taught aristotle.dible] they said is private property a good thing or a bad thing. they also argued against the nuclear family but aristotle says i think private property serves a role. if you try to take their stuff away you would take away their meaning and ability to pass on wealth and ideas to the next generation. this divide between aristotle and plato is playing out today in our politics, and we have to understand that bernie sanders does not think private property is a right and we kind of skidded away from this as conservatives. we don't mention that in the original drafts of some of our founding documents. it was life, liberty and private property. you informed me of this at a young age by listening to your radio show. why is this important? if you don't believe that being able to own private property is a right, then a course we can take away 16 of the american economy and healthcare. if you don't believe that's right, then you don't own your own speech. mark: this is a great point. madison d

this divide between aristotle and plato is playing out today in our politics.e have to understand that bernie sanders does not believe private property is a right and reese get away from this as conservatives, we don't mention that in the original draft of some of our founding documents, life, liberty and private property and you informed me at a young age listening to your radio show. why is that important, if you don't believe that being able to own private property is a right, then of course we could take away 160 american economy and healthcare. if you don't believe it's the right, then you don't own your own speech. mark: this is awawa great point, madison and the entire essay holds more than physical material. private property is what is in yyour head and what you have to say. private property is crucial and the reason why the left rejects private property because it's one of the barriers against their agenda and their ideology. that's why they attack it constantly. they don't care about billionaires because they are attacking the so-called middle class,

aristotle: not at all.u guys have -- like, we were excited about that. you came in here with this opportunity to be a part of a team, and it never really felt like you wanted to be a part of the entire team. parker: before, this was just taylor and i sitting around, you know? it's different to work with more than just taylor. lemonis: sometimes people don't do well on teams. travis: i'd rather not fight with these guys every day. lemonis: i think the reality of it is that you guys have expectations that this group isn't going to be able to meet, not today, not tomorrow, not next year. brad: i just don't think these guys are gonna be happy ever with the way things are structured and working on other brands that aren't making money right away. lemonis: want them in the deal or not, brad? brad: i just don't think they can be in the deal. lemonis: juli, yes or no? juli: no. lemonis: travis? travis: i don't think it's possible. taylor: i'm sorry you feel that way. lemonis: i don't see how things move forward. i

you don't have to know about aristotle to serve. you don't need to know einstein's theories to serve. a soul generated by love. people will sometimes say to me, kind of anti-academic. it is saying, you know, you are a good person, but you are not educated. hi test scores do not define you as a human being. i have hi test scores, but i'm not better than people who have low test scores. every child deserves the best that we can give them. every child. [applause] by except being this theory that started with the texas miracle by accepting the theory that we could test every child every year and judge children and teachers and schools. we have become locked into a way of thinking that is very destructive in which tens to, not tens, but forces to rank and rate children from best to worst. the standardized test is construction that is deeply flawed. many children that have brilliant capacity that is unrecognized by standardized tests. what we want to do as teachers and parents is love every child two pieces and give them the best that we

i thought very well about aristotle and the social contract. i didn't find it to be self-parody.elf-parody, and seemingly unaware, he then used the term panglossian without a second thought. of course, willie, you and i long said panglossian is one of the english language's most underused words. it is naively optimistic. >> of course. >> he tossed out panglossian as if he was throwing out a conjuncti conjunction. i thought it was a self-parody in itself. >> john, our viewers, when they see you come on, they watch with a dictionary. they don't understand half of what you're saying. we love you anyway, buddy. >> well, just because people who went to alabama and vanderbilt don't have the vocabulary doesn't mean we have to dumb this down. raise the bar. >> david ignatius, thank you. >> again, again, whenever willie and i brought up panglossian at our classes at the university of alabama and vanderbilt, our professors would scoff and say, please, please stop being so pretension. suwannee is just up the road. i'll buy you a bus ticket. >>> still ahead, much more. light break here. the