winthrop is not arguing why are a city on the hill. the wisdom of the shipmates arguing over whether they would have low enough taxes. he was in arguing whether they're entitled to 20 years of retirement once they settled on the city on the hill. he was talking about working together for the destiny of the nation to be. and i were not for ourselves, posterity. over the next for centuries, the united states and its people created the world's first modern functioning democracy. we led allied nations to the jury. we won the cold war as well. we eventually removed most of the elderly from poverty to sell its expanded civil rights and opportunities. we developed one of the richest nations known in history. fast-forward to today to a time of political disarray and pessimism. our economy generates, if we do the numbers break on our economy generates about $140,000 per household in gross domestic product or income. even higher than it was before the great recession. if you look at what government does today, add up all the numbers and even a s

that's what we argued. and if there was a need to provide these drugs to women for free they could do it directly noting the most straightforward way for the government to meet it's compelling interest is to deliver the drugs directly. >> ira, does this extend the notion of person hood in rifra. to individuals? >> i think it takes us some place new neither the first amendment's had not been interpreted this way. this was an open question, and so the court decided that open question in a way that puts us in a new place and opens up the possibility of other sorts of corporate religious freedom claims. >> now as we look back at juris prudence, in religious exercise was something inherent in a human being, in an individual. corporations can't go to church. they can't wear certain garb, they can't perform rituals. >> i was enter waded to the government's side of the case. but at this point whether corporations could exercise religion, i was not on the government side. we all know that corporations can corporate

as henry argued in 1864, it might not be possible for egregious acts. cases, a larger body could he held responsible. a city, army or entire community is sometimes punished for the illegal act of its rulers. southerners looked with scorn upon the protests after the earning. how they raise this vandalism. and those who have been the most outspoken advocates of the and suffering inhabitants. wished that they have not stooped to the level of the area, they had the areas that it before as hypocrites and cowards. out northerners pointed that it was thought the news who are hypocrites. they noticed the ruins are evidence of the tender theifully fast mercy of rebels who boasted so loudly. was a vengeful at inherently contradict three. they have their own goal of preemptive violence through act of revenge. use this to justify and sometimes fueled their actions ofinst civilians in the fall 1864. he pursued them, catching up to them in virginia. many contend they yelled remember chambersburg and surrender your villains of a shot. appeal,n further consider their a

i think i'm only sg that argue ad patent case and and i now argued three of them. the tenor of the argument ask a little bit different in those cases. they are cases where members of the court have less of a clear sense what they think about the right answer going into the argument, so the argument has a different tenor as a result of that. most of the time they seem to me, the justices seem to me to have a pretty good sense what they think and they're asking really probing, hard questions which is their jobe and what they should do and it, you know, there will be some case it is will be the chief justice really giving me a tough time. some case it is will be justice kagan a tough time. those tend to be different cases but that is their job. they should be probing for weaknesses. they should challenge the position of the united states in particular to try to work through what the implications of agreeing to the united states's view would be. that is what, that is what they do. that is their job. and there are, this is a really smart group of jurists, the justices t

they keep paying an attorney to come up here and argue things that don't make sense.t please reject the appeal. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker. >>> good afternoon, district supervisors. president chiu. my name is rudy corpus. i'm the executive director of the violence prevention program here in san francisco. i'm here with some of my team, united players. i'm born and raised in san francisco. our headquarters of up is down in the south of market district 6 with jane right there. i'm here to speak about cultural diversity, how important. i know you had some of the latino brothers come up to speak and sisters. you got a filipino right here. you got some blacks up here. it's important not only in our city, but in our county, the country and this world for cultural diversity. we are very supportive of the mexican museum. we want to see it to move forward as well the filipino museum to be built out here also. it's really important that we embrace that, embrace cultural diversity in this city. as you see here, it's not only about the diversity of different nationalit

