the same court and arguing screen court and arguing in the supreme court as opposed to other federalappeals courts? >> guest: a lot of this is a tactic of time. in most appellate courts particularly in cases this big you get at least 30 minutes come sometimes 45 minutes to argue. often it goes past the time and it's no big deal. the fifth circuit in a marriage case was over an hour. i think that was pretty much true in the windsor case when we argued in the second circuit. because you have the luxury of time, the argument very often tends to be a very high level. there's a lot of discussion about the precedence and impact of the precedence and the statute and technical discussions of the law and often it is a great intellectual interchange but particularly if you have a great judge to have a discussion to treasure persuade him or her why you should win the case. the supreme court particularly in a big case like this it doesn't work that way so you have very little time. to help the justices on your side of kind of argue with the justices on the other side are doing which is very diff

all we were arguing is then when we started the case, when i argued the case mind, when we won the casegot 12 states that allow gay people to marry that in those states was wrong and unconstitutional for the government to say even though new york or massachusetts and allows people people to marry we are going to treat those as invalid. it is a much narrow were released but we were seeking in a much more moderate case and we wanted to really differentiate the case. we were worried the court wasn't ready to go all the way there and we wanted the court to see windsor as the sort of easy moderate next step. >> host: you write that when proposition eight was argued that lawyers have to hire line standards to meet sure they could get into the court and get into the seats and recently the supreme court said we are not going to allow that not for lawyers at least. what was your reaction to that? >> guest: there is no question of the right decision. pam karl has been very vocal on this and she sent me an e-mail saying look at my huge victory which it was. there is no question that people who we

he argues for campaign finance reform. george pat tacky is -- pataki is running for president. and kentucky senator rand paul calls for smaller government and more bipartisanship in his book "taking a stand. money another entrant in the presidential race is marco rubio in money person dreams" heout lines this man for economic opportunity. beany sand desis a candidate for the democratic nomination for president. his 1997 autobiography now titled, outsider in the white house, was updated to include his time in the senate and a launch of his presidential campaign. and in "blue collartivetive" rick santorumum argues the republican matter must focus on the working class in order to retake the white house. donald trump has written several betts sellers. in hi newest book he outlines his political platform. finally, governor chris christie and former governors martin o'malley and jim gilmour announces candidacies but have not released books. booktv has covered many of thieves candidates. you can watch them on our web site, booktv.org. >> next up, dr. ben carson, former neurosurgeon an

can you bring up noah's arc ark to argue. carson has highest net favorable ratings of any 2016 candidate. according to a new poll carson's net favorability is plus 21. that leads everyone by a mile. among republicans the net favorability is plus 59. he is 20 points ahead of his nearest republican rival. the chairman of the american conservative union. susan, you covered politics and on the front page. why are people saying at least they want this good doctor to be our next president? >> well, because republicans are very interested in an outsider. ben carson gives them an outsider who lacks kind of the bluster of donald trump. he also comes across as a very spiritual man, deeply religious. i think that is appealing to evangelicals. >> people are interested in an insider. he gives them an alternative to donald trump. >> i don't know what to say. so go on. i have no idea how to ask the question because i can't fathom the answer. i don't get it. is this some kind of strange american resort to basics because we are facing a world

but these guys are arguing for repressive policies and this is fascinating. if you support the concept of male female based marriage which is the position of 99.99% over the last 2,000 years you were now on the right so you should not be tolerated. the new left marxist leninist in the book the feminine mystique and betty friedan was a marxist. i found an idolatry and on one of the of websites like of fact checked and the response was who cares? she said the suburban homestead of american housewives of comfortable concentration camps a comment that she had to walk back one of the scholars is very good and is on the left and a notes portions that were taken from the book that i quoted earlier that actually have a draft of one of the early versions of the feminine mystique she incorporates the ideas. understand she was a communist. kate is one of the founders of the national organization and wrote the book sexual politics and argued and would go on to argue for non monogamous marriage and bisexuality and today she supports same-sex marriages and wrote the sexual

a is lester lange, he argues for campaign-finance reform. george pataki is also running for president, in 1998 the pres. new york governor released pataki, where he looked back on his path to the governorship. and kentucky senator rand paul calls for smaller government and more bipartisanship in his latest book, taking a stand. another entrance into the 2016 presidential race is a florida republican senator, marco rubio. marco rubio. in american dreams he outlines his plans to advance economic opportunity. independent vermont senator bernie sanders is a candidate for the democratic nomination for president. his 1997 his 1997 autobiography, now title, outsider in the white house, was updated to include his time in the senate and the launch of his presidential campaign. and in blue-collar conservatives, presidential candidate rick santorum argues the republican party must focus on the working class in order to retake the white house. donald trump has word and several bestsellers, and his newest book, crippled crippled america, he outlines his

