aristotle was a pretty bright man most of western civilization is built on aristotle's writings and thinkingsd so on. what do you think he'd be saying about what's going on in the country today on our border and with this invasion taken place? works great to be on the show, market is a great quote. another quote of mine sam adams you don't need a majority in the entire list willing to set brushfires to freedom that something is always stuck with me. you have lived that i have tried to live that. right now we are trying to expose and i think we are successfully doing it to the american people what's happening at our border. we have been able to for the work of governor abbott, governor desantis in florida and others open highly at the prom by frankly sending some of the folks to d.c. or near exceeded e mayor of new york is calling this out when the governor of massachusetts is declaring an emergency, it got leaders in los angeles talking about this crisis. now people are trying to wake up to what we have been extrinsic in texas. this is what's really important your listeners your viewer the pe

, who is herodotus, but this is the father of history, aristotle, time is up 3.2, who is this, who? now build, this is a hut, build a tower, please, did you have this version with a table, again, ez sounded behind yours table, for some reason, they later chose socrates, maybe you like alina is building, yes, well, let's stop there, alina is already in a good mood, yes, be careful, yes, this is, this is a complex element, a complex mission. a very complex element, usually everything moves off it. alin, no matter what happens, you are better, well done, somehow you are very short, well, this is the level, vasily, i don’t know, this is what i want to tell you, a bid for victory, well, now that’s all about one of the punctuation marks , the french writer anaré balzac said that he... well, i mean , this sign is the key to all science, oh what sign are we talking about? question, punctuation mark, punctuation mark, don’t rush, you have a little more time to discuss your answer, the time for the first round is up, i managed to start with your team and i want to hear the answer, this is a q

aristotle, who are we? 3.2 who is this well who socrates socrates i went to build, well wait, let's count to three, take a pause, a noble pause, now build, this is ezob, build a tower, please, you had this version at the table, again, ezob sounded at your table, for some reason, later they chose socrates, maybe you like alina building, right? well, let's stop here, alina is already in a good mood, yes, be careful, yes, this, this is a difficult element, a difficult mission, a very difficult element, usually everything goes wrong with it, alin, no matter what happens, you are better, well done, by the way, very small, small in stature, well, this is the level, vasily, i don’t know, this is what i want to tell you, a bid for victory, well, now they are not... it will all be fine, about one of the punctuation marks, the french writer anareda balzac said, that he, well, in the sense that this sign is the key to any science about what are we talking about the sign? question, punctuation mark, punctuation mark, e

and the way aristotle talks about being a good person. you're not going to see complete correspondence, those differing traditions, but you're going to see things that overlap. if they overlap in essential ways. there's a possibility that they've hit upon something edmund burke talked about as wisdom of the ages, and that doesn't mean that students have to just passively take this information, say, oh, well, this is what aristotle says, so i'll live like that. but instead it gives students an opportunity to, an omni cultural core curriculum to examine what various civilization have had to say about the best ways to live lives so that students can grapple that question themselves. we've got a question way in the back over here, and then we'll go here. thank you very much, jason stevens, from ashland university. and i apologize in advance. my question someone has to do with hegel. the panel mentioned college studying with professor garman, the philosopher. my understanding is that he was also a hegelian and given coolidge's close relationsh

cordoba and he encounters, yes , an arab doctor, teacher, philosopher, he encounters precisely aristotle’sted out that borhis had no sense of humor, no, i think that he just showed in such a crooked way that he... really appreciates borhis's acting, and that thus, in general, overoes, whom borhis sees in the mirror in which he continues to believe, he at some point he will understand what comedy is, but in the monastery of uberta eco, the library burns , burns and manuscripts, monochorge himself burns, well , that’s a separate story, but if the world is a library, then our work there is probably manuscripts, when we don’t know whether this book will become, whether it will enter the world library, yes, these manuscripts are burning, natasha, i, i, as a convinced neoplatanian, believe that the manuscripts are burning, but, of course, shadows remain on the walls of the cave, then there is our work for eternity, and the manuscripts burn, no matter what you say volend ubulgakova, well, let's listen to the song of the mill manuscript. now is the time of fire, don’t let me in, i’m like a rusty a

