see a model here in arizona -- in arizona -- in arizona. i'm not familiar, precisely, with what i said, but i stand by what i said, whatever it was. >>> today, the crazy anti-constitutional thinking of arizona governor jan brewer got smacked down by the united states supreme court. two republican-appointed justices, including the chief justice, joined clinton and obama appointees on the supreme court to throw out three out of four provisions of an arizona law, and left the fourth provision hanging by a legal thread that they will surely cut as soon as a case on the enforcement of that provision makes its way back up to the supreme court. much of what you're about to hear may be in contradiction with much of what you may have heard about this case today. there have been many headlines and comments today saying that the supreme court upheld the most controversial element of the law. it did not. there have been many headlines and comments indicating that this supreme court upheld the papers, please provision of the law. it did not. the court s

arizona youth was very angered in 2010 by sb-1070, and the arizona youth is starting to flex its political muscle. we've seen them flex their political muscle in the streets, and what we see different organizations do is harness that power and moving towards registration drives and turnout. i think that we're going to see some interesting shifts in arizona in 2012, and also a longer term move for arizona and states that we previously wouldn't have thought were in play for democrats. >> real quickly, victoria, i want to read part of the statement by governor jan brewer we got moments ago as we started the show. she said in respect to sb-1070 and the what the supreme court has said that today's decision is a victory for the rule of law and the 10th amendment and all americans who believe in the right and responsibility of states to defend their citizens. it goes on to say that while grateful for this legal victory, today is an opportunity to reflect on our journey and focus on the true task ahead, the implementation and enforcement of this law in an even-hand manner that lives up to the high

what they said to arizona is drop dead, arizona. drop dead and go away. we are going to ignore you. >> is arizona the only state that you know of that has had the 287g agreement stopped today? >> yes. it is. we verified that and checked and arizona is the only state that it was rescinded on. >> well, the president must be a little bit concerned about your state because not long after your press conference and not long after the 287g was cut off, the department of justice set up a telephone hotline and intake email for the public to report potential civil rights concerns, related to the sb1070 provision requiring immigration status in certain law enforcement encounters. so apparently the department of justice is worried you are going to do something? >> well, it's like they're baiting people to participate in this. i have all the confidence in the world in our law enforcement. and they will be held accountable. there will be no racial discrimination. no one's civil rights will be abused. and for the federal government and the department of justice to go ou

arizona did not ask for this fight. nor did it seek the task of having to confront illegal immigration. we cannot forget that we are here today because the federal government has failed the american people regarding immigration policy. has failed to protect its citizens, has failed to preserve the rule of law, and has failed to secure our borders. the failure to secure or border has and arizona without question bears the brunt of that failure. we also cannot forget that president obama and his party have both houses in congress for two years and could have secured our borders and fulfilled the promise to fix our broken immigration system. they failed. and in response, arizona had no other choice but to act and arizona did so by following, not changing, federal law. instead of devoting resources to suing states like arizona, the federal government should have spent time, money and energy on fixing the problem. so today is a day when the key components of our efforts to protect the citizens of arizona, to take up the figh

mitt romney is in arizona this hour.oday's decision underscores the need for a president who will lead on this critical issue and work on a bipartisan to pursue a national strategy. president obama said he is pleased but concerned about the part of the law that was upheld that jeff toobin and i were talking about. he said what this decision makes unmistakably clear is congress must act on immigration reform. a patch work of state laws is not a solution to our broken immigration system. it's part of the problem. john king joins me. john, a little bit it seems like for both side sides, what is th impact? >> i think it's a to be determined. isn't it delicious that governor romney happens to be in arizona today. it will be interesting to see if he speaks publicly. that's a state that the obama campaign was watching closely. we lean at romney right now is to grow to the latino population. how will this impact latino mobilization. they are glad three of the divisions are struck down but they are furious that 2b was left in. ar

