what argues at the expense of the other side, was a price military maneuvers. especially in an american context is to handle the entire war, among the people. sofa leader thinks that the united states reputation of regional security, but you have a domestic public that is either asleep at the war wheel or opposed to that, secrecy me be a way to deal with that. these logics, especially the operational security, this can accompany glad to, i think that there are two cyst them systems. i tell a story that is interesting, it is one that suggests something more complicated going in. i also think there is something more domestically complicated going on. they can be something that makes it very difficult. so i develop a logic for secrecy that is anchored in the process of fighting a secret war. especially in the modern era. to answer both of my questions, there is a reason to engage in covert, and if your are an adversary, this is a good reason for you to stay quiet about it as well. so willing down the argument, hopefully this will stick. number one, i argue that la

apple's tax burden for over 2 decades effectively making it illegal state aid apple is expected to argue that it did nothing wrong as it had followed the irish and us tax from dollars of a more let's cross over now to our financial correspondent pandey in a frank that i should just out of apple already made that pavement so what is the issue. well yes apple has deposited the money in an escrow account that was set up by the irish government and is being managed by a 3rd party as it manages but apple actually argues that it should have been told to pay that money in the 1st place because it followed the rules the law of the land was followed the taxes that would do were paid and it also argues that it did the bulk of his taxes in the united states that's where most of the value creation happens they the intellectual property creation research and development takes place in the us whereas in the island it's mainly better for activities such as distribution logistics and storage and i were listening to you one could argue that apple also blames ireland for not telling it to pay more taxes a

the other half argue for 1755. for a full disclosure, after 10 argued foralysis, i january 11, the venting 57 in the formative years. for the last 80 years we have been arguing the same thing area did no one since 1939 has found any new evidence on this debate until now. 1759, john mica live feed filed for in 1759, john michael levine filed for divorce from rachel fossett, alexander hamilton's mother. three witnesses were summoned to testify, jemima gurley, james ash, and james hedrick. the divorce was granted to john michael levine but rachel was barred from remarrying. it's not working too well. while the divorce court ruling has been known for the last 80 no one had found the actual testimony of the three witnesses. accordingly, we had no idea what these three witnesses had to say about rachel fossett's life from the time she left st. croix in 1750 until their testimony in 1759. as a result, almost nothing was known about rachel's life during this 9-year period, a time that included her meeting james hamilton an

in fact, i would argue, even more needed in other areas of medicine. where our progress has not been as good. just take the a's -- alzheimers, anti-microbial resistance, arthritis, als, and aging. that's one letter of the alphabet and those are all areas where we need to see more progress. which brings me back to this session. the title of the session itself, "leveraging data to accelerate medical progress" captures two of the most critical issues we face in the medical research community generally, and specifically at the fda. first, what types of data do we need? what are the means whereby we get those data, and in a manner efficient, respectful, values patient privacy and follows the rules. second, how can we best use these data and their downstream technological advances to speed the development of treatments that make a difference in patient lives? at a time of limited resources, and enormous scientific challenges, we all want to make the most of these precious scientific investments. we want to maximize the payoff for our efforts. this rings espe

i argued with the president. pullout of this agreement. it is a terrible national security decision for the united states. the president made the bold choice and pulled out of the agreement. however, the battle was not done yet. there may be some folks here who have heard of the deep state. i am here to tell you the deep state is alive and well. and has circled the barricades around washington, d.c. the number one objective of the deep state, preserve the disastrous obama iran nuclear deal. every single day the deep state, a treasury of state is working to frustrate president trumps decision. how did they do so? they did so when the president pulled out of the agreement by commencing the administration into a series of waivers. oil waivers allowing iran to sell a million barrels a day of oil. when you've got the world leading state sponsor of terrorism who wants to murder you, it is a good idea. this was lunacy. hand-in-hand with the civilian nuclear waivers. which are waivers that let iran do nuclear work. at sites literally built into th

autos and argues against driverless cars. smithsonian associates hosted this event.historian and automotive journalist dan albert. dan has spent a career writing and teaching about the history of culture and technology. his articles can be found in magazines, popular science, and the journal for the history of behavioral sciences. he holds a phd in history, from the university of michigan, where he also taught in the college of engineering. dan also served as the curator of vehicle collections at the national museum of science and industry in london. he is the author of "are we there yet?: the american automobile past, present, and driverless." it is available for sale and signing at the conclusion of the program. so please, without further ado, join me in welcoming him this evening. [applause]