. >> host: you argue that a return to the gold standard would be impractical. >> guest: i think it's impractical for what i'm saying is the current system is very vulnerable and in a way it explains what happened in 2008. i talk about that quite fully. i mentioned the fact that many actually predicted that this would happen when you have a system where you have fiat currency essentially printing money you will get a vulnerable and unstable system. that's something that we have to consider. >> host: what about the effect of war on 2008. obviously 9/11, seven years earlier but your argument was that it wasn't just about 9/11 but about something much bigger than that. >> guest: it wasn't that complicated but if you remember, i was with jpmorgan. i think that sort of a swear word in this country. i was a banker and the first thing that happened was obviously the index went down 10%. the dow jones went down i think it to personal amount, the same amount and the response of the central bank was to lower interest rates. interest rates have been coming down all through that year from 6.5. th

the book does not argue that we should take immediate military action, the book does not argue the military option is our best option, doesn't argue that it should be our first option. i think some people see the title of the book and jump to the wrong conclusion. i argue we should solve the iranian nuclear challenge through diplomacy that all possible and there are no experts who disagree with this position. everyone agrees we should try to solve the problem through diplomacy. no one is saying we should take immediate military action or the we should just give up and acquiesce to a nuclear-armed iran. since there is some agreement on that question, it is not an interesting one. the more interesting question, and i think from a foreign policy perspective the more important question is what happens if diplomacy fails? if diplomacy fails to stop iran from building nuclear weapons are we prepared to live with a nuclear-armed iran and the threats that would pose for decades to come and if not are we prepared to take military action to stop here and from building nuclear weapons? the argument in

i'm not arguing we should just substitute class for place.i'm arguing that universities should take into consideration the structural barriers in society, and they should scrub their admissions processes of any practices that reinforce vantage. so what does that mean? first, i would give special consideration to high achieving students. i'm not talking about watering down standards, i'm talking about focusing on their application process on the factors that research shows really predict success; cumulative high school gpa and create, stick to itiveness. those are the two main factors that truly predict long-term success, completion of college. the s.a.t. is nowhere to be found, right? so i'm arguing that standardized tests should be optional. financial aid should return to being based on need, not merit. racial preferences should not be used, but we should no longer use legacy preferences. and by the way, a number of universities which have had to operate on bans of race -- eight states have banned -- a number of universities, including calif

in making that argue. they set that ethical commitment to reciprocity to phares prosty -- phares prosty at the core of their mitt -- plate cat commitments. so when we get to the expend they say we mutually pledge our lives, fortunes and sacred honor to one another, they built an egalitarian bond with each other based on the prison primp of res pros -- the principle of reciprocity. >> this is a fascinating conversation. we wanted to leave some time for questions. so, if people have questions, just congregate behind the microphone over here. >> we will call on you. >> good afternoon, mr. ellis. was curious, do you think that there was a real fear of monarchy developing after the revolution in the americas? >> you men in the 1780s and '90s? >> yes. >> yeah. monarchy is one of the two ghosts that haunts the constitutional convention, the other is slavery. they can't talk about slavery. they talk forever about monarch okay. the row robust expression of authority will be perceived an monarchial. hamilton gives a

they argue the robertsbot, j.r.r., does not follow rules. he reacts to them or predict the behavior of others and then behaves accordingly. the second claim is that a jurist right? has to take what hla called the internal perspective. yes to understand thel legal norms as applying to him and as basically internalizing them. the external perspective they argue is the perspective that they associate with j.r.r., the robertsbot in which the norms are not internalized. they are external to the entity. it's related to the first claim. the third argument is based on the philosophy of ronald kirk and. -- ronald dworkin. he argues that what a jurist does in deciding cases is to articulate and apply and be in sympathy with the norms of the community in which the jurist is. they argue that the john roberts bot cannot be a member of the community and has not internalized the community's norms. so all of these arguments really revolve around it seems to me a set of assumptions about robots. and their relationships to communities. indeed if you look at t

