since all the applicants are up for reappointment, this is a question for all the applicants, if you come up and address the issues that you worked on when you're up. some of the issues that you worked on and any of your future goals in you're reappointed. >> sure. we currently were working on a few things. we have the -- we have -- maybe they can elaborate more on the mid mall situation. there's also the -- we did the -- sorry, i'm going blank right now. there's so much. those housing on natoma housing, the small sites. and up, so the united players is seeking funding as well. as well as other supports from other organizations. >> okay. thank you. >> yes. connie ford. >> good afternoon, i'm with the mayor's office with housing and community developmentment connie ford to leave earlier today. she had a conflict, but she ask that i speak on her behalf. she was been with cac since its inception so we have been working together for the last eight years and she's the only original member of the cac that's with us and working hard. she is currently also with the san francisco labor counci

administration approval of the building applications and within both of those so the building applications can be submitted at the same time of the phase applications so the community review first a required preapplication meeting for both phases and building permit applications those have to had a in visitacion valley and they have the option of happening in the planning department and given the neighborhood how far we made it implicit 2, 3, 4 happen near the project site. after the meetings the neighborhood notification and within the 312 period both for phase pleas and now building permits not on the slides that's from the may 8th hearing for parks and building permits there's a post application meeting within the thirty day notification period close to the project site my public comment and review has to be documented similar to the preapplication meeting so all of those xhments comments my written comments and my comments that happen during the post application meetings are going to be farther to the planning director to make their final approval. and we made that under the redevelopm

that's what they told us, for 3 mirabel and prepare a new application for 3 montezuma. they even gave it an address, a new fictitious address on the south side of the community garden at the intersection of montezuma, mirabel and coso. so, this kind of corresponds to what the appeal -- what the objection was that they attempt, because then we realized we were going to have to reach out to the community again about the alternative site because we didn't -- we were only [inaudible] and the other people weren't given a chance to agree that this was a good alternative site. >>> can i give her my minutes? >> you may. >> if you want to speak. >>> everything anita didn't get to say was that we had expected some kind of communication about why number 3 was or wasn't going forward and when the new -- what the new one would go through. instead, all we got from anybody was that they appealed it and we had to show up for a hearing. so, it's kind of a sense of ill feeling that there was an agreement or an idea and we never have heard why the alternative place was not accepted. so, i

thr are eight seats and # 1 applicants. -- there are 11 applicants. >> i believe thomas pew. >> good afternoon, chairman and community members. thank you for allowing me to speak. i'm tom, and i'm at the school of journalism and i teach on public records. i'm here as co-chair as the chapter -- san francisco sunshine task force requires spj to nominate a journalist and a lawyer to the task force. as you know our nominees are attorney mark and investigator reporter ally. they're outstanding candidates, literate and open governance, fair minded and highly educated and technically savy. the foy committee screened their applications and interviewed them and approved them. their credentials to serve is above approach. let me be claire that fbj perspective is one of disclosure and openness. with the unequivalent cal intent and the will of san francisco voters that the journalism -- they would nominate candidates. the intent of voters remains transparency. look no further than tuesday easy lexes where 71 percent of voters approved. make no mistake, the people want open government. be reminde

application no. 14exc-1497. for hearing today1234 you have seven 7 minutes to present your case. >> hi, my name is sally stooens the president of the golden heights association. the steward came to us and asked for help in pealing this permit. it's a group that's been active for five 5 years at -- beautifying the and where they want to put the at&t box. i live about half a block away from this area and it is very much considered by the neighbors to be open space. the stewards have done a great job of beautifying the over the past few years and we don't want to see it get any worse than that. they came to ask for our help and we agreed to do the appeal. i would like to get marina moran oh come up to speak. >> good evening, my name is marina moreno. i'm an attorney and just a resident. i have a lot of history with the site. we have been taking care of this for 5 years. we came together in 2009 because at the time we were hoping to get a grant from the community challenge grant so we got a little bit more form al i

and approve that nomination -- that application today. thank you. >> so let's have a role call. >> do you want to role call vote on continuing seat 11 or filling. speaker: just a motion. >> on the motion to continue seat 11. >> campus. >> no. >> tang. >> aye. >> yee. >> aye. >> we have two aye and one no. >> motion passes. so are we finished. >> mr. chair, before going forward we need to waive the residency requirement for alley. >> we need a waiver requirement for -- >> seat number three. >> just one, right? >> so moved. >> for winston. any objections? seeing none, motion passes. >> and so for the original motion, that will be recommended as a committee report. >> yes. >> and then the second duplicated file to the call of the chair or a date certain. >> let's do -- we'll have it within the next two meetings. >> but it will be continued to the call of the chair. >> yes. >> madam clerk, any other items? >> that concludes our business for today. >> meeting adjourned.

