appellate court to reach a decision. you are going to have to have -- oral arguments, so there will be a hearing and then the courts will often take mont

the project sponsor or the appellate. >> of the appellate. i am little confused because i believe that the department analysis talks about the character defining features of the building, so they definitely--not saying deaf-footly, i don't know. looks to my eyes like they had identified the character defining features of a potential historic resource and then were looking at the project in that context. what does it matter whether there was a historic resource evaluation? >> well, the analysis done is a one liner in the exemption and what it says and i think my understanding is that, the changes to the stairs in the front of the building that those were not going to remove any character defining features but the reason the analysis for the addition on top the rational behind that was it wasn't visible from the public viewing area, and so my understanding of the department analysis was, we didn't have to determine whether that portion impacted any character defining features because it isn't visible from the public way and that's clearly not t

but today, an appellate judge ruling the trial must go on.jury selection is set to begin monday. prospective jurors will fill out a seven-page questionnaire asking whether they've ever attended a trump rally, follow him on social media, or belong to an array of extremist groups like proud boys, oathkeepers or antifa. potential jurors will also be asked if they have “strong opinions” about trump or “firmly held beliefs” about whether a former president can be charged with a crime. trump has tried every which way to delay this trial. the historic first trial -- criminal trial of a former american president. and he still has a couple of appeals left, but david, as of now, jury selection starts monday, and the judge is

again, unless an appellate court intervenes and says the case doesn't begin on mondayed, you bet your will be in court on monday with his attorneys. the manhattan d.a.'s office will be there and jury selection will begin. and it's going to take a couple of weeks, so they say, to be able to get a jury impanel instead this case. >> could you explain why it could take so long, and what will you be watching for? >> the obvious, right? you and i are talking about it. there are thousands of criminal cases across the country that don't get this attention. donald trump has been contributing to the publicity behind this case. he tried to get a change of venue because he complained about the amount of pretrial publicity and yet all he does is talk about his criminal cases. and so a jury has to be seated, ana, that's going to be fair and impartial. that is the legal standard. and in order to get there, more than 500 new yorkers have received notices to appear on monday. they will be whittled down to a jury of 12 with a couple of alternates, maybe more than two because this is a five to six-week

the project sponsor or the appellate. >> of the appellate. i am little confused because i believe that the department analysis talks about the character defining features of the building, so they definitely--not saying deaf-footly, i don't know. looks to my eyes like they had identified the character defining features of a potential historic resource and then were looking at the project in that context. what does it matter whether there was a historic resource evaluation? >> well, the analysis done is a one liner in the exemption and what it says and i think my understanding is that, the changes to the stairs in the front of the building that those were not going to remove any character defining features but the reason the analysis for the addition on top the rational behind that was it wasn't visible from the public viewing area, and so my understanding of the department analysis was, we didn't have to determine whether that portion impacted any character defining features because it isn't visible from the public way and that's clearly not t

president- >> public comment on behalf of the appellate casement at 2351 mission.you line up to my left, your right. first speaker, please. >> hi. i'm-can i start? >> yes. >> the sound engineer that went out. i took two measurements by the neighbors and one at their patio, and my findings the loudest spot was 40 above ambient, which is half of what the entertainment commission is recommended as acceptable levels of adb. i didn't find anything really coming from casement, but i do recommend a couple alterations to the wall both for transmission moving the wall up three feet and taking into consideration some of the dampening material on the inside to help sound not get out in the first place. and a couple recommendations have been made to the system itself adding a limiter, doing band width limiting to it and reaiming it so it's directed inside the venue only, and that's my findings. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker. >> i'm steven carp second generation san francisco and property owner at 2391-93 mission street, the neighbor. we are in full support of the propo

when he did was a disgrace is being reviewed by the appellant and i hope they do justice is everybody's looking and nobody no business is coming into the city. >> none whatsoever they're looking at that case cases and threat to democracy, frankly, what took place bag a cricket ag, letitia james paid and the facts we can or the fact that i'm going to get drunk bomb, going to get trump. that's all she said for two years and its people don't want to see this stuff we have violent criminal zola with the streets of new york and nothing happens. so even when they catch him, they let him know bao nobel whatsoever so this is just a concerted which there is judge kaplan with a person i have no idea of gel. >> they called and said they're showing us i had no idea who this person was this judge or if you look at a gora versus that mar-a-lago, whichever was worth a video or 1,000,000,000.5. kelce said it was where 18 how this because that suited his narrative. but what what's happening in this city and all over the country. but what's happening in particular in this setting, some very good, but way

