the planning department found this application complies with the t.r.b. compatibility standard so based on this public works tentatively approved the application on december 19, 2017. they noticed the approval through a mailing in a posting. public works held a public hearing to consider protests and based on the hearing officer's findings, the director of public works approved the permit. i wanted to clarify that one of the appellant's concerns was about notice prior to the tentative approval. so under article 25, there actually is no required notice prior to an application being tentatively approved. also regarding the required noticing of the tentative approval i have code 25 section 1512 -- >> that's you, gary. >> it does say the notice of mail of notice to approval is to any person owning property or residing within a 150-foot radius and we interpreted that to be properties within 150 feet need to be mailed noticed. also, in terms of the notice of the posting, the applicant is required to post the notice for approv approval in conspicuous places. it

e-verify has to be an applicable application across the not hurting businesses. it's saving businesses because if you'reoing to follow that e-very pros, it's very, individuals that say once you start a database on that, your not going to like it. weush /pull me type of process. we got to have somewhere to orient thestat of equal application of the law. so you're exactly right.>> bere reprwant you to re bk and that waseported on between you and members of representative ossator mccain overin mccain ility becoming a plement should john mccain pass away. >> where i got involved here is that the comment was made he would not appoint cindy main. cindy's name came outeft field. it's been reported a number of places. who did it, i don't know. on ken bennett was inappropriate. the reason i say that is that was ken bennett's opinion, that cindy mccain wasn't goin be somebody he wou c because she di not fulfill his iderole. we involved oursf because of governoresnd eett. well.n of hav as oue thatpen discussion. anybody that plans for anything in life has a p if u're n doin

didn't say there was an eviction in their application. our focus on this is pretty narrow. to the public commenters i think we all get the issue, but the board has passed laws on who can condo convert and ellis act has been taken into account where new applications you can't condo convert or you have to wait a certain amount of time. our power here is fairly limited in making sure there is a complete application and i think this does indicate there were these eviction. >> right. >> president hillis: commission erner moore. >> could they make sure that the protected unit was in the report. i couldn't find that particular mention. >> i was not made aware of anything in terms of protected status or disabled tenant if that is what the reference is to. the eviction history that was filed with us didn't necessarily include that information so that is the same information from the rent board that is included in your status' well or in your staff report. it states there were ellis act evictions that occurred in 2002, so i was unaware of any citiz

he would not be able to persist with his application. responsibility for that choice is that and that alone of theri. it's not down to the honorable member from marie. it is not down to me. members must take responsibility for their own action. as to whether there would be either an urgent question on the matters of which the honorable job has just treated or indeed an application on another day is a matter for another day. i'll takhe honorable member first and then the shadows of the house. point of order. >> thank you for taking the point of order. as you said, mr. speaker, application should not be made by half past in the morning. obviously, i did not make such an application but standing order 24 of subsection four does allow you, mr. speaker, to consider an application if the urgency is not so known at 10:30. notice can be given soon there after. my suggestion to you, mr. speaker, is the application became a point which the right honorable member decided that pulling a stunt was more important than allowing scottish members to be h

pull down application.7 for the submission so this is a fixed one year pilot program, so we will likely wait until june 7 until we have collected any and all applications at which point we will endeavor to review them as quickly as possible. applications will be working with companies to get them complete as soon as possible. the city attorney said we are hoping to issue permits by the end of june, so as soon as the end of june given our experience with past permit programs it probably will take some time to get complete applications and complete the review but we are shooting for the end of june to have these permitted. as quickly after that as they can get them out on the street will be up to them. >> look at how quickly this has been developing the fact that in less than a couple of months that we have a program that has been designed by the mta and we are taking applications today and you have such a tight turn around i think is a measure of the degree to which the city collectively uses this as importa