after the application was reviewed the members on the application status held a meeting for additional feedback and only after this was completed made the phase application. specifically the da was specified that the process for the people submitting that process denial must occur within thirty days and no more than thirty days into the 60 day review period and the post operation meeting must take place. the next change is remthd to the development permit approval if the department of building inspection receives an application and certain other agencies must review the application before the predicaments can be issued and they must complete the reviews between thirty days this requirement applies to the sfmta and dpw and emergency dpw and the rec and park department to the list is added. next the original da states that the cost canceling can't be applied to the project for affordable housing. the expectation is justified because of the act because the city contribution to the project such as the partial impact fees that are described. the update impact makes it more specific i've add

for example, one of the avenues is that our on-line job application system is ada compliant. we also at the department of human resources in our lobby have computers that are ada compliant. and every one of our job announcements on the dhr website also stipulate that if an applicant requires accommodation, who to contact for that accommodation, and we do routinely provide those for the applicants and in addition to that all of the announcements also provide contact information, regarding tty access. and in addition to that, we also have donna kataki who you have identified as leading the effort to work with the cbos in the community and particularly we have been very happy to work with kate williams for light house for the blind in reaching out to those and advising them of positions that are available that are listed on the website and also asking the cbos that if they have clients that meet any of the minimum qualifications for those positions please send us their resumes. and then we can reach out to those departments and have them identify those positions, as rule 115, so

planning code 7033 i if the city looks at a formula retail use the applicant hazard to prove to the city it's not a formula retail so it's on the retailer not the department this is a new non-es terrific of the 9 findings in section 7033 of the existing planning code 4 deal with the size and structure of the company while only two addresses aesthetics. supervisor breed appreciates the work on formula retail i don't want to sound like a nitpicker but your department has done a great job navbt the issue by on subsidies supervisor breed strongly disagrees with our staff analysis that was endorsed by the has a valley association and the has a valley association as >> heard a minute ago and now from christen the hate ashbury is asking for the same change the small business commission endorsed that and supervisor mar is proposing to adapt the same changes norpdz the writing is on the wall if planning didn't make the changes the board of supervisors will we encourage you to do this on behalf of supervisor breed. thank you. >> thank you. >> good afternoon, commissioners i waited to the he s

the department verifies that as part of the application process. at the hearing lynn fong of dpw appeared and stated on the record that at&t has in fact complied with all the requirements including seeking private easements. this is something that at&t does voluntarily. it can't be a basis for denying at&t statutory right to place the utility cabinets in the public right-of-way. at&t has that right under 7901, the public utilities code. it can't be ordered as the appellant request to place this on private property including that the property owners are unaware of granting an easement. as to being able to underground the cabinets, we presented evidence previously about this. mr. brakeman is available to answer questions both about the easement and about placing cabinets and undergrounding and what the technical obstacles to doing that are. we also have provided dpw with information as recently as november of 2013 that at this time it's not technically possible to put these large cabinets underground. i don't have anything further to add to this but

commissioner borden >> so right now it's at the mandatory discretionary review but the applicant has to file a new application it's a different process now. >> so there's no cu on file. >> if we continue it will they have to file a new cu and they wouldn't be heard that date anyway. >> the department will have to take it in and review it as a conditional use. >> so continuing it basically is definite for all intents and purposes so they'll have to file a new application. >> i believe that's right it requires a 20 day notification period as well. if the new legislation requires this facility to be a conditional use there's a new applications that needs to be made >> commissioner hillis. >> just another question procedural the public health department has made a ruling, you know, and agreed to for the change of ownership is it appealable. >> yes. to the board of appeals and from the ryan health inspector the respondent plans on appealing the decision saw that's also pending, you know, so i support a continuance for both of us clustering is an issue regardless of the cu process is in pl