if it is hard enough for me to argue with myself come imagine arguing with the state of texas with the textbooks. some of theseeach stories because our students don't know what to listen for. they have learned to listen for -- getting the dizziness activism can start with a woman you help wash the dishes. you change the diapers. getting them to think of activism. it takes a wild when you are teaching it to get your students to think a little bit differently. and to go home and talked of their grandmas about what they did. >> the theme of this year's conference, walls and bridges, who came up with that theme? did you have a role as the president? >> i did. >> can you talk about what that means? >> i am a metaphor junkie. bridges, a bridge divides. they can bridge national borders, social boundaries. walls are impediments that stop people. that might have prevented interracial couples from marrying or same-sex couples from being openly together. there are also conceptual walls. dishwashing as trivial. it is only things that happen in public and are done by men our history. you have to re

now they're expected to argue with each other and they're expected to argue with the faculty. we've made a lot of progress with respect to allowing students to say whatever they want. now we're to a point where people can abuse that privilege, they can do things to make other students feel like they're not wanted on campus. we have to talk about what the line is between free dom of spreech and making sure that everybody feels as if they belong to the campus. >> even the language we use, when you say the media has an influence on this, if we talk about freedom of speech going too far or political correctness running amuck, are they at odds with each other intellects al >> in some ways they are and some ways they aren't. if you take the view that free speech is whatever i want in any circumstance in any way, that will be complicated about people that are politically correct. if you think of free speech as being defined by where you say it, so for example we're not allowed to scream fire in a theater, where you say it such as, say, a court, for example, in courts you can have arg

kissinger argued you have to have a historical framework.istory is what characters did individuals that if you don't know the history you won't understand. i think that was a very important insight that still resonate today or think about the problem of conjecture which i thinks get to the heart of some of questions you're racing. kissinger says not choosing between two evils but when you make the choice you don't really know how things are going to turn now. he may take a difficult preemptive action and avert disaster. but if you are successful can you be grateful? know because it didn't happen and foreign-policy does this great asymmetry that the early edition may get you low payouts because in preempting disaster you basically prevented from happening and therefore prevent people from suffering. you may get lucky and people will think you are wise and if you are not lucky and things turned out badly you can always say well i did my best. the temptation as we see these days is to keep the can down the road. when you assess any of the decis

one of the realists who argued the united states should simply follow its narrow national interest, hewas not one of them. so those who were realist and were critical of him it started to read his writings thoroughly, which i began to think that many people had done, i was really struck by some things. they were in fact critical of realism, brooke of out the congress, things are quite revolutionary and highly critical of the 19th century politics. so i started to think there is something funny there. then i delved deeper into his development, three things are striking. one, his own experience growing up typically germany in 1938 made him not surprisingly highly critical of the foreign policy. what he appears as a realist and very interesting essay because they thought they are pursuing a narrow self-interested approach to form policy and disregarded the human rights abuses of dictatorship. so number one his own experience in the 1930s makes them suspicious of what he thought of the realists. number two, he comes to harvard and to try to get rid of this rather pushy undergraduate, they

he argues for a more perfect union. he argues for a better understanding of the constitution.next up, they applied navy seal combat lessons to business and life in extreme ownership. wrapping up our look at some of the titles on usa today's list of best-selling nonfiction books is an examination of the 1692 salem witch trial by pulitzer prize winning author stacy shea. several of these authors however will be appearing a book to be, you can watch them on our website, book to be.org. [inaudible conversations] .. >> welcome back to booktv continuing live coverage of the 32nd annual miami their book festival. follow us on twitter ticket scheduled updates at booktv is our twitter handle. also the full schedule is available at our website, booktv.org. the first author event for the day is beginning. to you here from longtime journalist gail sheehy and rabbi kushner discussing their latest books. both of which are memoirs. this is live coverage of the miami book fair on booktv on c-span2. ♪ ♪

