dear football coach and expert who is with us, ardalan, hello, good night. in the name of god, i offer my courtesy and respect to you, mr. puya, and also to the esteemed viewers, jadar eid ghadir. congratulations to all the shiites, i am asking for the greetings of holland and austria. how was the game? i know i messed up a bit because you like me so much do you think you are a little sad now? yes , it is really dynamic. maybe rafe ranking is not really some kind of self-absorbed expert. they call him the professor. the one who came and took over the national team of otisho made the people of austria reconcile with football. he was exactly the one who defended the four. someone invented a line, and jurgen klub's philosophy is the same as the famous gagen press or the counter press, the same is true of franking, who is now sitting on the bench in austria. he had put it outside and all my glasses were shot from the channel on the left, on the contrary, i was surprised by ronald koum that he has two unique takras or great defaras in his list, denzen dumfries an

ardalan , hello, have a good night. i respect your service, dear mr. pooya, and also respectable viewers. eid al-ghadir , congratulations to all dear shias. i am asking you to tell me how was the game. well, it's really dynamic , maybe franking is really kind of an expert they don't call him the professor. the one who came and took the austrian national team in his hands made the people of the country austrian . reconciliation football was exactly the one who invented the four-man line defense, and jurgen klub's philosophy is the famous gegen press or counter-press , the same raf rankinge who is now sitting on the bench in austria. you lose the ball , go quickly and get the ball back, what happened today many times with one player or several players with several players players have to play close to each other. they can get the ball back quickly very high running, very high physical fitness is required. in today's game, you saw that he fired this tactic on holland many times. he came to the defense line and worshiped from the front as soon as they lost

ardalan ashtiani, expert and football coach. hello, ardalan . you are very welcome. in the name of god, i offer my courtesy and respect to you . i am , please, mr. ashtiani, how do you see it, now let's talk about the start of the games and then. specifically , how do you see the teams in the final game, the teams that have the power european football now, have their names changed or not , the ones that most of us know talk about action , mr. asadian, we must first point out that we will witness the highest quality of football in the euros. it should be higher and i believe the same. i have to point out that uefa president alexander ceferin, with the good plan he considered for the european teams and the leveling he did, the level of ab and cdd, made the small team succeed in the development of football. and somehow it motivated me in these teams, you can now see that a team like georgia has been able to make it to the euros, a team like hungary, germany, this team that was not heard from in romania for a few years, came to the euros , and we are definitely witnessin

ardalan ashtiani, an expert and football coach , hello ardalan, i am very happy, in the name of god, i offer my courtesy and respect to you, dear asadian, and also to the viewers of the program, i am very happy to be at your service. the quality of the euro can be higher than the society, and i believe the same, and let's point out that uefa president alexander ceferin, with the good plan he considered for the european teams and the leveling he did and the bvcd that your small teams were successful in the development of football and it somehow motivated you. we are definitely witnessing that any of these maybe they can cause surprise and you definitely saw that in your program i said the czech republic from the point of view of abney. it has the lowest age, and all these teams that i see are mostly in very good conditions in terms of origin , mostly they use 21-23-year-old players . in my opinion , it was very successful in the whole continent of europe, so let's go to tomorrow's game and how do you see the start of the cup, see about. first, let's talk about germany . he is 28 years

let�*s talk to siavash mehdi—ardalan from bbc persian.re will be a run—off on friday. what does that mean, how will that take place? well, the second round of elections always traditionally will be held a week later. as it stands, now, from the 24 week later. as it stands, now, from the 2a million votes that have been counted, 10.5 million went to the heart surgeon, and 9.5 to the far right candidate, saeed jalili, and 3 million to the second to the right candidate which will be the kingmaker because 3 million people who voted for the centre—right candidate, we have to see whether they will choose pro—reform and a modern candidate who is in support of relations with the west, in trying to resolve iran�*s nuclear deal, those devastating sanctions that are crushing people in iran, whether they will choose to vote for saeed jalili, who was a former nuclear negotiator, hard line taff negotiator who doesn�*t believe sanctions are an issue, who thinks the country has enough potential to advance on its own through alliances with russia and china

