and when he started arguing in the mid 1930s, so even before his 36th election, he starts arguing against dictatorships and for democracy, and he does in explicitly christian terms. he uses light and dark, up and down, all those kinds of metaphors. and because that language was so consistent over time with this slight pickup for russia, because first off russia is like on the side of the dick tater and our bad and unlikely for him, likely for him there is this siege of stalingrad which allows him to then talk about the russians in exactly the same way he can talk about the british, right. but he keeps that same light and dark christian kind of movement throughout, and that language authorizes domestic policies and also makes very clear the argument he is making for war. and it causes the anti-interventionists all kinds of problems. because the anti-interventionists end up having to argue that there is no moral principle at stake in world war ii. and hitler makes that argument increasingly tricky, right, and the more people know about this the more people have to say there's nothing of val

he's arguing these people have always been with us. they have always been incorporated and it is time we recognize that. it is hard i think to imagine a more eloquent claim to national unity. at least for those of us who tracer ancestors to europe. it is clear this rhetoric was meant to be inclusive, although it also of course is exclusionary potential for all those, for instance, i don't see themselves reflected there. but it is well worth noting he does in fact include many of those who were previously marginalized, and that this inclusion may have been one of the reasons these members chose to vote democratic with such consistency. all of them were subject to rhetoric. they all joined the new deal with what can only be called enthusiastic force. this rhetoric was based on the centrality of shared value. man, he said, everywhere throughout europe, your ancestors and mine suffered from an imperfect and often unjust government of their homeland. they were driven by deep desire to find not alone security, but also in large opportunity f

vice president marshall: i do not want to to argue the case. how much time? >> 3 minutes and 16 seconds. he has a minute and 44. >> specifications 2, 3, and 4 deal with a he-said, she-said, regarding the search warrant. i called a lieutenant, who was at home. he was the day watch captain. i was on my day off, serving the search warrant. i called him to notify him the search warrant had been served. i told him i was already off duty, and was going to get a day watch inspector to book the evidence. he said fine. that was done. all of a sudden, they turn around and bring me up on charges saying that was not what the lieutenant had said. he had put out memos regarding, "save money, save over time." i was just following instructions. specification three, i supposedly told inspector delahunte that the lieutenant think i make too much overtime. i would never make a statement like that. specification number four, supposedly we are in a meeting with lt. spillaine, and all of a sudden a door was open and he overheard this conversation? specification five is regarding a

zimmerman's lawyers argued the comments jeopardized his rightt to a fair trial.immerman is charged with second-degree murder in the shooting death of trayvon martin. he's pleaded nnt guilty... saying he shot the unarmed teen in self-defense. penn state university will soon ave to give back á14 yearsá worth of football n-c-double-a's punishment against the university for the jerry sandusky child abuse scandal. the school says it'll return all football trophies won from 19-98 to 20-11... to the groups that awarded them. the n-c-double-a has already issued a few other sanctions against the school... including a 60-million-dollar fine and a ban on bowl games for four years. sandusky... a former penn stateeassistant football coach... was found guilty in june of sexually abusing 10 young boys over several years. some customers of "chipotle mexican grill" are outraged today... after learning the restaurant chain is cheatinn them out of pennies. jersey star-ledger"... some busy chipotle chains in new york and new jersey are rounding customers''totals to the nearest nicke

you can't be more jewish than to argue with fellow jews. it's not a problem. >> at the 92nd street "y" in new york, vanderbilt divinity school professor amy-jill levine is making the case that jews and christians alike need to pay more attention to the jewishness of jesus. and e best way to do that, she believes, is by reading the new testament from a jewish perspective. >> if i want to understand jewish history, the new testament is one of the best sources that i've got. >> levine, who is an observant jew, is co-editor of the jewish annotated new testament, a version of the christian scripture with footnotes and commentaries written entirely by jewish scholars. >> the new testament does have extraordinarily beautiful and profound material in it. paul's hymn to love in 1 corinthians the parables of the good samaritanr th prodigal son, or comments such as "god is love," which is 1 john. this is magnificent material, and everybody ought to appreciate it. i find for myself the more i read the new testament, in fact the better jew i become. >>

i do not think the mayor has argued it is dumb. it forms the basis of the opinion.take do>> then the language of e charter was changed by initiative. how do we know a changeÙ was in order too must bel5@ in office, or to make clear that was not with the voters intended? the fact that there is a change after something happens does not tell you in which direction they intended it to be and the words in relation to the duty. there were other words available if the initiative had wanted to say while you are holding that office or conducting that office. how do we know which direction? it is difficult to tell, you have to adopt the interpretation that favors the accused in this situation. if there is an easier way to answer that, in the statute has to be harmonized with other bobs impossible, if it will not do violence to the interpretation of the statute. i think you have to look at the current charter definition of official misconduct that was enacted after mizola and draws from opinion to say that the drafters, whoever they may have been, were well aware of what mizol