you argue that it made things worse, can you explain?>> all caused by government mistakes, massive terrorism government policy. in 1970's it was the fed that printed the money that caused the terrible inflation and rigged havoc around the world. people say the head of the fed didn't stop the inflation, yes, he stopped the fire and put it out by why set the fire in the first place. you have it as john allison pointed out. the fed went on a bing again. the other thing that's not fully recognized that since the crisis of 2008-2009 the fed is the principal reason why we have problem today and big governments and big corporations, pricing of credit, but starving credit for small and new businesses, the so-called interest rate, that sounds great, but as they used to say in the soviet union, the health care is free but you can't get any. >> i'm confused. low interest rates and feds are doing what it can to bolster the economy. can you explain that? >> when you had an anemic patient, you blood the patient, that does more harm than good. right wh

i went to one of the worst public schools in the country, i would argue. was wildly under-educated. i could barely perform -- >> i wish you had brought that up earlier. i'm kidding. i'm kidding. >> we needed metrics then, and i'm happy with them now. >> it's valuable to have pictures of your bosses in compromising positions. >> offering yourself up, right? >> when we come back, lawmakers called them villains when gas prices were soaring, where are the same lawmakers now that gas prices are plummeting and energy cops are laying off thousands? >>> remember this? >> every dollar that oil goes up their profits rise $375 million dollars. >> the sign symbolizes record profits the oil companies are making. >> families are struggling while the big five oil companies are raking in record profits. >> except like right now. fast forward to today. where is washington bashing energy companies now that prices are plunging, profits are cratering and chevron laying off upwards of 7,000 in the oil and oil reelated services industries. north of 100,000. where are the hearin

i never argue that black women are working at the top of their game. that's what, i mean, when i say they are on locked up because they have been trained, there is a chapter called becoming that was about me being placed behind by guidance counselors in the community behind talented black men and they would say you deserve this, but we will put him forward. that became kind of the frame. credit was highly talented on her own and in a way i'm telling culture stories that some people think should not be said. what black women need to learn is that they are worth the same amount of effort that they put into everyone else. [applause]. >> the authors of the book about the nonviolent movement said if you can convince black women to come together and work, it will not only be important for black america, it will revolutionize the country because black women are already working. look at any black church. look at black lives matter. i mean, easy black women who are not necessarily pushing themselves forward, but-- the girl scouts did a thousand girls study and

no matter where you stand, there's no arguing.hen you adjust it for inflation, the wage is lower than the minimum wage in 1968. in today's dollar the wage back then was $10.94 an hour. president obama backs a democratic bill that would raise this to $12 an hour. today, hundreds of thousands of disabled workers throughout this country are earning as little as $2 an hour. sometimes less. another part of the fair labour standards act allows employers to pay americans with physical and mental disabilities less than the minimum wage. the intent was to encourage businesses to hire people they wouldn't higher. the law says that disabled workers can be paid based on how much they produce. there's no minimum wage for the disabled. low pay is not the only issue. disabled workers are segregated fromable bodied workers in what are known as sheltered wark shots. thee are workers who perform basic representative tasks. almost always for subminimum wages. the sheltered workshops are guilty of discrimination and exploitation. the workshops violat

this in the 1990s, and the length was arguing the importance of dance. that dads have often been thrown under the bus for this push for the same-sex marriage movement. the argument now, divorced dads in home, has been pushed aside in order to argue for same-sex marriage. i would add here, by the way none of this is to say that same-sex parents can't love a child of course they can. none of this will save the kids will grow up and said i didn't love my parents. people would say no, if you have same-sex parents can provide the road over the child's head, they can love their children, they can pay for their college, they can, too, of course. no one is denying any of that. if that's the case why not a three or four person marriage? i mean, a four-person marriage, you could really get the kids to and from soccer practice, right? you could really have people helping. you really have money for the college education. double the work, you've got to really -- so if your definition of strictly a function again of, that people can love and what they can provide or t

this is what the judge argue too lifted the moratorium to say, the band has not done much to preventching. >> how much is rhino horn worth on the black market? this is what is driving the problem in the first place. reporter: if you look on the asian black market, the biggest market for rhino horn, one kilogram can fetch up to $65,000. >> internationally it's band. locally they are lifting this band. -- ban. it does not mean traders can start right away. reporter: not necessarily. the government will be appealing this judge's decision. >> give me the two arguments, before and against. reporter: the hunters say some of the money in their trade is funneled into conservation efforts and that when you regulate the trade of the rhino horn, you're able to save more rhinos because the animal doesn't have to die. verses in the poaching scenario, where you lose the whole animal. you have your conservationists arguing that when you allow the trade to continue, you are fueling the industry and of course you are going to fuel the people that are pushing the animals illegally -- pacpoaching the a