this case could not have been brought without the cases that you person argued. so i -- it's not as though there's any claim that it suddenly, people woke up in 2008 and thought, you know, let's start thinking about lgbt writes. i think what happened was that proposition eight was a low point for many, many people. the idea that this could pass in california of all places, for some people it was just the kind of come it was like the last straw. if they can pass here, how can we -- >> host: there's no question and i think you capture abbottabad, and did the survey was devastating for lgbt californians and their friends and her family, people who care about civil rights, people across the country who care about civil rights. so absolutely important, but let's go back to that time. again, the question is not whether the issue was important. where does it fit, and it wasn't just the cases that i was involved in with rome are back in 1996 and lowers in 2003, but ongoing litigation to marriage equality. let me go back to the time issue because you said that chuck coope

while they argue that they spur more market activity. some argue that these are minimal and that investors are harmed by the conflict of interest. there is aound that lack of publicly available data. determining whether the payments actually have an adverse effect on the market. they look for more transparency in the payments, allowing to study these in greater detail. this'll educate them about high-frequency trading. informationresult we will maintain from our expert witnesses that action taken to restore confidence which has clearly been eroded in recent months, especially since the publication of michael lewis book. >> i want to thank you for holding this hearing. they mention the word complex. there is no doubt about what is happening in terms of trading is highly complex. from my standpoint, having been an individual investor, i think the primary solution is transparency and increase competition. isause it is complex, it difficult to understand. i'm hoping this hearing will lay out the reality of the situation. investor whoual has

this official said many in the military think bergdahl should be court-martialed while others argue five years in captivity is punishment enough. bergdahl could return to the u.s. as early as the end of this week. at which point he would be reunited with his family and eventually get a chance to tell what no one has yet heard: his side of the story. >> dubois: david martin at the pentagon, thank you. in response to criticism of the deal for the release of bergdahl, the president's spokesman said today it was absolutely the right thing to do. major garrett is at the white house for us, major? >> reporter: maurice, critics like republican senator lindsay graham of south carolina accused president obama of releasing the taliban dream team from guantanamo, cuba. top advisors don't deny the five detainees traded for bowe bergdahl were not hardened taliban killers, but the white house argues, their release does not undermine u.s. national security. all five detainees were active taliban fighters and planners. three held leadership posts in the taliban government. mohammed fazl was a former dep

i was not trying to argue he has ever repetition for effectiveness, i was trying to argue that this will weigh at the public perceptions, and that is what they are trying to avoid by getting rid of shinseki early. they're trying to get their hands around this problem to avoid that kind of public faith damage. all of this,ing of we have shown the clip of all of 2008 candidate convention. the budget has doubled over the last 8-10 years, and so by all accounts money is not the issue, it is leadership. what happened? guest: president obama mentioned that these are problems that preceded him, and he is now five years in. it is a long-term issue, but having now owned it for the last five years it is hard to argue that you did not have a perception of that and a perception that has not been asked the way it ought to -- fixed the way it ought to. clear we knew that the thertment was not working way the veterans are wanted. take the risk to possibility. on whatbe judged happens these next months and years by why he's -- by whether or not he is able to fix it. a new book by hillary clinton. any re

while many trading firms argue that those payments spur more markest activity, some experts argue that these benefits are minimal and that investors are harmed by their broker's conflict of interest. committee has found that there is a lack of data recording make or taker pay. s leading to difficulties in determining whether the payments have an adverse effect on the market. a logical first step would be to have more transparency in the payments allowing neutral researchers to study in greater detail. i hope that as a result of this hearing and the information that we will obtain from our expert witnesses that action will be taken to restore confidence which is clearly been eroded in recent months especially since the publication of michael lewis he' book. i change mr. chairman. >> thank you mr. chairman. i also want to thank you for holding this hearing. very interesting getting prepared for it. both senator levin and makin' offered complex. there's no doubt what's happening in terms of trading is highly complex. from my standpoint having been an individual investor, i think the prima