i really want to thank all the applicants for coming back here again. i think -- i'm not going to repeat the issues brought up at the last meeting and i don't think it's fair to hold this committee on what has happened on the past. and yee has done everything he could to bring you back. we tried not to delay it further. i know supervisor campos and i don't always agree on issues but we didn't have the full compliment of the committee last time so i'm glad he was able to join us today. after following last week's rules committee, i received more information that brought to light more - addressing more of the concerns we raised so i appreciate that and that was really the time being that we needed to get some more information. some of the information or some of the issues that i had raised at the last meeting stems from my work previously. i was the lead staffer in the office that was assigned to the sunshine task force when their issues are brought up to our office so attended the meetings and handled some of the sunshine request so my issues were brough

so we have two applicants for the seat and both applicants are here today and if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them >> thank you. so i see no questions let's invite the two applicants to come forward with short statements >> great to see you. >> good afternoon, commissioners hope you're having a wonderful day i'm here to speak to you guys about my qualifications to the geneva advisory committee. one the reasons i'm applying is i want to combine my passion with my former education and the experiences of the o m i to shape the feasibility study i'm a student at the san francisco university studying political science and completed my upper habitat institution study. i've lived along san mateo county and san francisco counties and right along the border my personal connection to the residents in the area. and i believe that i'm imitating acquainted with the student population as well as the residents in the neighborhood. as a member of the geneva proximately i'm sure we need the input from young people and additionally to insure that the geneva studies so there it's applic

second application would be project 797 0.ond subdivision application, five-unit air space final map with up to 190 condominium units propose hees to subdivide parcel a and b from project 79 69 along with existing assessors block 3706 lot 93 and 275. lot 93 is currently a mid rise mixed use building at the corner of mission and third. lot 275 is a small parcel fronting stevenson street that provides access to the underground parking garage. the proposed five air space lots will provide the development new portionseses devoted to underground parking, new [speaker not understood] and other buildings proposed to house the mexican museum at the corner of mission and third. thank you. >> good afternoon, honorable president board chiu, members of the board. i'm annemarie rogers, planning department staff with kevin guy. you heard mr. store describe the subdivision that are under appeal today so i'll skip right to the underlying project which is much of the appellant's concern. so, this project was approved through a series of hearin

>> no, okay, thank you. >> is there any public comment on this application? >> all right, seeing none, public comment is closed. and the matter is with the commission. >> a like to approve this application. >> i second. >> with the conditions? >> with the condition of the police. >> okay. >> on the motion to approve this permit with the police conditions same house same call? >> yes. >> okay. >> the motion passes. >> okay, so the next one i mentioned that we had a few that are going to be continued, this is for the village located at 969 market street. we received an e-mail today from the applicant requesting that it be postponed to june 17th and mr. renne is here to talk more about it. >> vice president hyde, and commissioners, mark renne for 969 market street, the village, and this is the old pearl paint store on market street near mason and it is going to be an 800 person corporate event facility. and the applicant is or has a company called drums studio and it does huge projection art events to people like facebook, twitter, google, and some of the usual

and approve that nomination -- that application today. thank you. >> so let's have a role call. >> do you want to role call vote on continuing seat 11 or filling. speaker: just a motion. >> on the motion to continue seat 11. >> campus. >> no. >> tang. >> aye. >> yee. >> aye. >> we have two aye and one no. >> motion passes. so are we finished. >> mr. chair, before going forward we need to waive the residency requirement for alley. >> we need a waiver requirement

, in their original application. though i think it would make the process go a lot smoother if they would. we denied these because they didn't then follow proper notification procedures for the alternate locations identified at the box walk. in those locations where there was no objection to the initial original location, which is always a single location, then the department issued permit. so, it appears that the at&t is trying to use the process to have the director review and approve their chosen location rather than to use the process to focus on finding the best location, which is the least incommodious to the community. i would also say i think what i heard this evening from the members of the public that testified was that they expected -- and one of the members of the public even stated, we knew we would have to then do outreach to the other neighbors because they weren't at the box walk and they didn't have the opportunity to weigh in on whether or not they preferred the alternate location. i believe i heard