>> to have a complicated range of emotions, but there is a lot of pressure not to argue the case. to be a member of the supreme court after thinking about it the minute that we do we're going to the supreme court i'm thinking whether or not to argue their case and if i don't and if he agrees with my recommendation ultimately i will recommend that you argue the case. sova pam immediately said you should argue the case there are things better different for you camera then they're not that hard to learn that is a conversation i will never forget for the rest of my life. it is a great tribute to her. >> it is a factor of time. with most appellate court cases you get at least 30 minutes or 35 minutes that the second argument that was pretty much true in the windsor case. the schedule have the luxury of time that there is a lot of discussion of the impact of a statute and technical discussions of the of law and with that interchange to have the intellectual discussion to persuade him or her why you should win the case. see you have very little time your job as an advocate is to help the

>> i think it's a very weak case. >> a weak case, the defense argued, even though ferris' fingerprint was found on a dresser a few inches from the victim's head. ferris said they had sex all over the bedroom and fingerprint analysts forced to admit they couldn't prove the prints were left the night of the murder. >> you said you could not place a time on it, correct? >> that's true. >> so you don't know when it was made? >> i don't. >> that was the one piece of physical evidence they had. the problem with that piece of physical evidences that fingerprints last. that fingerprint could have been left there any number of prior occasions. >> the defense's argument was simple -- there was far less reason to believe that ferris had committed the murder and more reason to believe that someone else had done it. first, the defense brought up the original suspect, abbass esfehani. you'll recall he was the victim's former boyfriend, describe made a hasty return to iran in the days after the murder. esfehani's fingerprints were found on the banister leading up to the murder scene. >> i'm telling

here, -- >> if it is a state law question, then what you have to argue? it, it isr to decide like the case in oklahoma where the court, the oklahoma court had to decide the federal question in order to decide whether it had jurisdiction over the issue area this court held that where the court had to decide the federal issue, and it did in this case, it found that the batson claim had no merit. it is decided, the federal issue. there is no contest about that. >> explained to me why deciding the federal issue was essential to its deciding the state res judicata issue. because, it framed the question as being that it would look at the batson versus kentucky claim. if there was merit to that claim. then the court would grant the writ on it. on the other hand, if there was not eric on it -- -- merits on it -- that is a very strange application of res judicata to me. factsr there were changed sufficient enough -- bring an issue that has already been litigated on indirect appeal. if it would produce a different results. >> if the facts are such that it would pro

i went to one of the worst public schools in the country, i would argue.wildly under-educated. i could barely perform -- >> i wish you had brought that up earlier. i'm kidding. i'm kidding. >> we needed metrics then, and i'm happy with them now. >> it's valuable to have pictures of your bosses in compromising positions. >> offering yourself up, right? >> when we come back, lawmakers called them villains when gas prices were soaring, where are the same lawmakers now that gas prices are plummeting and energy cops are laying off thousands? i take prilosec otc each morning for my frequent heartburn because you can't beat zero heartburn! ahhh the sweet taste of victory! prilosec otc. one pill each morning. 24 hours. zero heartburn. @ amerivest selects the funds and manages your portfolio. is it run by robots? no no, you can talk to a person anytime. 'cause i don't trust robots. right...well, if the portfolio you're invested in doesn't perform well for two consecutive quarters, amerivest will reimburse your advisory fees for those quarters. i wasn't born yester

in the democratic system, argued in congress, argued in the press, suit before the united states supreme court, won before the supreme court with the ruling ignored and troops came to take them away, they engage in what we could call civil disobedience. it is an amazing story that is a prequel that prefigures many things that will happen much later in american history with other racial minorities. >> we think about it today, our a story like this speaks to where we are right now with many of the issues we struggle with today, issue is this nation and our culture have always struggled with. where do you fall right now on the current debate? we have seen in terms of jackson's place on the $20 bill, we heard recently the change of jefferson jackson dinners, the notion -- we are in this debate, how do we properly acknowledge or memorialize a whatever the right word is jackson, where does he fall? what is the proper way to think of his legacy? >> i got a chance to read about this in the new york times and put forth a proposal having to do with the $20 bill. you guys must have heard of women o