that is not fair game and many would argue that is notfairand game and many would argue that is notof that individual have a reasonable expectation to keep that information private. today, stokes received support from the ecb, his employer adding they we re the ecb, his employer adding they were appalled and saddened by the story for some thanks to his performances with both bat and ball, the all—rounder has become one of the all—rounder has become one of the most famous faces in british sport. now he's taken a stand off the field, too. dan roan, bbc news. police investigating the murder of an officer in berkshire have made a new arrest, and re—arrested three teenagers. pc andrew harper, who was 28, was killed near the village of sulhampstead last month while responding to reports of a burglary. he had married his wife lissiejust four weeks previously. a fifth man has already been charged. a former us marine — accused of spying in moscow — has told the bbc that he hasn't committed any crimes and that he was set up. paul whelan, who also has british, irish and canadian citizenship, w

both the state department and defense department argued for staying in that agreement and i argued vigorously directly with the president, pull out of this agreement, it is a terrible national security decision for the united states. thankfully the president made the goal bold and courageous choice and pulled out of the agreement. however the battle was not done yet. maybe some folks here have heard of the deep state. i'm here to tell you the deep state is alive and well and has circled the barricades around washington dc. and the number one agenda objective of the deep state, at the department of state in the department of treasury, is to preserve the disastrous obama iran nuclear. every single day the deep state , of treasury and state is working to frustrate pres. trump's decision. how did they do so? they did so first with the president pulling out of the agreement, by convincing the administration to issue a series of waivers, to issue oil waivers. oil waivers allowing iran to sell 1 million barrels a day of oil. because when you've got the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism who

and so i argued the semantics of the case and i argued the law. the afghan law.eresting. you have to have an extremely detailed knowledge of afghan law, you would have had to have dug deep into it yourself? absolutely. that is part of myjob. that‘s the job of a litigator, to represent their clients and argue the law as it relates best in the interests of your client. you‘ve said in the book and you say repeatedly i didn‘t see myself so much as a human rights lawyer, i saw as myself very much as an inside the courtroom litigator. you were just taking a grandstand overview of human rights in afghanistan, you were doing it on a case—by—case basis with an intimate knowledge of that particular afghan law that was relevant. right. exactly. i mean, to me, that is more effective. i definitely respect human rights lawyers, but frankly, i don‘t think petitioning, marching was going to help gulnaz. what needed to happen is ‘we need to legally argue this in court‘. one of the things that they failed to bring, is according to islamic law, you need to bring four eyewitnesses t

and argue that this amendment will threaten these roles. the opposition for organizing will prevent the necessary two thirds of states from ratifying the amendment. there's a time limit in which the state had to approve or ratify the amendment. they don't meet the deadline and congress extend the deadline and it never gets past. on the bottom is one of the leaders, the one with the hat is a congressman from new york city. famous for the hats. this shows us not only the strengths of the women's movement, but also the limits that is going on here. it will foreshadow future trends in the coming years. one of the famous incidents monastery the most important, but most symbolic -- did anyone see the battle of the sexes movie? i haven't seen it yet. bobby riggs the man on the left with a 55-year-old former tennis star -- he thinks that there's too many differences between men and women. no way a woman could be on the tennis court. he challenges the number of women tennis players to a match. he challenges 29-year-old billie jean king to a televise

businesswoman, gina miller, who argue that parliament was suspended foran argue that parliament was the key point lord pannick is making is that every executive or governmental decision must be exercised for a proper purpose. here, what has actually happened is by proroguing forfive here, what has actually happened is by proroguing for five weeks, rather than the usual five days, in the context where there's only seven weeks, at the time, left for brexit, according to the prime minister, what the prime minister was really trying to do was to stop the democratic body, parliament, representatives of the people, actually scrutinising the government through questions, through potential legislation, through select committees, and that he argues is impermissible and unconstitutional. there was an interesting point that early on, which talked about the failure of the prime minister to produce a witness statement to give his reasons in the court of session in edinburghfor his reasons in the court of session in edinburgh for proroguing parliament. how unusual is that?” think it would be very