the first application. roxanne in panama city, florida. caller: i was calling in because of my daughter, she is 30 years old and had heart surgery on her because of ave motor vehicle accident. problems -- female problems and needs a hysterectomy. this may wrap around and cause her to become septic -- she has been to the emergency room every -- andtime and cheated she needed something cheaper than all of these er visits, she applied for medicaid and she has no income at all, she is living with me, and i am disabled. and it is just a mess. i have never seen this so bad in my life, she can get her heart medicine and she can't get anything. i don't make that much money. worst i havehe ever seen it. host: she is in florida so she would have to apply for medicaid through the federal system? guest: yes, she would have to go to the state office or apply through healthcare.gov and florida is one of the states that is not expand eligibility with the income level for adults, who have income that is very low. host: i g

we have the information that is provided in the applicants application. we really don't need necessary to interview that person. and because each application will be examined by an officer come if there is something in an individual application that raises the question we can invite that person to come in for an interview. there are other examples of people that we would be able to remove from key you of people waiting for appointments -- remove from cue. >> thank you very much. mr. wagner, where are we with the development of metrics? are we at a point anytime soon where we are going to have a maximum wait time target as an official policy of cbp? >> so we measure the wait times at all the major airports today. that information is posted on our website. we take two pieces of information that we have good data on, and that's the block on aircraft at the time we reached the person's passport in the primary inspection area and we subtract that what the average full-time is to get from the plane to our area. so that david is calculated, tablet everyday, post

and the applicants can come forward and if you want to come and support the applicants can speak afterward and first up, we have cynthia crews. >> i became an activist when i was 16 and my home town of jacksonville, was home of three sites, and the drums of dyoxin leaked into our soil and our well water and our streams and our parks and they spewed toxins in our air and protesting it was the first taste of working for environmental yus. and i felt that same intolerance here in san francisco in the face of similar injustices and when i joined up with the pissed off voters with the grassroots organizer i learned that the only way to move the discussion forward was to jump with both feet. clean power sf has been attack under many fronts, pg&e, and we have been in the site together for a decade or more, and from early partnerships on the first pca legislation to green gorillas against green rush and we have been fighting to make clean power a reality. and i know that clean power sf is important to all of us and it is imperative that this be number one on the agenda. and it is also important th

the first application.anne in panama city, florida. caller: i was calling in because of my daughter, she is 30 years old and had heart surgery on her because of ave motor vehicle accident. problems -- female problems and needs a hysterectomy. this may wrap around and cause her to become septic -- she has been to the emergency room every -- andtime and cheated she needed something cheaper than all of these er visits, she applied for medicaid and she has no income at all, she is living with me, and i am disabled. and it is just a mess. i have never seen this so bad in my life, she can get her heart medicine and she can't get anything. i don't make that much money. worst i havehe ever seen it. host: she is in florida so she would have to apply for medicaid through the federal system? guest: yes, she would have to go to the state office or apply through healthcare.gov and florida is one of the states that is not expand eligibility with the income level for adults, who have income that is very low. host: i go to

we have the information provided in the applicants application. we really don't need necessarily to interview that person and because each application will be examined by a consular officer if consular officer if there is something in it and it will ju just -- individual application we can invite that person to come in for an interview. their other examples of people we would be able to remove from the queue of people waiting for appointments and move them along and focus their attention on the other folks about whom we know less. >> thank you very much. mr. wegner were we with the development of metrics and are we had a point anytime soon where we are going to have a maximum wait time target as an official policy of the cbp? >> we measure the wait times in a major airports today. that information is posted on our web site. we take two pieces information we have good data on it that's the time of the aircraft from the time we read the person's passport in the primary inspection area and subtract out the average talk time to get from the plane to o

let me give him the fact, that we have 300,000 extra applications that is normal at this time of year. we have increase massively the staff, the level of applications outside the normal three-week limit is less than the 10% of the 300,000. >> mr. speaker, the truth is that is tens of thousands of people who are finding the holidays are being canceled because they're not actually getting a passport. and he said they've increased the resources, increase the resources at the passport agency. that is not the case. there are greater responsibilities for the agencies and fewer resources. will the prime minister tell the house went to the government first know about this problem and how has it been allowed to develop? >> well, the government has taken action to deal with this problem -- not today but in weeks contest. we got 250 staff already redeployed to the frontline, prioritizing all outstanding applications but that would allow for extra 25,000 examinations weekly. we are having -- asked the question. people would be concerned about this, they will want to be the answer. >> order. that'

we have the applicants on medicaid, on the waiting list. the question is, how many americans are waiting for medicare coverage and according to your survey, it was 2.9 million americans. of 41 2.19 americans out states. 41 states got back to us with numbers. medicaidse are applicants that are applying for medicaid under the regulations of the affordable care act? guest: this is those people who applied for traditional medicaid, since 1965 and also those who are part of the group that gained coverage because they became newly eligible under the affordable care act. is the biggest reason behind this waiting list of nearly 3 million people? guest: it boils down to technical problems and a surge in applications, we have higher than usual volume, and where we found this problem is in the states that had technical problems with their websites or relied on healthcare.gov. host: there was another report healthme out from kaiser about the same issue and the headline was medicaid applications pile up in some large states, they say an peopledented num