i think that anybody would that would argue that is like believes in the wizard of oz who would argue with your so the yellow brick road yeah what's that anyone who would argue against that you mean is living in anyone who'd argue against that there is a plutocracy is tuned out you know it and the yellow brick road the golden road it ends it the cayman islands and bain capital yeah now you you you know you have a big platform you're very well known band you can put out these songs like that what advice do you have for people who don't have a band and who are as concerned about this plutocracy in the choice that we have the real choice we have this election you have any advice for how people can what we can do about that. yes don't give up it's too easy to give up that's what they want you to do they want you to make you feel so bad you just lay down and take it just don't give up do whatever you can start where you are and do whatever you can that's what we did that's what we continue to do we're by no means justin bieber but then he doesn't seem to really have any social consciousnes

keith. >> the reason is offered is because we argued, as i argued earlier tonight, there has been a pattern of basically mistreatment of our reporting what this by a law-enforcement official, and it is continuing. this is basically belittling and making fun of the reporting witness, the wood is to correct the reported a crime. the idea that he would have his lawyer is going to a news agency and basically making fun of her and sang she is not credible because she has written a comic book, i think that is not decent and it is not the right thing to do. i think that is why it is relevant to the conduct charge. >> ok.

keith. >> the reason is offered is because we argued, as i argued earlier tonight, there has been a pattern of basically mistreatment of our reporting what this by a law-enforcement official, and it is continuing. this is basically belittling and making fun of the reporting witness, the wood is to c

you are arguing if we double down, triple down -- >> i'm not talking about throwing money at a problem. we need to help keep people in their homes. neil: we did, we tried half a mortgage rework programs to about $450 million, make it billions but that argues that more money is getting you different results. >> why is it okay to give hundreds of billions to the banks and not help joe and jane home opener make their mortgage games to keep them in their home. home. neil: i am not to give money to anyone, not rescues or credits, not one individual or another, we have a slippery slope. >> the slippery slope is the corruption on wall street, mortgage-backed security. neil: no, no, that slope is $45 trillion in more debt, it is leaving all of that -- all of that, you to the tax payers, everyone is paying that bill, not just those in arears. >> how do we get out of the mess. neil: stop spending, that is how we get out, just put the shovel down. >> get america back to work, people can pay taxes, this is not rocket science. neil: we sppt a lot of -- spent a lot of money, and not a resu result. i

he has argued nine cases before the under the circumstances supreme court and once clerked for chief justice william rehnquist. currently cruz is a top partner at a law firm lewis morgan. cruz has never been elected to public office at age 41. how does he explain his win over david dewhurst the incumbent lieutenant governor a wealthy businessman who spent $19 million of his own money on there race? >> look, everyone who has a vested interest in the status quo, in business as usual in spending and spending and spending wants to stop anyone who wants to stop that gravy train. but i think the american people are looking for leaders that aren't going to washington, to suddenly be popular at the cocktail parties. they are looking for leaders to go to washington and to be public servants. >> this november, paul sadler, being vacated by the outgoing o republican senator kay bailey hutchison. >>> question. what does ted cruz's victory say about the tea party movement and its influence on the republican party? rich lowry? >> john it says the most important and powerful force in the republican

keith. >> the reason is offered is because we argued, as i argued earlier tonight, there has been a pattern of basically mistreatment of our reporting what this by a law-enforcement official, and it is continuing. this is basically belittling and making fun of the reporting witness, the wood is to correct the reported a crime. the idea that he would have his lawyer is going to a news agency and basically making fun of her and sang she is not credible because she has written a comic book, i think that is not decent and it is not the right thing to do. i think that is why it is relevant to the conduct charge. >> ok. any questions for mr. keith? mr. kopp, i will give you an opportunity to say something. >> last night, i said some things about miss madison's credibility to some reporters. i mean, the mayor is out there, permitted to make comments about his view of sheriff mirkarimi's actions, but we are still supposed to fight with one hand behind our back? i don't think so. this is not a playground. i think -- well, i don't want to say what i really think about this, but i don't think there is

how many of us have argued over the care of our children?many of guys have done and said things in an emotional moment for which we are deeply sorry? the mayor's charges are billed on an erroneous -- [no audio] >> thank you, ma'am. next, please. >> thank you. my name is espinoza jackson. i have been a career activists for 50 years or better. n surprised that you have had this commission for just 18 years. you have a hard decision. i'm hopingÑi that you do the rit thing. as the previous speaker said, the family knows best. and the innuendoes about brutality -- she was bruised because a lot of us are easy tubers, and we all know that. i want you to takece- the facts are, and not what people or the press gave up. please, do the right thing. so that you can sleep at night and people can look up to you in years to come. you are very young and you will continue to run for office. i'm quite sure they will do the right thing. -- that you will do the right thing. >> good afternoon. my name is barbara. ms. lopez, i supported your husband's position s