then we can argue how we get there and the individual policy position. that's not -- democrats want to shut down the debate. want to create this evil appearance that how dare you. that's why i think all this polling we do, day after day on television and newspapers, it's just a bunch of hogwash. people don't want toed a hit they'll vote for donald trump as opposed to, say, hillary clinton because they don't want their neighbors or somebody else to beat them over the head with it. try to embarrass them. that's part of the strategy. want to embarrass people. >> one of my favorite part of the book when you put your investigator hat on and dig through the tax returns of big nonprofits on the left. that did you discover how to the operations are financed and the shady accounting tricks and full disclosure at heritage i'm glad i learned about the tricks for the first time in this book. we don't do that. >> this is what people need understand. you look at the priorities that they have put forward in congress, and you look through any poll that is out there, abo

we argued back and forth. she argued, doing this will embarrass the chinese government. i said, yes, exactly. that is not a bug. it is a feature. in the senate, just as i said with u.s. foreign policy, there are also levers of power. every obamaold on nominee to the state department. unsurprisingly, the state department was dismayed about this. -- forn we do to lift you to lift your hold? as soon as you pass my legislation renaming the street in front of the chinese embassy. i said, what about a resolution? my legislation passed the senate unanimously. senator feinstein did not object. sadly, the republican house killed it. that is a whole other story, onch does not reflect well the house leadership. 2017, let meto finish the story because it is very interesting. rex tillerson is secretary of state. i had breakfast with >>. -- rex. he said when he met with his chinese counterparts, he said among their top three objectives were prevent the street in front of the embassy from being renamed. at the time, he had passed away. part of what i was trying to do was get him releas

biden investigated by the ukrainian president so this is what is being alleged so republicans can argue look at there's nothing wrong here but it will come down to the articles of impeachment so bad as what's being investigated that's what's been announced under the umbrella of 8 impeachment the house speaker nancy pelosi less than 24 hours ago announced that all of these 6 committees investigating the president would now operate under that one umbrella moving forward what this means is that they will now begin trying to nail down what will be the indictment if you will and then it will be voted on likely in the house of representatives but the president is not guaranteed to be removed from office that's something the senate would have to vote on controlled by republicans that's a big question mark still a long way away what we're looking at right now is the actual charge and right now all we have is this one bit of evidence if you will released by the white house memo detailing the contents of a call now democrats are pushing for a few other things they want to hear from the person who

builders edf argue it's the perfect back—up when the wind doesn't blow.. it's low carbon, it's safe and it can be made affordable, and if we are really, really serious about taking carbon out of the way we make electricity, then we need nuclear. and we're going to need a lot of electricity if we're going to replace petrol and diesel engines. it seems very odd looking under the bonnet and seeing nothing, really. you get used to it! nearby dealer in second hand electric vehicles andy farmer says business is brisk. the change has been huge. it's gone from being more of a niche thing to now anyone's buying an electric car. for the school run, if two or three people get an ev, everyone starts to go, "wait, i could do that, i could live with an ev". despite a fivefold increase in sales over the last year, evs make up less than 1% of vehicles on the road and there's an even tougher, more expensive and less exciting challenge. so, here it is, good old —fashioned gas boiler. we all recognise that, there are 2a million of them around the uk and that is a big proble

in it, he argues that hitler never knew about the holocaust. he tried to stop it. that's what he writes in the late 1970's. he revises the book in the late, early 1990's, and then all mention of the holocaust disappears. not only that hitler had nothing to do with it but it is gone is being mentioned. but historians were interested in the documents he found. it wasn't he had so much respect, but he had history for suing people and being very litigious. i, of course, was one of his victims. >> you briefly touched on this in the book. you mention how at first he starts not as a full-on denier. he gradually falls into this denying. how do you think that happened? prof. lipstadt: here i'm speculating. i do not know for a fact but it seems to me that as time went on, he was getting less and less attention. people were saying, what's this craziness claiming hitler did not know about the holocaust? what is this extreme view of one thing or another? and it was a way of being, it seems to me, a way of being outrageous. of getting attention. and when he would go to the meeti