. >> would the police like to come up and address this application? >> so, steve from the central station. and the applicant said that this used to be oz and they did have an entertainment permit and we had a minimal amount of calls for service there and there were not any issues and i did come up with eight proposed conditions that we would like the commission to take a look at. and there is some of them are similar to shroeders although there was an extra one, and that was regarding number eight and that is the security that the vehicles do not cause a safety hazard by double parking in a lane of traffic on kearny at that point you have multiple lanes that are going northbound and we do not want anyone double parking and getting rear ended and so we want to be sure that the security take an active part so that they move over so that there are not any car accidents out in front. >> and any questions for the officer? >> no, okay, thank you. >> is there any public comment on this application? >> all right, seeing none, public comment is closed. and the

both applicants are in the marina. there is no mention that nc 3 and two districts and some of the blocks there are only 1 house difference between the directs. all of this was done according to the job of the planning department with the exhibit 3. all this was not done according to job. the letter of determination did not address the 15 percent square footage of the accessory use. it stated that it did not address the size of the formula retail versus a liquor store. 15 page did not state the percentage must be designated and cannot be changed unless it's brought back to the planning department. the necessity of incidental and subordinate use alcohol is never, is anyone of these three character. wallgreens is a drugstore with an accessory use already of drugstore with accessory use of groceries and this would be a subordinate use on accessories use existing use. this would, you would have to change the code. 703.2c v 6 in order for this to be -- it's right here in the determination. accessory use for alcohol must hav

staff is working with the applicant to look at alternative sites and we're in support of the application and recommend approval of the motion. thank you >> thank you project sponsor. >> good afternoon, commissioners i'm teddy i'm the director of external affairs for at&t california i'm here with east son who conducted the radio frequent analysis and the third party review that's part of our packets i'm here with the site acquisition manager at&t is seeking our approval on the unity street antenna. it will place up to 6 panel machines on the subject property thaip they'll decommission the other locations the associated equipment will be located outside the public view in the basement of the property. it - we conducted a significant alternative site analysis for this site we have 24 sites evaluated and that analyze it part of our pact it's located on union and octavia streets and the subject is a 3 story mixed use. as i recall at&t was seeking to cover it's site in coverage with the site that came up most recently in january, the address was on union street. it covered the gap in its wirel

we had six applicants for that particular school site. the principal and her team interviewed the six applicants. they actually went out and did site visits and in the end they sent -- they forwarded two applicants to dcyf to make a decision. the agency that we ended up selecting actually is a long-term, long-standing agency that's in the mission and has been providing services in the mission for a number of years. >> okay, thank you. >> next speakers, i guess, would be michelle parker and todd davis. >> good afternoon, supervisors. my name is michelle parker and this is todd davis, we're co-founders of the san francisco parent political action committee. it takes a village to raise a child and we want to say thank you to all the people that have gotten us to this point now. the work of the extended learning collaborative, after school for all alliance for the past many years with support from dcyf and sf staff, commissioner [speaker not understood] for recognizing the existing inequity and prioritizing this issue by authoring new policy

export application. for anyone who thinks this activity in the house is few tile, given harry reid's intrang jens of taking up legislation that comes from the house, this action by the department of energy highlights that efforts taken in this house goes beyond, sending a clear signal to the obama administration that the people's house is fed up with the delaying tactics and the refusal to move forward with the approval of legitimate permit applications is key to making progress toward a more robust domestic energy sector. the delays which president obama's administration have imposed on these applications make is more and more difficult, applications collecting dust, and these companies are looking to secure finance and they'll soon lose patience and look elsewhere for their needs. the window of opportunity is closing and it's the president's hand who is pushing it down. mr. gardner's legislation is straightforward. indeed, a two-page bill with a clear purpose and intent. the legislation exat the indict