, sientes miedo en arizona, la gente con la que hablaste, sientes que tienes temor?brewer, y si bien dijo que rechazÓ ambas secciones habÍa dejado vivo el corazÓn de la ley. y hay que ver como ese corazÓn empieza a palpitar y como afecta. >>> gracias por ser nuestros ojos. gracias por estar con nosotros. y tendremos un programa especial donde analizaremos las repercusiones. >>> gracias por estar con nosotros y gracias por confiar en univisiÓn. ♪ >>> ahora estÁ bien informado, noticiero univisiÓn su voz, su decisiÓn. ♪

he used e-verify as means of employment verification. >> you see a model here in arizona. >> arizona's requirement that the records be kept for three years was struck down. the top democrat on capitol hill used romney's own words against him. "the idea that such an unconstitutional law" should serve as a model for national reform is far outside the american main stream. romney never called arizona's law a federal model. he called it a model for other states when the federal government does not act. chairman of the house judiciary committee put it this way. "today's ruling essentially put answer end to immigration enforcement since the states no longer can step in and fill the void created by the obama administration." starting with the president's decision to stop supporting some imlegal immigrants two weeks ago, democrats try to use immigration as web issue against romney. latest gallup poll, hispanic voters say healthcare is the top issue. unemployment is second at 19%. economic growth is third. gap between rich and poor fourth. migration is fifth. 12%. president has a lead among his

in response, and arizona have no other choice but to act and arizona did so by following, not changing, federal law. arizona, federal government should have spent time, money, and on fixing the problem. when the key of our efforts to protect the citizens of arizona, the fight against illegal immigration in a balanced and constitutional way unanimously been vindicated by the highest court in the land. the hearts of senate bill 1070 has proven to be constitutional. arizona and every other state can protect and defend its been upheld. i pray for strength and i pray state before i signed 1070. i did so because i firmly believe it represented what was best for arizona. border-related violence and crime and a significant financial cost due to illegal immigration are critically important issues to the people state and to me. both as governor and a citizen. as i have said, this is the day for mistake, arizona is ready. we know the eyes of the world will be upon us. we know the critics will be waiting, hoping for another opportunity to continue their legal assaults against our state. i have fai

the arizona decision, what's your take?think the ball's now thrown back to congress because the supreme court, essentially the majority opinion, the kennedy opinion embraces the obama administration's claim that they have unlimited discretion to ignore immigration law and states have no authority in this area. and the majority opinion -- saying that congress can delegate to the state's specific authority. there's all sorts of provigszs, and instead the kennedy opinion cites the morton memo, the so-called morton mem owe, we have the right to anything we want and nobody can stop us. if you're a taxpayer looking for guidance, the only place left now and this is what romney needs to go back to, real reform will happen in congress as to how the federal-state enforcement strategy needs to work. the supreme court had a great opportunity to really provide some guidance to give us a real structure that would work. what they did, though, was essentially say, just like the case in 1982, taxpayers are going to pay billions and billions

arizona is ready. we know that eyes of the world will be upon us. >> that 8-0 vote was because elena kagan recused herself on the case. mitt romney was in arizona for a fundraiser yesterday, issued a brief statement about the court's ruling. he said nothing about whether or not he agreed. writing only that president obama had failed to provide leadership. a traveling spokesman nick gosha was reportedly asked for more clarity on the position. >> . >> this debate is spun from the president failing to address this issue. so each state is left and has the power to draft and to enact immigration laws. >> we've governor again each state has the right within the constitution to craft their own immigration laws. >> later on last night romney told a room of about 200 supporters, i would have preferred to see the supreme court give more latitude to the states, not less. and there are states now under this decision have less authority, less latitude to enforce immigration laws. you remember in february during the

arizona has a very serious problem, this decision does not help arizona.s clear that a majority of the court said three of those provisions are unconstitutional, that's the law of the land now. the one involving the stop, ask and determine status is constitutional, but you've got a president through executive order that is basically making that null and void. the states are in an awful hard place. to make this -- this isn't about ro mitt romney, this is about the supreme court's decision and what arizona was trying to do. at the end of the day, the rule of law is the rule of law. the supreme court made a decision. >> a quarter of the time, a conservative court has declared unconstitutional at least 80% of what was in the arizona law, one. two, in terms of the federal responsibility everybody agrees the federal government should take action we should get comprehensive immigration reform, but to the point that is made about president obama's recent decision not to deport, to use the discretion not to deport people who were brought here at a very young age wh