someone that we would argue about for decades to come. am nearly 40 that there are very few people in my lifetime in britain who have that sort of iconic status. i mentioned churchill that he died 50 years ago and this is before my time. from my generation whether you loved her or loathe her was a key figure in that very interested in her leadership style, not just that she was a woman that sh but that she had a nonconformance methodist background but she had a sort of religious imagery and was almost like a preacher in terms of her style. >> host: she was an inspiration. she didn't really remember that and i remember the day that she left i was probably 15 and a half so that was a very long time where she was a sort of dominant figure in the whole decade where she was the prime investor. and i like her style of politics. i liked the fact that she stuck to her guns and she said and i was doing a bit of research about her she said i'm not a consensus politician. you could imagine three months before the election if you want to compromise a

he argues that "a well established by a war." he does concede that there need to be constraints placed on forging because as he put it "to do otherwise would be to bring dishonor honor upon the country." lipid's work, demonstrates the complexity of the moral issues that surround the forging. by very nature, would you seize supplies from civilians you are inflicting hardship on that civilian. and so in order to inflict sort of the magical right amount of hardship, enough but not undo to operate within the moral boundaries of warfare, officers need to maintain tight control. lipid explains without foraging parties and centralized distribution systems, chaos could ensue. the army could really descend into an armed mob. so, what is interesting is that you would have expected lipid to use a sherman's march as an example as he is making this complicated case. he does not. he goes back to napoleon's russian campaign. in fact, he does not ignore the march when he is talking about how an army should dissented to chaos. he actually defends

here is the suspect caught on surveillance video last week arguing with a clerk and then throwing the liquor bottle. keeps going, throws more bottles. this happened near bascom and stevens creek boulevard. the clerk fought back going after the suspect with a garden tool. in the end the man beat the clerk to the ground. that's when a customer stepped in and pulled the attacker off. the suspect got away. the clerk suffered minor injuries. >>> authorities have not yet identified the woman and baby killed in a head on crash in concord last night about 11:00 p.m. on mckinney bridge overpass near willow pass road. an suv collided with a van going in the opposite direction. five people suffered major injuries but none is considered to be life threatening. the woman died at the scene and her baby who was in the car later died after being transported to the hospital. police are trying to determine if drugs or alcohol played a role. >>> a powerful explosion knocks an apartment building off its foundation. now police are searching for two suspects in the east bay. fire officials say butane canis

he's 25 years younger and argues after 40 years in congress it's time for rangel to retire.gressman is retiring putting the seat up for grabs. in maryland incumbent john delaney is considered vulnerable because of . here in oklahoma as well as in mississippi tenses of millions of dollars are spent. the campaigns are in full work out mode. because both states are so republican there's little doubt it will be republicans who will protect this seat in the fault. it won't necessarily hurt the republican chances of picking up the nomination. the outcome tomorrow in both states could say is a lot about the relationship between the tea party and the establishment of the gop. >> thank you, carl. >>> the border patrol has cancelled for now plans to fly fatherly 300 central american illegal immigrant from texas to california. no reason has been given. border patrol spokesman said the flights are not proceeding today but added it's a very fluid situation. the administration is taking criticism for flying families coming across the rio grande to arizona and dropping them off at a bus st

now, affirmative action, race-based affirm thetive action, i argue, is on -- affirmative action, i argues on life support. the court's holdings in fisher and schute are likely to put further pressure on the policy. only 45% of private universities today still consider race. only about a third of public universities do. and the policy's going to continue to be under assault. and meanwhile, the policy does engender quite a bit of resentment. we're in a bad place in this country. our politics, i believe, are broken. and, you know, in post-civil rights america unfortunately a lot of white folks feel that the gains of the civil rights movement have happened at theiro expense. and meanwhile, poverty is growing fastest in the suburbs. there are a lot of whites who struggle with economic insecurity. and there's, i talk about this in the first chapter of the book about what i call the perception gap. there's a huge gaps of perception on average between whites and people of color, and a lot of whites feel reis sentiment. -- resentment. not racism. i think we've defeated largely racism, but they fe