in applications, but interestingly not only do we have an increase in applications, but the percentage of the applications that are found to be disabled and begin receiving benefits drops. so the increase in the number of people starting to receive benefits does not rise as much as the number of applications as you would expect. of course, the counterpart of that is true, when the economy gets re strong and jobs become nor plentiful we tend to see fewer applications coming in. we had anticipated that in the recovery that we have had since the great recession, what is so fascinating, though, is that the drop in the applications has been so much more than anticipated, even given the strength of the economy. >> thank you for that answer. after last year the tax cuts and trobs act was signed into law our economy continues to grow, americans are taking home higher paychec paychecks, new jobs are being creatinged. the cbo has estimated a tax cuts and jobs act will create approximately 900,000 jobs for the next decade. that's certainly great news for our country. in this context it seems to m

when the applications will turn backup is critical to this. at the reserve date in 2032, they projected we could pay 96% of benefits. under the current ones if things get better we may not a plea much later than 2032. >> first of all mr. goss, thank you for your service. my grandfather used to quote finley done all the time that said trust everyone to cut the cards, we like to say trust everyone but read the actuary reports. i thank you for the report and the analyses have done various bills. i know you look at our bill and social security 2100. does that bill strengthen social security trust fund so that it is financially sound throughout the 75 year projection? >> indeed, it does. >> i noted in my opening comments that this is going to put additional stress on the system that has not been actuarially adjusted since 1983. for given all the assumptions we go through for program i think any rational person listening to this says have any of my other insurances gone up since 1983? the answer is yes, they have to adjust to the times and the chang

they went forward to and a half years without a conditional use application without a variance applicationand without a single neighborhood outreach meeting. without any engineering or soil testing, without shoring, even though it is on a slope over 20%. without approved plans, without any planning applications or review, and that is how they went forward. no shoring and that is why joe duffy was really worried. they remove the entire rear yard and flooded andy's house. that complaint is still also outstanding. when the retaining walls collapsed. but the real reason that you shouldn't grant the variances that are requested here, as the variance application is completely at odds with the facts. the statements in it do not match the city records. they don't even match the other applications that they've submitted. the variance application says that there is an existing four floors and there is only an existing two floors. the variance application says there is 3140 square feet. the city says there is 2,300 square feet. their environmental application says something completely different. so,

he would not be able to persist with his application. and responsibility for that choice is that and that alone of the right honorable gentleman. it is not to the honorable member and it is not down to me. members must take responsibility for their own actions. as to whether there will be either an urgent question on the matters of which the honorable gentleman has just treated or an application on another day is a matter for another day. i will come to the honorable gentleman -- i will take the honorable member first. >> point of order from the honorable member. as you have said, mr. speaker, applications should be made by half past 10:00 in the morning. obviously i did not meet such application but staing order 24, subsection 4, does allow you, mr. speaker, to consider an application if the urgency is not so known at 10:30. notice can be given soon thereafter as is practical. my suggestion is the right honorable member decided that doing a stunt was more important than allowing scottishembers proper debate on this subject. >> i'm very

the application is clearly referring to, in this case, the conditional use application. it should not have been issued yet. the first question in this process is, what are you going to build a replacement? and that question still has not been answered. there is not a finalbuildg permit and plans approved by the planning commission were not finished. the commission actually said go back and work with staff to revise the plans further. a letter of determination say it can be converted and expanded beyond existing envelope. that is also wrong. it is impossible to distinguish between the commercial and residential portions. if you are demolishing the residential portion, you can't then say it will be sanded and converted, because it no longer exists. thank you very much. i will answer any questions. >> i've got a question. going through the brief, your client is your boss? [laughter] >> that is true. my other client is andrew's wife. >> you better when. that was it. >> i always try. thank you. >> thank you. we will now hear from the subject property owner. the attorney for t