father, who, aristotle, who is herodotus, but this is the father of history, aristotle, socrates, time yes, wait, let's count to three , let's take a pause, a noble pause, now build, this is isop, build a tower, please, you had this version at the table, again, it sounded at your table, for some reason, later they chose socrates, maybe you like how alina is building, yes, well let's stop at this, alina is already in a good mood, yes, be careful, yes, this is, this is a difficult element, a difficult mission, a very difficult element, usually everything goes off the rails, alin, no matter what happens, you are better, well done, what a great you are small, little thief. well, this is the level, i don’t know, this is what i want to tell you, a bid for victory, well, now they won’t answer, everything is fine, about one of the punctuation marks, the french writer annare balzac said that he, well, in the sense of this sign, is the key to all science, oh what sign are we talking about? question, punctuation mark, punctuation mark, don't rush, you have a little more time to... because in scie

their aid as soon as possible, save them from the siege, and show the radio show of the lady of aristotle. every day at 12:45 p.m. , the show is broadcasted on the radio . shah is qajar. marjan sadeghzadeh, radio journalist. the tolubion system has launched a page with the special name of palestine. this page presents ten different news and programs that various national media networks broadcast these days on the subject of developments in the occupied territories. special for palestine, a section placed on television to show the abstract of the content produced in the national media on the subject of occupied palestine after the heroic operation of the al-aqsa storm. in this section , an explanatory analytical program will be seen every hour at quds time, with the performance of a palestinian host , the cruelty and lies of this regime. after the al-aqsa storm, we saw gatherings in we were in european countries, the world today, the khabar network is also one of the other special sections of palestine tv, since the time when al-aqsaar storm started, every night the world today has found a

aristotle's book on comedy, which is why you think that this is a character written by borhis, a cleariful italian hat and says hello to borhis, because that here, of course, behind borhis stands his character overoes, who in medieval cordoba writes a treatise and he encounters, yes , an arab doctor-teacher... philosopher, he encounters precisely aristotle concepts of tragedy and comedy and he doesn’t understand them, poor fellow, uh-huh, that is, in general, everything was mumbled that borgis has no sense of humor, no, i think that he just, in such a crooked way, just showed that he really appreciates borhis's acting, and that in this way, in general , overoes, whom borhis sees in the mirror in which he continues to believe, he will at some point understand what comedy is, but in the monastery of uberta eco, the library burns down and the manuscript burns down, the mana of khorhi itself burns, well, that’s a different story, if the world is a library, then ours creativity there is probably manuscripts, when we don’t know whether this will become a book, whether it will enter the world

dignity on the internet , so they write, you explained everything interestingly with reference to aristotleinflicting insult expresses disdain, because insult means doing and saying things that make the person to whom they are addressed ashamed, and, moreover, doing it with the aim of getting pleasure from it. the feeling of pleasure in people who inflict insults appears because they insult others in their imagination, this makes them rise even more above them, therefore , often young people or rich people easily inflict insults, it seems to them that by inflicting insults, they achieve greater superiority. insult is associated with belittling someone else's honor; whoever belittles someone else's honor disdains, as aristotle says. or they do not enjoy any respect for something that is worth nothing, either in a good or in a bad sense. the one who insults , it turns out, demonstrates excessive faith in his own strength, while at the same time, by bringing the insulted person down, he bullies the one who can be insulted, because he is not able to defend himself and take revenge for himself.

politics, the way, he had access to aristotle's metaphysics and ethics. maybe he would have written more significantly on political thought, but he didn't. and so i thought that this was this was a gap that i could at least humbly begin to fill with this book to study great jewish lives and to attempt to deduce from their lives what is jewish statesmanship itself. so this is a non humble question. yeah. and then we're to i mean, i'm a very handsome person, so it's going to be hard for me to answer it. yeah having gone through the journey of, writing this book and contemplating this for a while, what you makes for great political leaders. yeah, so here is a the there i note several themes, several different aspects of great jewish political leadership, but the first one also can be seen actually lincoln because one of the things that came up in the course we taught together was a virtue that lincoln exemplifies that very great statesmen throughout the history of the west ever reflected. and that is humility. now, what do we mean by humility we don't mean a

plato and aristotle. both of those thinkers alike favor the collective over the individual. the public over the private. aristotle in particular defines political activity as an intrinsically natural part of human flourishing. lewis, on the other hand, saw political activity as only a means, and often, a distasteful one, at that, to genuine aspects of human flourishing. not an intrinsic part of flourishing itself. yet, even as only a means, collective activities are necessary. lewis recognized the appeal of technocratic solutions to address our collective social problems. the temptation to invest government with more power, he noted, always works on a real need that has been neglected. lewis feared that legitimate human problems that require social coordination and collective activity will give rise to solutions that are far worse than the original crisis. something we may have witnessed in the last few years. in his book, that hideous strength, the conclusion to his science fiction trilogy, there is a conspiratorial organization, and this demonstrates his fear. lewis writes