i think we could argue that until the cows come home. but in the interest of talking about the problem that faces us today in iraq, let's talk about what it is we need to do there. >> i can agree with that. whether we went in or how we got out, that date is not useful to how we got there today. >> it's arguing over how you got pregnant. >> you know what with, i'm going to take you up on your offer. we're going to come back and talk about what to do next. i think there's way to fix this situation. but first, today's "crossfire" quiz, when did iraq become an independent country, 1898, 1932 or 1956? we're going to give you the answer when we get back after the break. did you know, your eyes can lose vital nutrients as you age? [ male announcer ] that's why there's ocuvite to help replenish key eye nutrients. ocuvite has a unique formula not found in your multivitamin to help protect your eye health. ocuvite. help protect your eye health. >>> welcome back. now the answer to our crossfire quiz, i rack has been independent since 1932. now toni

what is being argued on behalf of your client? >> actually, that is being argued by another member of the defense team. my only role in this was to handle the portion related to the compounding pharmacy. >> okay. >> in essence what they're arguing is he's had a stellar record while in prison and other things about him that perhaps persuade those others to give him clemency. >> why is it to those who have said it doesn't matter where these drugs or how these drugs are procured. what would be your response to that? >> well, our response is that the state is going to take the, you know, most drastic step, the most drastic punishment available they at least comply with the law. one of the things that we made clear in our attack last friday -- we're not attacking lethal injection as a process for executions. we're attacki inot attacking we connection but both state and federal law are clear that schedule ii narcotics must be prescribed for a legitimate medical purpose. the state of georgia is already determined, at least by the legisla

many things we argue you do with your diet are criticizable. should you be on a low-fat diet, low-carb diet? we have come full circle and no longer recommend that because we realized it wasn't working for patients. it is remarkably complex to figure out what works for most people even in a dietary program. even in the practice of medicine we evolve by looking at new ideas, challenging orthodox involving them. when i hold, these are the clinical papers, and we can argue about the quality of them, very justifiably. i can pick apart papers that showed no benefit, as well. at the end of the day, if i have clinical subjects, real people having undergone trials, and in this case i actually gave it to members of my audience. it wasn't a formal trial. >> which wouldn't pass. the trial did you with your audience you would not say that would ever pass scientific muster. >> no. i would never publish the paper. that wants the purpose of it. the purpose was for me to get a thumb snail sketch. was it worth talking to people about or not? again, i don't think

genius for in the pages of the new york times this week economist blogger a professor tyler cowen argues that the problem for our economies in the west is that there just isn't enough all out war these days stacey. yes max this was the kind of tyler cowen he's a professor at george mason university sounds an awful lot like tony blair as well also in the pages of the papers here in the u.k. was calling for all out war in the middle east well the headline really is the lack of major wars may be hurting economic growth and his argument is that the perception and persistence in expectation of peace is actually harming economic growth because the world just hasn't had that much warfare lately at least not by historical standards some of the recent headlines about iraq or south sudan make our world sound like a very bloody place but today's casualties pale in light of the tens of millions of people killed in the two world wars in the first half of the twentieth century even the vietnam war had many more deaths than any recent war involving an affluent country and even gives the chart max of th

>> well, part of the argument, judy, is they argue that's not true, that college sports fans would stille sports in college even if student athletes were able to negotiate for their name, image and likeness and they would likely do so not individually but through a trade association. so the idea there would be sports agents on campus negotiating contracts, that could be true for some of the elite college athletes, but it's unlikely to be true, at least o'bannon argues, for the mainstream basketball and football player. so they believe that the parade of tecials that mighto -- teshles that might occur really isn't true and have argued regardless of whether it's true or not that doesn't mean anti-trust law is violated by the system, that a system where they're allowed to negotiate because of a "conspiracy" or "cartel." that's illegal, regardless of the effect it would have on college sports. >> woodruff: finally, whatever the judge rules, this is an argument that goes on, and there are other efforts to change the relationship between college athletes and the sports they play, are there not