i would argue he is more ideologically rigid and learns less. his economic policies -- equally challenging. the second part is the argument that the republicans have written down the rhine plan. now we can attack. the democrats always attack the republicans ever since the 1940's with wanting to undo social security and later medicare. they always say that when bush ran in 2000 and 2004 with a plan to privatize social security for people under 55 -- if you are under 55, will give you the option of a 401k. the democrats said this would have us win the election. that was one of the few elections where social security was a winner for republicans. we did not let the democrats care the old people when they yelled social security. they made it clear they were not changing it to 55 and over. every time, the castoff 20, 30, 40, 50 year olds who understand they will never get what was promised. when you rate something down, you make it more difficult for the other team to lie about your position. the democrats will attack his reforms on medicare. the onl

some of those in history who argued this. marxists fundamentally -- there's a bearish wall logic and the proletariat logic. different logic for different periods in human history. this is one of the reasons i never trust communists and that might seem trite. some countries there are. they happened to be the majority of parliament. i never trust them because they don't believe in truth, the fundamental idea is absent. there is the truth that is useful to them and that is it. i tell my friends in the paul and elsewhere do not trust these people. if they get power, if you trust them with that power they will turn on you. and they will kill you at some point. the reason is that a deep level they don't even believe in the idea of truth. the national socialists, there was a jewish logic and area and logic. don't worry about that einstein guy. either jewish physics. we are doing aryan physics so different logic for different races or classes and so on and we hear echoes of this in some parts of american academia. extreme forms of ge

so i think the argue. is a little bit like, if he lower the incentives a little bit will it have a big impact? in the short run i won't but in the long run they compound, as i described. you look at the europe versus europe and japan. 26 of -- california created 26 of the top 500 largest companies in the world. europe has created one during that time frame, back to then 19 # -- 1970s. if the payoffs don't matter, why isn't europe and japan able to produce the kind of employment and meddle class median wages the u.s. economy has produced? often people say, it's just -- -- we have entrepreneurialism our blood. but we didn't dough our economies faster than their economiesen in the commercialization of the internet. if anything our productivity was slower and moved from 1.2% a year growth rate up to 2%. one and a half of those two paints are coming from innovation. theirs moved from one and a half to two to one to one and a half. i just don't think that god blessed america with entrepreneurial blood. i think w

believed that they could implement these policies and still have a vibrant middle class but i would argue that nobody could believe that today nobody that's actually serious in paying attention but if if all americans i mean if the middle class by and large goes away and we go back to the kind of of. social and economic strata that you had in victorian england you know that. it was written about by charles dickens and so many of his books so brilliantly which seems to be the kind of normal stable form of economy and government when there's not a lot of regulation if we want to that and most of america had the income of appalachia and the buying power what happens to all those consumers i thought the american middle class was the consumption and the drove the production engine. right and that's what i see that's the way that it used to be when they actually introduced this program thirty years ago i worked for the head of the environmental protection agency and i remember telling colleagues at the time that they will say this being reaganomics the great promise of reagan but they would nev

aides argue little matter until after labor day when voters tune in, and the two daily tracking pollsen and gallup show the race tied. romney aides say they never polled popularity of romney's potential picks. paul ryan attended memorial of sikh temple shooting in wisconsin. and speculation focus on him when romney described what he wants the pick to signal to voters. >> vision to the country, adding something to the political discourse about the direction of the country. >> 41-year-old ryan went to congress at 28 years old with almost no private sector experience, at odds with romney long-held assertion that would-be president needs private sector experience. >> i spent my career in private sector,ed bys, small and large -- in businesses small and large. i understand through that experience what it takes to get a business to grow. >> another top contender tim pawlenty has strong corporate background, but he has joined boards to open him to attack being too cozy with big business. mcdonald in virginia. marco rubio in florida. rob portman in ohio. the combination of the vice presidenti

in the book i argue that roe v. wade changed the equilibrium in politics. it made pro-investors aligned with the religious right stronger politically and the reagan administration lowered marginal tax rates and reduced regulation, opened up trade borders. those things ultimately lead to higher payoffs for successful risk-taking and that compounded it. certainly i believe that starting a company in the u.s., you see it in google facebook ebay and amazon, cisco, why have no companies been created in europe and japan? you just don't see it. >> one thing that you mentioned earlier that is pretty prominent in the book is we call it on-the-job training but i think of it as a cluster. you get a cluster of businesses that build on momentum so those companies have a lot of common in terms of the industry and that cluster was forming in california in particular during that time and you make the point that it fed on itself. part of it is getting at the root of plighted that form? we have seen other clusters historically and united states. you have we have the research

for more austerity more spending cuts in government it's a vision that will argue for more tax cuts for the rich and fewer regulations of wall street banks or texas oil barons and private health insurance vampires and it's a vision that's already being played out with disastrous consequences in the city hosting this year's republican national convention that's right if you want to know what mitt romney and paul ryan's vision of america looks like and check out tampa florida joining me now to explain why that is is will do a staff writer at salon dot com will welcome. thanks for having me it's great to have you with us who is a brilliant piece you wrote why is tampa bay and i are ron ike perhaps even iconic choice of cities to host the r. and c. . it's pretty fair to say that what mitt romney and paul ryan are suggesting for their vision of america could be called the tampa fixation of america basically means no real no real invest in infrastructure any more anything that would perhaps benefit future generations as far as roads as far as trans the far as a sustainable but sustainable