economy some members on the phone see argued for another $25.00 basis points and we probably will see another $25.00 basis points this year but unless the u.s. trying to trade war escalates and the u.s. economy deteriorates much further we won't see any more easing than that because probably won't be necessary so what you're saying that the fed's decision yesterday was aggressive enough in order to keep the u.s. economy healthy. the fed wasn't seeking to be aggressive actually because in their estimation of the economy growth is going to settle at about 2 percent annual real g.d.p. growth and inflation is going to sustainably converge to target over the next 2 years and at the moment looking at us data the labor markets for strong inflation really not far from target it's difficult to avoid that conclusion that the u.s. economy doesn't need aggressive interest rate cuts i'm despite what president trump is arguing quite aggressively i what about those concerns that exist about you as a quiddity which forced the fed to increase the amount of short term funding available for the very 1st

nothing in the next two years but try to impeach president trump, that's a position we're happy to argue about. we think we ought to be able to do more than just create controversy here >> senator, good morning your critics would say you've done as much as any modern legislator to extract political leverage from votes that were once routine, 8 years ago, you and the rest of the republican leadership used debt ceiling legislation to advance your party's political goals. three years later, nearly happened again why is this any different? >> well, look, during the obama years i made three major deals on taxes with joe biden. three very significant deals so when you have divided government, you need to look for things you can agree on and do those. and i don't see much of that happening right now so i know the house has been on this impeachment addiction since the day the president was sworn in, but i hope they can turn their attention to something else. usmca ought to be right at the top of the list, it is good for the american people. >> senator, just to dig into that a little more all of

that is why i have argued for a single market customs union brexit and argued that if there is a primedeal that they think is good enough then they should give the public the final say and ratify that because there is no doubt that we had a referendum in 2016 and then a general election in 2017 and we have beenin general election in 2017 and we have been in the situation of having a hung parliament that has made brexit very difficult ever since so there are ways out of this but the problem we have is that instead of trying to find one, borisjohnson is kowtowing to quite a small group of people in his own party and nigel farage and the brexit party. and that is the problem rather than saying ok, what isa kind problem rather than saying ok, what is a kind of way of dealing with brexit that we could get the vast majority of mps brexit that we could get the vast majority of mp5 on board with and then get back to things that people really care about like schools and health service. by delaying for another three months your assuming that boris is pushing for no deal but that is not what he s

american university professor abram will argue that america must choose to be antiracist. and former secretary of defense, jim, who will reflect on his military career and offer his thoughts on leadership. that's all airing tonight starting at 7:45 p.m. eastern. check your program guide for more schedule information. >> mr. clark what at see setting. >> 45 percent of the years unclaimed by any nationstate. in the technology of creating little animations that would be stalled up miniature countries at at hand and we are starting as soon as we get it. >> at hand. what at been done #. >> built off the coast of thailand in the beginning of 2019. 13 miles off the coast. it was outside of the territorial waters and the key victory that it costs less than the average american home. so the hundred and $50000 for the first pilot project. so this got people very excited like the average middle class american could afford it. we have invested interested in underwater restaurants and we can look at the windows at the aquarium. looking out at the ocean. people could come in. now we are

i would argue we not only learned a lot, but we had great success into 2018. example of a change in as our cyber capabilities and thinking has matured. david: we're going to go out to all of you. are andtell us who you we will start with barbara. >> thank you very much. interested to get your evaluation of iranian capability. over the summer, they shut down a sophisticated and expensive american drone with their own technology. were you surprised by that? how would you rate that in terms of an adversary? capabilityd: that was not designed to be deployed in a high-end fight. own selft have its protection. important for people to understand. i would argue iran has made great efforts and develop their cyber and cruise missile capability. i respect them, but i wouldn't put them anywhere near the capabilities of russia or china. david: cyber as well? gen. dunford: cyber as well. they have developed them, but they are not in the same category of china or russia. paid to respect any potential adversary capability. i was not surprised at iran's ability to shoot down t