negative consequences from use alcohol was noticed by the ancient greek scientist aristotle, who calledntary madness. that is why historians say that the egyptians and romans placed a human skull on the table during a feast, as a reminder of what alcohol can do to a person. in the middle ages in europe there was a real cult of alcohol, knights drank it in large quantities in battles, and this was a sign of strength and courage, but soon europe faced a problem, people drank too much, and by the end of the 17th century they began attempts are being made to limit drunkenness, and at the legislative level. for example, in 1736, a law was passed in england according to which a tax must be paid for the purchase of strong alcoholic beverages. a little more than a century later, the first separate hospitals for treating alcoholics were opened there. in france , such patients were admitted to psychiatric centers. in russia, alcohol has long been classified as alcohol. negatively, in the 21st century, ordinary people could only drink beer four times a year on church holidays, but they were allowe

cult the heralds of the apocalypse worshiped, here and the praise of the spirits of nature and aristotle’salthough the couple ran away away from people and cars, modern technologies, as they say, they did not shy away, they installed electricity in the dugout and even somehow the internet, but the officers of the department and the traffic police decided that this was still not enough, so they invited the family to the department, then- then the cohabitants grabbed a knife and a pitchfork, attacked the uninvited guests, and then , armed, went to the swamp, where investigators found them. currently, both suspects have been detained procedurally and have been charged with committing a crime under article 317 of the criminal code of the russian federation, at the request of the investigator , a preventive measure was chosen in the form of detention. the minor child is suspected to be legally handed over to a social institution. the police officer continues to be treated in the hospital; doctors managed to stabilize her condition, despite the fact that the knife struck her in the neck and face

monstrous blind villain, the librarian, the monk jorge, who denies existence and the right to exist, aristotle’sening, you think that this is a written character, a clear hint, yes rorja's library, then we understand that in this way umberto eco takes off his beautiful italian hat and says hello to borchis, because here, of course, behind borchis is his character overoes, who in medieval cordoba writes a treatise and he encounters an arab doctor , teacher, philosopher, he is faced with the aristotelian concepts of tragedy and comedy and he does not understand them, poor fellow, uh-huh, that is, in general, all the searches hinted that... he has no sense of humor, no, i think that he's just in such a crooked way, he just showed that he really appreciates borhis' acting, and that thus, in general, overoes, whom borhis sees in the mirror in which he continues to believe, he will at some point understand what comedy is, but in the monastery from bert eco, the library burns down, burns down and the manuscript, the monk orhi himself burns down, well, that’s a separate story, if the world is a library,

it says there are five elements again goes to aristotle. there's exposition, rising action, climax falling action. and while so the story with an exposition of where are we, who are the protagonists who are the that we can care about what the place we can relate to the or the poor orphan with a funny scar living under the stairs or the peaceful countryside with a lovable, lovable hammett's story, lurie's in with a problem, a conflict, a mystery it makes you want to know what happens next. what happens when the visit wizard visits the orphan, when the wizard visits the habits and drags them away from home, then the story has a central point when the main character has make a crucial decision, when uncovers the key piece of information and everything that you thought you knew changed, and that decision that information. the main moment has consequences. it matters. you know how it matters within the realm of the story, because we've given the set up about the first place in the first place back when the book began. so we know about the evil w

we see here a break from some of lewis's favorite teachers, plato and aristotle.lewis was a platonist. lewis was an aristotelian, but both those thinkers alike favor the collective over the individual. the public over the private, and aristotle in particular defines a political activity as an intrinsically natural part of human flourishing. lewis, on the other hand, saw political activity as only a means and often a distasteful one at that. to genuine aspects of human flourishing. not an intrinsic part of flourishing itself. yet even as only a means collective activities are necessary. and lewis recognized the appeal of technocratic government solutions to address our collective social problems. the temptation to invest government with more power, he noted, always works on a real need. that has been neglected. lewis feared that legitimate human problems that require social coordination and collective activity will give rise to solutions that are far worse than the original crisis, something we may have witnessed in the last few years. in his book that hideous stre

appears before him, the librarian, the monk jorge, who denies the existence and rights to exist of aristotle’snd a library, but if we dig further, we understand that in this way umberta eco takes off her beautiful italian hat and says hello to borhis, because here of course, behind borhis is his character overoes, who writes a treatise in medieval cordoba and he encounters, well , an arab doctor, teacher, philosopher, he encounters just... the concepts of tragedy and comedy and he does not understand them, poor fellow, that is, in general i was looking for everything borhis has no sense of humor, no, i think that he just, in such a crooked way, just showed that he really appreciates borhis's play, and that thus, in general, overoes, whom borhis sees in the mirror in which he continues to believe, at some point he will understand what comedy is, but in the monastery of uberta eco, the library burns, burns and the manuscript, the monk orge himself burns. well, this is a separate story, if the world is a library, then our work there is probably manuscripts for we don’t know whether this will beco