i don't approve of the arizona law.. >> second, his campaign believes turning out the latino vote could make the difference in november. colorado, nevada, virginia and florida, where there's a growing number of potential latino voters. many of the would-be latino supporters are angry he has not prioritized immigration reform until now. the president just announced a new policy that certain kids brought here illegally by their parents are now safe from deportation for two years. >> it is the right thing to do. >> and with the arizona ruling, the president can anyway tell latino audiences he fought for them in the nation's highest court. >> we said, yes, we can. now today the president also expressed concern that one part of the law that the supreme court left standing could lead to civil rights violations. he also emphasized that he is committed to tight border security, careful balancing acts for a very tricky political issue. >> we were talking about this earlier today. when you look at justice scalia, you can see how

the arizona's lawyers says if the government says we do not want them, arizona will let them go. i think in thinking about what the impact of the provision will be in the real world, obviously time will tell. but you can say whatever things are happening. according to the supreme court opinion, nobody is going to be detained longer than they would be otherwise solely because of an immigration check. on the other hand, arizona does get to make a statement it does not considered illegal immigrants welcome in their state. the basically turn every police officer in to kind of an ambassador of on welcome -- by making them check the immigration status and indicating that they are watching and looking and they're very concerned about this. so, to the extent arizona wants to send a message to illegal immigrants that thedo not belong there, they get to send that message through the statewide policy, but they don't get to actually punish such people beyond what the federal government wants them to. host: boringfilecleark tweets -- and here are comments from facebook coming in -- louisiana.

but if in fact somebody who does not belong in this country is in arizona, arizona has no power? what does sovereignty mean if it does not include the ability to defend your borders? >> your honor, the framers vested in the national government the authority over immigration because they understood that the way this nation treats citizens of other countries is a vital aspect of our foreign relations, the national government, and not individual states -- >> it's still up to the national government. arizona is not trying to kick out anybody that the federal government has already said do not belong here. no state shall without the consent of congress lay impost or duties on imports and exports, except, it says, what may be absolutely necessary for executing its inspection laws. the constitution recognizes that there is such a thing as state borders, and the states can police their borders, even to the point of inspecting incoming shipments to exclude diseased material. >> but they cannot do what arizona is seeking to do here, your honor, which is to elevate one consideration above a

stay out, arizona. we don't want your help. >> jay, so arizona -- >> go ahead. >> arizona has a 1-800 number to report police officers doing their lawful job. at the same time that's what the federal government has done here. at the same time under eric holder as attorney general the united states department of justice was running guns into mexico and said they -- what do they do? they sue arizona on the immigration case, that's where they are spending the resources and now they are saying sorry, arizona, if you find somebody illegally here, too bad. we around going to follow-up at all. >> am i talking to too brilliant lawyers, both of you here, and you are basically saying the president of the united states is saying a jackhammer to the concept of checks and balances in the separation of powers in an oath he was sworn to uphold or is that a stretch? >> i don't think it's a stretch. i don't think separation of powers means very much for this particular president. i think he wants to get the case across

arizona really doesn't have the right to decide that.nk that that's something that the courts will look at when this case pres as well. >> does this put a lot of people in a dangerous situation? >> i think a lot of the impact of the law is largely symbolic in the sense that it does suggest to people who are brown skinned, people of color that there's going fob a special eye on them. i would emphasize the point that the court did not say the law is necessarily going to be applied in a constitutional way. it said, let's wait and see. there's a lot of pressure from the federal government and sift rights groups to keep the pressure on and to make sure that this law is enforced in an even-handed way. >> how long do you think -- i'm going to bring our panel back in. do you think we'll see things happen that can be used as political fodder by either side? >> i think very possibly so in these red states if anti-immigration forces are able to get show me your papers laws passed through the state legislatures and if that gets a lot of press attent