submits the application for apartment to operate for a massage or tattoo manual and no construction is required or needed but facility was not a massage - never a massage or tattoo facility that existed more like this a slogan but add an additional kind of requirement for their business and the applicant needs to pull a permit or do they require an over-the-counter permit only if they don't need to do any construction because for record purposes they have to get an approval from dbi to get permit. >> yeah. generally a change of use will need to go through planning in order to - you'll need a building permit we can look to make sure that your complying with the existing and accessibility and the fire life and safety anything that is triggered by the change of use. >> one thing i deem as a problem every time i send the applicant to the dbi they look at over-the-counter and take it back and is no construction dbi didn't generate any preliminaries permits so a change of use - they have to have a permits and a change of use did that require a set of plans. >> it requires specifically for

application. just become something is innovative doesn't mean it's good for our city. we are using this to put in place the regulatory for example work that makes sure that we can get the best of the transportation benefits for the people of san francisco without some of the detriments such as we have seen on the streets already. the city attorney made reference to safety and that is our number concern. to make sure that the use of the scooters is being donecephaly and appropriately when used and when stored and not using them to ride on sidewalks or block sidewalks and there are the two main concerns h a we shao the permit will require aobus r plan to show how they will ensure the proper use and storage of their scooters. there are provisions that speak to the people. who support the scooter share programs whether employees or contractors, there are privacy protection. we are in the business of transportation and mobility but not in the business of permitting harvesting of personal data, sonefur

we understand applicants lack such evidence for various reasons and we will help applicants.es and these provisions will not affect the overwhelming majority of eu citizens and their family members. throughout the process will be looking to grants, not for reasons to refuse and caseworkers will be able to exercise discretion in favour of the applicant, where appropriate, to minimise administrative burdens. friendly guidance and support, including a customer contact centre will be in place to help applicants through the process. subject to parliamentary consideration to the fees regulations, applications will cost £65 with a reduced fee of £32 50 for children under 16. there will be no fee for children in care. the process will be particularly straightforward for those who already hold a valid, permanent resident or an indefinite leave to remain document, which they will be able to swap for settled status free of charge. those granted pre—settled status will be able to apply for settled status without paying a further fee. settled status without paying a furtherfee. eu settled

the fact is the application would have been heard, the right honorable gentleman who made the application chose to put himself in a position in which he would not be able to persist with his application. responsibility for that choice is that and that alone of the right honorable gentleman. it is not down to the honorable member from murray and it is not down to me. members must take responsibility for their own actions. as to whether there will be either an urgent question on the matters of which the gentleman has just treated or indeed a 24 application on another day, is a matter for another day. >> i will take the honorable member from oxley and shetland first and then the shadow leader of the house. >> thank you for taking my point of order. obviously i did not make such an application. if ther an application urgency is not so known and 10:30. you, mr.tion to speaker, is the point at which the right honorable member -- the proving was more important than -- on the subject. >> i am very grateful to the gentleman. i say that with sincerity. the right honorable gentleman is an accomplish

do applications for disability insurance go up when it is more difficult to find a job? and with high unemployment. but interestingly not only with an increase in applications but thef percentage found to be disabled drops so the increase does not rise as much as the number of applications as you would expect and of course jobs become more plentiful we see fewer applications coming in and we anticipated that in the recovery since the great recession. what is so fascinating is the drop in the applications is so much more than anticipated. >> after last year the economy continues to grow. in fact the cbo has estimated costing 900,000 jobs for the next decade it is super great news for the country. but it seems to me that getting or merrick is in the workforce can you describe the significance of all the new jobs relative to the social security solvency? those are absently critical because all the benefits that are scheduled to be paid out with the payroll tax contributions and those are critical and it is interesting and you are correct the vo projects a higher number of w