i went to one of the worst public schools in the country, i would argue. was wildly under-educated. i could barely perform -- >> i wish you had brought that up earlier. i'm kidding. i'm kidding. >> we needed metrics then, and i'm happy with them now. >> it's valuable to have pictures of your bosses in compromising positions. >> offering yourself up, right? >> when we come back, lawmakers called them villains when gas prices were soaring, where are the same lawmakers now that gas prices are plummeting and energy cops are laying off thousands? ♪ ♪ (singing) you wouldn't haul a load without checking your clearance. so why would you invest without checking brokercheck? check your broker with brokercheck. get fast-acting, long-lasting relief from heartburn with it neutralizes stomach acid and is the only product that forms a protective barrier that helps keep stomach acid in the stomach where it belongs. for fast-acting, long-lasting relief. try gaviscon®. i built my business with passion. for fast-acting, long-lasting relief. but i keep it growing by making ev

it is hard enough for me to argue with myself. the stateguing with of texas which adopts school textbooks. thes hard to teach some of stories, because our students do not know what to listen for. to listen forned certain things. getting them to see that activism can start with a woman -- i worked all day today, too. you change the diapers. you wash the dishes. that is the beginning of changing the gender roles. a we do not think of that as act divisive. it takes a while when you are teaching to get your students to think differently and go home and talk to their grandmothers about what a did. >> so the theme of this conference, thresholds, walls, and bridges, who came up with that? elizabeth: i did. about what that means? it elizabeth: i am a metaphor junkie. obviously bridge or divide. they can bridge national borders, they can bridge borders that separate women and men or people of different races. impediments that stop people. havenstance, might prevented interracial couples from marrying or same-sex couples from being openly t

so they argued at the time, we should say that the doctor pled guilty, they argued at the time for the maximum. but 40 people wrote letters, including ben carson. ben carson traveled to actually testify at the sentencing hearing talking about what a great guy he wassing how much work he had done for ben carson's charity and never did get prison time. what he got was house arrest for a year in an 8,000-square foot nan nan mansion in florida. he did community service. that was reduced because of work he did for his charity. and then there's the book. so here's what a the of people are raising eyebrows about. ben carson wrote a book subsequently after arguing for leniency for his friend, and he called for, in cases of fraud, the saudi arabian solution which he said should include ten years prison and loss of all personal possessions. so questions are being raised tonight about whether or not it's one set of standards for the rich, your friends, another set of standards for everyone else. chuck? >> old hypocrisy issue, it will get you every time when you run for office. chris jansing in so

they argued the -- feed back. they argued the fee was for photo packages. we will be right back. ,,,,,,,,,,,, some neighbors are energy saving superstars. how do you become a superstar? with pg&e's free online home energy checkup. don't let your neighbor enjoy all the savings. visit pge.com/checkup and get started today. heightened security in the wake of the paris attacks... soon all eyes will be on t >>> new at 6:00 p.m. heightened security in the wake of the paris terror attacks. all eyes will be on the bay area for super bowl 50. what we are learning about plans to keep thousands of people safe. >> plus, an animal encounter you don't see every day. mountain lion making a kill, this one along a popular hiking trail. join us for those stories coming up at 6:00 p.m. >> thank you. >>> all right. thank you for the watching us at 5:00 p.m. scott pelley live in paris tonight and more news back here at 6:00 p.m. see you then. >> pelley: tonight, terror in paris. the victims are honored with silence and avenged with thunder. police go on a manhunt for accomplice

the aclu was involved in the same litigation representing a student and was arguing that the injunction was proper and that the school officials needed to clamp down on the sensor of the student speech. well in that kind of battle, we chose the winning argument. the 11th circuit twice ruled that we were right. you have to pick your battles carefully and communicate them. but over time i think voters will recognize that if you are winning more than you are losing you might know what you're talking about. >> i would say that i think there is a notion that maybe the average voter doesn't know what we would want is and i would submit that i did not experience that last year at all. everywhere i went in the states when i gave my speech that revolved around the importance of the rule of law following the law of the people absolutely got it. i always used to joke it was amazing and it didn't matter if it was a town of 500 people, eric holder was like the first name on people's -- the first question i ever got what are you going to do about eric holder? and the thing that they knew is laws are