in greek, socrates and aristotle in thought. we are the constitution of the united states.puses in america have been undercutting this tribe for quite some time. rachel: yeah. will: they've been undercutting the idea of what it means to be american and sowing discold and and tearing us apart at our seams for quite some time, and i would have liked to see such strength when the attacks were against the foundation of america. rachel: yeah. i think that's a really fair point. pete: i think that's a a great point. for so long, those threats were almost covert inside our universities meaning you had to really pay attention ott curriculum and to the direction, the anti-american direction of what was being taught. think what's different here is it's become blatantly overt in that you've got, you know, the flags being waved, we support hamas from the river to the sea, and it's become a demonstration of the cesspool because, you're right, they were lost a long time ago, and we let it happen. will: this did not happen overnight. rachel: no, this has been a slow boil. but there's also

therefore, i will turn to aristotle, it is enough to win the war, it is much more important to organizewer. together we will visit a belarusian village. i returned from the village to my grandmother, just look, here is the ideal option for a complete reboot, no gadgets of civilization. we will visit the largest boulder in the volozhensky district. if you believe folk superstitions, in order for your wish to come true, you need to leave a coin on top of the stone. let's learn all the intricacies of wood carving. in fact, it’s just like some kind of meditation, because when it goes well, it’s very pleasant. see in the program: the route is built on tv channel belarus 24.

and i think ultimately like aristotle said a democratic society needs to rest on the middle class. so i've always been comfortable with the idea of some element of popular -- populism in the republican party. and i think what's happened is we've had leaders who essentially have used that to gain power on both the left and the right, used that anger on the left and the right and inflamed it and we've been getting more and more polarized. but i think i would put the blame squarely on the left to getting the ball rolling here. talk about the debate, you know, the threat of free speech didn't come from the right, maybe from the left and was manifesting universities and all the usual ways of taking things off the table, things are off the table. and you know, if you're a catholic school teacher and the catholic school is teaching traditional doctrine about marriage, it's hate speech. all the terminology to stop debate and intimidate people, people couldn't get jobs and people said they're two genders, all of a sudden they're fired and that's a threat to the first amendment. and that kin

the united states of america, the matter of elections of democracy, let us also remember plato and aristotley some moves , as it were, that close the possibility of seeing strategy from us, so yes, no doubt, now a lot of incriminating evidence will be found on each other, persons, everything else seems to be yes, but it blinds us to the vision of strategy, but it is irrelevant, i repeat once again, that society. and from corruption and from for some reason incomprehensible injections, incomprehensible because it requires an explanation, where did our money go and so on, you can play on this , opponents are playing, this is quite real, quite understandable, objectively, in general, expected, but the matter the fact is that you asked me last time whether zelensky is a change of tactics, and that is, fatigue from zelensky is a change of tactics, but it makes no difference, you need to look at the essence, the essence is that it is not the top and not the bottom level, but one of the fairly acceptable levels of explanation. what is happening next is that, strictly speaking, the development of ca

the matter of elections, democracy, let us also remember plato and aristotle, this is always a lie, these that close the possibility of seeing strategy from us, so yes, there will be a lot of compromising evidence now, a friend has been found on a friend, a person, everything else, it seems, yes, but it closes us off... strategies, yes, pointless, i repeat once again that society is tired of corruption and for some reason incomprehensible injections, incomprehensible, because they require an explanation of where our money went, and so on, and you can play on this, opponents are playing, this is quite real, quite understandable, objectively, in general, expected, but the fact is that you asked me last time, but isn’t zelensky a change of tactics, but that is, fatigue from zelensky ’s change of tactics, yes, no point, you need to look at the essence, the essence is that not the top and not... level, but one of the fairly acceptable levels of explanation of the analytical events that are happening is the following, what strictly speaking, the development of capitalism in the western world al