siavash ardalan from bbc persian — explained the differnces between the two remaining candidates. 0nee doesn't want to change the entire political system but he believes in certain reforms, he believes in certain reforms, he believes the biggest issue facing iran is the us sanctions which has devastated the country's economy for years now. the other is a hardline, ultraconservative politician who has always had ambitions to become president. he is as hard right as you can get in politics. he believes that the sanctions aren't an issue. he wants to have alliances with china and russia to become a powerhouse on its own terms. he thinks he can pull it off so he wouldn't bother engaging with the west or trying to reach approach meant whereas when there was a nuclear deal back in 2016, the other candidate believes there should be some engagements. he is called the morality police immoral and believes that there should be easing up of these draconian restrictions on women's rights and civil liberties. the right—wing candidate believes there should be even more strict in place. we've seen th

let's talk to siavash ardalan from bbc persian. tell us what will happen on friday.ference of votes is very marginal, difference of1 million votes. the heart surgeon reformist candidate, he won 30 full cash he won 43% of the votes and the hardliner won 38%. the kingmaker here is the centre—right candidate, the third candidate was assumed to become the next president of iran, he didn't win a lot of votes. given how radicalised the conservative face —— base in iran has become. so he endorsed the far right candidate, saidjalili. if he he endorsed the far right candidate, said jalili. if he and his supporters decide to vote for him than the next president of iran will be hardliner. but the real kingmakers are those iranians who have chosen to stay away as a sign of defiance against the regime. the turnout was the lowest ever since the 1979 revolution. 60% decided to stay away. the 1979 revolution. 6096 decided to sta awa . ~ the 1979 revolution. 6096 decided to staawa. , ,, the 1979 revolution. 6096 decided to sta awa. , ,, ., stay away. were you surprised that the refor

siavash ardalan from bbc persian — explained the differnces between the two remaining candidates.public is it does not mean he wants to change the entire political he is a loyalist, he once was still certain reforms. he believes that the biggest issues facing iran other us sanctions which have been devastated the country's economy for years now. this hard—line ultraconservative politician who's always had ambitions to become president, he is as far right as you can get in irianian iranians politics. he doesn't even believe that the sanctions are an issue, he thinks they are a blessing and an opportunity for iran to exploit its domestic potential through alliances with china and russia to become a powerhouse on its own terms. to become a very strong actor. he thinks he can pull this off so he wouldn't even really bother engaging with the west. whereas pezeshkian thinks as we had the nuclear deal back in 2016, there should be some engagement and diplomacy, seem as far as foreign policy is concerned. this goes back to the issue of the hijab thing which sparked nationwide protests and

earlier, i wasjoined on set by siavash ardalan from bbc persian, and he explained what we can expect two candidates, in which the difference of votes was very marginal, a difference ofi million votes. the heart surgeon reformist candidate, he won 43% of the votes. and the hardliner won 38%, that is abouti million votes. they kingmaker here is obviously the centre—right candidate. the third candidate who was assumed to become the next president of iran, he didn't win a lot of votes, given how radicalised the conservative base in iran has become. so, he endorsed the far right candidate saeed jalili. if he and his supporters decide to vote for him, then the next president of iran would be a hardliner. the real kingmakers are those iranians who chose to stay away, as a sign of defiance against the regime. the turnout was very low, the lowest ever since the 1979 revolution, 60% decided to stay away. where you surprised that the reformist candidate did so well? hat reformist candidate did so well? not so well. reformist candidate did so well? not so well- he — reformist candidate did so we