conrad told crook he and heidy had been arguing. a minor dustup, he said. no big deal.t enough for heidy to draw a bath and ask to be left alone. >> she went and locked herself in the bathroom. and then he details how he picked the lock and went in the bathroom. and then she kicked him out. to me, that's another -- it's just more proof of there was an argument, a bigger argument. >> reporter: as for the location of the gun itself, that, too, was suspicious. that gun's how far from heidy? >> oh, i would say eight feet, ten feet maybe. it's far enough away that it wasn't a normal if she shoots herself and falls to the ground type of thing. >> reporter: next morning they ask conrad to come to the station for more questioning. >> they can say whatever they want. but i did not hurt my wife. and i know that. bottom of my heart, i did not hurt my wife. >> reporter: heidy's family thought otherwise. after finally learning from police the details of how heidy died. >> the minute i heard how she died, i knew he did it. >> sounds like he had a temper, and he was very intoxicated,

she argues that as a wage earning woman, she has to pay equal taxes with men but as a non-voter, has no voice in how those tax dollars are spent. she further states that acknowledging super superior -- she is paid a third of the wages as a man in the same school. this petition was sent to congress in 1879. 140 years ago this year, women were already arguing they needed the vote to press for equal wages. of course, as a wage earning woman, women like emily barber, from their working experience, it's clear how vulnerable women were without the vote. one of the other ways a lot of women came to ultimately fight for their right to vote was through engagement of other reform issues. lots of women were engaged in the antislavery movement, and the temperance movement, prohibiting the sale and consumption of alcohol, as well as other educational, public health and social reforms. one of the most important endorsements the suffrage movement got came from the women's first temperance union. they were the largest women's organization at the time. we have this petition hear from the women's chri

argued, if you revoke the oil waivers, the rocket. oil will sky now, the energy department, would ne you might think know something about energy, rightly argued no, they will not. than enough supply in the marketplace, both u.s. supplies, supply of other to more than fill that void. ell, i engaged actively and aggressively and fortunately the administration and the president agreed with me, ended the oil way, not nd by the only did oil not go up, it went down. were state and defense wrong, totally wrong, and the proven they were totally wrong. so then the battle shifted to civilian nuclear waivers. the united states revoked three of the seven civilian nuclear waivers, but unfortunately, at the urging of state and them.ury, reissued four of serious a mistake, a mistake. as we sits here today, the foreign minister is in town. treasury secretary teven m mnuchin, and urging a plan, a plan to effectively give billion to the ayatollah say, inand i'm sorry to the leaking sieve that's washington, the reports are rampant that the white house f

builders idiot argue it is the perfect backup when the wind does not blow.to rethink nuclear. it is low carbon, it's safe, and it is affordable —— builders e d f. we need nuclear. we are going to need a lot of electricity if we are going to replace petrol and diesel engines. it seems very odd looking at the bonnet and seeing nothing, really. there are you get used to it. can hand vehicles emergences business is risk. it's breast. it's gone from more of the knees being to —— its brisk, it's gone from electric vehicles being an easy thing to more of a mainstream being. electric vehicles make up less than 196 electric vehicles make up less than 1% of vehicles on the road. and there is a tougher and more exciting challenge. so, here it is, the good old fashion gas boiler, 2a million of them across the uk, that is a problem. they are one of the biggest sources of emissions. in fact, they turn out as much as five uk aviation systems. this looks like an air—conditioning unit? systems. this looks like an air-conditioning unit? does what it is, but in reverse. ithink

social media giant facebook argues that it is a publisher and has the right to block any content told. by an activist did band that despite telling sentences it's merely a platform are not responsible for what they post. the company strikes a multi-million dollar plea deal to settle more than 2000 and. keeping it or thriving the country's opioid epidemic and an american street. right by using the names of schools where mass shootings took place and this new range of we get reaction from the relatives of one of the things. i lost my brother in 25 other families.