thank you. >>> thank you. >> supervisor safai: please call the next applicant. >> clerk: the next applicant is gloria berry. >> supervisor safai: miss berry, please come forward. >> okay. here we go. hello. thank you, supervisors, for listening to my request to be on the police commission. i'm basically going to start off by informing of you what led me to today. i'm a native. i was born in san francisco in the fillmore in 1969. my first view of police officers was cultivated by what went on outside my window of my apartment. i saw police officers beating up black men, and it really resonated with me at a young age that the fear that is in the community. then moving along to thege of 15, i found myself a victim, and i was assaulted, and the police officer that responded was very compassionate, very concerned. took a thorough report, and he went as far as keeping in contact with me and my family because he was very devastated and touched by what had happened to me. so through communications with him, he recommended i join the san francisco police activities league, and i did. and through tha

if the first application is not. these have only been vetted by the office of cannabis for the qualifications are the equity partner, not for the appropriateness of the management team or of the location. i would suggest that you will see a lot of this and see a lot of confusion about what the planning commission role is in selecting the eventual retailers. and it will be a lot of fear and loathing going on in this town about this because it's not the gold rush anymore. it's a hard business. and retail margins are similar to every other retail business. so there's going to be a lot of disappointment and frustration. there is one thing i would like to pass up to the commissioners. there's a letter that was circulated to all the property owners of applicants for cannabis locations and it's a fraudulent letter using department letterhead. i'm going to put it on the overhead, essentially threatening federal action against property owners should landlords choose to rent to legal cannabis retail. this is an interesting tim

you were asking about -- >> the four applications on carter page. i think you've been vague on whether you signed -- >> no, no, sir. let me try to clarify if i may -- >> did you sign the fourth fisa application? >> i approved the filing -- >> you say you approved that application -- >> yes. >> now, that's going -- >> before -- that's my job, sir. >> that's your job, okay. you approved it. when you approve a fisa application, in your mind, does that mean you should read it and understand what's part of it? >> you should certainly understand what's part of it, sir, as i said -- >> you're parsing words. it doesn't mean you need to read it -- >> it depends on the circumstances. >> being a former felony state judge -- >> yes -- >> if i had somebody like you come before me and now it was -- >> i'm not the -- >> -- and find later the guy that signed and approved an application for a warrant had not even read the application that would ally spying on somebody -- >> that would be atrocious -- >> -- i would look at everything he signed from then on with a jau

applicants should be able to predict if they're application will succeed. that's one of the primary objectives of the planning department. we should make it easier to add 100% affordable housing to other parts of the city. there are too many parts of the city where you cannot build dense housing. i don't think we should move discretionary review on-line. i think we should make it harder to file. a lot of discretionary reviews are pernicious and designed to get rid of it. i think we should move it to alcatraz and charge $2,000. [laughter] >> president hillis: thank you. next speaker, please. >> i'm jimmy, resident of the sunset. born and raised here, lived here all my life. because i'm one of pport this those nosy neighbors that gets all of your notifications and i'm kind of, quite frankly, horrified at the amount of mail i got. it's overwhelming. and it takes me hours to read through everything. i'm also horrified at how easy it is to butt into my neighbors' business and kill their housing projects. i get mail for like building a deck. i don't care about a

ibm and not mentioned some of the applications that ai can help on that front.nd watson made a big splash. there is criticism of that. the results have been slowly seen. what impact is watson really having? ichal: artificial intelligence is a loving all of us to automate prophecies. they are trying to identify a potential remedy or treatment, putting two heads together is better than one. advances are slow. in the beginning of the advances of artificial intelligence and there is more to come. y: are we at risk of an article is shoveled -- artificial intelligence hype cycle? michael: not just yet. there is an opportunity to be more proactive about the applications of artificial intelligence. organizations have come under criticism for project maven, that was out there when they were collaborating with the department of defense on analyzing video footage. ogle put together principles for dealing with this. we are in the early stages of artificial intelligence, but it is not too early to think about applications. not just in terms of workforce training and skills,