siavash ardalan from the bbc persian service told me more about the election.owest turnout we've seen since the 1979 revolution, 43%. i mean, that's pretty low, not even counting those spoiled ballots which might take the real turnout down to the 30s. this is just unprecedented, especially given the fact that the supreme leader had come out a few days before the election saying that, "we want people to turn out because if they turn out, "then that will prove that the people are still loyal "to the system and the system is legitimate, whereas a low turnout "is bad news for us." so, they have a run—off vote. do you think now that pezeshkian is leading in this first round, do you think people will turn out in the second, in the run—off vote? it really depends, it really depends. so, the society is very polarised now. on one hand we have these people turned away from the elections altogether, you know, giving a very powerful message to the system, "we don't want you, we don't want the clerical "establishment any more, we want more like a secular, "liberal—minded de

let's talk to siavash ardalan from bbc persian. trying to make their point perhaps on that side of things?— make their point perhaps on that side of thins? , ., ., , , side of things? they have absolutely made their point _ side of things? they have absolutely made their point in _ side of things? they have absolutely made their point in a _ side of things? they have absolutely made their point in a spectacular- made their point in a spectacular way. this is the lowest turnout we have seen it since the 1979 revolution, 43%, that is pretty low, not even counting those that spoiled ballots which might take the wheel turnout down to the 30s, this is just unprecedented, especially given the fact the supreme leader had come out a few days before the election saying we want people to turn out because if they turn out, then that will prove that the people are still loyal to the system and the system is legitimate, whereas a low turnout is legitimate, whereas a low turnout is bad news for us.— is bad news for us. they have a run-off vote.

with me is siavash ardalan from bbc persian. these second round, talk us through the difference between them. {line these second round, talk us through the difference between them. one is a reformist- — the difference between them. one is a reformist. what _ the difference between them. one is a reformist. what does _ the difference between them. one is a reformist. what does that - the difference between them. one is a reformist. what does that mean i the difference between them. one is a reformist. what does that mean in| a reformist. what does that mean in the islamic republic is it does not mean he wants to change the entire political he is a loyalist, he once was still certain reforms. he believes that the biggest issues facing iran other us sanctions which have been influencing the country's economy for years now. this hard—line ultraconservative politician who's always had ambitions to become president, he is as far right as you can get in his rain two iranians politics. he doesn't even believe that the sanctions are an i

let's talk to siavash mehdi—ardalan from bbc persian.s like an upset, with the moderate candidate, massoud pezeshkian, leading, with 19 million votes counted. he's got 8 million so far. the hard right candidate, saeed jalil has 7 million. it was thought that the current speaker of parliament would be the winner, and that turned out to be false. the other assumption was that if the turnout is low, it will favour the conservatives. maybe saeed jalil, the hard right candidate, might sneak ahead of the pro—reform candidate massoud pezeshkian. so far, that does not seem to be the case. the reformist camp, having been marginalised and alienated in the past, they are in a position to celebrate. ., ., , , ., , celebrate. turnout has been low. is that ou celebrate. turnout has been low. is that you to — celebrate. turnout has been low. is that you to peeple _ celebrate. turnout has been low. is that you to people making - celebrate. turnout has been low. is that you to people making a - that you to people making a political stance, or apathy? fix,

siavash ardalan from bbc persian — explained the differnces between the two remaining candidates.conomy for years now. where as the hardliner, ultraconservative politician who is always had ambitions to become president, he is as far right as you can get in iranian politics. he believes it's an opportunity for iran to exploit its domestic potential through alliances also with china and russia to become a powerhouse on its own term, to become a very strong actor. he believes he can pull this off. he wouldn't even really bother engaging with the west you are trying to reach reproach mark. where he thinks as we had the nuclear deal back in 2016 whereas pezeshkian thinks as we had the nuclear deal back in 2016, there should be some engagement and diplomacy, seem as far as foreign policy is concerned. this goes back to the issue of the hijab thing which sparked nationwide protests and they have gored the morality police in moral gored the morality police immoral and they believe they should be easing up on these kinds of severe draconian restrictions on women's rights and civil liberti