the legal team for the business woman gina miller argued yesterday that boris johnson's gina miller argued yesterday that borisjohnson‘s suspension of parliament was unlawful, intended to deny mps a voice on brexit. today, it was the term of the government's lawyer. good morning, sirjames. non—just to see ability. put simply, an issue on which the courts have no right to intervene, including the prime minister's ability to suspend parliament. it is a prerogative power that has been expressly reserved by parliament. sirjames said borisjohnson reserved by parliament. sirjames said boris johnson had reserved by parliament. sirjames said borisjohnson had broken no laws in having parliament prorogued, but that raised questions from the court. would you argue that the prorogation has the effect to undermine the ability of parliament to carry out its constitutional function of holding the executive to account? by definition, prorogation, asa account? by definition, prorogation, as a point i would come back too, has the effect that it has. sir james accepted its meant mps couldn't ask questions an

he had said to me, "it's clear that you love to argue."e said, "you should really think about doing an internship at the justice department in the solicitor general's office because, of course, the solicitor general is the master litigator for the united states government." and everybody in the office had devoted to that mission, and i applied, and i got the job, so i spent a summer there, at the sg's office, as it's known. i got to know charles fried, i got to know the people in the office, and they asked me to come back on the permanent staff after my clerkship was over. so i was -- i was quite a challenge because i was very green. i was newly minted lawyer. i really didn't have a lot of experience. i didn't have any litigation experience, so i -- it was a little reckless on charles fried's part, but i learned the ropes. i argued 15 cases before the court during my tenure there. i wrote briefs and participated in all the activities, and i really -- it was the most wonderful, the best years of my life. i can honestly say that. the people

(muffled arguing) or, make you feel both at once. overwhelmed by bipolar i symptoms? about vraylar. some medications only treat the lows or the highs. vraylar effectively treats depression, acute manic and mixed episodes of bipolar i. full-spectrum relief of all symptoms. with just one pill, once a day. elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis have an increased risk of death or stroke. call your doctor about unusual changes in behavior or suicidal thoughts. antidepressants can increase these in children and young adults. report fever, stiff muscles, or confusion, which may mean a life-threatening reaction, or uncontrollable muscle movements, may be permanent. side effects may not appear for several weeks. metabolic changes may occur. movement dysfunction, restlessness, sleepiness, stomach issues are common side effects. when bipolar i overwhelms, vraylar helps smooth the ups and downs. when bipolar i overwhelms, mom you've got to [ get yourself a new car.g ] i wish i could save faster. you're making good choices. you'll get there. ♪ were you going to tell me a

your position is very clear, would be clearer for labour to decide what he wants to do and argue foromplicated route through various options? i think it is all about finding compromise and the labour conference is going to be discussing this issue and will be agreeing for the policy as a whole and there are those who determine a policy 90 constituents from all parts of the uk have put a0 position on that which means we should campaign is labourfor remain which means we should campaign is labour for remain and reform. which means we should campaign is labourfor remain and reform. not just some uncritical sting of the european union, there are a lot of things i need to change but the crucial thing that absolutely agreed on is that this issue must go back to the people and that is the stark contrast between the position of labour and the conservatives want to drag us into a new deal brexit from which there is no mandate, no majority and currently, no plan. define struggling to understand the people having their final say on and what people are thinking. this is very clear, will be havin

apple trading above that today i might argue this cycle china is the only market that really mattershey're rolling out 5g pretty early. a lot of chinese manufacturers have 5g phones apple does not have a 5g iphone. how much do you think that matters? >> well, first of all, carl, the valuation, the stock's now at market multiple which is fair. they've shown they can continue services, growth, maybe that will improve, it is near fair value. regarding china and 5g, i think it is overplayed at this point 5g even next year won't give that much incremental capability in the phone networks are faster. the real benefit is beyond phones, internet and things. nevertheless, it is a big deal next year from a marketing standpoint carriers will push it in a big way. in china, maybe apple is behind relative to huawei earlier in the year, apple is losing share in china, reduced prices, have new phones out. they have been regaining share in china huawei has problems generally speaking outside china at this point. i feel like apple's market share around the world and perhaps in china as well is in fai

special envoy to thisnistan arguing for meeting. but it is not so much the argument but how thihis came out and the leaks that were e coming out. sense that it would be one of many issues to stop the exit. fact thatk about the the talks were controversial. >> they did not want to include afghanistan's democratically elected government. wastimeline to withdraw very unrealistic ahead of the u.s. 2020 elections. they were also suspicious about the taliban motivations. they called themselves islamic immigrants of afghanistan. wasthe u.s. withdrawal contingent on taliban guarantees in the anti-terror fight. that increase the islamic state qaeda.nd tentatively, al al qaeda is the group that conducted the 9/11 attacks 18 years ago. things that really made afghans very worried about their future. >> and thihis is the 1 18th ananniversary of 9/1/11. what about america's longest war? >> it doesn't look like america's longest war will soon bebe over. been publicly releaseded, but there are many reports of it. the u.s. names al qaeda as one of