application chose to put himself in a position in which he would not be able to persist with his application. responsibility for that choice is that and that alone of the right honorable gentleman. it is not down to the honorable member and not down to me. members must take us possibility for their own actions. as to whether there will be either an urgent question on the matters of which the gentleman has just treated or indeed a 24 application on another day, is a matter for another day. >> thank you for taking my point of order. it is in fact a point of order from the honorable member. as you said, applications should be made by 10:30 in the morning. -- 24 doesder 27 allow you to consider an application if the urgency is not so known at 10:30. you, mr.tion it to speaker is that the urgency became a point at which the honorable member decided that pulling a stunt was more important than allowing scottish members authority on this subject. >> i am very grateful to the right honorable gentleman because he is an accomplished and dexterous lawyer. i think he is an accomplished fellow. what i sa

persist with his application. and responsibility for that that, and that toalone. honorable t gentleman. it's not the honorable member, murray. members must take responsibility for their own actions. there will be either an urgent question on the honorable which the gentleman was just treated or an o 24 application on another ay, is a matter for another day. will come -- i'll take the honorable member for schett land first and then the shadow leader house, mr.alster carmichael. >> point of order from the member for money. as you have said, mr. speaker, should not be made -- [inaudible] make such i did not anpplication but subsection four does allow you, mr. speaker, to consider an pplication if the urgency is not known -- notice can be given is oon thereafter as practicable. my suggestion to you, mr. speaker, is that the urgency point at which the honorable member decided that of a stunt wasore scottish than allowing members a proper debate on this subject. >> i'm very grateful to the gentleman. say that, with sin

now, the permit application and the plans are in the possession of the permit applicant. they haven't done much since january 2018, but i wouldn't anticipate that they are going to do this work and get the permit. the reason we couldn't review the plans is we don't have them yet. when that permit is issued, we will keep one set of plans and pop those in our records, the applicant will get the other plans. so what we did was we spoke to d.b.i. structural engineer robert chung, and robert was good enough to give us an e-mail today, and i'll read that out. find it. so this is from robert chung, d.b.i. "this is a form 8 application. i have not had a chance to review the drawings because the applicant has the drawings. based on d.b.i. records, structural work consisting of sheer walls and hold downs are included in the permit work. thank you, robert chung." and then as you heard, we have special inspection for certain items for the enforcing steel, sheer walls and floor systems, used for sheer downs and hold downs, and there are other title 24 special inspections requirements

well, to take more qualified applicants. it is ironic that it qualified applicants. in the crosshairs of this lawsuit. obviously it is a very prestigious university and so it isa very prestigious university and so it is a good pr move to sue them rather than somebody else. but also, harvard infamously has a history in the 1920s up to the 1940s on putting a cap on the number ofjewish students. a similar thing may be going on here. one of the things that harvard will say, and has said before, is that all those who get into harvard are qualified, regardless of ethnicity. i'm sure that's true. ironing, depending on how you define qualified. but if you have people of the exact same convocations, not just have people of the exact same convocations, notjust academic scores but extracurricular activities, volunteering, all of these different things that go on to evaluating weather you can play the violin or weather you are a good athlete, all these various things, if they are equal, it seems like race still determines a whole lot. and if you are asian, it is very ha rd to an

applicants will need to prove their identity and nationality.ty. for those who wish to complete the application entirely online there will be an app available on their mobile phone, tablet. they can send their identity documents by post and a dedicated tea m documents by post and a dedicated team will check this and return it to them as soon as possible. second, we will establish the applicant is resident in the uk and where appropriate, their relationship to a fellow eu citizen. what possible, we will help the applicant to continued their continuous residence here and whether it amounts to five years and settled status using an automated system looking at records. we recognise some applicants may lack of such evidence in their own name for various reasons and we will work flexibly with applicants to help them evidence their continuous residence in the uk by the best means available to them. third, we will check the applicant is not a serious or persistent criminal and does not pose a security threat. it is right we do what is needed to protect