me tois hard enough for argue with myself, i imagine arguing with the state of texas, adopts the school textbooks, and it is hard to teach some of the stories because our students do not know what to listen for. they have learned to listen for kings. and getting them to see the activism can start with a woman i went out to work all day today, too. you help wash the dishes. you change the diapers. that is the beginning of changing gender roles. but we do not think of that as activism. it takes a while when you are teaching it to get your students to think a little bit differently. and to go home and talk to their grandparents about what they did. host: the theme of this year's conference. who came up with the theme? did you have a role as the president? elizabeth: i did it. host: can you just talk about what that means? elizabeth: yes. i'm a metaphor junkie. bridges, obviously bridge divides. they can bridge national borders. they can bridge social boundaries that separate men and women or people of different races or classes. impediments that stop people. that might have prevented inter

and in "blue collar conservative," presidential candidate rick santorum argues the republican party must focus on the working class in order to retake the white house. donald trump has written several bestsellers. in his newest book, "crippled america," he outlines his platform. and finally governor chris christie and former governors martin o'malley and jim gilmore have announced their candidacies but haven't written books. you can watch them on our web site, booktv.org. >> in the united states, we define insider trading. this is a matter of stock fraud, fraud in terms of finance. we define insider trading in a very peculiar way. right now if i am a ceo and i'm playing golf with my be best friend and i tell my best friend tomorrow my company is going to do something that's going to dramaticically affect the stock price of my company -- and that's confidential, you're not supposed to trade on it -- but if my golfing buddy takes that information, tells his best friend who happens to be a hedge fund manager and doesn't tell him where he got the information and the hedge fund manager just k

s marriage was strong, argued the defense. >> the relationship seemed good. and we were able to establish that there wasn't a problem. >> there were no allegations of olence in that marriage? >> no. >> reporter: but remember that post-it note that a.b. had written to betty, apologizing for pain he caused her, and hoping she could soon soar free? while the prosecutor said the post-it showed that the marriage was on the brink, the defense attorney said they were rather the words of a caring husband. one who knew that his job was preventing his wife from seeing her family as s ch as she'd like. >> a.b. schirmer's description of why he put that in there is simply, "i wanted to express to her that i -- i had caused her hardship and -- and pain by having this job in reeders. you're so far away from your children, your grandchildren." >> reporter: bottom m ne, argued the defense attorney, , b. loved his wife and had no reason to want her dead. >> i argue that there was no motive. made no sense. >> we talking about a ton of money from insurance or something? >> there

tom wheeler is a wild card, i would argue.dent that they'll not come out at the fcc and say still too much market power when it comes to broadband for this combination? >> when you look at our data business, we'll still be smaller than comcast when this deal is completed. and we're smaller than at&t. we're smaller than verizon. we're about the same size as sprint and t-mobile in terms of data customer relationships. so i would argue that it's a pretty competitive environment, and you have a lot of investment occurring in the wireless space. a lot of investment occurring in the wire line space. and moving toward a mobile competitive environment and i think that allowing us to operate at this scale will actually be good for all the parties. and good for competition. so i think the fcc will see it that way as well. >> when i was speaking to john malone earlier today, because there's been some murmuring or conversation about the idea, there could be an argument that there's also some vertical relationships here given his ownership

(indistinct arguing) i was trying to cover. no, no, we're one. stop it, stop it, you're walking too fast. whoa, whoa, whoa! hey, hey, hey! what happened to you guys? bad luck happened, because emma gave you the spirit stick, we got bench butt! and my face looks like pepperoni pizza! i said i'd do the talking! (sighing) xander, but you gave it to me. with a nice note. did you not mean all those xo's? (gasping) of course i did. i'll get you something else. do you like baseball? i'll buy you season tickets. or a team! you realize if i give the spirit stick back, then my cabin will have bad luck? yes! so, we're agreed. how do you feel about the yankees? (indistinct arguing) xander: no way! ...for absolutely nothing. (screaming) (groaning) you know we have to move in sync! didn't you learn nothing in the bathroom? look, i am swimming. i think he's improving. remember to synchronize your arms and legs like the book said. (chuckles) your books were no help at all! that's why my motto is, "never read." that explains so much about you. jorge: hey! i know