the most important words he wrote, appellate review. that should have judge cannon running scared. -- joins me after a break. brea. when symptoms tried to take control, i got rapid relief... and reduced fatigue with rinvoq. check. when flares kept trying to slow me down... i got lasting steroid—free remission... with rinvoq. check. and when my doctor saw damage,... rinvoq helped visibly reduce damage of the intestinal lining. check. for both uc and crohn's: rapid symptom relief... lasting steroid—free remission... and visibly reduced damage. check. check. and check. rinvoq can lower your ability to fight infections, including tb. serious infections and blood clots, some fatal; cancers, including lymphoma and skin; heart attack, stroke, and gi tears occurred. people 50 and older with a heart disease risk factor have an increased risk of death. serious allergic reactions can occur. tell your doctor if you are or may become pregnant. put uc and crohn's in check... and keep them there with rinvoq. ask your gastroenterologist about rinvoq an

you saw one side, there was no way to counter it by james and jennifer crumbley will see when an appellate court says about that i think because our thanks very much for joining me now is the lead prosecutor on the case, oakland county, michigan prosecutor. karen mcdonald. i'm as mcdonald, i appreciate your time. you heard in genes report a sister of one of the victims on essentially anna says that the ten to 15 years sentence for the crumbleys feels too short because hana, or sister didn't even live to be 15 are you satisfied with the sentences you got >> you know satisfaction isn't really a feeling that i think anyone has just watching your story. it's i haven't actually watched it since we were in court today and it is so jarring and moving and i think nothing will bring back these kids. but the shear enormous impact that their gross negligence had these families is just it was palpable. and if i could anderson, i would like to just address just the previous statements. it is not to be true that the shooter said a psychiatrist said he lied that that was taken completely out of context a

by james and jennifer crumbley, we'll see when an appellate court says about that because our thanks very much for joining me now is the lead prosecutor on the case? i'm county michigan prosecutor. karen mcdonald. i'm as mcdonald. i appreciate your time you heard in genes report a sister of one of the victims, essentially, anna says that the ten to 15 years sentence for the crumbleys feels to shore because hana, or sister didn't even live to be 15. are you satisfied with the sentences you got? >> you know, set a section, isn't really a feeling that i think anyone has just watching your story. it's i haven't actually watched it since we were in court today and it is so jarring and moving and i think nothing bring back these kids. but the sheer enormous impact that their gross negligence had on these families is just it was palpable. and if i could anderson, i would like to just address just the previous statements it is not actually true that the shooter said the psychiatrist city liked that that was taken completely out of context and we heard that even today, which was a surprise th

>> i think what matters here is that allows the appellate system to move forward. now what the final outcome is unknown, but at least the system work that the trust in the american system of fairness and transparency and the appellate system of appeal, all the way to supreme court is what allows me as an investor to get on a plane lean on wednesday night, fly all around the world to go raise 3.6 billion. tell these investors as they have for years trusted america, let me bring that 3.6 billion back here to do a real estate development in data centers. now, i have removed the slide that had new york in it because right now we don't want to talk about new york risk things are still a little funky chicken as you know, that people don't want to take any risks in new york and that's just i'm just one investor, but believe me that deck everybody running around the world raising money, i'm just one of them is not talking about new york right now. we're waiting to see how this plays out. why take new york risk? new york did that to themselves. i didn't do it to them. they

maybe never because the normal appellate avenue for review from a new york trial court is to go to the york appellate courts. >> laura: highest court. >> and you can preserve your federal issues in state courts. >> laura: so the due process argument here that the president cannot get a fair trial, given how this is conducted, with the underlying bias of the judge, the political connection, all of that, that goes to the 14th amendment claim of he can't get due process. on top of that is the first amendment issue that sol was talking about. this is an overbroad order that goes to the fundamental right of an individual to stand against a government trying to imprison him. i mean, that's just shocking for most americans to hear this. >> yeah. you are absolutely right. and mike and sol i think had it just right to say this gag order. in other words, you have to separate the gag order from the underlying issues in the prosecution. the gag order is a separate issue. it may be that trump will have an ability to appeal the gag order if there is an attempt to enforce it upon him during the cours