the united states of america, is a matter of elections, democracy, let us also remember plato and aristotlerary, some moves, as if yes, which are closed from us the possibility of seeing a strategy, so yes, there is no point, now a lot of compromising evidence will be found on each other, faces, everything else, as it were, yes, but it closes the strategy from us, yes, there is no point, i repeat once again that society is tired of corruption and from incomprehensible injections, incomprehensible because they require an explanation of where our money went, and so on, and you can play on this, opponents are playing, it’s quite real, quite understandable, objectively, in general, expected, but the point is, what you asked me last time, but is not whether zelensky is changing tactics, but i’m tired of zelensky’s changing tactics, but it’s irrelevant , you need to look at the essence, the essence is that it’s not the upper and not the lower... level, but one of the fairly acceptable levels of explanation of the analytical events that are happening is the following, which, strictly speaking, the

she gives up pretensions to aristotle. crissy comes up to richmond to help out in the famed chimborazo hospital, one of the largest hospitals in, the entire confederacy. she even says at the start, young men advocated for a festive state of affairs, arguing that the fatigues and dangers of a campaign in the field. after this, some relaxation was necessary. so there are these feelings that we all need it, that political leaders, social leaders, the men who are in the field. we all need these. but how did evolve over the course of the war. well, on christmas night, christmas eve, 1864, the the women of richmond, led by varina davis, take part in an elaborate starvation ball. this occurs at one of the homes of one of the elite members of society. it's part of this event called the last confederate christmas. and it's reallyhis confederate christmas events probably one of the most telling episodes. women are using rituals, very conspicuous and intentional rituals to try and affirm their power, to show benevolence, to try and g

were just an extraordinary gift of intellectuals, if they had a question about locke or montas or aristotle, they would look to madison. hamilton. you just know they read this stuff in latin and greek. they knew what. but madison, the chief executive, not so much madison was our smallest president. five foot four, weighed about a buck so what they called him the great little madison. yeah, yeah. one joke about madison was given extraordinary intellect and diminutive stature was so much mind, so little. what they said about madison. a great intellect, but not a strong chief executive. he was around by the claes calhoun's, the southern frontier war hawks. so real. and i think i have the great honor of being one of that small group historians that they ask every two or three years to rank the presidents. we take that very seriously. i'm i'm in, you know, hallowed company, frankly. but always argued that madison is one of the most overrated presidents. i just don't think he deserves. i think quite honestly his sort of a little bit above rating is sort of a thank you for being such a great frame

if you go back and read plato and aristotle, they say that good government depends on picking good people to be in high office and that will always be the case. you've got a gary hart on one of these oversight committees, it's going to work. you've got some of the other people who have been on these committees and the committee has failed completely. so it's been up and down and the bottom line is we have to work hard to elect good people to high office. >> so you're turning this to the political consultant. get you elected right here. >> not anymore. i'm an old gray guy, old grey horse. um you know, if uh if democracy is gonna and thrive in the 21st century, uh we have to consider that one question that someone started with, which is if you um adopt the techniques of your opponents, the last line the church put after talking about that was you will become more like them and we have over over the world now. an attack on democracy and you know, we have to have, again, people look up to us as, as the purveyors of, of, of a real democratic order and that's gonna take a lot of work and liking

choose between murder mysteries from agatha christie and things that would improve his mind like aristotlesome days he would say let's just have a little murder he liked entertainment as much as anyone. the constantly stretching himself, he thought it was his duty. ever since he began as a law student where he was most distinguished for his incredible work ethic and ability to focus and read, he kept at it throughout his life and look at that inspiring results. peter: charles and brooklyn texan, anyone who follows the court today knows about judicial philosophies originalist, textualist, etc.. did anyone think in terms of judicial philosophy and holmes era and if so how would he be characterized? jeff: great question. they certainly did not think about it in a systematic way as we do now and judges were not appointed based on their judicial philosophies in the same way. our modern phrase for him would be about a pragmatist, a relativist and justice breyer as i said would be his heir. there were strict constructionists back then who he was strongly opposed to. like james mcreynolds who thou

if you go back and read plato and aristotle all, they say that good government depends on picking goodpeople to. be in high office and that'll always be case. you've got to gary hart on of these oversight committees is going to work. you've got some of the other people have been on these committees and the committees failed completely. so it's been up and down. and the bottom line is we have to work hard, to elect good people, to high office so you're turning this to the console that you elected earlier and not anymore. i'm an old gray guy. old gray horse. you know, if if democracy is going to survive and thrive, the 21st century, we to consider that one question and someone's with which is you adopt the tactics of your opponents the last the church put after talking about that was you will become more like them and we have over over the world an attack on democracy and you know, we have to have, again people look up to us as as the purveyors of of of a real democratic order and that's going to take a lot of work and, like some good people to, nice on helping to create open secrets. ah