the president argued that his country is now at war. >> translation: we are not fighting a war against civilizations because these asass endo not represent one. we are at war against terrorists which threaten the whole world, not only france. >> reporter: the most visible face of france's war has been the greatly stepped up temple of attack against the islamic state strong hold raqqa where french officials believe that last week's attacks were planned, but after those attacks some of france's muslims ares citizens born and raised here, law-abiding, are increasingly afraid that that war will turn inwards and that they will find themselves in the cross-fire. we met in woman near the site of paris attacks. she was too nervous to show her face. from her apartment windows she saw what happened at the bataclan musical. >> reporter: do you really think that france is at war? >> translation: yes, yes. we are at war with them. we are at war with i.s.i.l. >> reporter: what do you think now for your life in paris? do you feel safe in your city? >> translation: after what happened friday, i don't

one thing that happened, why argue, is that the society was already angled a certain way. they viewed african-american authorities -- african-american through a particular lens. we think about the state retreating out of the lives of african american families, less be theent in what would welfare state it has been malevolent investment. you can see this in the report, a lot of the solutions he thought we should embrace were not published. so we made up our own solutions. no solution has become more prominent, no solution has been more dealing with the policy of mass incarceration. issues toe employment be a factor. very often an african-american communities, we use this as a -- drug for job issues issues. a piece i read this week, there is an alarming rate -- ride of heroin use and african-american communities, not getnnot -- could around the town of the piece. where crack a time was popular. and the pieces during that time. , -- you cannot separate solutions. rates there was -- crime were higher in the 1960's and , yous, but you also argue made the argument that as you we

the defense argued that was just an unproven theory.emale clients may not have been involved -- but the long strands suggest another woman may have been there. >> it suggested that a female had maybe killed her and that in the middle of the fight she'd pulled the hair out. between that and the amount of cleanup, that would have been required, we always believe two people were involved in this murder. >> reporter: and as for that visit to gardere lane? the defense lawyers say greg was reluctant to admit it, but not because he had tossed the wallet. >> well, because he was buying steroids. he was discussing buying steroids, which is illegal. >> reporter: kill her for the insurance? the defense said, "no way." >> he had too much goin' for him. we did not buy into the prosecutor's theory that he would do it because he was in -- had some financial stress. we didn't buy into that for a minute. >> reporter: the defense argued cops didn't look hard enough at the list of scary clients who may have wanted chiquita dead. and that unknown male dna

and argue that their plan stream lines getting pot into shops and money into tax coffers. investor jennifer doering runs a liquor distribution company. >> it tells the rest of the nation that ohio is progressive and people are progressive thinkers. and that if it can happen in ohio, it can happen anywhere. >> no on issue three. >> reporter: but opponents got their own amendment on the ballot to ban monopolies. and both the anti and proamendments are polling well. >> reporter: if both of these pass, in your understanding, what's next? >> if there is one lawyer alive in the state of ohio there's going to be a lawsuit. >> reporter: if so, courts may ultimately decide if marijuana in ohio stays on the black market or becomes the state's newest big business. barry petersen, cbs news, columbus. >> glor: and to illinois where lawmakers have proposed a new approach to preventing domestic violence. they're looking to the beauty profession to help spot ugly situations at home. jamie yuccas shows us why some believe training salon workers could help save lives. >> reporter: women go

and we can argue the merits of that. but there is no arguing the numbers who aren't buying that. >> well, i think everybody has the same opportunity. i think it's showing. >> they feel they don't get it. they feel that wall street is getting away or some fat cats are getting away and some take advantage of to reinforce that argument. but does it worry you that that morphs into something more sinister? >> i think we need to go back to having more control on these protesters. and a lot turn into criminals and we've seen that. >> they'rae agage traitors, som bused in. >> and we've been trained teaching law enforce the taking a softer approach, and that's fine to a point because you want to limit the litigation that comes behind it. but you have to take back the streets. you can't allow people to shut down city street, putting people's lives in danger. how does an ambulance get through when you have these streets being shut down day after kday. >> and they promise more of these events. >> and the same sort of anarchists who

[inaudible] he argued, you have to have historical framework.history is part of a person's character. i think that was very important. think about central problem he defines the problem of conjecture. that's when he gets to the heart of some of the questions you're raising. he said not only do you have to choose between evils, but you also don't really know, you may take a difficult preemptive action and prevent disaster, but if you're successful, the early decision may get you no payoff because in preempting disaster you basically prevent it from happening and you pay rent people from suffering it. if you get lucky people might think you are tremendously wise. the temptation is, to kick the can down the road. you have to ask yourself how does this fit into the ground strategy but also at the time the decision was taken was this the right decision at the time could you say with confidence that this is the lesser evil of any two courses of actions? that's the i've set for myself. >> as you said the book began with his childhood in germany and you