still, arizona governor jan brewer called the court's ruling a victory. >> well, today the state of arizonaand senate bill 1070 was vindicated and the heart of the bill was upheld. >> reporter: polls have shown a majority of people from arizona support the law. state senator steve pierce voted for it. he says fear of arrests has forced thousands of illegal immigrants to leave the state. >> it made lots of room in the schools. the crime is down. the lines in the emergencies at the hospital are down. and it's... it changed things drastically. >> reporter: now, late this afternoon arizona governor jan brewer sent out a scathing statement from the state capital here in phoenix. she took issue with the federal government saying that they don't plan to arrest most non-criminal illegal immigrants. she called that, scott, a new low even for this administration. >> pelley: ben, thank you, the president says he's pleased that the justices threw out most of the arizona law but he's concerned about the part they kept, that police ask suspected illegal immigrants for their papers. in a statement, presid

the other decision is in the arizona v.ates case on the arizona law requiring that police check immigration status of anyone who they arrest. justice kennedy announcing that decision. just is kagan -- justice kagan -- the court found it was improper for a lower court's to enjoin section 2b. a major part of the arizona law invalidated by the court. this is the ninth circuit decision that was affirmed in part and the second and only decision from the supreme court today. there will be other decision days this week. we will be there until we know the outcome of the health-care decision. we'll take your reactions once the results are known. >> we will end our live coverage from the supreme court on this monday morning. we will be back later this week, wednesday or thursday to keep watch on the supreme court. right now we're going to bring you coverage of the oral argument in the major case decided today, arizona v. united states. the court upheld a portion of it and invalidated other portions. more details will become known lat

andy lopez and arizona, looking to take out the south carolina gamecocks. south carolina, in prime position, with a runner on third. but joey pankake said see you later. moving to the ninth now. top nine. same score. two on for brandon dixon. mr. dixon, doubled down the line. that would russell retzsnyder to the house. trent gilbert, barreling out that fastball. that would plate a pair. arizona would take a 4-1 advantage. home half of the ninth. bases stuffed for the gamecocks. tanner english, hanging out at fave corners. he hits a seed. but gilbert, his glove was golden. two outs. grayson griner, the only grand slam of the season. but that right there, nothing doing. arizona wins this one 4-1. they're your college world series champions for 2012. andy loenz becomes just the second coach to win college world series titles with two different schools. arizona, capturing their fourth college world series title and theirs first since 1986. >>> if you like the college game you'll love the pros. wednesday night baseball. detroit make the trip to arlington. they'l

they on the show will take a closer look at some of the rulings issued by the supreme court today arizona's immigration law as b ten seventy was decided upon and betting on what you read or where you watch it was either up held or gutted we'll break it all down plus the bradley manning case continues and his defense is making it clear the government is doing everything in its power to prevent the accused wiki leak or of receiving a fair trial i'll have all that and more for you tonight including a dose of happy hour but first let's take a look at what the mainstream media decided to miss. so it's monday funday here in washington and just like last week the outside of the supreme court looked more like a circus as the fourth estate waited with bated breath for the ruling on the affordable care act known to many as obamacare the excruciating waiting game may almost be over any minute we could get a major decision from the supreme court on health care or immigration to nine justices to landmark decision starting in an hour the supreme court could release its ruling on the sweeping health care

and, make no mistake, arizona is ready. civil rights will be protected. racial profiling will not be tolerated. >> reporter: but opponents of the so-called show me your papers provision will fight on. >> i believe it's the most venomous part based on race, based on nationality and based on racial profiling. >> reporter: and the high court made clear, if arizona cops do profile or bend the rules to make arrests, the law could be back in court. struck down were parts of the law banning living and working in arizona without papers and police arresting those suspects without warrant. president obama celebrated that. but played up instead what he did on immigration. >> it's time to stop denying citizenship to responsible young people just because they're the children of undocumented workers. >> reporter: mitt romney was cautious, saying in a statement, the nation needs comprehensive immigration reform. i'm steve handelsman, nbc news, at the supreme court. >>> well last night on the "ed show" speaking about the court's ruling, arizona congressman raul grielva t

and he's actually holding a fundraiser at this hour in arizona. say the timing is a coincidence. campaign carl cameron is live in scottsdale. do we have any way to know? i think we have history with a bunch of different positions in the past, but what is his position today as of this hour there in the valley of the sun on immigration? >> well, his aides have said it over and over and over again, and it's 100 degrees, actually hit triple digits in arizona today, not a rare thing for them. what romney has said in his statement when his aides have said repeatedly today is as follows and i quote, i believe that each state has the duty and the right to secure our borders and preserve the rule of law, particularly when the federal government has failed to meet its responsibilities. over and over and over again, romney's aides have repeated the statement that he put out in writing today. and here he is in arizona with an opportunity to talk about the immigration statute and the constitutional case, now decided in the u.s. supreme court, and romney has ch