>> you were asking -- >> the four applications to spy on carter page. and i think you have been a bit vague on whether you even signed. >> let me try to clarify for me. >> did you sign the fourth fisa application? >> i approved the filing of a -- >> okay, you say you approved that application. now, that's going -- >> that's my job, sir. >> that's your job, okay. you approved it. when you approve of fisa application in your mind, does that mean you should read it and understand what's part of it? >> you should certainly understand what's part of it, sir. >> you're parsing words, that doesn't mean you need to read it, in your opinion, is that correct? >> it depends on the circumstances, sir. and -- >> well being a former felony state judge, if i had somebody like you come before me and now it was -- revealed later that the guy that signed and approved an application for a warrant had not even read the application that would allow spying on somebody, i would look at -- >> that would be atrocious. >> i would look at everything he signed from then on with a

for both applicants, you have been provided a staff report, a draft resolution, the application, a case report from planning department staff, and a resolution from the historic preservation commission. there are copies on the table for the public. item 3-a is the animal company. the business is a small, neighborhood pet store located in noe valley. the animal company was founded in 1976 as a full line pet store, selling troppical fish and birds, along with the products to maintain these animals. in 2001, after 25 years of business, rick and allen french purchased the animal company and molded the store to fit their vision while providing individual character. it was provided to put the emphasis on what they new best: tropical birds. in addition to exotic birds, they carry a large variety of supplies for dogs and cats in noe valley and the surrounding location. they moved to 1317 castro street in the heart of noe valley. item 2 is sf grooming, inc. the business was established in 1984 at 24 and douglas streets in noe valley. in 1996, yancey wu took over as a full-time owner. she is a na

in 2016, more than 40% of the applications contained no race data. that's nearly three times the state average. >> i don't like to see a lot of race unspecified data. >> reporter: peter smith is a researcher at the center for responsible lending. he says borrowers have the right not to disclose their race and some might think marking it down will hurt their chances. but he says 40% sounds high. >> when we see larger sets of people or larger sets of borrowers failing to report their race, i wonder, you know, if there are sort of structural issues. it raises a little bit of a red flag for me. >> reporter: quicken is the nation's largest mortgage lender. its popular rocket mortgage site says you can get approved in minutes. but that convenience may come at a cost. if someone comes into a bank to apply for a loan but decides not to disclose their race, the loan officer is required to report their first impression of the person based on observations we all make, like skin color, accent, or last name. but quicken's clients fill out applications on the phon

applications be working th companies to ge them complete as soon as possible. the city attorney said we are hoping to issue permits by the end of june, so as soon as the end o juniv o experience with past permit programs it probably will take some ti to get completelicaons a mp rev b were ng ouneo have these permitted. asqulyftn get them out on the street will be up to them. >> look at how quickly this has been developing the fact that in less than a couple of that we have a program thas been designed by the mta and we are takin applications today and you have such a tight turn around i think is aeasure of the degree toh the collecve thi as impoant both in terms of fostering transportation invasion, but also protecting the healtndyf onthe ans and i want to applaud the mta for how quickly they have designed this program and the emen assistance ts is wre you saw the city coming together to recognize that this is impornt for our city. one more question. >> how many -- [indiscernible] >> three. we have had heard rumorsore o wu have heard the three that are out ther

however, out of those 76 applicants, 46 failed the on-site drug test, andix applicants didn't follow up on the next step of the interview process. we ended up hiring 24 applicants, and now primarily due to attendance issues, only four of these individuals remain employed the at foundry today. as you can see from the results of our job fair, finding applicants, especially drug-free applicants s a real struggle. typically only 25% to 30% of prospective employees can pass a drug test. given the fact that we have heavy equipment and molten metal in foundries, it is vitally important that our workers are drug free. our industry is stepping up and making a commitment to actively reach out to introduce the metal casting process to local elementary, middle schools, high schools, and other venn use. foundries are working with their local labor departments, technical colleges, veteran organizations, and correctional facilities for referrals. we're providing in-house training, including apprenticeships for our more technical positions, and paying for our associates to go to technical classes. t