to engage china in a head-to-head cold war on multiple fronts, or do we embrace what i would argue is our most traditional leadership role, and strengthen the international order that beijing is attempting to upend? i would argue that the second approach of offering a better model to the world, one rooted in freedom and opportunity, is both consistent with our values and the approach most likely to succeed. first, i want to talk briefly about how we got here. in many ways, we are having a conversation like this because the conventional wisdom has changed rapidly over the past few years. until recently, conventional wisdom thought the u.s. and china would rise together, two nations intertwined with the partnership in trade, business and education. like many, i hoped that the prc's greater global integration would lead to a more open, prosperous and potentially more democratic china, and a rising china would be good for the world. today, it is clear that the aims of president xi and a communist party do not align with that vision. instead, the chinese government has worked to challenge

president obama and his administration arguing then, yes, part of what trump officials argue now, when the flores rules are too rigid, they force the government to absorb more undocumented immigrants respect that's why obama was asking congress for more flexibility. >> a part of what we're looking in the supplemental is some flexibility in terms of being able to preserve the due process rights of individuals who come in, also to make sure we are set's strong signal that they can't simply show up at the border and automatically assume they're going to be absorbed. >> immigrant groups continue to go after the government if court. they said obama's intention were not matching these rules. what happened? do you remember? history is really important right now. the government lost and the courts expanded this ka is to cover more people. not just unaccompanied minors, basically all minors in detention. >> the united states government has been using special detention centers to hold thousands of undocumented women and children, late friday night, a federal judge ruled they do not meet legal st

get a handle on domestic issues look into the any chance to tackle violent crime but lawyers here argue that really what he wants to do was run down the clock on bricks that debate now on the other side the prime minister's lawyers are arguing this is also about the power of these courts and they say that they have no power to rule on this issue it is a constitutional matter they cannot intervene or do it and that is part of the problem here the u.k. constitution is not one single written document it's a very fine tissue of procedures laws amendments unusual practices and it really depends very heavily on politicians playing fast in following the norms and what gina minutes ago was arguing is that the prime minister has flouted those norms and in doing so you could set a very dangerous precedent of the judges here have a judge and they're going to reconvene on friday at 9 g.m.t. and that is when they will give the decision. boris johnson's had a busy day hole so meeting israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu they held talks inside 10 downing street on strengthening ties between the c

>> i would argue lesser evils is.ut i would say that the danger is that vessel appears more often among the most vocal leadership in evangelicalism. which i think is a big problem in and of itself. >> related to the idea of vessel theology your next significant point of the new good news is king cyrus argument. i think it was one of these i call the core evangelicals, the evangelicals that come to the king's court and flatter him. one of these guys lance wall was recently on the jim baker show. bet jim baker. he has a television show now. pitching a king cyrus coin. i don't know if you saw that, for $45 you can buy a coin with king cyrus on it. why king cyrus? what did that have to do with anything in terms of the way evangelicals talk to trump? i've heard this and written about this they see him as a new king cyrus. >> part of it they feel is fulfilled as a result of the embassy. netanyahu actually mentioned king cyrus when he was talking about how thankful they were for tromped moving. i don't personally feel like h

>> there are a few things they are arguing. first of all, the probation office is essentially arguing this is just an economic offense. that's what they think. no one was harmed. she didn't derive any gain. prosecutors in response are saying, it doesn't matter. she didn't commit this out of desperation or need. they called her morally clueless and it was a sense of entitlement that she plead guilty to fraud. the judge is going to see what the pro-baying officers are arguing, which is 0 to 4 month, no time in jail, which i have never seen them ever advocate so strongly for a defendant in a simple fraud case as i see here, including levying blame and looking at culpability of the test taking process and the admissions people. >> dana: what do you think is behind that? >> i have no idea. i made a joke to your producer and said, i don't know if they are desperate house wives fans. i have seen a case less than $100,000, i have seen the probation office refuse to grant home confinement for someone who had a disabled defendant and far