arizona decision. by 5-3 the justices upheld the most controversial part of the law, requiring police to check the immigration status of anyone they stop and suspect is not in the u.s. legally. the court rejecting the claim that's only the federal government's job. swing justice, anthony kennedy sided with court conservatives, writing for the majority. the mandatory nature of the arizona status checks does not interfere with the federal immigration scheme. consultation between federal and state officials is an important feature of the immigration system. that's what arizona's republican governor, jan brewer, had argued. >> this is the day we have been waiting for. and, make no mistake, arizona is ready. civil rights will be protected. racial profiling will not be tolerated. >> reporter: but opponents of the so-called show me your papers provision will fight on. >> i believe it's the most venomous part based on race, based on nationality and based on racial profiling. >> reporter: and the high court mad

diane. >> david wright in arizona. as you know, david, all day long, we've been following the furious debate on the internet, especially from the latino community. one perspective tonight from univision, our new partners and friends and the number one hispanic network in america. i talked to the co-anchor of univision's evening news, jorge ramos. jorge, what does this mean for our shared audience tonight? >> i think it's very disappointing and very dangerous. it's a very sad day for the hispanic community. and the supreme court allows a state like arizona to use racial profiling as a rule. we know that we really need immigration reform right now. the hispanic community did not like the "show me your papers" provision and this will only create more persecution and discrimination in arizona and many other states. it's difficult to believe that the immigration law in arizona could be an example for other states in the country. and it's even more difficult to believe that sheriff joe arpaio could become a role model for ot

ifill: not only for arizona. how do you walk the line that the court laid out today which is a law that can... that complements federal law but doesn't supersede it as the court said so much of the arizona statute did. >> well we now have some clear guidance from the court. we know that the arrest provisions of section 2-b the main provision we've been talking about here, those are perfectly fine. we've got a number of other states that have already implemented them and are in circuit courts right now. there are a bunch of states waiting in the wings to do the same thing. those can move ahead. if a state wanted to do the criminalization of seeking employment, the supreme court has said no. one other thing that is really important about this opinion, the court clarified what i have been arguing all along and i think most people who follow this specific area of preemption law know. that is there have always been windows of opportunity where states can act as long as those actions are consistent with federal law. th

arizona gov. jan brewer claim to victory even if partial for her state >> brave men and women in

mitt romney will be in arizona later today, just one time for a possible supreme court ruling on arizona's law. and president obama will be in massachusetts where romney care similar to obamacare is up and running. cnn's political director mark preston is in washington. do you think the candidates planned that or is it just karma? >> reporter: how dare you take policy and politics and try to weave it together. >> it's weird though, isn't it? >> reporter: you know, it is weird. for mr. romney it's not that good when you're just talking about immigration. he's now trying to walk a fine line on the whole issue of immigration. we saw him do that last week certainly when he spoke to the conference. he was very hard lined on illegal immigration in the republican primary and in many ways that helped him. heading into the again rag election he needs to back off that a little bit. president obama will be in new hampshire early this afternoon for a campaign event but he'll be in boston later this evening for a series of fundraisers and that's where governor romney helped craft his own health care le

i think arizona will be also cautious.e i'm sure have been told to be very careful of how they apply this law, as they should be. jamie: and even though only one of the four provisions of this law stood governor jan brewer issued a statement saying that it was a legal victory for the state. why is this provision so helpful in the state's implementation of immigration law? >> i think this was the most important provision of it, where they get to actually ask them whether they are here legally, or not, and the supreme court ruled that they then can let the federal authorities know that they have somebody who is here illegally in the country. this is important, to be able to now point out to the federal government, hey, we have people here who are here illegally, do something about it? do you want us to hold them. if the ra the federal government says yes we want you to hold them, they can hold them and it puts pressure on federal government to do something about it. jamie: that's real tricky. because the real point governor