the white house is not arguing it's a slow recovery.mists do not see this as being something even remotely suggesting. >> consumer spending q12014 spending growth at 1% expected growth at 3.1%. those are facts. slower than projected. you're right. the projections are for second quarter to be better but to overcome as you heard wendell's piece the 3% hole for the year it's probably going to end up right around zero. >> i have said it a million times, said again, a slow recovery. i think we have to be very clear that it is a recovery. we're not heading back into a recession at least according to most economists. >> last word. >> when you're hovering at 2% and having a lot of trouble creating jobs, have a whole generation of young people who can't get them then you're always hovering near negative growth and if you have minus three in one quarter that means even if we have a plus three in the second we'll have zero net for the first half of the year. >> speaker of the house prepares to take the president to court. that's up next. introduci

aereo argued that its antennas are essentially the same as rooftop antennas are that used to watch tv for free and, therefore, it does not need to pay the broadcast networks to record programming they own. the supreme court rejected that argument and agreed with the major broadcast networks, including cbs. justice stephen breyer, joined by five other justices, wrote the majority opinion reading a summary from the beforehand, he said, "aereo's system is for all practical purposes identical to a cable system." and cable companies under copyright law must pay for the use of broadcast programming. some networks had said that if they lost before the supreme court, they would consider moving their programming to cable or the internet. in a statement, a cbs spokesman said, "we are pleased with today's decision, which is great news for content creators and their audiences." aereo's c.e.o. called the decision a massive setback for the american consumer. when the case was argued before the court in april, some justices worried that a ruling against aereo could threaten the booming growth of the

those who argue that. and some argue that when you look at wealth today, it is not inherited so much as it is people starting businesses and making great wealth. it is not royalty. it is not inherited wealth that is propelling the number of people getting rich. >> two responses. the share of inherited wealth is rising. you can see trust funds, large pieces of inherited wealth. sometimes you do not see them as much as you should because it is harder to spot inherited wealth. self-made billionaires want to be seen. sometimes they don't. it is harder to spot them in rankings. i can tell you you can see a return of inherited wealth. number two, the following, whether it is inherited wealth, if you have an economy where the top of the wealth distribution, wherever they come from, rice three times faster than the size of the economy, you can see you have a problem. this means the concentration of wealth at the top is rising very fast. this will have to stop somewhere. >> will it create social tension? >> there i

while many firms argue they sperm market activity and reduce costs for consumers, some have argued thathese benefits are minimal and investors are harmed by brokers conflict of interest. the subcommittee has found that there is a lack of publicly available data regarding maker taker payments leading to difficulties in determining whether the payments actually have an adverse effect on the market. a logical first step would be to have more transparency allowing neutral researchers to study the issue in greater detail. i hope this will educate the public about high-frequency trading and brokerage conflict of interest and i hope as a result of this hearing in the information we obtain from expert witnesses that action will be taken to restore confidence which has clearly been eroded in recent months since the publication of the book by michael lewis. thank you. >> thank you very much. >> thank you, mr. chairman. a very interesting. both german levin and senator mccain mentioned the word complex, and there is no doubt about what is happening with trading is highly complex. from my standpoin

to the subject, i used to argue about this point a lot with clara. she didn't disagree with my analysis. but i think for clara, it was close, almost a heresy for a colleague to argue that the euro, which is a huge symbol of europe and integration could actually become a threat to the eu and a threat to european integration. we would have lengthy discussions about this. i'm going to start off by outlining why i think the economy, the eurozone economy in particular is in poor shape. why this situation poses a threat to the eu as a whole, and why the choice really does now come down to more or less europe. now, despite the talk of economic recovery that one hears a lot of in europe, and despite claims by eurozone policy makers that the crisis is over, the eurozone and by extension, the eu remains in a very serious mess. it's worth remembering that the eurozone economy is still 3 percentage points smaller than it was in the beginning of 2008. now, even the u.s., which is supposed to be pretty more abundant at the moment is six percentage points bigger. a