you argue passionately that this is. you argue passionately that this is.t parliamentary sovereignty, you know there will be people watching you saying, yes, but fundamentally, gina miller, this is about you try to stop brexit. fundamentally, gina miller, this is about you try to stop brexitlj can't stop brexit and i can't tell mps what to do, all i can do as an individual on the back of my judgment on the first case is that oui’ judgment on the first case is that our eyes and judgment on the first case is that oui’ eyes and ears judgment on the first case is that our eyes and ears in parliament, our elected representatives, must not be shut out of this process and must be able to scrutinise. if they decide to bring odd legislation or whatever decision, they must be there to do that. would that not be your ultimate aim? i think where we are right now in the timeline we have left, we a re right now in the timeline we have left, we are drifting towards an ideal, and i don't see ideal being of any benefit to this country in any sector in any, for anyone's live

so it can be argued that the most prominent black athlete is the one who lost the most in the 196 he's, could easily be called muhammad ali. and so even today, the fruit that we see happening in the life, from the life of muhammad ali, and in the life of colin kaepernick and in the life of eric reid and in the life of lebron james, it's born from the stand, the courage from muhammad ali. >> and were there some other icon that is we may be less familiar with that you can talk about? >> doug johnson from the 1920's, a prominent boxer, who refused to allow himself to be paid in chicken feed. he was a world champion boxer in the 1920's. he was the first to demand to e paid over $1,000 for boxing. and jesse owens. jesse owens, in some people's minds, there are some in the black culture that consider him a "sellout." but there has to be trailblazers. jellsee owens, the great our-time medalist in munich, germany, was a trailblazer for the opportunity that many of our black athletes get together f. we don't get the platform, we don't get the opportunity. >> tell me a little bit about some of t

and if you argue for it, it is immoraland if it is an position, you are responsible.u should never assume a government attorney speaking in public is saying what the attorney actually believes. advocates in politics. it is in the court of politics and they are simply advocates and they simply are going to present what they think is the best way to convince you that all is ok. you cannot trust them. -- if to what they say you agree with what they say, go alonglyses, you with that, of course. but they are simply political operatives when an attorney speaks in public. certainly, a government attorney, right? it is different if they are speaking in court. then you would have a judge to referee the matter. you have representation from the other side. but, when they speak in public, they are simply political operatives. that is how jackson viewed himself, i believe. >> to what extent is it happening today? mr. castro: what do you think? [laughter] >> i question you. mr. castro: when jackson was doing something in public he was doing it to support his "hero and leader." roos

although i would argue that we have significantly reoriented since 2015. as you indicated, i think it is fair to say from 2001 to 2014, we were almost singularly focused on the fight against extremism. by 2014, really the catalyst for change came when we started to look at our competitive advantage relative to china and russia in 2014 and 2015 compared to what it was in 2000. i will not go into great length about this. happy to answer all your questions, but china and russia began to feel the wide range of capabilities designed against what they perceived to be our vulnerabilities. as we were focused on the fight against violent extremism, it began to feel these capabilities. even as early as 2015, the first classified military strategy we wrote in 2015 was focused on a 4+1. we now call it the 2+3. china,is now focused on russia, iran, north korea, violent extremism, and then we refined that with the national defense strategy to focus on great power competition. number one, clearly much and i and russia are the benchmark against which we measure our capabi

. >> donald trump you argued is a vessel. for many evangelicals. again just so we sort of get the larger context here, we can debate a number but a large number say anyone percent voted for donald trump. i would tend to agree. some of them did see trump as a divinely appointed person. i always wonder could you have the vessel theology where god is using particular person like donald trump. if you believe in the christian world view which we both do. is using god's using trump as a vessel to maybe punish the church. [laughter] >> i checked a little bit about this in the book. the thing about trying to determine not just if someone is a vessel of god's will, but also why, but the problem with that is judas could've been considered a vessel. it smelled like god didn't nobody was going to do and in fact jesus told him what he was going to do before it even happened. had he not done the, and the would've also been the entire circumstance. it is not the case the a vessel is a value judgment. in terms of good or evil, it is about being in a particular pos