that come out of us so that no not i just it very well you know molly come again as you do with ariel sharonut the problem is different perhaps is not are you out of it but he was the prime minister of the doesn't which which you just said if you trust israeli prime ministers brought prime minister netanyahu says there is no occupation and i'm not sure if you're holding back is really a product is not really sure we're getting because we're going to get to the political goal oslo based on the wrong. we're getting lost a little bit here in the word occupation look at eugene is trying to tell you and why did he tell you it's not an occupation let's say you jeans right let's look. say we throw out everything you know the consensus opinion the world that means that israel rules over millions of palestinians that have no ability to vote so have no political rights they cannot move freely well israeli jews who live in the exact same territory or so this is the state with full free movement with full political right ok full civil rights with full access to water should eugene wants its cake its if

bush 2004 april 2004 when he wrote a letter to then prime minister ariel sharon saying that realities on the ground in assessing state actually recognition of what we call here are the major blocs well as i said 1st questioned ronald reagan and of course the oslo accords were in the context of u.n. security council resolution 446 about settlements surely even the u.s. peace negotiator martin indyk has called the trump decision a gratuitous move at the very moment israel has a new government a you expecting violent retaliation from your enemies because of what they say is israeli colonial atrocities i don't think so i don't think so because at the end of the day i think they all realize that. nothing is done and nothing is settled until the reason a negotiated settlement and there's the same goes for a jerusalem you know that. trump present trump recognized sovereignty of israel over jerusalem although he was very very careful not to delineate any any demarcation and which leaves also with the question open. for the palestinians had i been a palestinian i would have taken this declarat

structures we've seen recently where the street demonstrations of there's an assistant keeping the old ariel sharon the isis them which is the whole reason why half the countries are on the street i should ensure that syria has done wanting to jonathan has or hasn't i feel yeah i get yeah i guess that we scored 0 on flexibility and agility that i did and powers who have been in and government or in parliament or heading the maples of since the major power structure of the country want the want to resign or don't want to give they give up very quickly it will take months and months especially that as i said before we can decide we can decide on our own so and even the protesters demands are not clear there is no consensus on a clear fiscal policy oriented policy or what's the alternative of the current government maybe chaos would be the other the other alternative as long as there is no clear leadership on the side of the protests or of the protesters then the other parties won't give up and it's clear that they won't be giving up especially that we have a great driver lead between the major politi

applying the framework of occupation they mean as an administrative matter because when and when ariel sharonho was exactly a friend of the palestinian when he said you may not like the word but what's happening is occupation holding 3500000 palestinians under occupation is a bad thing for israel what should we trust him or might prompt what's great is that israel is a democracy and totally relevant to what i know is not in the people express many different police the prime minister of israel but always does in his favor is followed roshan's across many different is unlike with the palestinians where there's only one view and i would say you can trust views that come out of this so that no not i just it very well you know molly come again and if you do with the aerial sharon but the problem is different perhaps it was not are you out of it but he was the prime minister of the dozen which which you just said if you trust israeli prime ministers brought prime minister netanyahu says there is no occupation and i'm not sure if you're holding back is really a product is not really sure we're getti

ruction in israeli politics and newspapers are reacting as you might expect what one of them the ariel sharon office is the newspaper that there who is alleged to have offered its own a help in trying to help of the activities of its rival it has a full page spread saying the state of israel against netanyahu and then quotations from the various indictments against him up against a picture of earth of an unhappy looking prime minister and an even less happy looking prime minister in maariv again it's the state against benjamin netanyahu and in big red letters here the word bribery so the fact that such an important and consequential charges being filed is highlighted there and in haaretz the. left leaning newspaper which has this very widely read english language edition as well we see pm charge bribery fraud and we preach of trust there is specter there is an analysis here of his valuing it says political expediency or love of country despite the bravery of battle still awaits talking about the fact that there is a huge fight ahead for netanyahu and the editor in chief of haaretz has made a