the crisis ry ofte john kerry landed in baghdad just a as sunni argu argues- insurgents match acrossthe company. this is the secretary of state arriving in jordan yesterday. t past two days, isis took over four cities. today kerry will meet with leaders in iraq to push them to take action. >> the united states would like to see the iraqi people find leadership that is prepared to represent all of the people of iraq. >> the secretary of state is now urging all arab states to work together to stop the sunni terror group. >>> it was a violent weekend in the city of philadelphia. police say three people were killed in at least nine shootings. the most recent happening sunday evening in west oak lane. police say they found more than a dozen shell casings on the 1900 block of 69th anue know ogontz avenue. no arrests have been made in any of this ekensshootings. >>> ten familie of their homes one day after an apartment fire in montgomery county th started yesterday morning inside this building on 4th street and pensburg. the red cross is providing clothes, food and shelter for those people

one could argue is a good thing.think you'll expect to see that next time around. >> you know what's weird about that, that puts the role of the government into the entity to spur activity. >> right. think we'll see it next time around when they really start to calculate how much everything's costing these days. i don't think the market cared today at all. >> we were talking during the break, we can remember we covered the retailers. they blame the weather or snowstorms or blizzards. it certainly was an awful quarter for that. our kids were home every other day. they'll be going to school right through the fall. >> if there were a god. >> i then want to see when they get the good numbers or presuming the quarter is going to be a good quarter, credit the sun. >> say people went easter shopping because it was sunny and warm. we never hear that. we will hear on the flip side, it rained so nobody went out to buy dresses for their kids. i think they're just trying to figure it out these days. i think the consumer is still

according to witnesses, sam freeman and laura wynn argued on the night of her murder.sed sam of hustling some young boys in a game of pool. afterwards, freeman had a few s. [ female voice ] yes? lactaid® is 100% real milk? right. real milk. but it won't cause me discomfort. exactly, no discomfort, because it's milk without the lactose. and it tastes? it's real milk! come on, would i lie about this? [ female announcer ] lactaid®. 100% real milk. no discomfort. and for more 100% real dairy treats you'll 100% enjoy look for lactaid® ice cream and lactaid® cottage cheese. >>> when human blood was discovered inside the galliano bottle in sam freeman's apartment, investigators suspected he was responsible for laura wynn's murder. according to witnesses, sam freeman and laura wynn argued on the night of her murder. laura accused sam of hustling some young boys in a game of pool. afterwards, freeman had a few more drinks and asked the bartender if he could have the empty galliano bottle for his collection. at 10:45 the bartender announced that it was the last call for drinks b

i argue in the books that this is what happened.ver the course of their 10 year relationship, 1969-1979, it was a two-way street. salameh was trying to draw ames him, and through ames, get the u.s. government to deal with the plo. simultaneously, ames is trying to draw salameh and influence him and his boss, arafat, into being more realistic about palestinian aspirations, and to think of laying down the gun, and to start talking not only to the americans, but eventually to the israelis, about a political compromise, what we would call today a two state solution. and i would argue he was successful, if you look at the progression of the palestinian narrative in the 1970's. they got closer and closer to doing this. not directly to oslo, but it planted the seeds of oslo. >> mosad, as i suggested earlier, had salameh on a hit list. >> from very early on. >> they wanted him because of things they felt he had been complicit in. >> mosad tried to kill him with a letter bomb before munich. ames warned salameh not to open his mail at his hom

some argue he was curious. people point to the fact that the dog's tail is wagging the entire time, but some argue the wag of a dog's tail is a sign of aggression in some dogs, but regardless, this man sprayed him. it's what happens next that has people more upset. you see this plain clothed officer start taunting the dog, kicking feet and dancing in front of the dog. >> acting like a kid. >> he then picks up a stick and throws it at the dog. >> that's animal cruelty. >> the owner of the dog is a 29-year-old, he launched a formal complaint against the police officer. fortunately, the dog was not injured, had watery eyes. because it got attention, the police officer is on desk duty while they do an internal investigation. >>> just because water isn't a solid doesn't mean you can't get hurt, especially when you do water spots. guys are jet skiing. look at all that space they got to ride their jet skis and water craft, but instead of using all that space, they decide to go up and one runs into the other. why does