the judge also said that the appellate court, i should say, also said that the judge made it clear to the harvey weinstein's defense team that if he took the stand and testify that the judge was going to allow prosecutors to bring in all of the allegations that essentially have been made against him. many dating back past the statute of limitations and the appellate court said that was also unfair and may have prevented harvey weinstein from taking the stand in his own defense and so what does this mean for prosecutors as they rethink if and when they want to retry this case well, we've already heard from the manhattan district attorney who happens to be a different district attorney, then the one that actually move forward with this case. >> but alvin bragg in manhattan has said he absolutely positively will retry harvey weinstein. but the big question is going to be will attempt to have prior, bad acts. witnesses testify. will he attempt to have fewer of those witnesses or will he be prohibited from the trial judge from using any of those witnesses? and if so, might that mean a diff

and the appellate court said this was a bridge too. for the judge allowed evidence and that should not have come into the courtroom therefore, this verdict of thrown out, and now the case needs to be retried. >> the harvey weinstein will not be going home. he will be moved from one facility to another as he awaits a new trial. without those witnesses, that that speak to the prior bad acts. is this case harder to prove in this impending new trial? >> yes. this is what the prosecution is going to have to grapple with. are they going to actually retry harvey weinstein to your point? >> he's also convicted in california. >> he's serving is 16 year sentence. so that california verdict is not impacted by the new york state court of appeals decision. now, that verdict is also going to be appealed, but the legal standards are a bit different in california. and there's a rule that's a bit more broad as to what evidence can come into the courtroom. but in new york, prosecutors are going to have to really look at this case and think if all of thi

prompt appellate review. what are jack smith's options, given the order and also the tone? >> yeah. that is the $65,000 question, right? and this has been so unique to judge cannon all along. she issues rulings that aren't really complete or definitive rulings or what we would call final orders that are appealable, and that is what she has really done here, she said right now, at this point, w based on the indictment, the pra does not provide a reason to dismiss. leaving open, of course, what we have been talking about. so, right now there is not a final order for traditional appeal. there is the prospect of seeking a writ of mandamus, and to do that, what you are doing is you are going to the court of appeals, like you would on an appeal, but you don't have a final order to appeal and you are saying that the judge made it clear and indisputable error, here it would be, not addressing the legal question that jack smith asked her to address, that there is no other alternative to obtain appeal, and that this kind of an order would be appropriate. now, i think there is another option,

as always, any party remains free to avail itself of whatever appellate options it sees fit to invoke, as permitted by law. at this point, special counsel jack smith might be left with no choice. neil served as acting solicitor general of the united states, he is now professor of national security, law at georgetown university. mary is a former acting assistant attorney general for the national security department of justice. she's co-hosting the prosecuting donald trump podcast, and they both join me now. meal, let me start with you. i've been trying to understand this, and i feel like i'm 85% of the way there. i don't get the jury instruction part. where does the jury instruction thing come from? that seems early anyway. if they're filing to say you should dismiss this case because the presidential records act doesn't allow the case to be brought, okay, and she says no. why does this jury instruction issue hang over all of this? >> ordinarily, chris, you would have jury instructions decided at the charging conference much later. what happened here is that judge cannon two different

now, she was an appellate lawyer before a federal district court judge.ody who trumps want to nominate to the supreme court, i would challenge people to look first at fifth circuit judge jim ho is likely to be trump's first nominee. they should be a lot more scared depending on their policy perspectives about a jim ho than they should be about an aileen cannon. >> jim ho of course because he weighed in on the subjects of whether or not women should be able to access mifepristone and that thing. >> weighed in on transgender care and inmate in a prison can go buy their -- can be assigned to a prison of their chosen gender, things like that. he has taken positions again and again that i think many americans would find absolutely terrifying. and he's an experienced appellate jurist who served as solicitor general of texas, now a fifth circuit judge obviously and former thomas clerk. >> we say scaring is caring on this show. you're lovely but you scared the hell out of me. thank you very much. that means you care. >>> up next, boeing had a series of technical