minister of ukraine 2014-16 arseniy yatsenyuk, mr. arseniy, you hear us, you see us. greetings.ternoon. lugano should still receive this plan and start taking some steps. i think that before the lugano conference, before restoring ukraine, we must answer the most important question, not just how to end the war, but how to win the war, and without this, our formula for success will then have the key information the key unknown is when, under what circumstances, under what conditions ukraine will push back the russian army and regain its territorial integrity, you see that the situation is extremely difficult and objectively this is expected because russia is a country that has a significant amount of resources, a significant amount of military and potential, which has, in principle, a large population . now the most important thing is the theater of war and how to make ukraine win this war as soon as possible and return its own and back, and now about lugano . propose reconstruction ukraine, from the very beginning, we need to build ukraine, just a new ukraine after the victory i

about the prospects for reconstruction well, in principle , each of our speakers and today, arseniy yatsenyukolutely i think it's boring said that well , we haven't ended the war yet we don't understand how to end it in ukrainian, all conversations about reconstruction have no special meaning, the president said that ukraine already has a plan reconstruction and called on our international partners to join such a reconstruction plan. lugano, i will remind you that the conference is currently underway on july 4-5, and it continues. 40, more than 40 countries, important international partners are gathering in order to think about the plan for the restoration of ukraine, in particular, this what ursova fondurlyan said about the fact that the european union has a reconstruction plan and will propose and propose it, but at the same time there is a counter-idea about the reconstruction plan that ukraine has , is there any potential potential disagreement here opinions, which can also be indicated. we will also definitely talk about it. by the way, denis shmagal, who estimates the recovery plan at 8

elected as a deputy of the odesa city council from the front of change party between another arseniy yatsenyukhe 19th year as a member of the parliament, already from the spirit of the people, he applied for the position of the head of sap, including, but an expert on public organizations classified him as a candidate with a dubious reputation. as the head of the legal policy committee, he was responsible for judicial reform in the parliament, however during the leadership of the kosti committee, the proper judicial reform was blocked, and the necessary legislative changes and proposals were distorted, well, this is also presented by colleagues from the up - this is their position, it is certainly possible and subjective, but do you think it is true that kostin andrii is a person close to andriy yermak ihor reiterovich i am asking for a similar appointment now without the approval of the president's office, it is simply impossible a priori who makes decisions in the president's office we know very well and by the way this candidacy to a certain extent it is even in some business because there

task was supposed to be carried out in the cabinet of ministers, but the then prime minister arseniy yatsenyuk gave a backdoor, saying that many ukrainians are interested in being saved without a visa from the trees, because someone travels to earnings in russia, others visiting relatives, but later changed my position in april 2014, i stated that this decision must be made, but it must be measured seven times and cut once. the time has come to cut, it is necessary to cut after the beginning of the russian armed aggression in 2014, the number of russians coming to ukraine decreased significantly, while in 2013, 11 million citizens of the russian federation crossed the ukrainian border, and the following year, two and a half million . only 500,000 people came to ukraine for the border, while ukrainian officials hesitated to introduce a visa regime for the aggressor country all the following years, the ukrainian public took everything into their own hands - in in february of this year, a petition appeared on the president's website regarding the establishment of restrictions on the entry of russ

task was to be carried out in the cabinet of ministers, but the then prime minister - minister arseniy yatsenyukacked down, saying that many ukrainians are interested in being saved without a visa because some go to russia to earn money, others visit relatives, but later changed his position in april 2014, i stated about the fact that this decision must be made, but it must be measured seven times and cut off once. the time has come to cut off. it is necessary to cut after the beginning of the russian armed aggression in 2014. the number of russians who came to ukraine decreased significantly. if in 2013, 11 million citizens of the russian federation crossed the ukrainian border, too. the following year, two and a half million, this figure gradually decreased every year, and a year before the northern neighbor’s full-scale invasion of ukraine, only 500,000 came over the border , while ukrainian officials all subsequent years hesitated to introduce a visa regime for the aggressor country, the ukrainian public took everything into their own hands - in february of this year, a petition appeared on