we enhance and support people for legally coming here, not the illegal application. i find it kind of offensive, not kind of, really offensive that in the first action that you want to come to this country is you violate the law. what made this country great was the equal application of the law, that no one was above it. oh, i forgot. we got hillary clinton sitting out there that bypasses all those types of processes. t we got to get back to it. everybody has to be held to that same accountability. now, i don't want to victimize children. not at all. but these aren't children anymore. so where was the stalwartness of them to come forward? i think everyone would like to try to help them. citizenship is the big stretch. the second part is, family unification is that we're going to allow parents to come back in, the original lawmakers. that's the problem here. and you can't have one without the other. that's the conversation that jeff is missing. can we zo somethido somethinth wa to just something with daca recipients. what about those children that are here from india

this is going to have far greater applications?he research that was going on in our labs and the work that was done by two individuals martinjenek who were studying the latest enzyme cas9 functions. once we understood how it could be programmed with rna and how to engineer the rna into a simpler form than what we find in nature, we have sort of realise that this would be an incredibly powerful tool for manipulating genomes. because at that stage, you knew that it would work in humans too. because it would be possible to cut any type of dna from our experiments, yeah. do you remember how you felt at the time and what you did? well, i remember leaning over the light box in the lab and looking at the results of an experiment with martin, and looking at each other and saying "wow, this is an incredible protein and it seems likely to be useful for genome editing." 0k, well, let's look at a few of the things that even in a few years, that was back in 2012, in the year since that it has already started to be useful in labs all around the

we did meet with every single applicant that what their application in in a timely manner. that is everyone that's in front of us today. so i appreciate the conversation that we had. in terms of -- just a policy reminder question, you are a san francisco resident, but the majority of your work has been in oakland. this position is all about the work in san francisco, and effective policy and san francisco and police department in san francisco. how do you respond to that? >> sure. well, the majority of my family is from san francisco. i live in san francisco now. as i mentioned, with my work at part, i was in san francisco on san francisco issues pretty regularly and with san francisco stakeholders. you know, my time in the mayor's office, i was offered a position in the oakland mayor's office and i thought that we had an opportunity to make great changes in the city of oakland. but i also would like to mention that i mentioned in the sentences -- i worked in the san francisco district attorney's office when i was in law school, and also, when i worked on haley's presidenti

it's also written on the application form. i don't have it in front of me, but the language makes it really clear what the consequences will be. so i think, to the point about wanting to send a strong clear message, that we want to discourage fraud, we should, you know, consider that as we are contemplating changing, and what is a very difficult situation. in order to prevent fraud and provide the greatest opportunity to serve the kids who do live in the city of san francisco. >> for the case of the school. , in the coming year, of the 17 work causes of fraud, what is the waitlist currently for both high schools? >> so, with the high school, we actually don't have a waitlist process. it is a competitive process to get accepted into the school. and so the offers are made in around one and what we do is we significantly over and roll the school with the assumption, because not everybody accepts the school when they sign up. we use a yield process in the hope we get to the desired enrolment numbers by the time the school opens. >

it should be easy to predict whether the application will succeed or not. that is the number 1 goal of the planning compartment -- department in an application process. we should make it easier to build affordable housing in other part the city. especially the sunset in richmond. you cannot add very much affordable housing, i don't think we should move discretionary review online which is one of the proposals. we should make it harder to file discretionary reviews. sat fiscus go hands five times as many discretionary reviews as new york city. a city that is five times larger. we should move this office to alcatraz and charge $5,000 to file one. thanks very much. >> speaker-01: thank you. any members of the comment to want to -- public who want to comment on item two please come up. is this the correct mic? >> hello my name is norma. i was planning on coming to support this great effort that the planning department and also o. e. w. d. has put together as well as many community members including really talented architects, i was going to come anyway to cheer