know at this point if this war is worth it and quite frankly i don't think there's really a point in arguing that at the at this point it doesn't matter what decisions we made in two thousand and three or in two thousand and seven with the surge the fact that matter is an extremely violent anti american anti western terrorist organization is seize large swaths of land and iraq and syria they could use that area to create a sanctuary where they can train more jihad is fighters more terrorists just like the ones they tacked us on nine eleven they could use that area to rebuild al qaeda which has been seriously degraded over the years at least the central ok to other branches of grown out like isis and we can start to see more attacks in the west and unfortunately in the united states. you know the facts right now are are that the middle east is teetering on the edge it's tutoring on the edge of anarchy and if they fall into complete chaos not just in iraq and syria but its present places like jordan saudi arabia could have serious consequences for not just that region but the whole economy of

. >> ted, you went to court to argue that this wasn't working for california kids. you havwhat's the problem? joshua makes a straightforward argument for how it operates at present. >> joshua described a system that we don't have in california. what judge troy found, tenure can be made in less than 18 months before they have finished their training. once they're given permanent employment. that's what it's called. it triggers these arduous arbitrary 20-step process to dismiss a teacher that everyone would agree is grossly ineffective, not teaching students. that creates a circle where those grossly ineffective teachers can't be dismissed. it can take years, two to ten years, hundreds of thousands of dollarsers those teachers stay in the classroom. they disproportionately end up in low and low minority school districts. those kids lose years of learning, lifetime earning capacity goes down. it's not even close. it's an irrational law that is creating disparity in our school season. >> dana, were you convinced that from what you saw that these ineffective teachers wer

they said they would argue and these are federal courts all over the country that they're they're not does a bang but some of the backers of gun rights some of the n.r.a. people they've likened it if you can believe this to massive resistance was which was you know which was that the south did after brown versus board of education that they say that these judges are are in fact resisting what the supreme court has said and we haven't heard from the supreme court yet michael where do you think it's all go on. i think that. unless and until the public gets angry and stays angry and stays organized that we're going to see chipping away at. at these gun. gun laws with these rulings and in particular you have seen a great loosening of the rules about carrying guns everywhere and i at the same time i think that there are ways to fix the gun issue you know this year larry as many people were more people will be killed by guns than by cars in the united states now one level of course that's a horrifying statistic that more people are killed by guns but part of it is that fewer people are dyin

he talks about the motivation of both unionists and federalists for fighting and argued the fall of atlanta have over time, to march the symbolic end of the antebellum ay of life in the south. the commission sponsored this event. his remarks are under half an hour. >> thank you so much for that kind introduction. thank you for that very warm welcome. i am delighted and honored to be here today for this kickoff event and want to thank the city of atlanta and the commission for inviting me to speak today. i want to take my friend, david moore, thank you for asking me to be here today. speaking of honors, it is an honor for me to share the voting for you today. thank you for your service to our nation. your leadership has helped to change the united states and get all of america to live up to its promises. thank you for all you have done. this whole theme is very exciting. civil war to civil rights. i served on the georgia civil war planning commission and was the chief advisor to the chairman. one of the things i said when we started the commission was planning five or six years ago is we hav

as i understand the argument she's arguing you should refers the public works in order so the at&t's cabinet be placed in other locations which is impossible for at&t's cabinets. the department found that the proposed location met all 22 sf m guidelines as you see from the refrigerates it's not a correct it would block the drugstore entrance and there's no bays basis in the record to reverse the department if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them >> where is your brief? >> the departments submitted a brief we did not. >> can you go back to the diagram you had on the overhead. >> sure. all right. so can i ask that the so this is a technical fielding >> let me ask the question and okay. >> when i looked at the discriminated i see your commits, however, no analysis as to the specific site and why is it those are not appropriate technically. you know, i see a diagram of certain box certain trees and driveways but no idea that in the engineering notes the statement that is technically not possible i can't tell from the diagrams >> with your permission i'm to put an e-mail f